A transit light curve (Chapter 2 method) of an old brown dwarf orbiting a Sun-like…

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Astrophysics & Cosmology · Stellar structure, energy generation and evolution · Stellar structure, energy generation and evolution

Stars from the Inside, Ch Pressure against gravity: the equation of state, polytropes and the Lane-Emden equation

Problem

A transit light curve (Chapter 2 method) of an old brown dwarf orbiting a Sun-like star of radius R∗=1.00 R⊙R_* = 1.00\,R_\odot gives a radius ratio Rp/R∗=0.115R_p/R_* = 0.115; the radial-velocity mass function (Chapter 1) gives a companion mass Mp=45 MJM_p = 45\,M_J. Take 1 R⊙=9.95 RJ1\,R_\odot = 9.95\,R_J. ((a)) An n=1n=1 polytrope of the same hydrogen-helium composition and the same constant KK has a mass-independent radius; for a 1 MJ1\,M_J planet of this composition that radius is 1.00 RJ1.00\,R_J. What radius does the n=1n=1 polytrope predict for the 45 MJ45\,M_J companion, and how does this compare with the transit-derived radius? ((b)) The host star has mass M∗=0.85 M⊙M_* = 0.85\,M_\odot and μ=0.61\mu = 0.61. Using the Eddington standard-model relation 1−β=0.003 μ4β4(M/M⊙)21-\beta = 0.003\,\mu^4\beta^4(M/M_\odot)^2, estimate 1−β1-\beta for the host star (note β≈1\beta \approx 1 makes this a one-step, not an iterated, estimate). ((c)) State the apsidal constant k2k_2 that would be predicted for the host star if it were modelled as n=3/2n=3/2 (fully convective, k2=0.143k_2 = 0.143) versus n=3n=3 (more centrally concentrated, k2=0.0144k_2 = 0.0144), and say which index is the more physically appropriate model for a star of 0.85 M⊙0.85\,M_\odot.

Browse the problem library