Total Internal Reflection and Optical Guiding
Total internal reflection takes two results already in hand — Snell's law from aq-optics-snells-law, and the amplitude coefficients of aq-optics-fresnel-equations that follow from matching plane-wave fields at a boundary — and pushes them past where the usual ray picture survives. Send light from a dense medium toward a rarer one and Snell's law bends the refracted ray away from the normal; tilt the incidence up and that ray swings toward grazing, reaching at a special angle. Past it, Snell's law asks for a sine larger than one, which no real angle satisfies: the refracted ray simply does not exist, and essentially all the power turns back into the dense medium — total internal reflection. What makes it more than a curiosity is what the wave picture reveals beyond the boundary. The transmitted field does not vanish; it survives as an evanescent wave that clings to the surface, decaying within a fraction of a wavelength while carrying no time-averaged power across it. Because no energy leaves, the reflection is perfectly lossless whenever both media are transparent — a mirror made of nothing but two clear materials. The reflected wave also gains a phase that depends on angle and polarization, and that phase is the hinge on which optical guiding turns: a high-index core wrapped in lower-index cladding traps every ray striking the wall above the critical angle, so it zig-zags for kilometres with negligible loss, and demanding the reflection phases add up self-consistently turns a continuum of ray angles into a discrete ladder of guided modes — the bridge from ray optics to the waveguide.
- Total internal reflection (TIR) happens when light in a higher-index medium meets a lower-index one beyond the critical angle , reflecting all the incident power.
- Beyond Snell's law would need : the transmitted wave becomes evanescent, decaying as while carrying no net power across the boundary.
- TIR is exactly lossless for real indices — unlike a metal mirror — which is why glass fibres guide light over transoceanic distances.
- Each bounce adds an angle-dependent phase (the origin of the Goos–Hänchen shift); the reflection is not from an infinitely thin plane.
- Repeated TIR guides light in a core, and requiring the transverse phase to be self-consistent quantizes the ray angles into discrete modes; the acceptance cone is set by the numerical aperture .
- Key idea: total internal reflection is a lossless, phase-shifting mirror that engages whenever a ray in a high-index core exceeds the critical angle; requiring that phase to be self-consistent after two transverse bounces quantizes the ray angles into the discrete modes a waveguide can carry.
Total internal reflection provides a lossless, phase-shifting mirror whenever a ray in a high-index core exceeds the critical angle; requiring the phase to be self-consistent after two transverse bounces quantizes the ray angles into the discrete modes that a waveguide can carry.
Where this lives today
The most direct modern heir of the evanescent field is total-internal-reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. A laser enters a glass coverslip above the critical angle, and the roughly 100 nm evanescent skin — precisely the above — illuminates only the sliver of a cell pressed against the glass, leaving the interior dark. That thin-sheet excitation gives the background-free contrast single-molecule biophysics needs to watch motor proteins step at the membrane. The same tail, read as a phase shift, lets surface-plasmon-resonance and attenuated-total-reflection sensors detect a monolayer of binding analyte without a label. At the other extreme of scale, repeated TIR is the substrate of the optical internet. Submarine fibre relies on the losslessness proved in Derivation 1: with real silica indices the bounce returns essentially all the power, so attenuation falls to a few tenths of a dB per kilometre near 1550 nm. On-chip, silicon photonics pushes the contrast the other way — a silicon core near in oxide near gives a critical angle small enough to bend light around micron-scale corners, packing modulators and microrings onto one die. And in atomic physics, a blue-detuned evanescent field at a glass surface builds a repulsive, near-lossless "atom mirror" whose steepness is set by , bouncing cold atoms without touching them.
The physical picture
Take a ray inside a block of glass and swing it toward the top surface. At modest angles it splits into a refracted ray that bends away from the normal into the air and a reflected ray back down. Tilt it further and the escaping ray leans harder toward the surface, until at one angle it lies flat — grazing, going nowhere. A hair more and the surface hands all the light back. That tipping point is the critical angle , and beyond it the interface is an almost perfect mirror that cost nothing to build — no coating, just two transparent media. This is why a cut diamond blazes: its index is so high that , so most rays that get inside are trapped and shuttled to the top facets before escaping to your eye.
The reflected wave is not quite what a metal mirror gives back. It is phase-delayed, behaving as though it bounced from a plane just beyond the interface — the Goos–Hänchen shift. The carrier of that delay is the evanescent field, a real oscillating field that soaks a fraction of a wavelength into the rarer medium and rides along the surface without carrying energy across. That field is no fiction — bring a second high-index medium within its reach and it pulls power across the gap, the mechanism behind frustrated TIR, directional couplers, and evanescent sensors. Guiding is simply TIR made a habit. Sandwich a high-index core between lower-index cladding and any ray steep enough to exceed at the wall is trapped, marching down the guide as a shallow zig-zag that never leaks. But not every angle survives. Because each bounce stamps the wave with a phase, only rays whose transverse round-trip phase closes on itself — a standing pattern across the core — persist. That self-consistency turns the continuum of trapped angles into a discrete set of guided modes, where this ray story meets the wave equation of aq-optics-waveguide-modes-wave-equation.
The core equations
Snell's law is the refraction bookkeeping at any interface, and reading it from the dense side is what exposes the critical angle: the product of index and the sine of the angle from the normal is conserved across the boundary.
where: — refractive indices of the incidence (core) and transmission (cladding) media; — angles of incidence and refraction from the surface normal. Physical reading: when the refracted ray bends away from the normal, so as grows, reaches first — the sign that refraction is about to fail. Set the refracted ray to graze the surface, , and Snell's law fixes the incidence angle at which transmission shuts off; for any larger angle there is no real , and TIR takes over.
where: — critical angle; TIR occurs for every . Physical reading: a real exists only for , so TIR is strictly dense-to-rare. Large contrast shrinks (glass in air, ); small contrast pushes it toward (silica core and cladding, ), trapping only near-axial rays. Beyond the transmitted field survives as an evanescent wave. Continuity of the tangential wavevector fixes the in-plane component; the medium-2 dispersion relation then forces the normal component imaginary — an exponential decay set by , with penetration depth .
where: — free-space wavenumber; — amplitude decay constant into the rarer medium; — penetration depth. Physical reading: well above the field dies within a fraction of ; as , and diverges — grazing modes near cutoff reach deep into the cladding and are most vulnerable to bend and cladding loss. The Fresnel coefficient carries the whole "lossless but phase-shifting" story. Past the transmission-angle cosine turns imaginary, so the TE coefficient becomes a ratio of a complex number to its own conjugate — unit modulus, pure phase.
where: — amplitude reflection coefficient for s (TE) polarization; — phase acquired on total reflection. Physical reading: says all power returns, while runs from at toward at grazing — the differing p-phase is why TIR converts linear into elliptical polarization. Guiding closes the loop by demanding self-consistency: a ray that crosses the core, bounces, and returns must reproduce its own transverse phase or interfere itself away. The path phase plus the two bounce phases must total a multiple of , selecting discrete angles labelled by an integer .
where: — core thickness (slab) or diameter scale; — TIR phase per bounce; — mode number. Physical reading: each integer keeping is one guided mode. A thin core or small contrast admits only (single-mode); a thick, high-contrast guide admits many. Finally, the critical angle at the wall reaches back to the input face and fixes how wide a cone of external light can be launched. Combining the guiding condition with refraction at the entrance face gives the numerical aperture.
where: — maximum external acceptance half-angle; — index of the launch medium (air, ). Physical reading: NA depends only on the two indices, not the core size; large contrast gathers a wide cone (multimode), a weakly guiding fibre only near-axial rays (small NA, often single-mode).
The goal is to prove that total internal reflection loses no power at all — not "almost none," but exactly none — for transparent media, by showing the Fresnel amplitude coefficient has unit modulus once the transmission angle turns imaginary. We start from the standard TE coefficient, substitute the beyond-critical geometry that makes imaginary, and read off the magnitude () and the vanishing normal Poynting flux — the result that separates a TIR mirror from every metallic one.
Step 1. Begin with the TE (s-polarization) Fresnel reflection coefficient, from matching tangential and at the interface:
Why: the same coefficient from aq-optics-fresnel-equations — nothing new is assumed; we only follow it past .
Step 2. Above the critical angle Snell's law gives , so the cosine is imaginary, . Write with real :
Why: the sine exceeding one is a signal, not a paradox — the transmitted wave is no longer propagating, and its "angle" stands in for an exponential decay.
Step 3. Numerator and denominator are complex conjugates, so their moduli are equal and the reflectance is
Why: any ratio of the form has unit magnitude, so the reflection is total however far past we go; only the phase, the argument of , keeps changing.
Step 4. Confirm with energy: the time-averaged Poynting component normal to the interface on the transmission side vanishes,
so all incident power is returned. Why: the evanescent field shuttles energy along the surface, but its net flow across the boundary is zero — reflectance stays pinned at unity. *Verified: reduces to the ordinary Fresnel reflectance below , and matches Hecht §4.7 and Saleh & Teich Ch. 6.*
Go deeper · Derivation B · 1 minMode quantization from the transverse-resonance condition
The purpose here is to show how a continuum of trapped ray angles collapses into a discrete ladder of guided modes — the single most important idea linking the ray and wave pictures of a waveguide. We track the phase a ray accumulates on one up-and-down traversal of a symmetric slab core — the transverse path phase plus two TIR bounce phases — and demand it close on itself. Self-consistency holds only at particular angles indexed by an integer ; those are the modes.
Step 1. Resolve the ray's wavevector into a transverse component . Over one round trip of thickness up and back, the transverse path phase is
Why: only the transverse component matters for closing the loop; the along-guide component carries the ray forward.
Step 2. Each of the two bounces adds the TIR phase from equation (4), so the round-trip phase is
Why: the bounce phase is not optional — omitting it gives the naive metal-mirror result and the wrong mode angles.
Step 3. For the transverse field to form a self-reproducing standing pattern, the round-trip phase must be a whole number of cycles:
Why: any other value makes successive traversals interfere destructively — only the discrete resonant angles survive.
Step 4. Counting the integers with gives the number of guided modes, which for a slab scales as
Why: a thin core or small NA leaves room for only (single mode); a thick, high-contrast guide supports many. *Verified: reduces to the standard slab-waveguide eigenvalue equation of Saleh & Teich Ch. 9; the step-index fibre count matches with .*
Limiting cases
How the interface behaves is governed mostly by where the incidence angle sits relative to , and secondarily by the index contrast, which sets both and the numerical aperture.
| Case | Result | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Below critical angle, | A real refracted ray exists; power splits by the Fresnel coefficients. No guiding. | |
| At the critical angle, | The refracted ray grazes (); reflectance climbs to unity and . | |
| Above critical angle, | Total reflection, pure phase shift; the transmitted field is evanescent, . | |
| Small index contrast, | small | Only near-axial rays guided — the weakly guiding single-mode regime. |
| Large index contrast, e.g. Si core, oxide cladding | small, large | Tight confinement, small bend radii; high-index-contrast integrated photonics. |
| Absorbing or scattering cladding | Unity only for real indices; an imaginary index lets the tail deposit power, and bends radiate. |
Worked examples
1 · Critical angle, numerical aperture, and acceptance cone of a step-index fibre (confidence builder)
A step-index fibre has core and cladding , launched from air (). Find the critical angle at the wall, the numerical aperture, and the acceptance cone half-angle.
Step 1. From equation (2), — only shy of grazing. A guided ray must strike the wall steeper than this from the normal, i.e. within of the fibre axis.
Step 2. The numerical aperture, equation (6), depends only on the indices: . The small value flags a weakly guiding fibre — the near-equal indices gather only a narrow cone.
Step 3. The external acceptance half-angle is . Check: the steepest internal ray sits from the axis, and refracting it out gives , matching the NA. Light must arrive within a 14.1° half-angle cone in air to be trapped; anything wider leaks into the cladding.
2 · How deep does the evanescent field reach, and by how much is the wave phase-shifted?
A HeNe beam () undergoes TIR at a glass–air interface (, ) at . Find the penetration depth and the TE reflection phase .
Step 1. Confirm TIR: . The radical is .
Step 2. From equation (3), , about . The field is essentially gone within half a wavelength — close enough that a second glass surface within a few hundred nanometres would frustrate the reflection and let light tunnel across.
Step 3. The TE reflection phase, equation (4): with and , the argument is , so — nonzero and angle-dependent, unlike a metal mirror's fixed shift, and (because the p-phase differs) what lets a Fresnel rhomb make circular polarization. The evanescent field reaches ≈ 285 nm into the air and the wave returns with a −36.9° phase.
3 · Single-mode versus multimode: the V-number
For the fibre of example 1 () at , find the largest single-mode core radius, and the mode count if instead .
Step 1. A step-index fibre is single-mode for (the first zero of ), so , a core diameter near .
Step 2. With , , and by Derivation 2 the mode count is . So this high-NA fibre needs a tiny core to stay single-mode; real telecom fibre uses a smaller NA () so the core can be a manufacturable . Single-mode operation trades index contrast against core size — high NA forces a tiny core.
Physics of the portrait
Total internal reflection is one of optics' oldest observations and its guiding application one of the most consequential — yet the two were separated by more than a century, and the first person to bend a beam of light along a curving path is not the name most textbooks remember.
Origins · 1 minDaniel Colladon and how this was discovered
The Geneva physicist Daniel Colladon set out in 1841 to make the internal jets of his fluid experiments visible, and gave the first demonstration of light guided by total internal reflection. He let water arc from a tank through a spout and shone sunlight down the nozzle bore; the light, striking the curving air–water surface always above the critical angle, followed the falling stream and glowed at its far end — his "fontaine lumineuse," the light fountain (published 1842). John Tyndall repeated and popularized the water-jet experiment at London's Royal Institution in 1854, and for generations the effect was mis-credited to him. The guiding idea then lay largely dormant until the twentieth century: cladded glass fibres in the 1950s (Kapany coined "fibre optics"), and the decisive 1966 argument of Charles Kao and George Hockham that purified silica could carry telecommunications, for which Kao shared the 2009 Nobel Prize. The same TIR Colladon watched in a fountain now carries the world's data beneath the oceans.
Going further
Texts. Hecht, Optics, 5th ed., §4.7 · Saleh & Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 and Ch. 9 (waveguides) · Born & Wolf, Principles of Optics, §1.5 (evanescent waves) · Foot, Atomic Physics (atom mirrors) · Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light · Demtröder, Laser Spectroscopy (fibre and waveguide sections).
Provenance. Check the critical angle, unit-modulus Fresnel coefficient, decay constant, and reflection phase against Hecht §4.7 and Saleh & Teich Ch. 6; the mode condition and numerical aperture against Saleh & Teich Ch. 9. A verifier should recompute , confirm above , verify , and check with the cutoff . The worked numbers (, ; , ; modes) were recomputed here; fibre loss ( dB/km at 1550 nm) and silicon/silica indices () are standard, and the Colladon 1841 priority over Tyndall 1854 is documented.
Builds on: Snell's Law and Refraction · Fresnel Equations · Plane-Wave Solutions of Maxwell's Equations. Leads to: Numerical Aperture and Acceptance Angle · Waveguide Modes and the Wave Equation · Step-Index and Graded-Index Optical Fibres · Coupled-Mode Theory and Directional Couplers · Fibre Attenuation and Loss Mechanisms.
Ask the tutor: Ask me to walk through the transverse-resonance condition for a specific fibre and watch the discrete mode angles fall out of the phase-closure requirement.
Why can total internal reflection only happen going from a denser to a rarer medium?
Because the critical angle needs a real value, requiring , i.e. . Refraction bends a ray away from the normal only when it enters a lower-index medium, so only then can the refracted ray reach grazing () and disappear. Going into a higher-index medium the refracted ray bends toward the normal and always exists — transmission never shuts off, so TIR never occurs. Light inside water or glass can be trapped; light in air hitting glass never is.
If total internal reflection sends back 100% of the power, how can there be any field in the cladding?
The two statements live at different levels. The power balance is total — the time-averaged energy crossing the interface is zero — but the field cannot simply stop at a boundary, because Maxwell's equations demand continuity of the tangential components. The resolution is an evanescent wave: a field that oscillates, travels along the surface, and decays as into the rarer medium. Its net Poynting flux across the boundary averages to zero, so the reflectance stays exactly one. "Total" describes the energy, not the field.
Is total internal reflection ever actually lossless, or is that an idealization?
It is exactly lossless only when both indices are perfectly real — both media transparent at the wavelength — where Derivation 1 gives unit reflectance. Real systems fall short three ways: absorption in the cladding gives it an imaginary index, so the evanescent tail deposits a little power on each bounce; scattering from roughness diverts light; and a bend lets the evanescent field detach and radiate. Even so, ultrapure silica comes remarkably close — a few tenths of a dB per kilometre, orders of magnitude better than any metallic mirror over the same path.
How is a TIR mirror different from an ordinary metal mirror?
Three ways. Efficiency: a good metal mirror reflects 95–98% and absorbs the rest, whereas TIR in transparent media returns 100%. Phase: a metal imposes a nearly fixed shift, but the TIR phase grows with angle and differs between polarizations — the basis of the Fresnel rhomb. And the far field: a metal screens it with real currents, while TIR leaves a genuine evanescent field reaching into the rarer medium — available for sensing and the reason TIR mirrors can be "frustrated."
What is the Goos–Hänchen shift, and does light really enter the rarer medium?
When a finite beam undergoes TIR it does not bounce from a sharp plane; it re-emerges shifted slightly sideways along the surface, by a fraction of a wavelength. This is the Goos–Hänchen shift, measured by Fritz Goos and Hilde Hänchen in 1947. Its origin is the angle-dependent reflection phase : the plane-wave components of a real beam pick up slightly different phases, and summing them displaces the reflected beam as though it had dipped into the rarer medium and come back. So in a real sense the light does enter the cladding — the evanescent field is where it spends that brief excursion — even though no net energy is transmitted.
If TIR is lossless, why do bends in an optical fibre cause loss?
A bend breaks the geometry that made TIR total. On a straight guide every trapped ray hits the wall above and reflects. When the fibre curves, the effective incidence angle on the outer wall drops, and rays only marginally above fall below it and refract out. Equivalently, the evanescent tail on the outside of the bend would have to outrun light to keep up, so it detaches and radiates. The tighter the bend and the closer a mode is to cutoff, the worse the leakage — which is why fibres specify a minimum bend radius, and high-index-contrast waveguides, with their small , tolerate much sharper turns.