Facilitated Diffusion

A red blood cell takes up glucose from plasma. It does so roughly 50,000 times faster than a synthetic lipid vesicle of the same size would allow. Glucose is polar and moderately large. It cannot slip through the hydrophobic core of the Lipid Bilayer at any useful rate. This holds true even for a cell burning sugar every second. Yet glucose crosses the erythrocyte membrane in milliseconds. It always moves from high concentration in blood to lower concentration inside the cell. No energy is spent in this process. This is facilitated diffusion. It is passive transport accelerated and made possible by specific membrane proteins. The puzzle it solves is fundamental. Cells must import and export polar and charged molecules. These include sugars, amino acids, ions, and nucleotides. They must move far faster than the bilayer alone permits. But cells cannot pay the metabolic cost of active pumping. This is especially true when the concentration gradient already favors the desired direction of flow. Facilitated diffusion is the cell's answer. Dedicated transport proteins, called channels and carriers, provide a solution. They offer a hydrophilic path or a shape-changing shuttle across the membrane. This lowers the effective activation energy for crossing. It does not alter the thermodynamics of the process. The direction of net flow is still dictated entirely by the electrochemical gradient. This is exactly as in Simple Diffusion Across Membranes. The protein changes the rate, never the direction. This matters because it bridges two key ideas. It connects the bilayer's near-impermeability to polar solutes with the cell's need for exchange. That exchange must be rapid, regulated, and selective. This explains why red blood cells absorb glucose fast enough to support anaerobic glycolysis. It explains why neurons can rapidly restore ion gradients between action potentials. It also explains why kidney tubule cells can reclaim filtered nutrients efficiently. It sets up a deeper distinction, developed later. That distinction is between channels, which form pores, and carriers, which alternate conformations. This article introduces that distinction but does not exhaust it. This article works through the molecular mechanism of carrier-mediated and channel-mediated facilitated diffusion. It covers the kinetic signature — saturation — that distinguishes it from simple diffusion. It covers the classic experiments that proved proteins, not lipid solubility, govern glucose and ion transport. It also presents two worked quantitative examples. These show how to reason about transport rates and gradients.

Key takeaways
  • Facilitated diffusion moves polar/charged solutes down their electrochemical gradient using membrane transport proteins — no ATP required.
  • Two protein classes do the job: channels (aqueous pores, ion-selective, gated) and carriers/transporters (conformational "revolving door," solute-specific).
  • Unlike simple diffusion, facilitated diffusion is saturable — the rate plateaus at high solute concentration because a finite number of transporters exist (Michaelis–Menten-like kinetics).
  • The GLUT1 glucose transporter and the erythrocyte anion exchanger were the founding examples; classic transport kinetics (competitive inhibition, saturation, stereospecificity) proved a protein carrier was responsible before any structure was known.
  • Direction of net flux is set entirely by the gradient — the protein never pumps against it; that job belongs to active transport.
  • This concept sets up Ion Channels and Carrier Proteins, where gating, selectivity filters, and electrophysiology are treated in depth.
The core insight

Facilitated diffusion uses specific membrane proteins to speed the passive, energy-independent movement of polar or charged solutes strictly down their existing electrochemical gradient.

The core idea

Facilitated diffusion is transport that is passive (no metabolic energy input, net flux always downhill) but protein-mediated (requiring a specific integral membrane protein rather than direct partition into lipid). It sits conceptually between simple diffusion — where small nonpolar or very small polar molecules (O₂, CO₂, water in some tissues) cross unaided — and active transport, where a pump uses ATP hydrolysis or a pre-existing ion gradient to move a solute against its own gradient. The defining criteria are: (1) the solute is too polar, charged, or bulky to cross the bilayer at biologically useful rates on its own; (2) a specific transmembrane protein provides the path; (3) net movement always proceeds from higher to lower electrochemical potential; (4) no direct coupling to ATP hydrolysis or to an ion's downhill flux occurs — the protein is a facilitator of equilibration, not a motor. Two structurally and mechanistically distinct classes of protein accomplish this. Channels form a continuous or nearly continuous aqueous pore through the membrane; when open, ions or small molecules diffuse through at extremely high rates — up to 10⁸ ions per second per channel — limited mainly by diffusion through the pore itself, and channels do not need to change shape for every molecule that passes. Carriers (also called transporters or permeases) never form an open pore spanning the whole membrane at once; instead they bind solute on one side, undergo a conformational change, and release it on the other side, cycling through alternating "outward-open" and "inward-open" states. Carriers are much slower than channels — typically 10² to 10⁴ solute molecules per second per carrier — because each transport event requires a full protein conformational cycle rather than simple diffusion through an open pore. Both classes share the kinetic signature that distinguishes facilitated diffusion from simple diffusion through lipid: saturability. Simple diffusion rate rises linearly with solute concentration without limit (Fick's law). Facilitated diffusion rate rises with concentration only up to a maximum, V_max, because the finite population of transporter proteins becomes fully occupied — a Michaelis–Menten relationship formally identical to enzyme kinetics, with a characteristic K_m (the concentration giving half-maximal rate) reflecting the carrier's affinity for its solute.

Mechanism

Channel-mediated facilitated diffusion. An ion channel is built from one or more transmembrane polypeptides that assemble to enclose a water-filled pore. The pore's diameter and the electrostatic character of its lining (rings of carbonyl oxygens, charged side chains) impose selectivity — the potassium channel's selectivity filter, for example, is lined by backbone carbonyl oxygens spaced to mimic K⁺'s hydration shell, allowing K⁺ through while excluding the smaller Na⁺ (whose hydration shell is not matched, so dehydrating it costs too much energy). Once open, ions move through by simple electrodiffusion — no conformational change is needed per ion, so flux rates are enormous. Most channels are gated: they open and close in response to a stimulus (a bound ligand, a change in transmembrane voltage, or mechanical force), which is how the cell controls when the passive pathway is available rather than controlling direction, since direction is always set by the electrochemical gradient. This gating is developed fully in Ion Channels and Carrier Proteins.

Carrier-mediated facilitated diffusion — the alternating-access mechanism. A carrier protein such as GLUT1 has a single solute-binding site buried within the protein, accessible alternately from the outside or the inside, never from both simultaneously. The cycle: 1. The carrier is in an outward-open conformation; the binding site faces the extracellular solution. 2. Glucose binds the site with stereospecific contacts (hydrogen bonds to specific hydroxyls — GLUT1 discriminates D-glucose from L-glucose by roughly 500-fold). 3. Binding triggers a conformational change — a rocking or rotation of transmembrane helix bundles — that closes access from outside and opens access to the inside (the "rocker-switch" or "alternating-access" mechanism). 4. Glucose, now facing the lower intracellular concentration, dissociates into the cytosol. 5. The empty carrier relaxes back to the outward-open state, ready for another cycle. Because binding and release both depend on concentration on each side, the net direction of transport is simply whichever direction has more empty/filled sites driving flux — determined entirely by the concentration difference, exactly as thermodynamics requires. No step in this cycle consumes ATP; the free energy released by glucose moving down its gradient is what drives the conformational cycling, not the reverse. The kinetics that fall out of this model match Michaelis–Menten enzyme kinetics almost exactly, because carrier transport is formally a single-substrate, no-catalysis "reaction":

v = V_max·[S] / (K_m + [S]) At low [S], v rises linearly with [S] (mimicking simple diffusion's slope, but usually far steeper because of the boosted rate). At [S] ≫ K_m, v plateaus at V_max as every carrier is occupied. Competitive inhibitors (molecules resembling the true substrate) raise the apparent K_m without changing V_max, precisely as they do for enzymes — and this analogy was one of the historical clues that a specific protein, not bulk lipid solubility, was responsible for glucose entry into cells.

Figure
Carrier-mediated facilitated diffusion: the alternating-access cycle for a glucose transporter
GLUT1-type carrier: alternating access extracellular space cytosol 1. outward-open glucose binds 2. occluded conformational shift 3. inward-open glucose released 4. empty carrier resets to state 1 cycle repeats — direction of net flux set only by [glucose]out vs [glucose]in
Figure
Kinetics: facilitated diffusion saturates, simple diffusion does not
Transport rate vs solute concentration solute concentration [S] rate of transport (v) simple diffusion (linear, no limit) facilitated diffusion (saturates at Vmax) Vmax Km ½Vmax

The evidence

The idea that specific proteins — not merely lipid solubility — mediate glucose entry into cells rests on a body of transport kinetics assembled well before any transporter was purified or crystallized, together with classic experiments that ruled out simple partitioning as the mechanism.

Overton and the lipid-solubility rule, and its glaring exception. In the 1890s, Charles Ernest Overton showed that the rate at which molecules entered plant cells correlated with their lipid solubility (measured as the oil/water partition coefficient) — the empirical foundation of the fluid bilayer model of membrane permeability. But glucose, a polar, water-soluble hexose with negligible lipid solubility, entered red blood cells and other cells thousands of times faster than its partition coefficient predicted. This mismatch — a molecule crossing far faster than its physical chemistry allowed by simple partition — was the first clue that something other than the lipid itself was responsible.

Wilbrand and Widdas: saturation kinetics. In the 1950s, William Widdas studied glucose uptake into human and sheep erythrocytes and, extending earlier work by Wilbrand, showed that the rate of glucose entry did not increase linearly with external glucose concentration. Instead it rose steeply at low concentrations and then leveled off toward a maximum rate as concentration increased further — a hyperbolic saturation curve mathematically identical to a Michaelis–Menten enzyme plot. Simple diffusion through lipid predicts no such ceiling: flux should keep rising linearly with concentration difference. Saturation demonstrated that a finite number of specific binding/transport sites exist in the membrane, becoming fully occupied at high glucose concentration — exactly the behavior expected of a carrier protein and impossible for unassisted partition into a homogeneous lipid phase.

Stereospecificity. Widdas and later LeFevre showed that the erythrocyte glucose transport system strongly favors D-glucose over its mirror-image isomer L-glucose — by roughly two orders of magnitude in affinity — even though the two isomers have identical solubility in lipid. A lipid bilayer, being achiral, cannot distinguish stereoisomers; a bilayer's permeability to D-glucose and L-glucose should be essentially the same. The dramatic stereospecific preference could only be explained by a chiral protein binding site making specific, geometrically precise contacts with the sugar — direct evidence for a protein, not a lipid pathway.

Competitive inhibition (countertransport and cross-inhibition). Structurally related sugars (for example, D-galactose or 2-deoxy-D-glucose) were shown to inhibit glucose transport competitively: raising the concentration of the competing sugar increased the apparent K_m for glucose without changing V_max, the classic enzyme-kinetic signature of two substrates competing for the same limited number of binding sites. Widdas's "countertransport" experiments went further: he pre-loaded cells with a nonmetabolized sugar analog and showed that its efflux could transiently accelerate the net uptake of a second sugar in the opposite direction — a phenomenon (trans-stimulation/countertransport) that only makes mechanistic sense if a single carrier alternates between inward- and outward-facing states carrying either sugar, precisely as the alternating-access model later predicted. Simple diffusion offers no basis for one solute's outward movement to accelerate another's inward movement.

Biochemical isolation. In the 1970s, the glucose transporter of the human erythrocyte membrane (now called GLUT1) was solubilized, purified, and reconstituted into synthetic lipid vesicles by several groups, including work associated with Gustav Kreutzberg-era biochemistry and more directly the labs of Peter Hinkle and later Mike Mueckler, who cloned and sequenced GLUT1 in 1985. Vesicles reconstituted with the purified protein displayed saturable, stereospecific, cytochalasin B-inhibitable glucose transport indistinguishable from that of intact red cells — while protein-free control vesicles showed only slow, non-saturable, non-specific glucose permeation. This reconstitution experiment is the direct, sufficient-condition proof: adding a single purified protein species to pure lipid bilayers is enough to confer all the hallmark kinetic properties of facilitated glucose diffusion, closing the causal loop opened by Overton's original anomaly nearly a century earlier.

Cytochalasin B and other selective inhibitors later gave a pharmacological tool that binds specifically to the glucose-carrier's inward-facing conformation and blocks transport at nanomolar concentrations without perturbing the bilayer generally — further confirming that a discrete, druggable protein site, not the bulk membrane, is responsible. Together, these lines of evidence — the historical solubility anomaly, hyperbolic saturation kinetics, stereospecificity, competitive inhibition, countertransport, and successful reconstitution of transport activity from a single purified protein — constitute the classical proof that facilitated diffusion is a distinct, protein-catalyzed mode of passive transport.

Worked examples

Example 1 — Estimating K_m and V_max for a carrier from initial-rate data (a Lineweaver–Burk-style problem). Suppose glucose uptake into a suspension of erythrocytes is measured at several external glucose concentrations (initial rates, arbitrary units of mmol glucose per liter of packed cells per minute):

[Glucose]out (mM)Initial rate v
12.5
57.7
1010.0
2012.0
4013.3

Using the double-reciprocal (Lineweaver–Burk) transform, 1/v vs 1/[S], the data should fall on a straight line with slope K_m/V_max and y-intercept 1/V_max. Fitting these points gives approximately:

  • V_max ≈ 15 units
  • K_m ≈ 4 mM

Physiological blood glucose is roughly 5 mM, meaning red cells normally operate at a concentration close to K_m — near the steepest, most sensitive part of the saturation curve, where small changes in blood glucose translate into substantial changes in uptake rate. This is a functionally sensible operating point: it lets erythrocyte glucose uptake respond sensitively to physiological swings in blood sugar (fasting ~4 mM, postprandial ~7–8 mM) rather than being either negligibly slow or already saturated at V_max regardless of blood glucose level. If a competitive inhibitor (say, 2-deoxyglucose) is added, the same experiment would show an increased apparent K_m (say, to 8 mM) with V_max unchanged — the diagnostic pattern for competition at the same binding site, distinguishing this from an uncompetitive or noncompetitive inhibitor (which would instead reduce V_max).

Example 2 — Direction of K⁺ flux through an open channel: reasoning with the Nernst equation. A neuron has:

  • Intracellular [K⁺] = 140 mM
  • Extracellular [K⁺] = 5 mM
  • Membrane potential (V_m) = −70 mV (inside relative to outside)
  • Temperature = 37 °C (310 K)

First calculate the K⁺ equilibrium potential (E_K) using the Nernst equation:

E_K = (RT/zF) · ln([K⁺]out/[K⁺]in) At 37 °C, RT/F ≈ 26.7 mV, and for K⁺ (z = +1): E_K = 26.7 mV × ln(5/140) = 26.7 mV × (−3.33) ≈ −89 mV Convert to log₁₀ form for a check: 61.5 mV × log₁₀(5/140) = 61.5 × (−1.447) ≈ −89 mV. Consistent. The actual membrane potential is −70 mV, which is less negative than E_K (−89 mV). Because V_m (−70 mV) sits above E_K (−89 mV), the electrochemical driving force on K⁺ (V_m − E_K = −70 − (−89) = +19 mV) is positive, meaning net K⁺ flux through any open K⁺ channel will be outward — K⁺ ions leak out of the cell down their combined concentration and electrical gradient until V_m falls back toward E_K. This is exactly the passive, protein-mediated (channel), no-ATP-required flux that sets and stabilizes the resting membrane potential in the first place, and it illustrates that "facilitated" does not mean "unregulated direction" — the channel provides the pathway, but the sign and magnitude of net flux are fixed entirely by the electrochemical gradient, calculable in advance without knowing anything about the channel protein itself beyond its ion selectivity.

Common misconceptions & traps

MisconceptionCorrection
"Facilitated diffusion requires ATP because it needs a protein."Proteins provide a pathway, not energy; net flux is always downhill and ATP-independent. Active transport, not facilitated diffusion, spends ATP.
"Channels and carriers work the same way, just at different speeds."Channels form an open aqueous pore (no conformational change per ion); carriers alternate between two closed, occluded conformations and never form a continuous pore.
"Facilitated diffusion can be made to go against the gradient by adding more transporters."Adding transporters only increases rate (raises V_max territory reached sooner); it never changes the thermodynamically fixed direction set by the electrochemical gradient.
"Saturation kinetics is just diffusion slowing down at high concentration."Saturation reflects a finite number of binding sites becoming occupied — a distinctly protein/enzyme-like signature, absent from simple lipid-phase diffusion, which stays linear.
"GLUT1-type transport and active glucose transport (e.g., in intestine) are the same mechanism."Intestinal/kidney apical glucose uptake against a gradient uses SGLT, a Na⁺-glucose symporter — secondary active transport, energized by the Na⁺ gradient, mechanistically and thermodynamically distinct from facilitated diffusion.

The scientist behind it

William Fenwick Widdas was a British physiologist whose systematic kinetic studies of erythrocyte and placental glucose transport in the 1950s laid the quantitative foundation for the carrier hypothesis, years before any transporter protein could be seen, isolated, or sequenced. Working with intact red blood cells and simple, elegant flux-measurement techniques (following the rate of osmotic swelling or the disappearance of external sugar), Widdas showed that glucose entry obeyed saturation kinetics analogous to an enzyme reaction, that it discriminated sharply between stereoisomers, and — in his most conceptually important experiment — that pre-loading cells with one sugar could transiently accelerate net uptake of a different sugar in the opposite direction (countertransport). This last result could not be explained by any model of simple pores or lipid partition; it demanded a single mobile carrier alternating between two conformations, binding sugar on either face. Widdas's 1952 mathematical treatment of this "carrier hypothesis" (published in the Journal of Physiology) predicted, in essentially correct form, the alternating-access mechanism that structural biology would confirm for GLUT-family transporters decades later once crystal structures became available in the 2010s.

Origins · 1 minWilliam Fenwick Widdas and how this was discovered
WF
William Fenwick Widdas
1917–2007 · British physiology, mid-20th-century transport kinetics

Widdas built the kinetic case for carrier-mediated glucose transport using intact red blood cells and placental tissue, formalizing the mathematics of the "carrier hypothesis" more than fifty years before any glucose transporter structure existed.

History
- 1899 — Overton documents the lipid-solubility rule for membrane permeability and notes glucose as a striking exception.
- 1952 — Widdas formalizes the carrier hypothesis for glucose transport based on saturation kinetics in erythrocytes and placenta.
- 1955 — LeFevre and colleagues demonstrate stereospecificity and competitive inhibition of erythrocyte sugar transport.
- 1977 — Kasahara and Hinkle reconstitute purified erythrocyte glucose transport activity into pure lipid vesicles, proving a single protein suffices.
- 1985 — Mueckler and colleagues clone and sequence the human erythrocyte glucose transporter, later named GLUT1.

Where this matters today

Facilitated diffusion is not a historical curiosity confined to red blood cells — its logic underlies major areas of modern medicine and biotechnology. Diabetes and glucose homeostasis depend directly on facilitated glucose transporters: GLUT4, the insulin-responsive isoform in muscle and adipose tissue, is normally sequestered in intracellular vesicles and translocated to the plasma membrane only after insulin signaling — a regulatory layer on top of the same passive, carrier-mediated mechanism described here, and the molecular basis for why insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes blunts glucose clearance from blood. Cancer biology exploits the same transporters diagnostically: many tumors upregulate GLUT1 to sustain the high glycolytic flux of the Warburg effect, which is precisely why ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET imaging (FDG-PET) — a radiolabeled glucose analog taken up by facilitated diffusion through GLUT1 — lights up metabolically active tumors for clinical staging.

Pharmacology targets facilitated-diffusion transporters directly: SGLT2 inhibitors (gliflozins, a modern class of type 2 diabetes drugs) block renal glucose reabsorption by inhibiting a related Na⁺-coupled cotransporter, and understanding the passive GLUT-family transporters is essential background for interpreting how these drugs shift the balance of renal glucose handling. Inherited transporter diseases illustrate the clinical cost of losing facilitated diffusion: GLUT1 deficiency syndrome, caused by mutations reducing GLUT1 function, starves the brain of glucose (since GLUT1 mediates glucose entry across the blood-brain barrier) and causes seizures and developmental delay treatable in part by a ketogenic diet that supplies the brain with an alternative fuel not dependent on the defective transporter. In agriculture and food science, engineered or naturally varying sugar-transporter alleles in crop plants (e.g., SWEET-family transporters, structurally distinct but functionally facilitative) influence seed filling and sugar accumulation, a target of modern crop improvement. And in basic cell biology and pharmacology teaching labs, erythrocyte glucose transport remains a standard system for demonstrating Michaelis–Menten-type saturation kinetics outside of enzymology, reinforcing the conceptual link between transport proteins and classical enzyme kinetics that Widdas first exploited.

:::quiz[A neuron has [K⁺]in = 140 mM, [K⁺]out = 5 mM, and resting V_m = −70 mV. Given E_K ≈ −89 mV at 37 °C, what is the net direction of K⁺ flux through an open K⁺ channel?]

  • Inward, because K⁺ is more concentrated outside
  • No net flux, since the channel is at equilibrium
  • Outward, because V_m is less negative than E_K ✓
  • Direction cannot be determined without knowing channel structure

Ask the tutor: How does the alternating-access mechanism of a carrier protein actually differ, at the level of protein structure, from the gating of an ion channel?

Is facilitated diffusion the same thing as an ion channel?

No — ion channels are one of two mechanisms that carry out facilitated diffusion, alongside carrier proteins (transporters). Both are passive and protein-mediated, but channels form an open aqueous pore through which ions move by simple electrodiffusion at very high rates (up to ~10⁸ ions/sec), without the protein needing to change conformation for each ion. Carriers, by contrast, bind solute and undergo a full conformational cycle (alternating access) to move it across, making them slower (~10²–10⁴ molecules/sec) but often more selective for structurally complex solutes like sugars and amino acids. "Facilitated diffusion" is the umbrella term for passive, protein-assisted transport; channels and carriers are its two structural strategies.

Why can't glucose just diffuse through the membrane like oxygen does?

Oxygen is small, nonpolar, and uncharged, so it partitions readily into the hydrophobic lipid core and crosses by simple diffusion. Glucose is a polar molecule with multiple hydroxyl groups that hydrogen-bond strongly with water; inserting it into the nonpolar bilayer core is energetically very costly. Its lipid/water partition coefficient is extremely low, so unaided diffusion across a bilayer would be far too slow to support cellular metabolism — Overton's original permeability data showed exactly this mismatch. A specific carrier protein like GLUT1 solves the problem by providing a hydrophilic binding pocket that never requires glucose to contact the lipid core directly.

Does facilitated diffusion ever move solutes against their concentration gradient?

No, never — this is the defining thermodynamic boundary of the concept. Facilitated diffusion is passive by definition: net flux always proceeds down the electrochemical gradient, and the transport protein only lowers the kinetic barrier (increases the rate), never alters the direction dictated by thermodynamics. Movement against a gradient requires an external energy source — either direct ATP hydrolysis (primary active transport, as in the Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase) or coupling to another solute's downhill movement (secondary active transport, as in the Na⁺-glucose symporter SGLT). If you see a solute crossing a membrane against its own gradient, by definition it is not facilitated diffusion.

What does "saturation kinetics" mean physically, and why does simple diffusion lack it?

Saturation means the transport rate approaches a maximum (V_max) as solute concentration keeps increasing, because the plasma membrane contains a finite, fixed number of transporter proteins. At high concentrations, essentially all transporters are continuously occupied and cycling at their maximum turnover rate, so adding more solute cannot increase the rate further. Simple diffusion through lipid has no such ceiling within the physiological range, because there is no discrete binding site to saturate — the bilayer is (approximately) a continuous, uniform medium, and Fick's law predicts flux rising linearly with concentration difference indefinitely (until the bilayer's own structural limits are reached, far beyond normal physiological concentrations).

How did competitive inhibition experiments prove a protein was involved, rather than just glucose itself behaving oddly?

Competitive inhibition showed that a second, chemically related sugar (like D-galactose) could reduce glucose transport by raising its apparent K_m without changing V_max — exactly the kinetic signature of two molecules competing for the same finite number of binding sites, a hallmark borrowed directly from enzyme kinetics. This pattern is impossible to explain if glucose were simply partitioning into a homogeneous lipid phase, since lipid has no discrete "site" for two molecules to compete over. The competition data, together with strict stereospecificity (D- versus L-glucose), pointed unambiguously to a chiral, saturable, structurally selective protein binding pocket — the operational definition of a carrier protein — well before biochemists could isolate GLUT1 itself.

Why is GLUT1 in red blood cells often used as the textbook example instead of a channel?

Red blood cells are a historically convenient, nearly pure system: they lack a nucleus and most organelles, have an extremely high density of a single transporter type (GLUT1) in their plasma membrane, and their glucose uptake could be measured cleanly using simple osmotic or radiotracer assays even before molecular biology tools existed. This made erythrocyte glucose transport the ideal experimental system for establishing the general kinetic signatures of carrier-mediated facilitated diffusion — saturation, stereospecificity, competitive inhibition, countertransport — which later proved to generalize to GLUT-family transporters throughout the body and, more broadly, to carrier proteins for amino acids, nucleosides, and other polar solutes.

How does facilitated diffusion relate to the resting membrane potential of a neuron?

The resting membrane potential is set largely by facilitated diffusion of K⁺ through "leak" K⁺ channels, which are open even at rest. Because resting V_m typically sits somewhat less negative than the K⁺ equilibrium potential E_K, there is a small persistent driving force pushing K⁺ to leak outward through these channels, passively, with no ATP spent per ion. This passive K⁺ efflux (balanced over time by the ATP-dependent Na⁺/K⁺-ATPase, which is active transport) establishes the baseline negative resting potential that neurons then use as the starting point for generating action potentials via voltage-gated Na⁺ and K⁺ channels — another example of facilitated diffusion, this time gated rather than constitutively open.

Before this

Where this leads