The Seebeck coefficient of a metal follows from the same zero-current argument as the…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Condensed Matter, Materials & Soft Matter · Free electrons, energy bands and electronic structure · Electronic transport in solids

Solid State Physics, Ch Two currents, two forces: Wiedemann-Franz and thermoelectricity

Problem

The Seebeck coefficient of a metal follows from the same zero-current argument as the Kelvin relation: S=L12/L11S=L^{12}/L^{11}. Using the Sommerfeld-expansion results L11=σ(EF)L^{11}=\sigma(E_F) and L12=−π23kB2Teσ′(EF)L^{12}=-\dfrac{\pi^2}{3}\dfrac{k_B^2T}{e}\sigma'(E_F): ((a)) Derive the Mott formula S=−π23kB2Tedln⁡σdε∣EF.S=-\frac{\pi^2}{3}\frac{k_B^2T}{e}\left.\frac{d\ln\sigma}{d\varepsilon}\right|_{E_F}. ((b)) For a free-electron metal with an energy-independent relaxation time, σ(ε)∝ε3/2\sigma(\varepsilon)\propto\varepsilon^{3/2}. Show that the Mott formula then gives S=−π22kBekBTEF.S=-\frac{\pi^2}{2}\frac{k_B}{e}\frac{k_BT}{E_F}. ((c)) Suppose instead that the relaxation time varies with energy as τ∝εr\tau\propto\varepsilon^{r}, so that σ(ε)∝ε3/2+r\sigma(\varepsilon)\propto\varepsilon^{3/2+r}. Find how SS depends on rr, evaluate it for sodium (EF=3.24 eVE_F=3.24\,\mathrm{eV}) at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K} with r=−12r=-\tfrac12, and find the range of rr for which the free-electron sign of SS would reverse.

Browse the problem library