A double-cantilever-beam specimen of a brittle ceramic is opened at its mouth by…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Fluids & Continuum Physics · Solid continuum mechanics and complex fluids · Solid continuum mechanics and complex fluids

Bending, Ringing, Breaking and Flowing, Ch Fracture: stress concentration, cracks and toughness

Problem

A double-cantilever-beam specimen of a brittle ceramic is opened at its mouth by turning a screw wedged into the crack, which fixes the crack-opening displacement δ\delta at each turn; the screw does not relax as the crack advances. The two arms have Young's modulus E=300 GPaE = 300\,\mathrm{GPa} and second moment of area I=4.0×10−12 m4I = 4.0\times10^{-12}\,\mathrm{m^4}, the specimen width (into the page) is B=10 mmB = 10\,\mathrm{mm}, and the crack currently has length a=40 mma = 40\,\mathrm{mm}, at which the energy release rate happens to equal the fracture energy of the ceramic, G=Gc=20 J m−2\mathcal{G} = \mathcal{G}_c = 20\,\mathrm{J\,m^{-2}}, with the screw held fixed. ((a)) Using the fixed-opening result G=9EIδ2/4Ba4\mathcal{G} = 9EI\delta^2/4Ba^4, predict whether the crack will run away or arrest if it advances by a small amount without the screw being turned further, and justify the prediction from dG/da\mathrm{d}\mathcal{G}/\mathrm{d}a. ((b)) Suppose instead the same initial opening at a=40 mma = 40\,\mathrm{mm} had been produced instead by hanging from the arms a dead weight chosen to give that opening, and the weight is then left hanging. Would the prediction in part (a) change? Explain in terms of load control against displacement control.

Browse the problem library