A thin, charge-free conducting plate occupies a bounded region of the plane, and its…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Mathematical Methods for Physics · Electricity, Magnetism & Electromagnetism · Conductors, capacitance and boundary-value electrostatics

Conditions of Validity, Ch The three equations, their characteristics and what makes a problem well posed

Problem

A thin, charge-free conducting plate occupies a bounded region RR of the plane, and its electrostatic potential u(x,y)u(x,y) obeys Laplace's equation ∇2u=0\nabla^2u=0 throughout RR. ((a)) State, in one sentence, what data must be prescribed on the boundary ∂R\partial R (a single closed curve) to determine uu throughout RR. ((b)) Someone argues: "Specifying uu and its outward normal derivative ∂u/∂n\partial u/\partial n along just one small arc of ∂R\partial R gives more information than specifying uu alone on the whole boundary, so it should determine uu at least as well, if not better." Using what the characteristic directions of Laplace's equation tell you about what kind of data it can accept, say whether this proposal is well posed, and explain the error in the reasoning.

Browse the problem library