Einstein A and B Coefficients
In 1916–1917, before quantum mechanics existed, Einstein asked a deceptively simple question: what set of rate laws for a two-level atom is consistent with the atom sitting inside a box of blackbody light? To make the bookkeeping close, we take two results from neighbouring articles rather than re-derive them. The quantum-electrodynamic value of the spontaneous rate — the Weisskopf–Wigner calculation of the atom decaying into the vacuum's continuum of modes — is owned by aq-qm-spontaneous-emission-einstein-coefficients; the perturbative absorption and stimulated-emission rates come from aq-qm-absorption-stimulated-emission. What this article owns is Einstein's thermodynamic argument itself: the demand that three phenomenological processes reproduce the Planck spectrum at every temperature, which forces two exact relations among the coefficients. Those relations are the reason lasers are possible. One, , says that absorption and stimulated emission are the same process run backwards, so a medium with equal populations per sublevel is transparent and net gain needs a population inversion. The other, , is the mode density of free space times : it tells you that spontaneous emission wins overwhelmingly at optical frequencies (why a sodium lamp glows incoherently) but yields to stimulated emission in the microwave (why the maser came before the laser). The remarkable thing is that neither relation contains the temperature. The oven Einstein imagined was only scaffolding; once the ratios are fixed they are properties of the atom and the vacuum, valid in a discharge tube, a laser cavity, or an interstellar maser. This is the template for how equilibrium constraints pin down physics that then holds far from equilibrium.
- Einstein modelled radiative transitions with three phenomenological rate constants: (spontaneous emission), (stimulated emission), and (absorption).
- Requiring the atoms to sit in thermal equilibrium with Planck radiation forces two exact relations: and .
- Both relations are temperature-independent — properties of the atom and the vacuum alone — so they hold in lasers and masers far from equilibrium.
- The ratio of stimulated to spontaneous rate is exactly the mean number of photons per mode, ; they are equal when there is one photon per mode.
- At 300 K the stimulated/spontaneous crossover sits at (): spontaneous dominates above it, stimulated below.
- Key idea: detailed balance plus the Planck spectrum uniquely fix the ratios of the three Einstein coefficients, and because those ratios carry no temperature they are intrinsic atomic constants valid in any radiation field.
Detailed balance in thermal equilibrium, together with the requirement that the radiation field be the Planck spectrum at every temperature, uniquely fixes the ratios of the three Einstein coefficients — and those ratios are properties of the atom and the vacuum, valid everywhere.
Where this lives today
Every rate-equation model of a laser, amplifier, LED, or atomic clock rests on Einstein's two relations. In a laser gain medium the small-signal gain coefficient is , and the threshold condition is a direct restatement of : without inversion the same transition that could amplify instead absorbs. Fiber amplifiers (erbium-doped, the backbone of the internet) are designed by balancing exactly these coefficients across the gain band. The relations also drive precision physics in the opposite direction. In cold-atom and Rydberg experiments the ambient 300 K blackbody field, weak as it is, still stimulates real transitions at rate ; because at low frequency and Rydberg transitions lie in the microwave, blackbody-stimulated redistribution and ionization limit state lifetimes and must be modelled quantitatively. Radiative-transfer codes for stellar atmospheres and nebulae invert observed line strengths for temperature, density, and abundance using the very same 's and 's — Einstein's oven, now the size of a galaxy.
The physical picture
Put a huge ensemble of identical two-level atoms in a sealed oven filled with blackbody light. Each atom flickers up and down, absorbing and emitting, yet the level populations hold perfectly steady. Einstein's move was to insist on a microscopic balance sheet: every process that lifts an atom to the upper level must be paid back by a process that drops it. Three elementary processes suffice. Absorption removes a photon from the field and promotes the atom. Stimulated emission is triggered by an existing photon and produces a second photon identical to it — same direction, frequency, phase, and polarization. Spontaneous emission is the atom's private clock: it fires whether or not any light is present, sending a photon off in a random direction. The two field-driven rates scale with how much light is already there, the spectral energy density ; the spontaneous rate does not. That single asymmetry is the whole story. Balancing the sheet and demanding that the light in the box be Planckian forces the spontaneous-to-stimulated ratio to equal the number of electromagnetic modes per unit volume per unit frequency, , times the photon energy . In other words, spontaneous emission is nothing but stimulated emission driven by the one quantum of zero-point field that every mode carries. The companion relation says absorption and stimulated emission are microscopically reversible, weighted only by how many sublevels each level offers. This is why you cannot get net amplification from a two-level system in thermal equilibrium: Boltzmann always keeps the lower level more populated per sublevel, so absorption wins. Only by pumping the system into a population inversion — more atoms per sublevel upstairs than down — does stimulated emission overtake absorption and the medium amplifies. Every laser is a machine for engineering that inversion.
The key contrast lives in the second figure. Because , the balance between spontaneous and stimulated emission is a pure function of frequency at fixed temperature. Plotting it reveals a sharp crossover that separates the microwave regime, where a thermal field already carries many photons per mode, from the optical regime, where spontaneous emission is overwhelming.
The core equations
The three processes each change the upper-level population, but only two of them see the field. Written as rate contributions, spontaneous emission depletes level 2 at a fixed per-atom rate, while stimulated emission and absorption scale with evaluated at the transition frequency.
where: — number densities in the lower and upper levels; — spontaneous-emission coefficient (units ); — absorption and stimulated-emission coefficients; — spectral energy density per unit frequency (). Read physically: is the inverse radiative lifetime; the 's are cross-sections in disguise, telling you how strongly the transition couples to whatever light is present. Balancing (1) in equilibrium with a Boltzmann population ratio and demanding the field be Planckian collapses to two temperature-free identities — the heart of the article.
where: — degeneracies (sublevel counts) of the two levels; — Planck constant; — speed of light; — transition frequency. Read physically: the first identity makes absorption and stimulated emission mirror images weighted by degeneracy; the second is the free-space mode density times , so it is fixed by the geometry of the vacuum, not by the atom's internal details. The single most useful rearrangement compares the two downward channels at a given field. Dividing the spontaneous by the stimulated rate gives a pure number that depends only on the photon occupancy of the mode.
where: — mean number of photons in a resonant mode at temperature (the Bose–Einstein occupancy). Read physically: stimulated emission beats spontaneous emission exactly when there is more than one photon per mode. The two are equal at , i.e. — the crossover frequency. Finally, the spontaneous coefficient sets the radiative lifetime, the bridge to the neighbouring articles on decay and linewidth.
where: — natural lifetime of the upper level; ; — transition dipole moment. The explicit dipole formula is the quantum-electrodynamic result owned by aq-qm-spontaneous-emission-einstein-coefficients; here it simply tells us is a fixed atomic number that Einstein's ratios then convert into .
The goal is to obtain both coefficient relations and from a single requirement: that the three phenomenological rates of equation (1), balanced in thermal equilibrium with a Boltzmann-distributed atomic population, produce exactly the Planck spectrum at every temperature. The strategy is to write steady-state balance, solve for the radiation density the atoms would have to be bathed in, and then insist that this density equal the known Planck form for all — which can only happen if two temperature-dependent pieces are separately forced to their unique values.
Step 1. In steady state the total upward rate equals the total downward rate: . Why: nothing in the populations changes with time in equilibrium, so absorption must exactly refill what spontaneous and stimulated emission remove.
Step 2. Impose the thermal population ratio and solve for the field: . Why: Boltzmann statistics fix how the two levels are occupied at temperature , turning the balance equation into an expression for the radiation density the atoms are consistent with.
Step 3. Compare with the Planck law . For the two forms to agree at every temperature, the coefficient multiplying in the denominator must be one, giving ; and the surviving prefactor must match, giving . Why: two functions of can be equal for all only if their structural pieces match term by term, and here that forces both relations at once.
Step 4. Note what fails without : dropping stimulated emission removes the from the denominator, leaving a Wien-type form that cannot reproduce the Rayleigh–Jeans low-frequency limit. Why: stimulated emission is not optional — thermodynamic consistency demands it, which is how Einstein predicted the process in 1917, years before its quantum justification. *Verified: the sympy solve of the balance equation returns after imposing , and at the Na D frequency, in verify_aq-optics-einstein-a-b-coefficients.py.*
Go deeper · Derivation B · 1 minThe stimulated-to-spontaneous crossover is one photon per mode
The goal is to turn the abstract ratio into an operational rule of thumb: at what frequency does stimulated emission stop dominating spontaneous emission in a thermal field? We do this by dividing the two downward rates, recognizing the result as the inverse Bose occupancy, and locating where it equals one — the boundary between the optical world (spontaneous, incoherent) and the microwave world (stimulated, the maser regime).
Step 1. Form the ratio of spontaneous to stimulated rate: . Using the Planck and , everything atomic cancels and . Why: the mode-density prefactor in is exactly the one in Planck's law, so their ratio is a universal function of alone.
Step 2. Recognize , the mean photon number per mode. Hence stimulated/spontaneous : the two rates are equal when there is exactly one photon per mode. Why: a single spontaneous photon is what one quantum of field (the vacuum's -independent zero-point) would stimulate, so the comparison is literally counting photons in the mode.
Step 3. Set : , i.e. , giving . At this is , a wavelength of . Why: below this far-infrared frequency a thermal field already holds more than one photon per mode and stimulated emission wins; above it, spontaneous emission dominates — which is why masers (microwave) preceded lasers (optical). *Verified: , , and exactly at , in verify_aq-optics-einstein-a-b-coefficients.py.*
Limiting cases
The competition between the three processes shifts dramatically with frequency, temperature, and field strength.
| Case | Result | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| High frequency / low () | Spontaneous emission dominates; visible and UV excited states decay incoherently. At the Na D line, at 300 K. | |
| Low frequency / high () | Stimulated processes dominate; the microwave/radio regime and masers live here. | |
| One photon per mode () | The exact stimulated–spontaneous crossover at 300 K, at . | |
| Strong resonant field (laser) | Stimulated emission and absorption saturate the transition; net gain requires (inversion). | |
| No field () | Only spontaneous emission, exponential decay with . |
Worked examples
Example 1 — the A/B ratio and why a sodium lamp is incoherent.
Step 1. The Na D line sits at , so . Compute the mode-density prefactor .
Step 2. Numerically . This is the spontaneous-to-stimulated conversion factor per unit spectral energy density.
Step 3. At , . The stimulated-to-spontaneous ratio is .
Step 4. So in a 300 K thermal field the Na atom emits spontaneously about times more often than it is stimulated: essentially every D-line photon is spontaneous, random in direction and phase. A sodium street lamp is incoherent for a purely thermodynamic reason — at optical frequencies there is far less than one photon per mode.
Example 2 — locating the maser window.
Step 1. Stimulated and spontaneous emission are equal when there is one photon per mode, , i.e. , so .
Step 2. At : , and , a wavelength .
Step 3. Below 4.33 THz (microwave and radio) a room-temperature thermal field already holds more than one photon per mode, so stimulated emission dominates. Above it (far-IR through visible), spontaneous emission takes over.
Step 4. This is exactly why the maser (1954, microwave) preceded the laser (1960, optical): building gain against spontaneous loss is far easier where spontaneous emission is intrinsically weak. The growth of is the obstacle every short-wavelength laser must overcome.
Physics of the portrait
The spontaneous-emission coefficient is the quantity Einstein could not avoid inventing. His 1917 balance sheet needed a downward process that runs with no field present; without it, absorption and stimulated emission alone cannot reproduce the Planck spectrum's in the denominator. So entered physics as a thermodynamic necessity, its absolute value unknown until Dirac quantized the field a decade later. It is the archetype of a coefficient whose ratios are pinned by symmetry long before its magnitude is computable.
Origins · 1 mineinstein a coefficient and how this was discovered
Introduced by Albert Einstein in his 1916–1917 papers on the quantum theory of radiation, the coefficient is the fixed per-atom rate of spontaneous emission. Einstein deduced its ratio to the stimulated coefficient, , purely from requiring detailed balance with the Planck spectrum — predicting stimulated emission in the process. The absolute value came only with Dirac's 1927 quantization of the field and the Weisskopf–Wigner theory of 1930.
Going further
References. Foot, Atomic Physics, Ch. 1 · Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 · Demtröder, Laser Spectroscopy, Vol. 1, Ch. 2 · Saleh & Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, 3rd ed., Ch. 14 · Hecht, Optics, 5th ed.
Provenance. All coefficient relations follow the standard Einstein (1917) thermodynamic derivation as presented in Foot Ch. 1 and Loudon Ch. 1. The A/B ratio and are exact and textbook-standard; they are reproduced here by matching the balance equation to the Planck spectrum (verify_aq-optics-einstein-a-b-coefficients.py). The quantum expression is the QED result owned by aq-qm-spontaneous-emission-einstein-coefficients (recalled by name); the perturbation rates are owned by aq-qm-absorption-stimulated-emission. No fabricated numerical values are used.
Builds on: Spontaneous Emission · Stimulated Emission · Resonant Absorption · Detailed Balance and the Planck Spectrum Leads to: Radiative Lifetime and Natural Linewidth · Oscillator Strength · Transition Dipole Moment · Lorentzian Line Shape
Did Einstein derive the actual values of A and B, or just their ratios?
Only the ratios. His 1917 argument fixes and exactly, but it says nothing about the absolute size of any one coefficient — that requires knowing the transition dipole moment. The absolute spontaneous rate came only after Dirac quantized the electromagnetic field in 1927 and the Weisskopf–Wigner theory of 1930. The ratios are pure thermodynamics; the magnitudes are quantum electrodynamics.
Why does the derivation need the Planck spectrum specifically, not just any equilibrium?
Because two temperature-dependent conditions have to be satisfied at once, and only Planck's form does it. Solving the balance equation gives a radiation density with an exponential in the denominator whose coefficient and prefactor both depend on the 's and . Demanding that this equal Planck's law at every temperature forces the exponential coefficient to one (giving the relation) and the prefactor to the mode density times (giving ). If you tried to match a Wien or Rayleigh–Jeans form alone you would get an inconsistent or incomplete answer — the full Planck curve, valid across all frequencies, is what pins both relations.
Is stimulated emission really a photon "clone" of the incident one?
Yes, in every measurable degree of freedom. The stimulated photon shares the direction, frequency, phase, and polarization of the photon that triggered it — that is what makes laser light coherent and directional. This is a consequence of the same matrix element governing absorption and stimulated emission (the reason and are equal up to degeneracy). Spontaneous emission, by contrast, has no incident photon to copy, so it goes off in a random direction with random phase, which is why thermal and LED light is incoherent.
If absorption and stimulated emission are mirror images, how can any medium ever amplify?
Because amplification compares populations, not just coefficients. Net stimulated gain needs the stimulated-emission rate to exceed the absorption rate . Using this becomes — a population inversion relative to the degeneracy ratio. In thermal equilibrium Boltzmann always keeps the lower level more populated per sublevel, so a medium in equilibrium absorbs. Only by pumping energy in to invert the populations do you tip the balance to net gain; that pump is what distinguishes a laser from a lamp.
What exactly is "one photon per mode" and why is it the crossover?
A mode is a single standing- or traveling-wave state of the electromagnetic field. The mean number of photons occupying a resonant mode in a thermal field is the Bose factor . The ratio of stimulated to spontaneous emission turns out to equal exactly this , because spontaneous emission is what the vacuum's single zero-point quantum "stimulates." When the two rates are equal; that happens at , i.e. 4.33 THz at 300 K. Below that frequency the mode is crowded with photons and stimulated emission wins; above it the mode is nearly empty and spontaneous emission dominates.
Why does the B coefficient matter for cold Rydberg atoms if there is no laser present?
Because the room-temperature blackbody field is always present, and it drives real stimulated transitions at rate . Rydberg-to-Rydberg transitions lie in the microwave, where is substantial and , so a "dark" 300 K apparatus still redistributes population among Rydberg levels and can even photoionize them. Experiments that need long-lived Rydberg states cool the surrounding blackbody environment (cryogenic shields) precisely to shrink and with it the rate. It is a textbook consequence of the very coefficient Einstein introduced.