A germanium p-n junction ( at

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Condensed Matter, Materials & Soft Matter · Semiconductor physics and devices · Semiconductor physics and devices

Solid State Physics, Ch Junctions and devices, finished

Problem

A germanium p-n junction (ni≈2×1013 cm−3n_i\approx2\times10^{13}\,\mathrm{cm^{-3}} at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}, far larger than silicon's 1.0×1010 cm−31.0\times10^{10}\,\mathrm{cm^{-3}}) is measured from 0.100.10 to 0.22 V0.22\,\mathrm{V} and shows a single straight line on log⁡10J\log_{10}J against VV down to the lowest measured current, with no low-bias upturn: V=0.100 VV=0.100\,\mathrm{V}, J=1.00×10−4 A cm−2J=1.00\times10^{-4}\,\mathrm{A\,cm^{-2}}. V=0.220 VV=0.220\,\mathrm{V}, J=1.00×10−2 A cm−2J=1.00\times10^{-2}\,\mathrm{A\,cm^{-2}}. Take kBT/e=25.85 mVk_BT/e=25.85\,\mathrm{mV} at 300 K300\,\mathrm{K}. ((a)) Find the ideality factor from the data and extrapolate to V=0V=0 to get J0J_0. ((b)) Explain, using the ratio Jgen/J0∝WdN/(niL)J_{\rm gen}/J_0\propto W_dN/(n_iL), why this diode shows only the nid=1n_{\rm id}=1 diffusion line over this range while a silicon diode of the same doping shows a visible nid=2n_{\rm id}=2 recombination line at low forward bias, and what the clean line down to 0.10 V0.10\,\mathrm{V} says about this diode's minority-carrier lifetimes.

Browse the problem library