A student analyzing the function finds that and

MATHEMATICS · Single correct · AP · Calculus AB · Analytical Applications of Differentiation · Analytical Applications of Differentiation

Problem

A student analyzing the function gg finds that g′(2)=0g'(2)=0 and g′′(2)=0g''(2)=0. The student concludes that x=2x=2 is neither a relative maximum nor a relative minimum of gg. Which of the following best evaluates the student’s reasoning? (a) The conclusion is justified because g′′(2)=0 implies the point is an inflection point, so it cannot be an extremum.\text{The conclusion is justified because }g''(2)=0\text{ implies the point is an inflection point, so it cannot be an extremum.} (b) The conclusion is not justified because g′(2)=0 already ensures the point is an extremum, even though the second derivative test fails.\text{The conclusion is not justified because }g'(2)=0\text{ already ensures the point is an extremum, even though the second derivative test fails.} (c) The conclusion is not justified because g′′(2)=0 makes the second-derivative test inconclusive, so additional analysis is required.\text{The conclusion is not justified because }g''(2)=0\text{ makes the second-derivative test inconclusive, so additional analysis is required.} (d) The conclusion is not justified because g′′(2)=0 guarantees that x=2 is a relative minimum.\text{The conclusion is not justified because }g''(2)=0\text{ guarantees that }x=2\text{ is a relative minimum.}

Related theory

Browse the problem library