The Cambrian Explosion

About 538 million years ago, something happened to animal life that has no clear precedent or repeat in Earth's history. Within a geological interval as short as 13 million years, the fossil record fills abruptly with recognizable ancestors of nearly every major animal body plan alive today: arthropods with jointed legs and compound eyes, mollusks with shells, early chordates, and a menagerie of stranger forms that fit no modern group at all. Before this window, the fossil record shows almost nothing but microbes, simple burrows, and soft-bodied, mostly immobile organisms. After it, most animal phyla are present. Charles Darwin himself worried that this pattern threatened his theory of gradual, branching descent, and called the abrupt appearance of complex fossils in Cambrian rocks "the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory." The Cambrian Explosion matters because it is the best-documented case of a macroevolutionary radiation, and it forces students of evolution to reconcile a seemingly sudden pattern with the gradualist, population-level mechanisms — Mutation and Genetic Variation, selection, drift — that operate at the microevolutionary level covered elsewhere. Resolving that apparent tension requires three separate lines of reasoning: understanding what the fossil record can and cannot preserve, understanding the ecological and environmental triggers that made rapid diversification possible, and understanding the developmental-genetic toolkit that made rapid morphological diversification possible once ecological opportunity opened up. This article treats the Cambrian Explosion not as a mystery to be marveled at but as a scientific problem that has been substantially — though not completely — solved. Geochemists have dated the event with high precision using zircon radiometric dating. Paleontologists have used exceptional fossil deposits, called Lagerstätten, to see soft tissues that are normally never preserved, revealing the true richness of the radiation. Developmental biologists have shown that the genetic machinery for building complex bodies (the Hox gene toolkit) was already in place before the explosion, meaning the explosion was primarily an ecological and morphological event, not the sudden invention of new genes from nothing. By the end you should be able to explain, in causal and evidentiary terms, why the Cambrian looks the way it does, what actually diversified (and what did not), and why "explosion" is a defensible word for a process that still took millions of years and built on billions of years of prior evolution.

Key takeaways
  • The Cambrian Explosion (~538–530 Ma) is the rapid fossil appearance of most modern animal phyla within roughly 13–25 million years, following the Ediacaran biota.
  • It is not the origin of animals — molecular clocks and Ediacaran fossils show animal lineages diverged tens of millions of years earlier, evolving as small, soft-bodied forms.
  • Triggers include rising atmospheric/oceanic oxygen, the evolution of hard skeletons and predation (an "arms race"), and ecosystem engineering that opened new niches.
  • Exceptional fossil deposits (Lagerstätten) like the Burgess Shale and Chengjiang preserve soft tissue and reveal far greater Cambrian diversity than shelly fossils alone suggest.
  • The genetic toolkit for complex body plans (Hox genes, gene regulatory networks) evolved earlier and was co-opted, not invented from scratch, during the explosion.
  • The pattern reflects both a real evolutionary radiation and a taphonomic "window" effect — both explanations are needed, not one instead of the other.
The core insight

The Cambrian Explosion was a rapid ecological and morphological radiation of animal lineages that had already diverged genetically much earlier — evolution didn't suddenly speed up, but its products suddenly became visible, diverse, and durable in the fossil record.

The core idea

The Cambrian Explosion refers to the geologically abrupt appearance, in rocks dated to roughly 538–517 million years ago (the early-to-mid Cambrian Period), of fossils representing nearly all extant animal phyla plus many extinct lineages that do not fit into modern groups. "Abrupt" is a relative term in geology: the main pulse of diversification occurred over an interval estimated at 13 to 25 million years, a span short compared to the preceding roughly 3 billion years of life dominated by microbes, but not instantaneous by any means — comparable in duration to the time separating humans from many other primates. Two things distinguish the Cambrian radiation from an ordinary evolutionary radiation. First is its taxonomic breadth: nearly every major clade of bilaterian animals (organisms with left-right symmetry, a front and back end, and three embryonic germ layers) that exists today has representatives, or near-relatives, in Cambrian rocks. Second is the sudden preservability of that diversity — the widespread evolution of mineralized hard parts (calcium carbonate or calcium phosphate shells, exoskeletons) meant that, for the first time, animal remains routinely survived fossilization, dramatically changing what the rock record could show. It is essential to separate three distinct questions that are often conflated: (1) When did animal lineages diverge genetically? (2) When did complex animal body plans and ecologies (large size, mobility, predation, mineralized skeletons) evolve? (3) When did the fossil record become good at showing these things? Molecular clock studies (calibrated with fossil dates) suggest that the last common ancestor of most bilaterian phyla lived considerably before the Cambrian, likely in the Cryogenian or Ediacaran Period, 650–560 million years ago — meaning the genetic divergence of lineages predates the morphological and ecological explosion by tens of millions of years. The Cambrian Explosion is best understood as the second and third of these — an ecological/morphological radiation made suddenly visible — layered on top of genetic lineages that already existed as small, likely soft-bodied and simple animals.

Mechanism

Step 1 — The Precambrian starting conditions. By the late Ediacaran Period (about 571–539 Ma), oceans hosted the Ediacaran biota: enigmatic soft-bodied organisms such as Dickinsonia (a flattened, quilted oval that may represent an early animal or a separate stem-group lineage) and Kimberella (a mollusk-like grazer that left trace-fossil scratch marks consistent with a radula-like feeding structure). These organisms were mostly sessile or slow-moving, lacked hard skeletons, and left few burrows deeper than a few millimeters into the sediment — implying limited mobility and simple, low-oxygen-tolerant physiologies. Multicellularity, differentiated tissues, and basic developmental gene families (including Hox-like genes) had already evolved in the stem lineages leading to animals, built atop the eukaryotic cell biology established by The Origin of Eukaryotes and Endosymbiosis.

Step 2 — Environmental triggers. Several interacting environmental changes set the stage:

  • Oxygenation. Geochemical proxies (iron speciation, sulfur and molybdenum isotopes) indicate a rise in atmospheric and, crucially, deep-ocean oxygen levels across the Ediacaran–Cambrian boundary. Large, active, muscular animals have high metabolic oxygen demands; more available O₂ permits larger body size, thicker tissues, and energetically expensive behaviors like fast locomotion and predation. This does not mean oxygen alone caused the explosion — the correlation is real but the causal weight is debated — but it removed a physiological ceiling that had constrained animal life.
  • Ecological feedback: the "arms race." Once even a few lineages evolved active predation, prey lineages faced strong selection to evolve defenses — mineralized shells, spines, burrowing behavior for refuge, and enhanced sensory systems (eyes) to detect predators. Predators, in turn, evolved better capture structures (claws, jaws, venom). This predator-prey coevolutionary feedback loop is a self-reinforcing diversification engine: each new adaptation creates new selective pressure on other species, a process sometimes called the "Cambrian arms race" or, more generally, diversity-dependent diversification.
  • Ecosystem engineering. The evolution of burrowing (bioturbation) physically restructured the seafloor, oxygenating sediments and creating entirely new habitats and food resources (infaunal niches) that had not existed before. This is a classic case of Niche Construction feeding back on further evolution.
  • Genetic and developmental preconditions. The evolution of a flexible gene-regulatory toolkit — Hox gene clusters controlling anterior-posterior body axis identity, together with signaling pathways (Wnt, Hedgehog, Notch) controlling tissue patterning — gave lineages the capacity to generate disparate body plans through relatively small changes in gene regulation rather than requiring the evolution of entirely new genes. This toolkit is explored in depth in Hox Genes and the Genetic Basis of Body Plans; here it matters because it explains how so much morphological disparity could appear so quickly: existing genes were redeployed (co-opted) in new combinations and expression domains, a much faster route to new morphology than waiting for novel genes to evolve from scratch.

Step 3 — Skeletonization and the taphonomic window. Independently in many lineages (a strong case of convergent evolution), animals began biomineralizing — depositing calcium carbonate, calcium phosphate, or silica into shells, spicules, and exoskeletons. This served multiple functions (defense, support for larger body size, muscle attachment) and had the side effect of making these organisms vastly more likely to fossilize. Soft tissue normally decays within days to weeks; a calcified shell can persist for hundreds of millions of years. This means the fossil record's "explosion" partly reflects a genuine burst of anatomical innovation and partly reflects a shift in preservation potential — the Cambrian didn't just create more animals, it created animals whose remains could survive being buried.

Step 4 — Diversification proceeds in pulses, not instantaneously. Detailed biostratigraphy (using trilobites and small shelly fossils as time markers, calibrated by radiometric dates on interbedded volcanic ash layers) shows the radiation proceeded in a series of steps across the "Cambrian Explosion window": the appearance of simple trace fossils and small shelly fossils near the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary (~538.8 Ma), followed by the diversification of trilobites and the peak of disparate body plans in Cambrian Stage 3 (~521–514 Ma), captured famously in the Chengjiang and Burgess Shale biotas.

Figure
Timeline of the Cambrian Explosion relative to Earth history
Millions of years ago (Ma) 4000 1000 560 538 515 0 Prokaryotes & early eukaryotes Ediacaran biota Cambrian Explosion Phanerozoic Multicellularity, first animals Skeletons, trilobites, Burgess Shale fauna Deep time is mostly microbial; animal radiation is a thin, recent sliver
Figure
Predator–prey "arms race" feedback loop driving Cambrian diversification
Predators evolve claws, jaws, eyes Prey evolve shells, spines, burrowing Higher O₂ & new niches support larger, faster, armored bodies Coevolutionary feedback accelerates morphological disparity

The evidence

Radiometric dating of the boundary and pulses. The Precambrian-Cambrian boundary itself is defined stratigraphically (at a section in Newfoundland, Canada, marked by the first appearance of the trace fossil Treptichnus pedum) and dated using uranium-lead (U-Pb) zircon geochronology on volcanic ash beds interbedded with fossil-bearing sediments. These analyses, refined over decades by geochronologists including Samuel Bowring and colleagues, place the boundary at 538.8 ± 0.2 Ma and show that the main morphological radiation, including the appearance of most trilobite and arthropod lineages, was concentrated within roughly Cambrian Stage 2 through Stage 4 — a window of about 20 million years. This precision is what allows scientists to say the explosion was "rapid" in an evidentially rigorous, not merely impressionistic, sense.

The Burgess Shale (Charles Doolittle Walcott, 1909). The single most important body of evidence for the true extent of Cambrian diversity comes from Lagerstätten — sites of exceptional preservation where soft tissues, not just shells, are fossilized. In 1909, paleontologist Charles Doolittle Walcott discovered an extraordinarily rich fossil deposit in the Burgess Shale of British Columbia, Canada, dated to about 508 million years ago. Because of rapid burial in fine anoxic mud (likely from underwater mudslides), the Burgess Shale preserves soft-bodied animals — worms, sponges, early arthropods with intact limbs and eyes, and bizarre forms like Opabinia (with five eyes and a clawed proboscis) and Anomalocaris (a meter-long, actively swimming predator with disc-shaped jaws) — none of which would normally leave any trace at all. Walcott initially classified most of these forms into existing modern phyla; a major reanalysis in the 1970s–1980s by Harry Whittington, Derek Briggs, and Simon Conway Morris at Cambridge showed that many Burgess Shale animals do not fit cleanly into any living phylum, revealing far greater anatomical disparity in the early Cambrian than modern diversity alone would suggest. This finding — popularized (and philosophically debated) by Stephen Jay Gould in Wonderful Life (1989) — demonstrated that the Cambrian produced more fundamentally different body-plan experiments than exist today, many of which were subsequently pruned by extinction rather than surviving to diversify further.

The Chengjiang biota (discovered 1984). An even older (~518 Ma) and comparably exceptional Lagerstätte in Yunnan Province, China, discovered by Hou Xianguang, independently confirmed and extended the Burgess Shale picture, adding early chordates (Myllokunmingia, among the oldest known vertebrate-like animals) and showing that the diversity documented at Burgess Shale was not a one-off preservational fluke but a genuine, geographically widespread feature of early Cambrian ecosystems.

Small shelly fossils and trace fossils bracketing the boundary. Below the Cambrian boundary, in latest Ediacaran rocks, only simple, shallow, horizontal trace fossils occur. Just above the boundary, complex, three-dimensional, vertical burrows (like Treptichnus) appear along with tiny mineralized "small shelly fossils" — fragments of shells, spines, and plates from various stem-group lineages. This progression is direct trace-fossil and body-fossil evidence for increasing mobility, active burrowing (implying muscular and neural sophistication), and independent skeletonization events tracking almost exactly with the geochemical oxygenation signal — a convergence of independent evidence types (geochemistry, trace fossils, body fossils, and radiometric dates) that strongly supports the causal story above rather than being an artifact of any single method.

Molecular clock studies. Comparative genomic studies (using DNA sequence divergence among living phyla, calibrated against fossil dates) consistently estimate that the last common ancestors of most bilaterian phyla lived 650–560 million years ago — before the Cambrian Explosion proper. This is crucial corroborating evidence that the explosion reflects rapid morphological and ecological diversification of already-diverged lineages, not the sudden genetic origin of animal phyla from nothing — resolving what would otherwise look like a violation of gradualist evolutionary logic.

Worked examples

Example 1 — Reading a stratigraphic/phylogenetic dataset. A field team collects fossils from five stratigraphic horizons in a Cambrian sequence, radiometrically dated using ash beds:

HorizonAge (Ma)Taxa present
A (lowest)538.5trace fossils only, no shells
B536small shelly fossils (fragments)
C529first trilobites, brachiopods
D520Chengjiang-type soft-bodied fauna, early chordates
E (highest)508Burgess Shale-type fauna, diverse arthropods

Question: What does this sequence demonstrate about the tempo and sequence of the Cambrian radiation, and what is the total duration of the interval from A to E? Reasoning: Duration = 538.5 − 508 = 30.5 million years. The sequence shows a clear, ordered progression: (1) behavioral complexity (burrowing) precedes hard parts; (2) small, fragmentary skeletons precede large, diverse shelly faunas like trilobites; (3) soft-bodied disparity (revealed only where Lagerstätten preservation occurs, as at D and E) is present throughout but only visible at exceptional sites. This is exactly the pattern predicted by the "genuine radiation plus taphonomic window" model: skeletonization is not instantaneous but proceeds in stages over roughly 30 million years, and the earliest stages (A, B) would look like an entirely different, much sparser fauna if we only had "ordinary" (non-Lagerstätte) preservation — underscoring why relying only on shelly fossils underestimates true Cambrian diversity.

Example 2 — Quantifying the oxygen/body-size argument. Suppose an ecologist wants to test whether rising oxygen could physiologically permit larger, more active animal body size, using a simplified diffusion argument. Oxygen delivery to tissue by passive diffusion (no circulatory system) falls off with the square of diffusion distance, while metabolic demand scales roughly with tissue volume. For a simple bilaterian with no specialized respiratory or circulatory organs relying on diffusion across its body surface:

  • Late Ediacaran atmospheric O₂ is estimated at roughly 10–15% of present atmospheric level (PAL).
  • Early Cambrian estimates rise to roughly 40% PAL by ~520 Ma.

Reasoning: If maximum diffusion-supported tissue thickness scales with the square root of ambient O₂ partial pressure (a standard simplification from Fick's law-based models), then increasing O₂ from 10% to 40% PAL increases maximum supportable tissue thickness by a factor of √4 = 2. A doubling in maximum diffusion-limited body diameter, compounded with the evolution of active pumping structures (guts, primitive circulatory motions) and muscular locomotion, is consistent with the observed shift from millimeter-to-centimeter-scale, thin, sheet-like Ediacaran organisms to the more compact, three-dimensional, actively burrowing and swimming body plans of the Cambrian. This does not prove oxygen alone caused the explosion — correlation across multiple proxies is what supports the causal inference — but it shows quantitatively why oxygen availability could have been a genuine physiological gatekeeper rather than a decorative correlation.

Common misconceptions & traps

MisconceptionWhy it's wrong
"The Cambrian Explosion is when animals first evolved."Molecular clocks and Ediacaran fossils show animal lineages diverged tens of millions of years earlier; the Cambrian radiates their morphology and ecology, not their genetic origin.
"New animal phyla are still being invented today the way they were in the Cambrian."No new animal phylum-level body plan has demonstrably originated since the early Paleozoic; disparity (range of body plans) was established early and has mostly been refined, not expanded, since.
"The explosion proves evolution doesn't need gradual change."The event still spans ~13–25 million years — gradual by human standards — and builds on gene-regulatory machinery that evolved gradually over the preceding hundreds of millions of years.
"All Cambrian lineages survive to the present."Many Burgess Shale/Chengjiang body plans (e.g., many "weird wonders" reassessed by Whittington, Briggs, and Conway Morris) belong to now-extinct stem groups with no living descendants at that level of disparity.
"Soft-bodied animals simply didn't exist before the Cambrian."Ediacaran soft-bodied organisms are abundant; what changed is skeletonization and the resulting fossilization potential, not the sudden appearance of animals per se.

The scientist behind it

Charles Doolittle Walcott (1850–1927) was an American paleontologist and long-serving Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution who, in August 1909, discovered the Burgess Shale fossil beds high in the Canadian Rockies of British Columbia — reportedly after his wife's horse slipped on a shale block that split open to reveal beautifully preserved fossils. Over the following years, Walcott and his field parties extracted over 65,000 specimens, meticulously describing many new taxa. Working within the taxonomic framework of his era, Walcott classified nearly all of the bizarre Burgess Shale animals into existing phyla (annelids, arthropods, and so on), a conservative interpretation that stood largely unchallenged for over 60 years. That interpretation was overturned starting in the 1960s–70s by a Cambridge-based team — Harry Whittington, and his students Derek Briggs and Simon Conway Morris — who painstakingly re-prepared and re-described the original specimens using new techniques (serial grinding, then later CT imaging and scanning electron microscopy) and found that many Burgess Shale animals possessed anatomical combinations unlike anything alive today, warranting entirely new higher taxonomic groupings. Their revisionary work, and its subsequent popularization (and contested interpretation regarding the role of contingency in evolution) by Stephen Jay Gould, transformed the Burgess Shale from a curiosity into the central empirical anchor for understanding Cambrian disparity.

Origins · 1 minCharles Doolittle Walcott and how this was discovered
CD
Charles Doolittle Walcott
1850–1927 · American paleontologist, Smithsonian Secretary, discoverer of the Burgess Shale

History
- 1859 — Charles Darwin, in On the Origin of Species, flags the abrupt appearance of complex fossils in Cambrian-age rocks as a serious challenge to gradualist evolution.
- 1909 — Charles Doolittle Walcott discovers the Burgess Shale fossil beds in British Columbia, Canada.
- 1947 — Reginald Sprigg discovers the Ediacara Hills fossils in South Australia, establishing the existence of a rich pre-Cambrian soft-bodied biota.
- 1971–1985 — Harry Whittington, Derek Briggs, and Simon Conway Morris reanalyze Burgess Shale specimens, revealing far greater anatomical disparity than Walcott had recognized.
- 1984 — Hou Xianguang discovers the Chengjiang Lagerstätte in Yunnan, China, independently confirming and extending the Burgess Shale picture at an earlier date (~518 Ma).

Where this matters today

Understanding the Cambrian Explosion informs several active areas of biology and beyond. In evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo), the discovery that Hox genes and other regulatory toolkits predate the explosion reframed how biologists think about the origin of morphological novelty generally: new phenotypes arise more often from rewiring existing regulatory networks than from evolving new genes, a principle now central to understanding Hox Genes and the Genetic Basis of Body Plans and applied in research on limb evolution, eye evolution, and even human developmental disorders where mutations in conserved regulatory regions (not just protein-coding genes) cause disease. In paleoclimatology and astrobiology, the tight link between rising atmospheric/oceanic oxygen and animal diversification is used as a template for predicting which exoplanet atmospheric signatures (oxygen combined with methane or other biosignature gases) might indicate complex, multicellular life rather than only microbial life — the Cambrian record is a rare "ground truth" case of oxygenation preceding an evolutionary threshold. In conservation biology and macroevolution research, the Cambrian record — alongside the "Big Five" mass extinctions — provides the deep-time baseline against which modern biodiversity loss is measured, feeding directly into Macroevolution and the Fossil Record and into debates about how quickly, or whether, lost anatomical disparity can ever be regained once a body-plan lineage goes extinct (the general answer, from Burgess Shale stem-group losses, is: rarely, and only over tens of millions of years). In biotechnology and synthetic biology, the Cambrian's demonstration that modest regulatory changes to ancient gene networks can generate large-scale morphological novelty motivates current genome-engineering strategies (e.g., CRISPR-based regulatory-region editing) aimed at generating targeted phenotypic diversity in crops and model organisms, rather than relying solely on coding-sequence mutation.

Ask the tutor: How do paleontologists actually distinguish a genuine burst of evolutionary innovation from a preservation artifact when reading the Cambrian fossil record?

Did the Cambrian Explosion really happen "suddenly," or is that just a misleading name?

It happened rapidly in geological terms but not instantaneously. The main morphological radiation spans roughly 13–25 million years, and the full sequence — from trace fossils, to small shelly fossils, to trilobites, to Burgess Shale-type faunas — unfolds over about 30 million years total. That is extremely fast compared to the preceding ~3 billion years of mostly microbial life, but it is not a single geological instant, and it still allows ample time for ordinary microevolutionary processes (mutation, selection, drift) to operate across many generations. "Explosion" is a fair description relative to the deep time scale of Earth history, not a claim that speciation defied normal evolutionary mechanisms.

Does the Cambrian Explosion contradict Darwin's theory of gradual evolution?

Darwin himself worried it might, since he expected fossil transitions to be gradual and continuous. Modern evidence resolves the apparent conflict: molecular clocks show that most animal lineages had already diverged genetically well before the Cambrian, evolving gradually as small, likely soft-bodied organisms during the Ediacaran and earlier. What appears "sudden" is the rapid morphological and ecological diversification of already-existing lineages, driven by environmental change (oxygenation) and ecological feedback (predation), compounded by a shift toward mineralized skeletons that dramatically improved fossilization. The gradualist mechanism was operating throughout; what changed was the rate of morphological change and, separately, the preservation quality of the fossil record.

Were there really more animal body plans in the Cambrian than exist today?

In terms of raw phylum-level counts, no — but in terms of anatomical disparity (how different body plans are from one another, independent of how many species instantiate them), yes, in a meaningful sense. Lagerstätten like the Burgess Shale preserve numerous lineages, such as Opabinia and Anomalocaris, that represent distinct stem-group experiments in body organization with no living representatives at that level of distinctiveness. Many of these lineages went extinct without leaving descendants, while a smaller number of body plans that did survive later diversified into the modern phyla. So the range of anatomical experimentation was arguably wider early on, even though total species richness has generally increased since.

What role did oxygen play, exactly, and is it fully proven as a cause?

Multiple independent geochemical proxies (iron speciation, sulfur and molybdenum isotopes) show that atmospheric and especially deep-ocean oxygen rose across the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition, and this correlates with the appearance of larger, more mobile, more metabolically active animals. Oxygen is best understood as a permissive factor — removing a physiological ceiling on body size and activity level — rather than a sole or sufficient cause. Most researchers treat it as one of several interacting drivers, alongside predation pressure and ecosystem engineering, rather than a single silver-bullet explanation; the causal weighting between these factors remains an active research question.

Are new animal phyla still evolving today the way they did in the Cambrian?

No convincing evidence exists for the origin of a genuinely new phylum-level body plan since the early Paleozoic. Modern evolutionary diversification (adaptive radiations like Darwin's finches or African cichlid fishes) occurs within existing body plans through variation in scale, proportion, and specific structures, not through invention of fundamentally new organizational schemes. One leading explanation is that ecological niche space for radically new basic body plans was largely filled early, and established lineages with entrenched developmental systems face strong internal constraints against wholesale reorganization — a phenomenon sometimes discussed under the concept of developmental constraint.

How do scientists distinguish a "real" radiation from an artifact of fossil preservation?

By using multiple independent lines of evidence that should agree if the pattern is real: radiometric dating of the rock sequence, geochemical proxies for environmental change (oxygen, temperature), trace fossils showing behavioral complexity, body fossils from both ordinary and exceptional (Lagerstätte) preservation, and molecular clock estimates from living descendants. The Cambrian pattern passes this test — independent methods converge on the same overall timeline and causal story — which is why it is treated as a genuine evolutionary and ecological event, not merely an illusion created by the sudden evolution of fossilizable hard parts, even though hard-part evolution does inflate the apparent magnitude of the pattern in ordinary (non-Lagerstätte) rocks.

How does the Cambrian Explosion relate to the evolution of multicellularity discussed elsewhere?

Multicellularity in animals evolved well before the Cambrian, rooted in the choanoflagellate-related ancestry of animals and built on eukaryotic cell biology established during The Origin of Eukaryotes and Endosymbiosis. The Cambrian Explosion is a later, higher-level event: it is not about cells aggregating into simple multicellular bodies, but about already-multicellular, already-differentiated bilaterian lineages rapidly generating complex tissue-level and organ-level anatomical diversity, mineralized skeletons, and predatory ecologies. In other words, multicellularity supplied the raw material; the Cambrian Explosion is what happened when that raw material met the right ecological and environmental conditions for rapid morphological diversification.

Before this

Where this leads