A radio-astronomy receiver observes a pulsar

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Electricity, Magnetism & Electromagnetism · Plasma Physics · Waves in plasmas

Modes, Packets and Media, Ch Transmission lines and electromagnetic waves in matter, plasmas and guides

Problem

A radio-astronomy receiver observes a pulsar. Its dipole feed presents a resistive impedance ZL=300 ΩZ_{\rm L} = 300\,\Omega and is matched to the Z0=50 ΩZ_0 = 50\,\Omega coaxial line of the receiver by a quarter-wave transformer designed for f0=800 MHzf_0 = 800\,\mathrm{MHz}, built from a coaxial line with velocity factor 0.700.70, giving a wave speed of 0.70c0.70c in the transformer. ((a)) Find the transformer's characteristic impedance ZmZ_{\rm m} and its physical length ℓ\ell. ((b)) The receiver specification requires the voltage reflection coefficient at the 50 Ω50\,\Omega input, Γ=(Zin−Z0)/(Zin+Z0)\Gamma = (Z_{\rm in}-Z_0)/(Z_{\rm in}+Z_0), to satisfy ∣Γ∣≤0.10|\Gamma| \le 0.10 down to 750 MHz750\,\mathrm{MHz}. Using the general (not the quarter-wave-only) input-impedance formula for a lossless line of length ℓ\ell and characteristic impedance ZmZ_{\rm m} terminated in ZLZ_{\rm L}, find ∣Γ∣|\Gamma| at 750 MHz750\,\mathrm{MHz} and state whether the specification is met. ((c)) The pulsar's radiation crosses about 1.5 kpc1.5\,\mathrm{kpc} of interstellar plasma whose mean electron density gives a plasma frequency of order 1.3 kHz1.3\,\mathrm{kHz}, far below the 400400-800 MHz800\,\mathrm{MHz} band used here. Using the free electron's equation of motion, explain (i) why this plasma does not measurably absorb the signal at these frequencies, and (ii) why, if a wave's frequency were instead below the plasma frequency, the same plasma would turn it back completely rather than absorb it. ((d)) A two-channel spectrogram of one pulse shows the 800 MHz800\,\mathrm{MHz} channel leading the 400 MHz400\,\mathrm{MHz} channel by 584 ms584\,\mathrm{ms}. Taking the source distance as D=1.5 kpcD = 1.5\,\mathrm{kpc}, find the dispersion measure and the mean electron density along the path, and state briefly why the delay scales as 1/f21/f^2 rather than 1/f1/f.

Browse the problem library