A large company's internal email network grows by one new employee joining per time step
PHYSICS · Subjective · Fermi University Physics · Thermal, Statistical & Complex Systems · Complex and collective systems · Complex and collective systems
Many Parts, One Behaviour, Ch Growing networks: preferential attachment and scale-free degree distributions
Problem
A large company's internal email network grows by one new employee joining per time step, time t counted in employees who have joined so far. Each new employee creates m=3 introductory email links to employees already at the company. Two rules for choosing the m=3 contacts are compared.Model U (uniform): the contacts are chosen independently and uniformly at random among existing employees, regardless of how many links each already has. Its stationary degree distribution is pk(U)=m+11(m+1m)k−m,k≥m.Model P (preferential): the contacts are chosen with probability proportional to the number of links the existing employee already has (the Barabási-Albert rule). Its stationary degree distribution is pk(P)=k(k+1)(k+2)2m(m+1),k≥m. (a) Show that the cumulative tail (the probability that a randomly chosen employee has degree at least k) is exactly P(U)(k)=(m+1m)k−mandP(P)(k)=k(k+1)m(m+1), using the geometric series sum for model U and the partial-fraction telescoping sum for model P. (b) Estimate the largest degree expected among N=5×105 employees under each model, using NP(kmax)≈1. (c) State in one sentence what the comparison shows about the claim that growth alone, with no preference for high-degree employees, is enough to create a genuine hub.