In a BB84 key exchange, Alice and Bob sift bits after comparing bases

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Quantum Information & Technology · Quantum information theory and communication · Quantum information theory and communication

Quantum Information and Technology, Ch Quantum key distribution and quantum networks

Problem

In a BB84 key exchange, Alice and Bob sift N=2×105N = 2\times10^5 bits after comparing bases. Unknown to them, an eavesdropper intercepts every photon on a randomly chosen fraction f=0.30f = 0.30 of the rounds, measuring each intercepted photon in a basis (ZZ or XX) chosen uniformly at random and resending the state she obtains; she leaves the remaining rounds untouched. ((a)) Find the quantum bit error rate QQ this attack produces in the sifted key. ((b)) Alice and Bob reveal a random sample of m=2×104m = 2\times10^4 sifted bits and find a sample error rate equal to the value from part (a). Using an upper bound at z=5z = 5 standard errors, compute QUBQ_{\rm UB}, the value used in the security analysis, and state how many sifted bits N′N' remain undisclosed for the key. ((c)) The remaining N′N' bits go through information reconciliation at efficiency fEC=1.10f_{\rm EC} = 1.10 and privacy amplification with security parameter ϵ=10−10\epsilon = 10^{-10}. Using ℓ=N′[1−(1+fEC) h(QUB)]−2log⁡2(1/ϵ),\ell = N'\left[1 - (1+f_{\rm EC})\,h(Q_{\rm UB})\right] - 2\log_2(1/\epsilon), with hh the binary entropy in bits, find the length ℓ\ell of the final secret key. ((d)) Keeping m=2×104m=2\times10^4, z=5z=5 and fEC=1.10f_{\rm EC}=1.10 fixed, but letting the intercepted fraction ff vary, find the largest ff for which the bracket 1−(1+fEC)h(QUB)1-(1+f_{\rm EC})h(Q_{\rm UB}) in part (c) stays positive, that is, the largest attack this protocol can tolerate before the asymptotic key length is driven to zero.

Browse the problem library