The nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centre has a spin-1 ground state split by zero-field…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Quantum Mechanics · Quantum Information & Technology · Physical realizations and quantum technologies

Quantum Information and Technology, Ch Trapped ions, neutral atoms, photons, NMR and spins in solids

Problem

The nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centre has a spin-1 ground state 3A2^3A_2 split by zero-field splitting D=2.87 GHzD = 2.87\,\mathrm{GHz} into ms=0m_s = 0 and the (near-degenerate at low field) ms=±1m_s = \pm1 sublevels, an excited triplet reached by a 532 nm532\,\mathrm{nm} green laser, and a metastable singlet that the excited state decays into preferentially from ms=±1m_s = \pm1 rather than from ms=0m_s = 0; decay from the singlet returns the system to ms=0m_s = 0 in the ground state. A silicon spin qubit is a single electron confined in a gate-defined quantum dot, addressed by microwave electron spin resonance (ESR) and by exchange pulses between neighbouring dots, and read out by spin-selective tunnelling to a reservoir, converted to a charge signal on a nearby charge sensor. ((a)) For the NV centre, identify which physical process in the description above realises (i) initialisation into a known spin state, (ii) coherent control of the spin state, and (iii) readout of the spin state. State the state that is prepared and the observable signature (bright or dark) of each spin sublevel on readout. ((b)) For the silicon spin qubit, identify the physical process that plays the same role as each of the three NV steps: initialisation, control and readout. Name the physical quantity actually measured at readout and explain how spin information becomes that quantity. ((c)) State one respect in which the readout mechanisms of the two platforms differ in what they directly detect (a photon count against a charge/current signal), and explain why this difference does not change the fact that both are projective measurements of the spin.

Related theory

Browse the problem library