A source distributes noisy entangled pairs to two stations whose devices are not…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Quantum Information & Technology · Quantum states, measurement and entanglement · Quantum information theory and communication

Quantum Information and Technology, Ch Quantum key distribution and quantum networks

Problem

A source distributes noisy entangled pairs to two stations whose devices are not trusted (device-independent QKD). CHSH tests on a subset of the pairs show the devices win the CHSH game with probability pwin=0.83p_{\rm win} = 0.83. ((a)) Using the relation S=8(pwin−12)S = 8\left(p_{\rm win}-\tfrac12\right) for the CHSH combination, compute SS. ((b)) Convert SS to an equivalent error rate for a pair mixed with white noise, Q=(1−S/(22))/2Q = \left(1-S/(2\sqrt2)\right)/2, and decide whether it beats the device-independent threshold S≈2.42S\approx2.42 (Q≈7.1%Q\approx7.1\%). ((c)) Using the device-independent bound quoted for collective attacks, r≥1−h(Q)−h ⁣(1+(S/2)2−12)r \ge 1-h(Q)-h\!\left(\tfrac{1+\sqrt{(S/2)^2-1}}{2}\right), compute the asymptotic key rate these untrusted devices can certify, and compare it with the rate 1−2h(Q)1-2h(Q) that trusted devices would give at the same QQ. ((d)) If the two stations were instead trusted and used the entanglement-based BB84 argument with a Calderbank-Shor-Steane (CSS) code to correct bit and phase errors at this QQ, state in words the property the two classical linear codes C1C_1, C2C_2 making up the CSS code must have, and explain why the phase-correction step does not need to be carried out on any physical qubit.

Browse the problem library