In a frequency-of-seeing experiment like that of Hecht, Shlaer and Pirenne

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Mathematical Methods for Physics · Biophysics & Medical Physics · Bioelectricity, the senses and the physics of the body

Forces, Machines and Signals, Ch Vision and photoreception: counting photons

Problem

In a frequency-of-seeing experiment like that of Hecht, Shlaer and Pirenne, a subject is dark-adapted and shown many brief flashes of fixed mean intensity. For a flash whose mean number of photons absorbed by rods is aˉ=4\bar a = 4, the subject reports seeing it on 21%21\% of trials. For a brighter flash with aˉ=9\bar a = 9, the subject reports seeing it on 88%88\% of trials. Assume that the number of photons absorbed on any one trial is Poisson-distributed with mean aˉ\bar a, and that the subject reports "seen" whenever at least nn photons are absorbed, where nn is a fixed integer property of the visual system. ((a)) Starting from the Poisson probability of absorbing exactly kk photons, derive the general expression for Psee(n,aˉ)P_{\rm see}(n,\bar a), the probability of absorbing nn or more photons. ((b)) Evaluate Psee(n,aˉ)P_{\rm see}(n,\bar a) at aˉ=4\bar a = 4 and at aˉ=9\bar a = 9 for the three candidate thresholds n=5n = 5, n=6n=6 and n=7n=7, and hence determine which value of nn is consistent with the two percentages quoted above. ((c)) In a real experiment only the numbers of photons at the cornea are known, here 4040 and 9090, and the fraction ff in aˉ=fI\bar a=fI is unknown. Taking n=6n=6, find the ff that makes the 4040-photon flash seen on 21%21\% of trials and predict the fraction seen for the 9090-photon flash. Explain why, with ff free, the two percentages test nn less sharply than in (b).

Browse the problem library