PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Mechanics & Dynamical Systems · Astrophysics & Cosmology · Celestial mechanics and planetary systems
Action and Symmetry, Ch Adiabatic invariants, canonical perturbation theory and integrable systems
Problem
A small moon orbits a planet of mass M. Because the moon's mass is much less than M, its reduced mass is μ=9.0×1022kg, essentially the moon's own mass. The orbit has semi-major axis a=4.0×108m, eccentricity e=0.050 and period τorb=3.00 days. The planet's oblateness adds to the two-body Hamiltonian a small extra term ϵH1=−γ3/r3, with γ3=4.0×1052Jm3, in addition to the Kepler potential V(r)=−k/r with k=GNMμ.
((a)) Using Kepler's third law to get GNM from a and τorb, find k and the orbital angular momentum ℓ, then use the action-variable method (averaging −γ3/r3 over the fast angle) to find the apsidal precession Δϖ per orbit, in radians.
((b)) A second, farther moon of the same planet has period τ2=6.10 days. Writing n1=2π/τorb and n2=2π/τ2 for the two mean motions, evaluate ∣n1−2n2∣/n1 and say, using the resonance-denominator argument, roughly by what factor a first-order perturbation term at this near-commensurability would be magnified compared with a generic (non-resonant) term.