Ten independently seeded 50-ReLU networks are each fitted to the Lennard-Jones pair…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Computational Physics · High-performance and data-driven computational physics · High-performance and data-driven computational physics

Scientific Computing for Physicists, Ch Neural networks on physical data: backpropagation, convolution and symmetry

Problem

Ten independently seeded 50-ReLU networks are each fitted to the Lennard-Jones pair potential U(r)=4ϵ[(σ/r)12−(σ/r)6]U(r)=4\epsilon\left[(\sigma/r)^{12}-(\sigma/r)^6\right] using training data only on r∈[0.95σ,2.5σ]r\in[0.95\sigma,2.5\sigma]. Inside that interval all ten agree with U(r)U(r) and with each other to within 0.05 ϵ0.05\,\epsilon. Extrapolated to r=0.85σr=0.85\sigma, the ten predictions cluster around 6.9 ϵ6.9\,\epsilon, with a standard deviation across the ensemble of only 0.25 ϵ0.25\,\epsilon. Someone argues: "Universal approximation guarantees that a network with enough hidden units can approximate any continuous function to any accuracy, and the tight agreement of ten independently trained networks at r=0.85σr=0.85\sigma confirms the prediction there is reliable." ((a)) Compute the true value of U(0.85σ)/ϵU(0.85\sigma)/\epsilon from the Lennard-Jones formula. ((b)) State what universal approximation actually guarantees, and explain why it says nothing about r=0.85σr=0.85\sigma. ((c)) Explain why the ensemble's tight agreement at r=0.85σr=0.85\sigma does not certify the prediction there, given what the ten members have in common.

Browse the problem library