A small moon orbits a planet of mass

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Mechanics & Dynamical Systems · Astrophysics & Cosmology · Celestial mechanics and planetary systems

Action and Symmetry, Ch Adiabatic invariants, canonical perturbation theory and integrable systems

Problem

A small moon orbits a planet of mass MM. Because the moon's mass is much less than MM, its reduced mass is μ=9.0×1022 kg\mu = 9.0\times10^{22}\,\mathrm{kg}, essentially the moon's own mass. The orbit has semi-major axis a=4.0×108 ma = 4.0\times10^{8}\,\mathrm{m}, eccentricity e=0.050e = 0.050 and period τorb=3.00\tau_{\rm orb} = 3.00 days. The planet's oblateness adds to the two-body Hamiltonian a small extra term ϵH1=−γ3/r3\epsilon H_1 = -\gamma_3/r^3, with γ3=4.0×1052 J m3\gamma_3 = 4.0\times10^{52}\,\mathrm{J\,m^3}, in addition to the Kepler potential V(r)=−k/rV(r) = -k/r with k=GNMμk = G_{\rm N}M\mu. ((a)) Using Kepler's third law to get GNMG_{\rm N}M from aa and τorb\tau_{\rm orb}, find kk and the orbital angular momentum ℓ\ell, then use the action-variable method (averaging −γ3/r3-\gamma_3/r^3 over the fast angle) to find the apsidal precession Δϖ\Delta\varpi per orbit, in radians. ((b)) A second, farther moon of the same planet has period τ2=6.10\tau_2 = 6.10 days. Writing n1=2π/τorbn_1 = 2\pi/\tau_{\rm orb} and n2=2π/τ2n_2 = 2\pi/\tau_2 for the two mean motions, evaluate ∣n1−2n2∣/n1|n_1 - 2n_2|/n_1 and say, using the resonance-denominator argument, roughly by what factor a first-order perturbation term at this near-commensurability would be magnified compared with a generic (non-resonant) term.

Browse the problem library