A pendulum-timing test and a neutron-monitor count-rate measurement use the Wilks…
PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Scientific Practice & Experimental Methods · Data analysis and model fitting in the laboratory · Data analysis and model fitting in the laboratory
Error, Chance and the Machine, Ch Tests, intervals and Bayesian inference
Problem
A pendulum-timing test and a neutron-monitor count-rate measurement use the Wilks likelihood-ratio result and Bayesian conjugate updating.
((a)) (Wilks, an exact case.) Six independent period measurements xi (i=1,…,6) of a pendulum are each Gaussian-distributed about the true period μ with known standard deviation σ=0.020s (from the clock's calibration), and their mean is xˉ=2.017s. Derive the maximum-likelihood estimator μ^, and show that the likelihood-ratio statistic −2lnΛ for H0:μ=μ0=2.000s against the unrestricted alternative equals exactly (σ/nxˉ−μ0)2 for any n, not only as n→∞, and explain why this holds exactly rather than asymptotically for Gaussian data of known σ. Evaluate −2lnΛ and its exact p-value from χ12 for the numbers above.
((b)) (Conjugate posterior.) A neutron monitor counts cosmic-ray events at an unknown steady rate λ (events per hour). Starting from a Gamma(a0,b0) prior for λ with shape a0=2 and rate b0=1hour, derive from Bayes' theorem the posterior after observing n counts in a total exposure T hours, and show it is Gamma(a0+n,b0+T). The monitor records n=48 counts in T=10hours. A Gamma(a,b) density with shape a and rate b has mean a/b and variance a/b2. Give the posterior mean, and, using the fact that a Gamma distribution with a large shape parameter is well approximated by a Gaussian of the same mean and variance, state an approximate central 68 per cent credible interval for λ.