A group measuring the resistivity of a length of copper wire (Chapter 5's method)…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Scientific Practice & Experimental Methods · Designing and running experiments · Designing and running experiments

Measurement and Method, Ch Running it: troubleshooting, the systematics hunt, safety and the record

Problem

A group measuring the resistivity of a length of copper wire (Chapter 5's method) takes batches of ten resistance readings and, after each batch, recomputes the running mean resistivity ρˉ\bar\rho and its standard uncertainty u(ρˉ)u(\bar\rho). The manufacturer's data sheet quotes ρsheet=1.68×10−8 Ω m\rho_{\text{sheet}} = 1.68\times10^{-8}\,\Omega\,\mathrm{m}. The group's rule is: stop as soon as ρˉ\bar\rho agrees with ρsheet\rho_{\text{sheet}} to within u(ρˉ)u(\bar\rho), or after 1010 batches, whichever comes first. Suppose the wire's true resistivity (unknown to the group) is ρ=1.75×10−8 Ω m\rho = 1.75\times10^{-8}\,\Omega\,\mathrm{m}, some way from the data-sheet figure. ((a)) Is this a fixed stopping rule in the sense required for an unbiased result? ((b)) Predict, with a reason, whether the published mean is on average closer to 1.68×10−8 Ω m1.68\times10^{-8}\,\Omega\,\mathrm{m} or to 1.75×10−8 Ω m1.75\times10^{-8}\,\Omega\,\mathrm{m}, compared with a measurement that used a number of batches fixed in advance.

Browse the problem library