A particle of reduced mass and angular momentum moves in the central potential V(r) =…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Mechanics & Dynamical Systems · Gravitation and central-force motion · Gravitation and central-force motion

Action and Symmetry, Ch The Kepler problem redone: reduction, quadrature and the Runge-Lenz vector

Problem

A particle of reduced mass μ\mu and angular momentum ℓ\ell moves in the central potential V(r)=−kr−γ2r2,k>0, γ2>0,V(r) = -\frac{k}{r} - \frac{\gamma_2}{r^2}, \qquad k \gt 0,\ \gamma_2 \gt 0, an inverse-square attraction with an extra attractive 1/r21/r^2 term, with 2μγ2<ℓ22\mu\gamma_2 \lt \ell^2 so that the effective potential is still repulsive at short range and the motion is bound between a pericentre and an apocentre. ((a)) Write the effective potential Veff(r)V_{\rm eff}(r) and show it has exactly the form of the inverse-square effective potential with the term ℓ2/2μr2\ell^2/2\mu r^2 replaced by ℓ′ 2/2μr2\ell'^{\,2}/2\mu r^2, where ℓ′=ℓ2−2μγ2\ell' = \sqrt{\ell^2 - 2\mu\gamma_2}. Carry the orbit quadrature through (substitute u=1/ru=1/r and complete the square, exactly as for V=−k/rV=-k/r) to show that the orbit is the precessing conic r=p′1+e′cos⁡[κ(φ−φ1)],κ=ℓ′ℓ,r = \frac{p'}{1+e'\cos[\kappa(\varphi-\varphi_1)]}, \qquad \kappa = \frac{\ell'}{\ell}, for constants p′p', e′e', φ1\varphi_1 fixed by EE, ℓ\ell, μ\mu, kk, and give p′p'. ((b)) Hence show that the apsidal angle is Δφ=π1−2μγ2/ℓ2,\Delta\varphi = \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{1-2\mu\gamma_2/\ell^2}}, and evaluate it in degrees for 2μγ2/ℓ2=0.192\mu\gamma_2/\ell^2 = 0.19. ((c)) Define ALRL=p×L−μkr^\mathbf{A}_{\rm LRL} = \mathbf{p}\times\mathbf{L} - \mu k\hat{\mathbf{r}}, the Runge-Lenz vector built from the inverse-square part of the force alone. The full radial force is f(r)=−k/r2−2γ2/r3f(r) = -k/r^2 - 2\gamma_2/r^3. Using p˙=f(r)r^\dot{\mathbf p} = f(r)\hat{\mathbf r} and the identity r^×L=−μr2r^˙\hat{\mathbf r}\times\mathbf L = -\mu r^2\dot{\hat{\mathbf r}}, show that A˙LRL=2μγ2rr^˙,\dot{\mathbf A}_{\rm LRL} = \frac{2\mu\gamma_2}{r}\dot{\hat{\mathbf r}}, and say why this is consistent with the precession found in part (b).

Browse the problem library