Adiabatic Reversible pVT Relations
Push a bicycle pump quickly and the barrel warms your hand. No heat entered the gas. Compression alone raised its temperature. This is the fingerprint of an adiabatic process. Turning that qualitative fact into precise arithmetic is the job of this article. We already know that adiabatic means . So all internal energy change comes from work. What we have not yet pinned down is different. It is how pressure, volume, and temperature move together. This happens during a reversible adiabatic change of an ideal gas. That relationship, , is one of the most quoted formulas in thermodynamics. It is used everywhere from engine cycles to the speed of sound. This article derives and its twin from the First Law. It works two fully numeric examples. It also flags the traps that catch students who confuse adiabats with isotherms. It sets up the later discussion of the Joule expansion. There, a gas expands adiabatically but irreversibly, and the temperature story changes completely.
- For a reversible adiabatic ideal-gas process, , with .
- The companion relation follows directly by substituting the ideal gas law.
- Both relations come from combining with under .
- Adiabats are steeper than isotherms on a – diagram because .
- Reversible adiabatic compression always heats an ideal gas; reversible adiabatic expansion always cools it.
- Key idea: setting in the First Law turns into a separable differential equation whose integral is .
Because a reversible adiabatic process has no heat exchange, every joule of work done on or by the ideal gas must show up as internal energy change; combining with and eliminating via produces a single separable equation that integrates exactly to .
The physical picture
Consider an ideal gas sealed in a thermally insulated cylinder with a frictionless, reversible piston. No heat can cross the walls, so throughout. If the piston moves inward, it does work on the gas; if the piston moves outward, the gas does work on the piston. In either direction, since , the First Law reduces to
For an ideal gas, depends only on , so (per mole). The reversible work is . These two facts, held together only by the ideal gas law , are the entire content of the derivation below. The key physical difference from an isothermal expansion is that here temperature is not held fixed by a heat bath. As the gas expands adiabatically, it does work at the expense of its own internal energy, so falls as rises. Compression does the reverse: work done on the gas raises as shrinks. This coupling between and , absent in an isothermal process, is what produces the extra factor of in the pressure–volume relation compared to Boyle's law. Plotted on a – diagram, an adiabat and an isotherm can cross at one point, but the adiabat is always steeper there. Physically: along the adiabat, compressing the gas raises , and that extra heating pushes up faster than the isotherm's temperature-fixed curve would predict.
The core relations
where is the heat capacity ratio for the ideal gas undergoing the reversible adiabatic change.
where and are related through the same reversible adiabatic path, with .
where this equivalent form is useful when pressure, rather than volume, is the natural control variable.
Goal. Starting only from , , , and , derive and for one mole of ideal gas undergoing a reversible adiabatic change.
Step 1: Apply the First Law with q = 0. For any infinitesimal step, . Adiabatic means , so
For a reversible change, the work is (expansion work against the instantaneous gas pressure, since the process is quasistatic).
Step 2: Express dU using the ideal-gas heat capacity. For an ideal gas is a function of alone (Joule's law), so per mole,
Combining with Step 1,
Step 3: Eliminate p using the ideal gas law. Since for one mole, . Substituting,
Step 4: Separate variables. Divide both sides by and rearrange so that all temperature terms sit on the left and all volume terms on the right:
This step is valid because is treated as constant over the temperature range considered (true for a monatomic ideal gas exactly, and a good approximation for diatomics away from vibrational excitation).
Step 5: Integrate between the initial and final states.
Step 6: Convert to a single power-law relation. Divide through by and exponentiate:
Define . For an ideal gas, (Mayer's relation), so
Substituting gives
which is the boxed relation
Step 7: Convert to the pressure–volume form. Use at each state and substitute into :
Since is a true constant, absorb it into the constant on the right to obtain the final result
Consistency check. For (as if , unphysical for an ideal gas but useful as a limit), the relation collapses toward , the isothermal Boyle's law form — confirming that the extra temperature coupling built into is exactly what distinguishes an adiabat from an isotherm.
Worked examples
Example 1 — Foundational: adiabatic compression of argon. A sample of argon gas (monatomic, treat as ideal) occupies at and . It is compressed reversibly and adiabatically to . Find and . For a monatomic ideal gas, and , so
Apply :
Now find from , with :
Sanity check. Verify with the ideal gas law directly: should equal .
These agree to within rounding, confirming internal consistency. Compressing argon to one-fifth its volume adiabatically raises the temperature by nearly 600 K — this is the physical basis of diesel ignition.
Example 2 — Applied: work done and final state for a diatomic gas expansion. Two moles of nitrogen gas (, diatomic, over the temperature range of interest, vibrations frozen out) start at , . The gas expands reversibly and adiabatically until . Find , , , and the work done by the gas. First, for a diatomic ideal gas:
Use the – form of the adiabat, , so
with exponent .
Get the volumes from , using :
Check via the relation (using SI-consistent units is not required here since both sides use L·atm, but let's confirm the ratio matches):
Predicted , matching the 25.93 L found above (small rounding difference). Good. Now the work done by the gas. Since , :
The gas expands, cools from 500 K to 316 K, and delivers about 7.65 kJ of work to the surroundings — all of it drawn from its own internal energy, since no heat entered the system.
Limiting cases & common traps
| Situation | What happens | Common error |
|---|---|---|
| Adiabat approaches isotherm's shape | Forgetting real gases never reach ; monatomic ideal gas gives the largest | |
| Reversible adiabatic expansion | always falls | Assuming is constant because "no heat is added" — heat and temperature are not the same thing |
| Reversible adiabatic compression | always rises | Confusing this with isothermal compression, where and both flow but stays fixed |
| Using vs in | Adiabatic always uses , since regardless of the path | Mistakenly plugging in because pressure is changing |
| Free (irreversible) adiabatic expansion into vacuum | , , so and is unchanged for an ideal gas | Applying to an irreversible expansion — the formula requires a reversible path |
The chemist behind it
The exponent and the study of adiabatic sound propagation trace back to Pierre-Simon Laplace, who corrected Newton's formula for the speed of sound in air by recognizing that sound compressions and rarefactions happen too fast for heat to equilibrate — they are adiabatic, not isothermal. Laplace's insight that rather than brought theory into agreement with measurement, and the ratio is still sometimes called the Laplace constant in older texts.
Origins · 1 minPierre-Simon Laplace and how this was discovered
Ask the tutor: What changes in the math and the physics when we move from this reversible adiabatic expansion to the irreversible Joule expansion into a vacuum?
Why does the reversible path matter for pV^γ = constant
The derivation uses , which is only valid when the external pressure equals the gas pressure at every instant — that is the definition of a reversible, quasistatic process. In an irreversible adiabatic expansion, such as expansion against a constant external pressure lower than the gas pressure, is still zero, but the work is , not integrated along the gas's own pressure. The relation simply does not hold for the irreversible path, even though the First Law itself still applies.
Does pV^γ = constant apply to real gases
Only approximately. The derivation assumes an ideal gas, both for and for depending on alone. Real gases have intermolecular forces, so depends weakly on as well as , and itself varies with temperature and pressure. For many practical engineering calculations — compressors, engines, atmospheric adiabats — the ideal-gas adiabat is still a good working approximation, but precise work requires a real-gas equation of state and measured heat capacities.
How is this different from the isothermal reversible expansion formula
Isothermal reversible expansion holds fixed, giving and (Boyle's law). Adiabatic reversible expansion holds instead, allowing to change, giving the steeper relation . Both are reversible ideal-gas processes, but they respond to different constraints — constant temperature versus zero heat flow — and therefore trace different paths on a – diagram, always crossing at exactly one point for a given starting state.
Why is γ always greater than 1
Because for an ideal gas (Mayer's relation), and , we always have , so . Physically, at constant pressure the gas must also do expansion work as it absorbs heat, so more heat is needed per kelvin of temperature rise than at constant volume — hence exceeds , and the ratio always exceeds unity.
What comes next after this relation
The next natural question is what happens when an ideal gas expands adiabatically but without any opposing pressure at all — the Joule expansion into a vacuum. There and simultaneously, so , and for an ideal gas that forces as well. Comparing that irreversible case with the reversible adiabat here sharpens the distinction between "no heat" and "no temperature change," and sets up the idea of internal pressure for real gases.