The invariance test of the previous problem is continued at : the fourth-order…

PHYSICS · Subjective · Fermi University Physics · Computational Physics · Mechanics & Dynamical Systems · Simulating classical dynamical systems

Computational Physics, Ch When trajectories separate: the driven pendulum and the logistic map

Problem

The invariance test of the previous problem is continued at Ad=1.2 s−2A_d=1.2\,\mathrm{s^{-2}}: the fourth-order Runge-Kutta run at Δt=0.01 s\Delta t=0.01\,\mathrm{s}, which reached the saturation separation δsat=1 rad\delta_{\rm sat}=1\,\mathrm{rad} (from δ0=1.0×10−15 rad\delta_0=1.0\times10^{-15}\,\mathrm{rad}) at t=261.7 st=261.7\,\mathrm{s}, is now compared with a run using a different integrator, the Euler-Cromer method, at Δt=0.0005 s\Delta t=0.0005\,\mathrm{s}, starting from the same two states. The Euler-Cromer run reaches the same saturation separation at t=259.7 st=259.7\,\mathrm{s}. (a) Find the Lyapunov exponent implied by the Euler-Cromer run, to three significant figures, using δ(t)=δ0eλLt\delta(t)=\delta_0e^{\lambda_{\rm L}t}. (b) Compare it with the Runge-Kutta value (λL=0.1320 s−1\lambda_{\rm L}=0.1320\,\mathrm{s^{-1}} at Δt=0.01 s\Delta t=0.01\,\mathrm{s}) and state whether replacing the integrator, in addition to changing the step, has altered the exponent by more than the quoted uncertainty of ±0.004 s−1\pm0.004\,\mathrm{s^{-1}}.

Browse the problem library