Inertia Ellipsoid
On the first of February, 1958, the United States finally had a satellite in orbit — and within hours, a mystery on its hands. Explorer 1 was a pencil: long, thin, spun about its long axis for stability like a thrown football. But the telemetry soon showed the spin decaying into an end-over-end tumble that no one had commanded. The explanation was not a thruster fault or a collision. It was geometry — the geometry of a single quadric surface that had been sitting in the mechanics textbooks since 1827, waiting for someone to check it before launch. That surface is the inertia ellipsoid. You have already built the moment of inertia tensor: nine numbers that convert angular velocity into angular momentum and price the kinetic energy of any spin. Nine numbers are hard to see. The inertia ellipsoid is the tensor made visible — plot, along every direction, a point at distance , and the cloud of points closes into an ellipsoid rigidly glued to the body. Its symmetry axes ARE the principal axes; its semi-axes measure the principal moments; its tilt exposes the products of inertia. Diagonalizing a matrix becomes reading the orientation of an oval. And the ellipsoid does not just summarize statics. Louis Poinsot showed in 1834 that torque-free rotation — the tumbling of a satellite, a flipped phone, a thrown book — is exactly the motion of this ellipsoid rolling without slipping on a fixed plane. No integrals, no special functions: the entire dynamics, performed by a shape. Master this one surface and you hold the geometric key to everything that follows — angular momentum of a rigid body, Euler's equations, and the stability drama that doomed Explorer 1's clean spin.
- The inertia ellipsoid is the quadric surface attached to the body: its radius along any direction equals , so it bulges along easy spin axes and tucks in along hard ones.
- Because the inertia tensor is real, symmetric, and positive-definite, the quadric is always a bounded ellipsoid — the spectral theorem drawn as a picture. Its principal axes are the body's principal axes; its semi-axes are .
- Nonzero products of inertia tilt the ellipsoid away from your coordinate axes by — the geometric signature of dynamic imbalance.
- Angular momentum is the gradient of the kinetic-energy quadratic form: , so is everywhere normal to the constant-energy ellipsoid — the single fact powering Poinsot's construction.
- In torque-free motion the energy ellipsoid rolls without slipping on the invariable plane (fixed distance from the center); the contact traces the polhode on the body and the herpolhode in space.
- The ellipsoid's shape classifies every rigid body: sphere → spherical top, spheroid of revolution → symmetric top, triaxial → asymmetric top, each with qualitatively different free rotation.
- Key idea: the inertia ellipsoid turns the eigenvalue problem for the inertia tensor into geometry — its principal axes ARE the principal axes of inertia, its semi-axes are , and the radius along any direction is .
Where this lives today
Spacecraft engineers live on this ellipsoid. Explorer 1's 1958 flat-spin surprise — a slender body spun about its minimum-moment axis, flexing antennas bleeding energy until the spin migrated to the maximum-moment axis — is now a textbook design rule ("major-axis rule": a dissipating free spinner is stable only about the largest principal moment), and every satellite's mass-properties report ships the inertia tensor whose ellipsoid attitude-control teams visualize before choosing spin axes. The polhode is not a museum piece either: Gravity Probe B's ultra-spherical gyroscopes (2004–2005) showed slow polhode wander that modulated their readout and had to be modeled to milliarcsecond precision, and mission teams tracking tumbling debris or a dead satellite for capture first fit its polhode state — which curve on which inertia ellipsoid — from light-curve flicker before daring an approach. The deeper legacy is the representation quadric habit: picture any symmetric rank-2 tensor as its ellipsoid. Crystal optics reads refractive indices off the index ellipsoid (the optical indicatrix); continuum mechanics draws stress and strain ellipsoids descended from Cauchy's original; diffusion-MRI tractography renders millions of brain-voxel diffusion tensors as tiny glyph ellipsoids whose long axes trace nerve-fiber bundles. Every one of those pictures works for exactly the reason the inertia ellipsoid works: real + symmetric + positive-definite means a bounded ellipsoid whose axes are eigenvectors — a theorem you can now watch roll across a table.
The physical picture
Stand at the body's reference point and look out along some direction . The body is hard to spin about that axis if mass lies far from it — large — and easy to spin if the mass hugs it. Now do this for every direction at once, and record your findings as a surface: walk out a distance along each axis and leave a marker. The markers close into a smooth, egg-shaped skin around you. That skin is the inertia ellipsoid: a mass-distribution portrait turned inside out, bulging OUT where the body is easy to spin and tucking IN where it is hard.
Three facts give the picture its power. First, the skin is rigid: the tensor's components are constants in the body frame, so the ellipsoid is frozen into the body and tumbles with it, like a ghostly exoskeleton. Second, it is complete: the moment of inertia about every conceivable axis through the point — infinitely many numbers — is stored as the surface's radius function, and conversely six well-chosen radius measurements reconstruct all six independent components of . Third, it is honest about orientation: if your coordinate axes are not principal axes, the ellipsoid sits visibly askew in them, and the off-diagonal products of inertia are precisely the algebraic record of that skew. The shape also tells you, before any dynamics, what kind of rotator you are holding. All three semi-axes equal: a spherical top, every axis principal, no wobble possible. Two equal: a symmetric top — coin, pencil, frisbee — with one distinguished axis and a plane of interchangeable ones. All three different: an asymmetric top, the home of the intermediate-axis instability that flips tennis rackets and phones. Diagonalizing a symmetric matrix can feel like dry linear algebra; here it is literally finding the symmetry axes of an oval.
One warning before the equations, because it catches everyone once: the radius is , an inverse. Long ellipsoid axes are EASY spin axes. A thin rod's ellipsoid is a long cigar along the rod (tiny moment about its own axis, huge radius); a coin's is a squashed bun, flattest along the coin's symmetry axis (largest moment, shortest radius). The ellipsoid resembles the body's proportions in orientation, never in scale — and reading it the wrong way round inverts every conclusion you draw from it.
The quadric and how to read it
Everything starts from the scalar moment of inertia about an arbitrary axis, delivered by the tensor article as the quadratic form evaluated on the direction. If you spin the body at , the kinetic energy is with
where: — scalar moment of inertia about the axis through the origin along ; — unit vector specifying the rotation axis, ; — components of the inertia tensor about the chosen origin. Read it as a price list: one number per direction, quoting what a unit of spin costs in angular momentum and energy. In the principal frame it expands to — a weighted average of the principal moments, which is why can never escape the bracket . The ellipsoid packages this entire price list as one surface. Take the equation -style and freeze its value at unity:
where: — Cartesian coordinates of a point on the surface, measured from the reference point (their unit is — this is a surface in an abstract inertia space, not a physical shell in meters); — the inertia tensor; its positive-definiteness is what guarantees a bounded ellipsoid, as Derivation A proves. A point of the surface in direction sits at distance — substitute into (2) and the rule falls out in one line. Rotate your axes onto the ellipsoid's own symmetry axes and the cross terms die. What remains is the standard form every analytic-geometry course would recognize:
where: — the principal moments (eigenvalues of ); — the semi-axis lengths; — coordinates along the principal (body) axes. This is the dictionary entry of the whole subject: eigenvalues ↔ semi-axes, eigenvectors ↔ symmetry axes. A uniform thin disk, with by the perpendicular axis theorem, has an ellipsoid exactly times wider than it is tall — a fixed shape, whatever the disk's mass or size. The algebraic engine behind the dictionary is the spectral decomposition of the symmetric tensor,
where: — the orthogonal matrix rotating lab axes into principal axes; — the tensor in its own frame. Geometrically, is nothing but the instruction "turn your head until the ellipsoid looks upright." When the lab axes are not principal, the off-diagonal entries of are nonzero and the ellipsoid sits tilted in your frame — Derivation C quantifies the tilt angle and connects it to the wheel-balancing problem.
Two claims built this section and both deserve honest proof: that the surface (2) has radius in every direction, and that it is always a genuine, bounded ellipsoid — never a hyperboloid with runaway branches, never a paraboloid. The strategy is to get the radius rule by direct substitution, then let physics certify the geometry: positive kinetic energy for every nonzero spin forces the quadratic form to be positive-definite, and positive-definiteness plus the spectral theorem leaves an ellipsoid as the only possible shape. Watch where the physical input enters — boundedness is not an algebraic accident but a restatement of "rotation costs energy."
Step 1. Take any direction and ask where the ray pierces the surface. Substitute into (2):
Why this is the whole point of the construction: the surface stores the full directional function as a distance you could measure with a ruler — big moment, short radius; small moment, long radius.
Step 2. Establish positive-definiteness from physics. The rotational kinetic energy of the body spinning at any is
Why strictly positive: a real body has positive mass located somewhere, and any rotation moves at least some of that mass (the only exception — every particle exactly on the axis — is the idealized line distribution, excluded for any three-dimensional body). A quadratic form positive on every nonzero vector is positive-definite by definition.
Step 3. Pass positivity to the eigenvalues. For each eigenpair with unit eigenvector,
Why this matters: each eigenvalue is the quadratic form evaluated on its own eigenvector — an energy, hence positive. All three principal moments are strictly positive numbers.
Step 4. Diagonalize and read off the shape. In principal coordinates the cross terms vanish and (2) becomes
Why an ellipsoid and nothing else: with all three coefficients positive, no direction lets run to infinity — the surface is bounded, closed, with semi-axes . A single negative eigenvalue would open the surface into a hyperboloid; physics just forbade that. *The result is the spectral theorem for a positive-definite symmetric matrix made visible. As a quick numerical anchor: the disk relation gives semi-axis ratio .*
Energy, momentum, and the rolling ellipsoid
So far the ellipsoid is a portrait. Poinsot's discovery is that the portrait moves — that free rotation is a rolling motion of this very surface. The bridge from statics to dynamics is a pair of innocent-looking equations. First, the kinetic energy of an arbitrary spin, inherited from the tensor article:
where: — rotational kinetic energy; — angular velocity. Read the second form geometrically: at fixed energy, the allowed angular velocities sweep out a surface in -space — the energy ellipsoid — which is the inertia ellipsoid scaled by the factor . Same shape, same axes, different size and different space: its coordinates are angular velocities, not abstract lengths. Second, the fact that unlocks everything. Differentiate the energy with respect to the angular velocity, using the symmetry , and the angular momentum appears as a gradient:
where: — angular momentum about the fixed point; — gradient in angular-velocity space. A gradient is always perpendicular to the level surfaces of its function — so is normal to the energy ellipsoid at the tip of . This is the cleanest way to see why and are generally not parallel: is a radius of the ellipsoid, is the surface normal where that radius lands, and on a non-spherical surface a radius and its normal align only on the symmetry axes — the principal axes, exactly as the angular-momentum article computes algebraically. Two scalar companions complete the toolkit. When the spin is locked along a principal direction , energy and momentum trade through the radius:
where: — magnitude of for a principal direction; — kinetic energy. At fixed energy, spinning about the large-moment axis stores the most angular momentum — the fact that decides where a dissipating spinner ends up, as the Explorer 1 FAQ below spells out. And in torque-free motion, where both and are conserved, the projection of onto the fixed direction is pinned:
where: — the constant height of the tip of above the plane through the origin perpendicular to ; — the two conserved quantities of free rotation. This constant is the invariable plane: a plane fixed in space, at distance from the center in the scaled picture, on which the whole motion will now be made to roll.
Go deeper · Derivation B · 2 minPoinsot construction - the ellipsoid that rolls on a fixed plane
We are deriving the celebrated geometric solution of torque-free rigid-body motion: the energy ellipsoid, glued to the body, rolls without slipping on a plane fixed in space. The strategy uses only the two conservation laws of free rotation — energy and angular momentum — plus the gradient identity (6). Nothing will be integrated; instead each conserved quantity becomes one geometric constraint, and the two constraints together leave rolling as the only motion possible. The step to watch is the last one: rolling (zero contact velocity) is not an extra assumption but a consequence of the contact point lying on the instantaneous rotation axis.
Step 1. Put the tip of the scaled angular velocity on the ellipsoid. Define the contact vector
Why the scaling: energy conservation says is constant, so dividing by parks the tip of exactly on the unit quadric (2) at every instant — the tip of the angular velocity rides the ellipsoid's surface forever.
Step 2. Identify the surface normal at the riding point. By the gradient identity,
Why this is the hinge of the whole construction: the normal to the ellipsoid at the contact point is parallel to — and is conserved, a fixed arrow in space. However wildly the body tumbles, the ellipsoid always presents the same space-fixed direction as its normal at the point where pierces it.
Step 3. Show the tangent plane there never moves. The plane tangent to the ellipsoid at has normal , and its distance from the center is the projection of the contact vector onto that normal:
Why both ingredients were needed: conservation of fixes the plane's orientation, conservation of (through equation 8) fixes its distance. A plane with frozen orientation and frozen distance is simply a fixed plane — the invariable plane.
Step 4. Convert contact into rolling. The contact point of the ellipsoid lies along — on the instantaneous axis of rotation. Every material point on the instantaneous axis has zero velocity at that instant, so the ellipsoid touches the fixed plane at a point momentarily at rest: it rolls without slipping. The contact point traces a curve on the ellipsoid — the polhode — and a curve on the plane — the herpolhode; the body's tumble is exactly the polhode rolling along the herpolhode. Why this deserves its fame: two conservation laws became two frozen geometric elements, and the entire solution of Euler's torque-free equations is performed by a shape rolling on a table. For a symmetric top the polhode and herpolhode are circles and the picture becomes the body cone rolling on the space cone. *For a symmetric top the polhode and herpolhode degenerate to circles, recovering the body-cone/space-cone picture of free precession. The worked brick example below confirms numerically ( both ways).*
Which equation answers which question
| you want | use | notes |
|---|---|---|
| moment about a given axis | , eq. (1) | weighted average of ; never outside |
| the whole directional map at once | the quadric , eq. (2) | radius ; rigid, glued to the body |
| principal moments from geometry | semi-axes via eq. (3) | ; eigenvalue problem solved by a ruler |
| is my frame principal? | tilt of the quadric, Derivation C | per plane |
| direction of for given | normal to the ellipsoid at 's tip, eq. (6) | parallel to only on principal axes |
| free-rotation trajectory, no integrals | Poinsot rolling, Derivation B | polhode on body, herpolhode in space, plane at |
The tilted ellipsoid and dynamic imbalance
When the products of inertia vanish, the ellipsoid stands upright in your axes and life is simple. When they do not, the ellipsoid leans — and the lean angle is exactly the rotation that diagonalizes the tensor. The products-of-inertia article does the full three-dimensional bookkeeping; here is the two-dimensional core, which is also the mechanic's wheel-balancing formula.
Go deeper · Derivation C · 1 minTilt of the ellipsoid from products of inertia
The goal is a formula for how far the ellipsoid's symmetry axes rotate away from coordinate axes when one product of inertia, say , is switched on. The strategy is to restrict attention to the plane — where the coupling lives — and find the rotation angle that kills the off-diagonal entry of the sub-block; that angle IS the tilt, because principal axes are by definition the frame with no cross terms. Watch the denominator: the formula degenerates when , and the degeneracy is physical, not a flaw.
Step 1. Isolate the coupled sub-block of the inertia matrix in the plane:
Why the restriction is legitimate: if is already principal (a symmetry plane guarantees this, per the products-of-inertia article), the remaining eigenvalue problem is exactly this symmetric matrix.
Step 2. Rotate by in the plane and demand the new off-diagonal element vanish. Under , the off-diagonal component transforms to , and setting it to zero gives
Why and not : a quadric is unchanged under a half-turn, so its axes are lines, not arrows — the natural period of the tilt is , and the doubled angle is the same structure as Mohr's circle for stress.
Step 3. Interpret. If the axes are already principal and the ellipsoid stands square. Nonzero leans the ellipsoid by — and a shaft forced to rotate about a non-principal axis drags a rotating around with it, demanding rotating bearing torques. The tilt angle measures how much mass redistribution (counterweights) brings the spin axis back to a symmetry axis of the ellipsoid.
Limiting cases
The ellipsoid's shape mirrors the spectrum of :
| Case | Result | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Spherical top | The quadric is a sphere of radius ; every axis is principal and is direction-independent. | |
| Symmetric top (oblate/prolate) | An ellipsoid of revolution about the symmetry axis; oblate body (, coin) gives a bun squashed along that axis, prolate (, rod) a cigar stretched along it. | |
| Asymmetric top | A fully triaxial ellipsoid with three distinct semi-axes; the intermediate-axis instability lives on its saddle-shaped polhode pattern. | |
| Planar lamina | The perpendicular axis theorem saturates the triangle inequality: — an absolute cap on how flat any inertia ellipsoid can be. | |
| Torque-free spin on a principal axis | polhode shrinks to a point | The ellipsoid pivots on a fixed contact: steady rotation, , no wobble — stable at the long and short ellipsoid axes, unstable at the middle one. |
Worked examples
1 · The ellipsoid of a spinning disk (confidence builder)
A uniform disk has mass and radius . Build its inertia ellipsoid about the center of mass, and find the moment of inertia about an axis through the center at to the symmetry axis.
Step 1. Principal moments. For a uniform disk the symmetry axis and any two diameters are principal, with and, by the perpendicular axis theorem, .
Step 2. Semi-axes of the ellipsoid. Using : and (units ). The ellipsoid is an oblate spheroid, squashed along the disk's symmetry axis, with the universal disk ratio — independent of and .
Step 3. Read off a tilted-axis moment. For at to the symmetry axis, , so equation (1) gives
Step 4. Audit with the radius rule. The ellipsoid radius along that direction should be — and indeed : the tilted radius sits between the two semi-axes, exactly as a point between the pole and the equator of a spheroid must. The price list interpolates; it never extrapolates.
2 · A tumbling brick: where L really points (exam level)
A rectangular book of mass and dimensions spins at about its face diagonal (in the plane of the covers). Find the moment of inertia about that axis, the angle between and , and the Poinsot constant .
Step 1. Principal moments of a uniform block, : , , . Triaxial: an asymmetric top, with ellipsoid semi-axes , , .
Step 2. The face diagonal of the face has direction . The quadratic form (1):
Step 3. Angular momentum. With , each principal component gets its own price: , so . The angle to comes from , giving . Geometrically: pierces the ellipsoid off any symmetry axis, and tips away from it toward the hard () direction — the surface normal leans toward the shorter semi-axis.
Step 4. Poinsot constant. , so .
Step 5. Audit. Equation (8) promises ✓. If this book were released torque-free with exactly this spin, the tip of would stay above the invariable plane forever while wandering along its polhode — and since the face diagonal is no principal axis, the book would visibly wobble: stays fixed in space, so (15.8° away from it) must precess around it.
Origins · 1 minAugustin-Louis Cauchy and how this was discovered
Cauchy was mechanics' great systematizer — a devout, stubborn royalist who followed the deposed Bourbon king into exile rather than swear allegiance to the new regime, and who along the way wrote nearly eight hundred papers that rebuilt analysis, elasticity, and rigid-body theory on rigorous foundations. In 1822 he distilled the internal forces of a deformable body into the stress tensor — the first great symmetric-tensor object in physics — and in his 1827 Exercices de mathématiques he applied the same geometric eye to rotation, introducing the ellipsoid of inertia as the quadric whose radii encode the moments of a body about every axis. Two years later he proved the theorem the picture had been whispering: every real symmetric matrix has real eigenvalues and orthogonal eigenvectors, established precisely by studying the principal axes of quadric surfaces. The chain inertia tensor → ellipsoid → spectral theorem is thus historically backwards from how we teach it — the physics picture came first and motivated the linear algebra. When Poinsot set the ellipsoid rolling in 1834, and when engineers today diagonalize an inertia matrix to balance a rotor, both are drawing on Cauchy's conviction that a symmetric array of numbers is best understood as the shape it draws.
Going further
References. Goldstein, Poole & Safko, Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed., §5.4 (the inertia ellipsoid) and §5.6 (Poinsot construction) · Landau & Lifshitz, Mechanics, Vol. 1, §32 (the inertia ellipsoid and free rotation) · Morin, Introduction to Classical Mechanics, Ch. 9 (angular momentum, principal axes) · Taylor, Classical Mechanics, Ch. 10 (rotational motion of rigid bodies) All equations are standard. The key checkpoints are: (i) follows by substituting into ; (ii) semi-axes come from the principal-axis form of the quadric; (iii) uses the symmetry of ; (iv) positive-definiteness yields a bounded ellipsoid by the spectral theorem. The only numerical constant introduced independently is the disk relation , which follows from the perpendicular axis theorem for a uniform thin disk. Worked-example numbers on this page (disk: , , ; brick: , misalignment , ) are illustrative arithmetic recomputed from the boxed formulas.
Builds on: Moment of Inertia Tensor · Products of Inertia and the Inertia Matrix · Principal Axes and Principal Moments of Inertia · Rotational Kinetic Energy Leads to: Classification of Rigid Bodies: Spherical, Symmetric, and Asymmetric Tops · Free Symmetric Top and Body-Cone/Space-Cone Precession · Angular Momentum of a Rigid Body · Euler's Equations of Motion
Why is the radius 1 over the square root of I, rather than 1 over I or I itself?
Because the tensor enters rotation quadratically. Both stores of the tensor — and the quadric — are quadratic forms, so walking out a distance along accumulates , and hitting the unit level set forces . Any other exponent would break the construction's best feature: with the square root, the surface is a true ellipsoid whose semi-axes are exactly and whose symmetry axes are exactly the eigenvectors. Plot or instead and you get lumpier ovaloid surfaces (fine as visualizations, useless as spectral geometry). There is one worthwhile companion convention: plotting radius gives Binet's momental ellipsoid, sometimes used because it looks proportion-matched to the body — but the standard inertia ellipsoid is the one that rolls in Poinsot's construction.
Does the inertia ellipsoid look like the body itself?
In orientation, yes; in proportions, only loosely. A rod's ellipsoid is a cigar along the rod (easy axis = long radius) and a coin's is a bun squashed along the coin's normal, so the qualitative elongation matches. But the proportions are compressed by physics: the triangle inequalities (and the lamina-saturated , per the perpendicular axis theorem) mean the semi-axes obey — the ellipsoid can never be flatter than a fixed bound, no matter how thin the plate. An infinitely thin disk still has a fat bun, ratio , not an infinitely thin one. And never confuse scales: the ellipsoid lives in coordinates of , not meters — it is a portrait of the tensor, not a scan of the body.
What are the actual units of the ellipsoid, and does its size mean anything?
The defining equation forces the coordinates to carry units of , so the surface lives in an abstract inertia space. Its absolute size scales as — heavier or larger bodies have smaller ellipsoids — which is rarely interesting; what carries the physics is the shape (ratios of semi-axes) and orientation (the principal directions). That is why Poinsot works with the rescaled energy ellipsoid , whose coordinates are honest angular velocities in rad/s: same shape and axes, but a size set by the spin energy, which lets the rolling construction make quantitative statements like the plane height in rad/s.
Is the inertia ellipsoid the same thing as the energy ellipsoid and the Binet ellipsoid?
Three related but distinct quadrics, and exams love the confusion. The inertia ellipsoid is in abstract coordinates — fixed unit level, pure portrait of the tensor. The energy ellipsoid is in angular-velocity space — the inertia ellipsoid magnified by , and the one that physically rolls on the invariable plane. The Binet (momental) ellipsoid used in some texts plots radius instead, and there is also the angular-momentum-space ellipsoid used to intersect with the sphere when classifying polhodes algebraically. All share the same principal axes — they are all portraits of the same — so qualitative conclusions transfer; quantitative ones require keeping track of which surface you are on.
Why exactly is L normal to the ellipsoid instead of parallel to the spin axis? I keep losing the intuition.
Hold onto one sentence: momentum is the gradient of energy. For a particle, — trivially parallel to because the mass is a scalar and the energy surfaces are spheres. For rotation, , and the energy surfaces are ellipsoids because the "mass" is now a tensor. A gradient always points perpendicular to the level surface — so stands normal to the ellipsoid at the tip of , and on a non-sphere the normal at a generic point simply does not pass through the center along the radius. The two directions re-align exactly where radius and normal coincide: the symmetry axes, i.e. the principal axes. The brick example makes it concrete — spin on a face diagonal and leans 15.8° away, toward the harder principal direction.
Polhode and herpolhode — which is which, and which one is a closed curve?
The polhode ("path of the pole") is the contact curve drawn on the ellipsoid — a body-frame object, rigidly carried with the tumbling body. It is always a closed curve: algebraically it is the intersection of two ellipsoids (constant and constant ) in the body frame. The herpolhode ("serpentine path") is what the contact point draws on the invariable plane — a space-frame object. It stays inside a fixed annulus but is generically not closed: the motion's two frequencies are usually incommensurate, so the curve fills its ring densely, and (a classical curiosity) it has no inflection points — it always curves toward the center. For a symmetric top both curves degenerate to circles and the rolling becomes the clean body-cone-on-space-cone picture of free precession.
If the rolling picture conserves energy, how did Explorer 1 end up in a flat spin?
Poinsot's construction assumes a perfectly rigid body: both and conserved. Explorer 1 was not rigid — its whip antennas flexed as it spun, and flexing dissipates energy as heat while the torque-free condition keeps untouched. Watch the geometry as slowly drops at fixed : the spin must migrate toward the state of minimum energy for the given momentum, and since along a principal axis, minimum energy means maximum moment of inertia. A pencil-shaped body spun about its long axis (its minimum , the ellipsoid's longest semi-axis) is therefore at maximum energy for its — a perch, not a valley — and any dissipation walks it down to the end-over-end tumble about the largest moment. Hence the major-axis rule of spacecraft design: only the shortest ellipsoid axis is a safe long-term spin axis for a real, flexing, fuel-sloshing machine.
Can I actually reconstruct the full inertia tensor from the ellipsoid, or is it just a cartoon?
It is the tensor, losslessly. A symmetric tensor has six independent components; a centered quadric surface is determined by six numbers (three semi-axes plus three orientation angles). Measure the ellipsoid's radius along six suitably independent directions and equation (1) gives six linear equations for the six — this is essentially what a mass-properties measurement rig does when it swings a spacecraft about several axes and fits the tensor to the measured periods. The cartoon-versus-content distinction worth keeping is different: the ellipsoid encodes the tensor about one chosen point. Move the reference point and the tensor changes by the Steiner shift of the parallel axis theorem, so the body carries a different ellipsoid at every point — the cm ellipsoid is merely the fattest of them all.