Someone argues: "In steam

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Electricity, Magnetism & Electromagnetism · Electric fields in matter · Electric fields in matter

The Boundary-Value Problem, Ch Molecular polarisability, permanent dipoles and the Clausius-Mossotti relation

Problem

Someone argues: "In steam, the Lorentz local-field correction χe/3\chi_e/3 works out to only 2×10−32\times10^{-3}. That shows the correction is a minor refinement in general: you can always use the macroscopic field EE as the field acting on one molecule and only lose a fraction of a per cent. Separately, the Clausius-Mossotti relation predicts εr→∞\varepsilon_r \to \infty when Nvα→3ε0N_v\alpha \to 3\varepsilon_0, but no real liquid has ever been measured with an infinite permittivity, so this divergence is just an artefact of dividing by a quantity that happens to vanish, not a statement about anything physical." ((a)) Test the first claim using liquid argon near its boiling point, for which Nvα/3ε0=0.144N_v\alpha/3\varepsilon_0 = 0.144. Find χe/3\chi_e/3 for this liquid and compare it with the steam figure quoted above. ((b)) Explain what the Clausius-Mossotti divergence represents physically, and name one substance in which the corresponding runaway is observed, to assess the second claim.

Browse the problem library