Suppose is a sequence of functions satisfying for in an interval and _ k=0 ^ (-1)^k…

MATHEMATICS · Multi-part · AP · Calculus BC · Infinite Sequences and Series · Infinite Sequences and Series

Problem

Suppose {ak(x)}k≥0\{a_k(x)\}_{k\ge 0} is a sequence of functions satisfying ak(x)>0a_k(x)>0 for xx in an interval II and ∑k=0∞(−1)kak(x)\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (-1)^k a_k(x) converges for every x∈Ix\in I. Assume further that ak+1(x)≤ak(x)a_{k+1}(x)\le a_k(x) for all k≥0k\ge 0 and all x∈Ix\in I, and lim⁡k→∞ak(x)=0\displaystyle \lim_{k\to\infty} a_k(x)=0. Let Sn(x)S_n(x) denote the partial sum through k=nk=n and Rn(x)=∣ S(x)−Sn(x) ∣R_n(x)=\bigl|\,S(x)-S_n(x)\,\bigr| the remainder at order nn. (a) Explain, without performing any explicit calculations, why the single inequality an+1(x)<εa_{n+1}(x)<\varepsilon ensures that Rn(x)<εR_n(x)<\varepsilon for all x∈Ix\in I. Your explanation should rely only on the stated properties of the sequence {ak(x)}\{a_k(x)\}. (b) Discuss qualitatively how the size of xx might influence the minimal integer nn required to achieve a given tolerance ε\varepsilon. Your answer should reference the behaviour of the functions ak(x)a_k(x) but need not involve explicit formulas.

Related theory

Browse the problem library