A Lloyd's-mirror-type interferometer is built entirely inside a large prism of crown…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Optics & Photonics · Polarisation and anisotropic media · Interference and diffraction

Optics and Photonics, Ch Two-beam interference and interferometry

Problem

A Lloyd's-mirror-type interferometer is built entirely inside a large prism of crown glass (n=1.50n = 1.50). A point source SS embedded in the glass emits monochromatic, coherent, ss-polarised light (electric field horizontal, parallel to the flat top surface of the prism) in all directions, and a distant detector inside the glass, reaching up to the top surface, receives light by two paths: directly through the glass, and after a single internal reflection at the flat glass-air top surface. The critical angle for this interface is θc=arcsin⁡(1/1.50)=41.8∘\theta_c = \arcsin(1/1.50) = 41.8^\circ. ((a)) Consider first a point of the pattern well away from the edge, reached by a ray reflected at an angle of incidence of 25.0∘25.0^\circ from the normal. Using the Fresnel amplitude coefficient for ss-polarised light (Chapter 6, under CV5), decide whether this internal reflection adds a phase of 00 or π\pi, and contrast it with the usual (external-reflection) Lloyd's mirror, where the light starts in air and reflects off the denser medium. Then consider the point where the two path lengths are exactly equal, the analogue of the mirror's edge: at what angle of incidence does the reflected ray meet the surface there, what is rsr_s at that angle, and is the edge bright or dark? ((b)) A thin polariser is now placed in the reflected beam's path only, rotating its polarisation from ss to pp, so that the direct beam arriving at the detector is ss-polarised and the reflected beam is pp-polarised. Writing each beam as a Jones vector in the fixed (s,ps,p) basis, use the general two-beam formula I=I1+I2+2 Re(E1∗⋅E2)I = I_1 + I_2 + 2\,\mathrm{Re}(\mathbf E_1^\ast\cdot\mathbf E_2) to decide whether fringes exist anywhere on the detector now, and explain in one sentence why the reflection coefficients found in part (a) are irrelevant to this conclusion.

Related theory

Browse the problem library