Lifetime, Linewidth, and Natural Broadening
Tune a laser across the sodium D line and you discover something an energy-level diagram never told you: the "line" is not a line. It is a little hill, about ten megahertz wide, with sharp Gaussian shoulders if the vapor is warm and long, lazy wings that refuse to die away. Cool the atoms, cancel the Doppler shifts, and the hill does not collapse to a spike. A floor remains: the natural linewidth, and no experimental cleverness gets under it. This article is about that floor. The physics is one Fourier fact wearing several costumes: an excited state that survives only a time radiates a wave train that rings down in a time , and a truncated ring-down cannot have a single frequency. We derive the exact consequence — exponential decay transforms into a Lorentzian profile of full width — then push the same integral further than the textbooks usually do: we compute what a spectrometer sees when it watches for only half a lifetime, two, ten, and watch the sinc-ridged profile relax onto the Lorentzian. That crossover is the daily bread of atomic clocks. Along the way we assemble the rate bookkeeping: why a level's width sums the rates of all its exit channels, why a line carries the widths of both its levels, and how the numbers ladder from Lyman-α (100 MHz) through the Mössbauer standard (nano-eV) to millihertz strontium clock lines. The rigorous decay theory behind the exponential is owned elsewhere and cited; here you learn to read every linewidth as a stopwatch.
- A state with population decay has lifetime ; its amplitude evolves as the damped phasor .
- Its power spectrum is exactly Lorentzian: the FWHM is in angular-frequency units, equivalently and .
- A level's population-decay rate sums all its allowed exit rates, ; for a transition between levels and , the natural angular-frequency linewidth is .
- A finite watch gives a Fourier-limited profile: FWHM at , at , at — computed exactly below.
- Doppler broadening buries the natural width (×305 for room-temperature Lyman-α) but can be engineered away; the natural floor cannot.
- Key idea: exponential decay in time and a Lorentzian line in frequency are one object seen through the two ends of a Fourier transform — the lifetime and linewidth are reciprocal scales, with .
A state with lifetime radiates a wave train that rings down in time , and its spectrum is therefore an exact Lorentzian of width : decay rate and linewidth are the same number read in two Fourier-conjugate domains.
Where this lives today
The natural linewidth is the currency of precision measurement. Optical atomic clocks run on transitions with pathologically small : the Sr clock line at 698 nm has a natural width near one millihertz (), and lattice clocks resolving fractions of it reach fractional uncertainty. The interrogation crossover derived above is their daily engineering reality: seconds of coherent probing are needed before the measured line approaches the floor — which is why clock lasers must themselves be stabilized to hertz-level linewidths. The same physics runs both directions in the quantum-optics lab: the natural width sets the bandwidth and temporal shape of single photons from atoms and quantum dots, and a cavity changes (the Purcell effect) — the linewidth belongs to the atom plus its electromagnetic environment. In astrophysics the Lorentzian damping wings of Lyman-α shape galaxy absorption spectra; in nuclear metrology the 4.7 neV Mössbauer width of ⁵⁷Fe registers a building's worth of gravitational redshift.
The physical picture
Strike a bell and listen. The pitch is definite while the tone lasts, but the tone does not last. A Fourier analyzer reports a distribution of frequencies, centred on the pitch, whose width is the reciprocal of the ring-down time: a short clang is broad, a sustained hum narrow. An excited atom is a bell struck once — its dipole oscillates at while the excited amplitude drains at rate , and the emitted light carries exactly that damped waveform.
The shape matters as much as the width. A single exponential decay produces a Lorentzian — algebraic wings that outlive any Gaussian: far from line centre, where the Doppler core has vanished, the damping wings of strong stellar lines are Lorentzian physics. And the And the line shape warns against interpreting the heuristic relation as the standard deviation of a Lorentzian energy distribution: the Lorentzian is so heavy-tailed that its second moment, and hence its standard deviation, diverges — the appropriate quantitative statements are the FWHM relations derived below, together with the orthogonalization-time bounds associated with the Mandelstam–Tamm relation. There is a second, more modern picture: the linewidth as an interrogation budget. The Lorentzian is what you record after watching forever; a finite window gives a ridged, broad profile narrowing as until, around ten lifetimes, it settles onto the floor. The figure below is computed from the finite-time Fourier transform: the same emitter has an FWHM of at and at , where denotes the natural FWHM. Clock builders live on this curve — a millihertz line is useless without the seconds of coherent watching that resolve it.
Finally, the ladder of magnitudes. Natural widths are fractionally tiny — of order parts in for some allowed optical lines — and can become dramatically smaller for weak or forbidden electric-dipole transitions. For an electric-dipole transition, the spontaneous-emission rate scales as , making it strongly suppressed by both small transition dipole moments and low transition frequencies. That is a resource: precision measurement is the art of choosing states that refuse to decay.
The working objects: rates, lifetimes, and conversions
Everything hangs on one empirical law and the amplitude behind it. An undisturbed excited population decays exponentially — what a delayed-coincidence photon counter actually records — with a rate built from the spontaneous rates of every open channel. The deep reason the decay is exponential (and when it is not) belongs to Survival Amplitude and Decay of Unstable States; here we spend the working law.
where: is the probability amplitude for finding the atom in the excited state, is the total population decay rate of the excited state, and is the Einstein coefficient for spontaneous emission into the final state , with . Physically, the total decay rate is determined by all open decay channels, so a fast ultraviolet decay channel can broaden the level even when the transition being observed is in the red. The radiating amplitude carries half the population-decay exponent because , while the excited-state probability decays as . This factor of two is a common source of errors in linewidth calculations:
where: — the Bohr frequency of the transition being watched; — the decay starts when the state is prepared. This damped phasor is the Weisskopf-Wigner ansatz: in the quantum theory of radiation it emerges as the resummed solution of the atom-field coupling, repairing the naive first-order probability that grows linearly forever. Its rigorous credentials — when a spectrum yields exact exponential decay, and where the quadratic and power-law eras hide — are Survival Amplitude and Decay of Unstable States' property; we use the ansatz as every laser lab does. Experimentalists quote linewidths in hertz — and slips are endemic — so keep the dictionary at hand:
where: the three widths are one Lorentzian measured in angular frequency, ordinary frequency, and energy. A 1.6 ns lifetime is but MHz — a factor-6.28 slip that has survived referees. The energy version, , is the honest "energy-time uncertainty" of a decaying state: an equality about a distribution's FWHM, not a bound involving a time operator (there is none — The Energy-Time Uncertainty Relation owns that argument, and Pauli's proof of it).
We want the spectrum a spectrometer records from a decaying emitter, twice over. First the classic result: Fourier-transform the damped phasor over an infinite window and obtain an exact Lorentzian whose FWHM is the decay rate — the lifetime-linewidth theorem. Then the part this article owns: redo the same integral with a finite watching window and extract how the measured width relaxes from the Fourier-limited regime onto the natural floor. The strategy is one convergent integral and one modulus squared; the thing to watch is where versus enters — the amplitude decays at half the population rate.
Step 1. Write the emitted field as the causal damped phasor for and zero before, and define the detuning . Its Fourier transform is elementary,
convergent precisely because the state decays. Why the lower limit is zero. The atom is prepared at ; there is no field before. Causality truncates the integral — and that truncation is what forbids a delta-function spectrum.
Step 2. The spectrometer records the modulus squared:
Phase information cancels; a Lorentzian centred on the Bohr frequency survives.
Step 3. Half-maximum points: falls to half its peak at , so
Why Lorentzian and not Gaussian. A Gaussian needs a spread of centre frequencies (Doppler); one emitter with one decay constant transforms to the Lorentzian with its algebraic wings.
Step 4. Now watch for only a window — cut the integral off. The same arithmetic gives the closed form
The Lorentzian denominator remains, while the finite observation window introduces oscillations with a characteristic period . These side lobes arise from the sharp temporal cutoff and reduce to the familiar profile in the short-time limit.
Step 5. Extract the measured FWHM numerically. Short window: decay is negligible, and the Fourier-limited FWHM is approximately , the FWHM of the profile. Long window: the ripples die under and the Lorentzian survives. The crossover, computed: FWHM at , at , at — ten lifetimes of coherent watching recover the floor to one percent.
The energy reading: what the line "knows" about the state
A spectral line is also an energy histogram: expand the decaying state over the exact stationary states of atom-plus-field, and the survival amplitude is the Fourier transform of the energy distribution — the Krylov-Fock master formula that Survival Amplitude and Decay of Unstable States owns — so the observed decay determines the distribution:
where: — normalized energy distribution of the decaying state; — the nominal level position; — its FWHM. An unstable "level" is a Lorentzian band of true stationary states, and the emitted line photographs the band.
Go deeper · Derivation B · 1 minThe energy distribution of a decaying state
We show that exponential decay produces a Lorentzian energy distribution with the exact relation , and clarify what this relation does and does not imply about "energy-time uncertainty." The route inverts the lineshape derivation: start from the survival amplitude as the Fourier transform of an unknown energy distribution, and invert. The subtlety worth watching: the resulting distribution's wings are so heavy that its variance diverges, so standard-deviation statements must be handled with care, not folklore.
Step 1. The survival amplitude is the Fourier transform of the energy distribution, — the spectral theorem the decay article owns. Imposing with a pure phase fixes .
Step 2. Invert the transform. The Fourier transform of the two-sided exponential decay is straightforward:
Why this is the same Lorentzian as the lineshape. The emitted photon inherits the energy bookkeeping of the state that made it: line profile and level energy-distribution are Fourier images of the same decay.
Step 3. Read off the exact product. The FWHM is and , so .
Step 4. Try to compute the standard deviation and fail informatively: diverges (checked symbolically). The Lorentzian has no finite , so standard-deviation-based uncertainty bounds cannot be applied directly to this distribution; the divergent second moment is the relevant point here. The FWHM dictionary of Step 3 is the statement with content.
Every open door widens the line
Two pieces of bookkeeping make the theorem laboratory-grade. Levels: independent channel rates add — equation (1); the branching ratio says how often each door is taken, but every observed line reflects the sum. Lines: if the lower level is itself unstable, the dipole coherence decays at the sum of the two half-rates.
where: , — total decay rates of upper and lower level. A transition between two broad levels is broader than either. This is why the strontium clock line pairs a ground state with a doubly forbidden excited state — both widths near zero — and why Forbidden Transitions: Magnetic Dipole and Electric Quadrupole is this article's natural sequel.
Go deeper · Derivation C · 1 minWhy the line width adds the widths of both levels
The claim: for independently decaying upper and lower levels with rates and , the transition has a Lorentzian full width , not and not simply the larger of the two rates. The strategy is to identify the object whose transform is the line: not a population but the dipole coherence between the two amplitudes, each carrying its own half-rate damping. The pitfall is squaring too early — the rates add in the amplitude product first.
Step 1. The radiated field is proportional to the dipole coherence ; each amplitude damps at half its level's rate, , .
Step 2. Multiply: . The half-rates add in the exponent, so decay of either level contributes to the loss of coherence.
Step 3. This has the same damped-phasor form as the lineshape derived above, with , so the spectrum is Lorentzian with
Why a ground state contributes zero. No decay channel means : the line width collapses to the upper-level width — the default case in tables.
Limiting cases
| case | result | meaning |
|---|---|---|
| isolated atom, watched forever | Lorentzian, FWHM | the natural floor; no experiment gets below it |
| finite window | FWHM , sinc-ridged | Fourier-limited: the apparatus sets the width |
| warm vapor | Gaussian, width | Doppler; ≈ 305 × natural for H Lyman-α at 300 K |
| natural + Doppler | Voigt profile | Gaussian core, Lorentzian wings — wings are always natural/collisional |
| buffer gas | Lorentzian, width | phase-interrupting collisions, same Fourier logic |
| lower level also decays | FWHM | coherence dies with either partner |
| (metastability) | line sharpens toward a delta function | the stationary-state limit — the clock builder's grail |
Worked examples
Example 1 — Lyman-α end to end: from a rate to a wavelength smear. The hydrogen level decays only to , at — the flagship number of Spontaneous Emission and the Einstein A Coefficient, re-derived from the radial integral in this article's verification script. Find the lifetime, linewidth, wavelength width, and the Doppler comparison.
Step 1. Lifetime: — set entirely by .
Step 2. Natural width: . Against Hz that is .
Step 3. Wavelength width at nm: . No grating spectrograph resolves that.
Step 4. Doppler at 300 K: — a factor ≈ 305 above natural. The natural line hides under the thermal Gaussian until you cool, trap, or Doppler-cancel.
Example 2 — the hydrogen 3p ledger: one level, two lines, one width. The level has two E1 exit doors: (Lyman-β) at and (an Hα component) at — both computed from first-principles radial integrals in the verification script (matching NIST to 0.1%). Find the level width, branching, and both line widths, given that decays only by two-photon emission at .
Step 1. Total rate: , so .
Step 2. Branching: of decays produce the Lyman- line, while produce the H line.
Step 3. Lyman- linewidth: the level is stable on this timescale, so .
Step 4. H-component width: the level adds , which is negligible compared with , so this component has essentially the same linewidth, . The minority line is essentially as broad as the majority line: the linewidth is determined primarily by the decay rates of the participating levels, not by the branching ratio. And the freakish narrowness of the door (0.12 s lifetime) is forbidden-transition physics — why cannot take a one-photon exit at all is owned by Forbidden Transitions: Magnetic Dipole and Electric Quadrupole.
Origins · 1 minNatural Linewidth and how this was discovered
The natural linewidth taught quantum theory to talk about decay honestly. Lorentz's classical damped oscillator already gave a Lorentzian, but only in 1930 did Victor Weisskopf, then a doctoral student, and Eugene Wigner compute the shape from Dirac's new radiation theory — feeding the decay back into the amplitude so a linearly growing perturbative probability became a clean exponential with a Lorentzian spectrum of width . The calculation quietly standardized a complex self-energy, a level shift alongside the width (the seed of the Lamb-shift industry seventeen years later), and the reading of an unstable state as a resonance band of true stationary states. Every linewidth in every atomic-data table since is a Weisskopf-Wigner number.
Going further
References. Griffiths & Schroeter, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., Ch. 11 · Sakurai & Napolitano, Modern Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Ch. 5 · Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light, 3rd ed., Ch. 2 · Cohen-Tannoudji, Diu & Laloë, Vol. II, Ch. XIII · Weisskopf & Wigner, Z. Phys. 63, 54 (1930) · Foot, Atomic Physics, Ch. 7-8. The decay-rate formula is the standard Einstein-/Weisskopf–Wigner result. Key checks: the Fourier transform yields the Lorentzian with FWHM ; the energy distribution satisfies ; and for with one obtains and , consistent with the standard sodium-D lifetime of .
Builds on: Fermi's Golden Rule · First-Order Transition Amplitudes and Probabilities · Absorption and Stimulated Emission · The Dipole Approximation. Leads to: Semiclassical Theory of Atom–Radiation Interaction · Harmonic (Sinusoidal) Perturbations and Resonance.
Does the natural width ever dominate in a real experiment, given Doppler is hundreds of times larger?
Yes, routinely — that is what "Doppler-free" methods are for. Saturated-absorption spectroscopy, two-photon spectroscopy with counter-propagating beams, atomic beams observed at right angles, and laser-cooled samples all cancel or remove the thermal shifts, and the recorded profile collapses to the natural Lorentzian (plus residual collisional and transit-time effects). Every hyperfine interval quoted to kHz was measured under the Doppler floor.
Why does the amplitude decay at Γ/2 but the probability at Γ?
Probability is the amplitude squared: |e^{−Γt/2}|² = e^{−Γt}. But it is the amplitude that interferes and radiates — which is why the coherence between two decaying levels damps at (Γ_e+Γ_g)/2 and the line width comes out Γ_e+Γ_g.
Is exponential decay exact? The derivation seems to assume it.
An approximation — extraordinarily good in the middle. The exact survival probability starts quadratically (the Zeno era), runs exponentially for many lifetimes, then crosses to a power law when the spectrum's lower edge asserts itself (Khalfin's theorem). Survival Amplitude and Decay of Unstable States owns that three-era anatomy and the statement that a Lorentzian band gives exact exponential decay while a physical, bounded-below spectrum is Lorentzian only in the middle. For linewidths the middle is all that matters.
What exactly does a "1 mHz natural linewidth" mean for a clock transition nobody can watch for 1000 seconds?
It means the floor is 1 mHz; the measured line is Fourier-limited by the interrogation time, exactly as in the crossover figure. A 1 s probe gives a roughly hertz-wide feature; longer coherent probes narrow it toward the floor. Clock development is therefore as much about ultra-stable lasers (keeping the probe coherent) as about the atom.
Do collisions and Doppler broadening also come from a Fourier transform?
Yes — same theorem, different truncation. Phase-interrupting collisions chop the wave train into random segments of mean length τ_coll, giving a Lorentzian of width ≈ 2/τ_coll. Doppler broadening is different in kind: each atom emits its narrow line at a thermally shifted centre, giving a Gaussian inhomogeneous profile. Convolving the two gives the Voigt profile: Gaussian core, Lorentzian wings.
Why does the same Γ show up in the decay curve, the linewidth, and the Breit-Wigner resonance shape?
All three are Fourier views of one pole. A quasi-bound state at complex energy E_r − iΓ/2 decays as e^{−Γt}, emits a Lorentzian of FWHM Γ, and scatters with the Breit-Wigner profile T(E) ≈ (Γ/2)²/((E−E_r)²+(Γ/2)²) — Resonant Transmission and Tunnelling Resonances derives that form and reads its width as the trapped state's lifetime τ = ħ/Γ, the dictionary Conservation of Normalization plants as early as the optical-potential model.