A citation network splits into two similarly sized subfields

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Mathematical Methods for Physics · Thermal, Statistical & Complex Systems · Complex and collective systems

Many Parts, One Behaviour, Ch Communities: finding the groups in a network

Problem

A citation network splits into two similarly sized subfields, AA and BB, each with nA=nB=500n_A=n_B=500 authors. A snapshot of the citation network shows mAA=760m_{AA}=760 links between two subfield-AA authors, mBB=745m_{BB}=745 links between two subfield-BB authors, and mAB=520m_{AB}=520 links between a subfield-AA and a subfield-BB author. ((a)) Using the stochastic block model maximum-likelihood result p^rs=mrs/nrs\hat p_{rs}=m_{rs}/n_{rs}, where nrsn_{rs} is the number of possible pairs of that type (nr(nr−1)/2n_r(n_r-1)/2 for r=sr=s, and nrnsn_rn_s for r≠sr\ne s), estimate p^AA\hat p_{AA}, p^BB\hat p_{BB} and p^AB\hat p_{AB}, and convert them into the planted-partition parameters of the detectability threshold, c^in=Np^in\hat c_{\rm in}=N\hat p_{\rm in} and c^out=Np^AB\hat c_{\rm out}=N\hat p_{AB}, with N=nA+nBN=n_A+n_B and p^in\hat p_{\rm in} the average of p^AA\hat p_{AA} and p^BB\hat p_{BB}. ((b)) Apply the detectability threshold (cin−cout)2>2(cin+cout)(c_{\rm in}-c_{\rm out})^2>2(c_{\rm in}+c_{\rm out}) to the estimated c^in\hat c_{\rm in} and c^out\hat c_{\rm out}, and decide whether the two subfields are, in principle, detectable from this network. ((c)) A researcher runs only the local-moving phase of the Louvain algorithm once on this network, starting from every author in its own group, and reports the resulting partition's modularity. Using the conclusion of part (b), and the pattern that even a structureless Erdos-Renyi graph of comparable size and mean degree yields partitions of substantial modularity from local moving alone, explain what such a reported modularity value would and would not tell the researcher about the two subfields.

Browse the problem library