Someone offers the following argument

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Mathematical Methods for Physics · Linear algebra and vector spaces · Linear algebra and vector spaces

Conditions of Validity, Ch Two quadratic forms at once: the generalised eigenvalue problem

Problem

Someone offers the following argument. "The matrices A=(100−2),B=(0330)\mathsf{A} = \begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&-2\end{pmatrix}, \qquad \mathsf{B} = \begin{pmatrix}0&3\\3&0\end{pmatrix} are both symmetric. By the same reasoning as the mass inner product route, the generalised eigenvalue problem Bv=λAv\mathsf{B}\mathbf{v} = \lambda\mathsf{A}\mathbf{v} must therefore have two real eigenvalues λ\lambda, and the corresponding eigenvectors must simultaneously diagonalise both A\mathsf{A} and B\mathsf{B}, exactly as the modes of an unequal-mass oscillator simultaneously diagonalise M\mathsf{M} and K\mathsf{K}." ((a)) Solve det⁡(B−λA)=0\det(\mathsf{B}-\lambda\mathsf{A})=0 for λ\lambda and use the result to say whether the claim is correct. ((b)) State precisely which hypothesis used for M\mathsf{M} in the oscillator problem is not met by A\mathsf{A}, and explain in one or two sentences why that hypothesis, not mere symmetry, is what the diagonalisation argument actually needs.

Browse the problem library