A citation network splits into two similarly sized subfields
PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Mathematical Methods for Physics · Thermal, Statistical & Complex Systems · Complex and collective systems
Many Parts, One Behaviour, Ch Communities: finding the groups in a network
Problem
A citation network splits into two similarly sized subfields, A and B, each with nA=nB=500 authors. A snapshot of the citation network shows mAA=760 links between two subfield-A authors, mBB=745 links between two subfield-B authors, and mAB=520 links between a subfield-A and a subfield-B author.
((a)) Using the stochastic block model maximum-likelihood result p^rs=mrs/nrs, where nrs is the number of possible pairs of that type (nr(nr−1)/2 for r=s, and nrns for r=s), estimate p^AA, p^BB and p^AB, and convert them into the planted-partition parameters of the detectability threshold, c^in=Np^in and c^out=Np^AB, with N=nA+nB and p^in the average of p^AA and p^BB.
((b)) Apply the detectability threshold (cin−cout)2>2(cin+cout) to the estimated c^in and c^out, and decide whether the two subfields are, in principle, detectable from this network.
((c)) A researcher runs only the local-moving phase of the Louvain algorithm once on this network, starting from every author in its own group, and reports the resulting partition's modularity. Using the conclusion of part (b), and the pattern that even a structureless Erdos-Renyi graph of comparable size and mean degree yields partitions of substantial modularity from local moving alone, explain what such a reported modularity value would and would not tell the researcher about the two subfields.