A beam of silver atoms is prepared in the spin state

PHYSICS · Subjective · Fermi University Physics · Quantum Mechanics · The formalism of quantum mechanics · The formalism of quantum mechanics

The Structure of Quantum Mechanics, Ch The postulates, measurement and collapse

Problem

A beam of silver atoms is prepared in the spin state ∣ψ0⟩=∣↑x⟩=12(∣↑⟩+∣↓⟩)|\psi_0\rangle = |{\uparrow}_x\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}(|\uparrow\rangle+|\downarrow\rangle), where ∣↑⟩,∣↓⟩|\uparrow\rangle,|\downarrow\rangle are the eigenstates of S^z\hat S_z with eigenvalues ±ℏ/2\pm\hbar/2. The beam passes through three Stern-Gerlach magnets in succession, each used selectively (only the stated outcome's beam is kept and sent on to the next magnet). (a) Magnet 1 measures S^z\hat S_z; keep the +ℏ/2+\hbar/2 ("up") beam. Magnet 2 measures S^n\hat S_n, the spin component along a direction n^\hat n in the xzxz-plane at 60∘60^\circ to zz, whose +ℏ/2+\hbar/2 eigenstate is ∣↑n⟩=cos⁡30∘ ∣↑⟩+sin⁡30∘ ∣↓⟩|{\uparrow}_n\rangle=\cos30^\circ\,|\uparrow\rangle+\sin30^\circ\,|\downarrow\rangle; keep the +ℏ/2+\hbar/2 beam. Magnet 3 measures S^z\hat S_z again; keep the +ℏ/2+\hbar/2 beam. State the normalised state of an atom immediately after each magnet, using the projection postulate at each selective step. (b) Find the fraction of the original beam that emerges from magnet 3 in the "up" beam, i.e. the joint probability of the outcome sequence up, ++, up. (c) Suppose magnet 2 is removed, so magnets 1 and 3 (unchanged, both measuring S^z\hat S_z, both selecting "up") are adjacent. Find the fraction of the beam surviving magnet 3 in this case, and identify which magnet's projection is responsible for the difference between this fraction and the one found in part (b).

Related theory

Browse the problem library