PHYSICS · Multi-part · Fermi University Physics · Quantum Mechanics · Central potentials and canonical three-dimensional systems · Central potentials and canonical three-dimensional systems
The Structure of Quantum Mechanics, Ch Central potentials as a rotation problem
Problem
For the l=0 radial equation −2μℏ2u′′(r)+V(r)u(r)=Eu(r), with V(r) finite everywhere (including at r=0), someone argues:"The equation is second order, so near r=0 it has two independent solutions: one with u(0)=0, and one with u(0)=0 (equivalently R(r)=u(r)/r→const/r as r→0). Normalisability is the only thing that can rule a solution out, and ∫0∞∣R(r)∣2r2dr=∫0∞∣u(r)∣2dr is perfectly finite for the u(0)=0 solution too, because the factor r2 in the measure exactly cancels the 1/r2 in ∣R∣2 near the origin, leaving no divergence there. So both solutions are equally acceptable on normalisability grounds, and setting u(0)=0 is just a convention."
((a)) Is the claim that ∫0∞∣u∣2dr stays finite for the u(0)=0 solution correct?
((b)) Find the actual error in the argument, and state the correct reason u(0)=0 is required.