Two simple tight-binding estimates

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Condensed Matter, Materials & Soft Matter · Free electrons, energy bands and electronic structure · Free electrons, energy bands and electronic structure

Solid State Physics, Ch Tight binding and the band structures of real materials

Problem

Two simple tight-binding estimates, one for a narrow d band and one for graphene's Fermi velocity, can be tested against real spectroscopic data. ((a)) Photoemission on palladium metal finds that its 4d band spans a width of 2.6 eV2.6\,\mathrm{eV}. Using the same rectangular density-of-states estimate used for nickel's d band (ten states per atom, spread evenly across the band, both spin states counted), estimate palladium's electronic heat capacity coefficient γ\gamma. The measured value is γPd=9.42 mJ mol−1 K−2\gamma_{\rm Pd}=9.42\,\mathrm{mJ\,mol^{-1}\,K^{-2}} (tabulated, low-temperature specific heat). Compare your estimate with this value. ((b)) Angle-resolved photoemission on a single layer of graphene grown epitaxially on silicon carbide, held at room temperature, shows the π\pi band near the KK point rising linearly, with an energy change of ΔE=0.66 eV\Delta E=0.66\,\mathrm{eV} over a wavevector interval of Δk=0.10 A˚−1\Delta k=0.10\,\mathrm{\AA^{-1}} measured along the ΓK\Gamma K direction. Find the Fermi velocity vFv_F implied by this slope. Then compute the tight-binding prediction vF=3tacc/2ℏv_F=3ta_{cc}/2\hbar using t=2.8 eVt=2.8\,\mathrm{eV} and acc=1.42 A˚a_{cc}=1.42\,\mathrm{\AA}, and state the percentage difference between the two.

Browse the problem library