An engineer measures a source with a large coaxial germanium detector

PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Nuclear Physics · Electronics, Instrumentation & Communication · Radiation interactions, detection and dosimetry

The Nucleus Resolved, Ch From a pulse to a number: detectors, resolution and what a spectrum establishes

Problem

An engineer measures a 60Co^{60}\mathrm{Co} source with a large coaxial germanium detector. At a triangular shaper peaking time of τp=2 μs\tau_p = 2\,\mu\mathrm{s} the 1332 keV1332\,\mathrm{keV} full-energy peak is recorded centred at 1315 keV1315\,\mathrm{keV}. Raising the peaking time to τp=6 μs\tau_p = 6\,\mu\mathrm{s}, with everything else unchanged, moves the centroid up to 1327 keV1327\,\mathrm{keV}. She argues: "This proves charge trapping. Trapping reduces the total charge collected, and a longer shaping time lets the amplifier integrate more of that reduced charge before it decays away, which is why the peak moves up." ((a)) Using the ballistic-deficit fraction Tc/(4τp)T_c/(4\tau_p) for a triangular shaper, find the effective charge-collection time TcT_c implied by the 2 μs2\,\mu\mathrm{s} measurement. ((b)) Predict the centroid expected at τp=6 μs\tau_p = 6\,\mu\mathrm{s} if the loss is really ballistic deficit, and compare with the 1327 keV1327\,\mathrm{keV} observed. ((c)) Explain the error in the engineer's reasoning and give the correct diagnosis.

Related theory

Browse the problem library