A vibrating cantilever beam near one of its modes is modelled as a Duffing oscillator…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Computational Physics · Research software practice, verification and validation · Research software practice, verification and validation

Scientific Computing for Physicists, Ch Are they the right equations? Solution verification, benchmarks and validation

Problem

A vibrating cantilever beam near one of its modes is modelled as a Duffing oscillator x¨+2ζω0x˙+ω02x+c3x3=F0mcos⁡Ωt,\ddot{x} + 2\zeta\omega_0\dot{x} + \omega_0^2 x + c_3 x^3 = \frac{F_0}{m}\cos\Omega t, with ω0=314 rad s−1\omega_0 = 314\,\mathrm{rad\,s^{-1}}, damping ratio ζ=0.008\zeta = 0.008 and cubic stiffness c3=4.5×107 m−2 s−2c_3 = 4.5\times10^{7}\,\mathrm{m^{-2}\,s^{-2}}, the last obtained by fitting a small-amplitude frequency sweep. A verified RK4 code time-steps the equation to its steady state and, for a forcing amplitude F0/m=5.05 m s−2F_0/m = 5.05\,\mathrm{m\,s^{-2}}, reads off the peak displacement at resonance: S=3.20 mmS = 3.20\,\mathrm{mm}. A step-halving study over three step sizes (in the asymptotic range) gives a numerical uncertainty unum=0.02 mmu_{\rm num} = 0.02\,\mathrm{mm}. Refitting c3c_3 within the scatter of the calibration data and re-running the simulation gives an input uncertainty uinput=0.15 mmu_{\rm input} = 0.15\,\mathrm{mm}. A laser-vibrometer measurement of the same beam under the same forcing, averaged over 20 sweeps, gives D=3.05±0.10 mmD = 3.05 \pm 0.10\,\mathrm{mm}. ((a)) Compute the comparison error E=S−DE = S - D. ((b)) Combine unumu_{\rm num}, uinputu_{\rm input} and uDu_D (independent sources) into uvalu_{\rm val}. ((c)) Using k=2k = 2, give the interval for δmodel\delta_{\rm model} and state whether the comparison provides evidence of model-form error at this forcing level. ((d)) The same ω0\omega_0, ζ\zeta and c3c_3, unchanged, are then used to predict the peak amplitude when the forcing is raised to F0/m=202 m s−2F_0/m = 202\,\mathrm{m\,s^{-2}} (forty times larger), a regime in which the Duffing backbone curve is known to bend enough to produce amplitude jumps and bistability. Is that prediction inside the validation domain established in part (c)? Justify.

Browse the problem library