Molecular Term Symbols

Look at the emission spectrum of N₂ in a nitrogen laser. Or consider the visible glow of a Bunsen flame turned faintly green by C₂ radicals. You are staring at transitions between electronic states. These states carry precise labels like 1Σg+^1\Sigma_g^+, 3Πu^3\Pi_u, or 2Π1/2^2\Pi_{1/2}. These are molecular term symbols, the diatomic cousin of atomic term symbols. They compress enormous quantum information into a few characters. This includes orbital angular momentum about the bond axis, total spin, and two flavors of parity. Without them, a spectroscopist could not say which transitions are allowed. Nor which are forbidden, or why one excited state lives for nanoseconds. Meanwhile another excited state persists for seconds. The reason term symbols matter is this: diatomic molecules lack the full rotational symmetry of an atom. They have only cylindrical symmetry about the internuclear axis. Homonuclear cases also have an inversion center. This lower symmetry means orbital angular momentum is not a good quantum number. It is not conserved the way ℓ\ell is for atoms. Only its projection onto the bond axis survives. That projection is called Λ\Lambda. Together with total spin SS, and the wavefunction's behavior under inversion (g/ug/u) and reflection (+/−+/-), it defines the complete symmetry label of an electronic state. These labels are not decoration. They are the selection-rule bookkeeping that tells you whether a transition dipole integral can be nonzero. The big picture is this: molecular term symbols are built like atomic term symbols. Both combine one-electron angular momenta into a total. But the combination rules change because the relevant symmetry group changes. It shifts from full rotation SO(3)SO(3) to the axial group C∞vC_{\infty v} (heteronuclear) or D∞hD_{\infty h} (homonuclear). Individual electrons in molecular orbitals labeled σ,π,δ,…\sigma, \pi, \delta,\dots carry angular momentum projections λ=0,±1,±2,…\lambda = 0, \pm1, \pm2,\dots. These add algebraically to give Λ=∣∑λi∣\Lambda = |\sum \lambda_i|. This value is then dressed with a Greek letter (Σ,Π,Δ,…\Sigma, \Pi, \Delta,\dots). This exactly mirrors S,P,DS, P, D in atoms. Spin multiplicity 2S+12S+1 sits as a left superscript. Parity g/ug/u appears as a subscript for centrosymmetric molecules. For Σ\Sigma states specifically, a ++ or −- superscript records behavior under reflection through a plane containing the axis. This article builds molecular term symbols from molecular-orbital configurations. It states the group-theoretical rules precisely. It derives g/ug/u and +/−+/- from first principles for two-electron cases. It works through O₂'s famously triplet ground state, the CN radical, and the term symbols of excited C₂. These C₂ terms are diagnostic in combustion chemistry. It closes with how these labels feed directly into the selection rules. These rules govern Electronic Transitions and Franck-Condon and the fate of excited states. That fate is discussed in Fluorescence and Phosphorescence: The Quantum Picture.

Key takeaways
  • Only the projection of orbital angular momentum on the bond axis, λ\lambda, survives molecular symmetry; individual λi\lambda_i sum to a total Λ=∣∑iλi∣\Lambda = |\sum_i \lambda_i|, labeled Σ,Π,Δ,Φ,…\Sigma,\Pi,\Delta,\Phi,\dots for Λ=0,1,2,3,…\Lambda = 0,1,2,3,\dots.
  • Spin multiplicity 2S+12S+1 is a left superscript, built from total spin SS exactly as in atoms, using Hund's-rule-informed configurations of molecular orbital angular momentum.
  • Parity label gg or uu (subscript) applies only to centrosymmetric (homonuclear or symmetric) species; it is the product of the individual MO parities.
  • The +/−+/- superscript applies only to Σ\Sigma states and records symmetry under reflection through a plane containing the internuclear axis; it decides electric-dipole selection rules.
  • Selection rules for allowed electronic transitions are ΔΛ=0,±1\Delta\Lambda = 0,\pm1, ΔS=0\Delta S = 0, g↔ug\leftrightarrow u, and Σ+↔Σ+\Sigma^+ \leftrightarrow \Sigma^+ or Σ−↔Σ−\Sigma^-\leftrightarrow\Sigma^- only.
  • Ground-state O₂ is 3Σg−^3\Sigma_g^- — a triplet ground state that follows directly from filling two degenerate πg∗\pi_g^* orbitals according to Hund's rule.
  • Key idea: a molecular term symbol is the axial-symmetry projection of atomic term-symbol logic — Λ\Lambda, SS, g/ug/u, and ±\pm together fix exactly which electronic transitions the transition-dipole integral allows.

Where this lives today

Molecular term symbols are the working vocabulary of combustion diagnostics: the CN violet system (B 2Σ+→X 2Σ+B\,^2\Sigma^+\to X\,^2\Sigma^+) and C₂ Swan bands (d 3Πg→a 3Πud\,^3\Pi_g \to a\,^3\Pi_u) are routinely used to extract flame temperatures from rotational-line intensity ratios in laser-induced fluorescence and chemiluminescence diagnostics used in engine and jet-combustion research. Atmospheric and photochemical science depend on O₂'s term-symbol structure directly: the metastable 1Δg^1\Delta_g "singlet oxygen" state, forbidden from radiating back to the 3Σg−^3\Sigma_g^- ground state by both ΔS≠0\Delta S\neq0 and orbital symmetry, survives long enough to diffuse through tissue and drive photodynamic-therapy cytotoxicity, oxidative damage in photoaged materials, and much of atmospheric ozone photochemistry. Astrochemistry leans on exactly this notation to identify interstellar and cometary radicals from rotationally resolved emission bands — CN, C₂, CH, and CO⁺ term symbols are read directly off telescope spectra to infer chemical composition and excitation temperature in comet comae and diffuse interstellar clouds. In laser physics, the term symbols of N₂ and N₂⁺ excited states (C 3Πu→B 3ΠgC\,^3\Pi_u \to B\,^3\Pi_g) define the gain transition of the nitrogen laser, a workhorse pump source, while excimer lasers (ArF, KrF, XeCl) are built entirely around term-symbol-labeled bound excited states paired with dissociative ground states of noble-gas halides. Finally, cold-molecule and quantum-control experiments — laser cooling of diatomics like SrF and CaF, precision spectroscopy tests of fundamental symmetries — depend on carefully chosen Σ→Σ\Sigma\to\Sigma or near-diagonal Franck-Condon-favorable term-symbol transitions to build closed optical cycling loops, linking this labeling scheme directly to the vibronic intensity questions taken up in Electronic Transitions and Franck-Condon and to the intersystem-crossing physics of Fluorescence and Phosphorescence: The Quantum Picture.

Ask the tutor: How would the term symbol and selection rules change if we added spin-orbit coupling explicitly, moving from Hund's case (a) to case (c) for a heavy diatomic like IBr?

The physical picture

An atom lives in a spherically symmetric potential (to a first approximation, the nuclear Coulomb field), so total orbital angular momentum LL and total spin SS are good quantum numbers, and atomic term symbols 2S+1LJ^{2S+1}L_J record them. A diatomic molecule's electronic Hamiltonian, by contrast, is symmetric only under rotation about the internuclear axis (call it zz) plus, for identical nuclei, inversion through the midpoint and reflection in any plane containing the axis. Rotation about an arbitrary axis no longer commutes with the electronic Hamiltonian — only rotation about zz does. That collapses L^2\hat L^2 as a good observable; only L^z\hat L_z survives, with eigenvalues λℏ\lambda\hbar, λ=0,±1,±2,…\lambda = 0,\pm1,\pm2,\dots for each electron. Electrons occupying molecular orbitals are classified by ∣λ∣|\lambda|: a σ\sigma orbital has λ=0\lambda=0 (no angular momentum about the axis, cylindrically symmetric electron density), a π\pi orbital comes in a degenerate pair with λ=+1\lambda = +1 and λ=−1\lambda=-1 (nodal plane containing the axis), a δ\delta orbital pair has λ=±2\lambda=\pm2, and so on — precisely the atomic s,p,d,fs,p,d,f analogy rotated onto the bond axis. This is the "molecular orbital angular momentum" idea assumed as background here: it is what makes π\pi and δ\delta orbitals doubly degenerate in linear molecules. For a many-electron configuration, the total projection is the algebraic sum ML=∑iλiM_L = \sum_i \lambda_i, and because +z+z and −z-z senses of circulation are degenerate in energy (no external field breaks that symmetry), states are labeled by the magnitude

Λ=∣∑iλi∣.\Lambda = \left|\sum_i \lambda_i\right|.

States with Λ=0,1,2,3\Lambda = 0,1,2,3 are called Σ,Π,Δ,Φ\Sigma,\Pi,\Delta,\Phi respectively — the Greek-letter echo of S,P,D,FS,P,D,F. All Λ>0\Lambda>0 states are doubly degenerate (clockwise/counterclockwise circulation), just as π\pi and δ\delta orbitals are doubly degenerate. Total spin SS is built the same way as in atoms — pairwise vector addition of individual electron spins — and multiplicity 2S+12S+1 is written as a left superscript, exactly as for atoms. For centrosymmetric molecules (homonuclear diatomics, or more generally any molecule with an inversion center), the electronic wavefunction's behavior under the inversion operator i^\hat i gives a further label: gg (gerade, even, wavefunction unchanged) or uu (ungerade, odd, wavefunction sign-flipped). This is a purely orbital-parity story, built by multiplying together the individual-orbital parities. Finally, for Σ\Sigma states only, there is a subtlety with no atomic analog: reflection through any plane containing the internuclear axis (σ^v\hat\sigma_v) can either leave the total electronic wavefunction unchanged (Σ+\Sigma^+) or reverse its sign (Σ−\Sigma^-). This distinction only bites for Λ=0\Lambda=0 states because Π,Δ,…\Pi,\Delta,\dots states are doubly degenerate and σ^v\hat\sigma_v simply maps one member of the degenerate pair into the other (or into a combination), so the +/−+/- label would be ambiguous and is simply not used there. Putting all four pieces together gives the general molecular term symbol format:

2S+1Λg/u±{}^{2S+1}\Lambda_{g/u}^{\pm}

with the g/ug/u subscript present only for centrosymmetric species and the ±\pm superscript present only when Λ=0\Lambda=0.

Figure
Building Λ\Lambda from individual orbital angular-momentum projections λi\lambda_i in a linear molecule
z (bond axis) σ orbital λ = 0 π orbital pair λ = +1, −1 δ orbital pair λ = +2, −2 Example configuration: one π electron (λ=+1) + one π* electron (λ=−1) Σλᵢ = 0 → Λ = |0| = 0 → term symbol type: Σ Example: two electrons both λ=+1 → Σλᵢ = 2 → Λ = 2 → Δ state

Configurations built entirely from closed-shell σ\sigma and π\pi orbitals (all λ\lambda paired to zero) automatically give Λ=0\Lambda=0, S=0S=0: a 1Σ^1\Sigma ground state, the diatomic default. Open-shell configurations — one or two unpaired electrons in π\pi or δ\delta levels — are where the interesting term symbols (and the interesting chemistry, like O₂'s paramagnetism) come from.

Figure
Parity (g/u) from inversion of gerade and ungerade molecular orbitals
σg (bonding): lobes same sign inversion through center leaves ψ unchanged → gerade σu* (antibonding): lobes opposite sign inversion through center flips sign → ungerade

The core ideas

The total axial angular-momentum projection is

Λ=∣∑iλi∣,Λ=0,1,2,3,…  →  Σ,Π,Δ,Φ,…\Lambda = \left| \sum_i \lambda_i \right|, \qquad \Lambda = 0,1,2,3,\dots \;\to\; \Sigma,\Pi,\Delta,\Phi,\dots

where: λi\lambda_i is the signed angular-momentum projection (0,±1,±2,…0,\pm1,\pm2,\dots) of electron ii in its molecular orbital, and the sum runs over all electrons outside filled, angular-momentum-paired closed shells. Reading: Λ\Lambda behaves exactly like the atomic LL but restricted to the one surviving direction (the bond axis); the Greek-letter naming convention is a direct alphabetic transliteration of S,P,D,FS,P,D,F. Total spin follows ordinary vector-coupling rules,

S=∣∑isi∣max⁡ over allowed couplings,multiplicity=2S+1,S = \left|\sum_i s_i\right|_{\max\text{ over allowed couplings}}, \qquad \text{multiplicity} = 2S+1,

where: individual electron spins si=12s_i=\tfrac12 couple by the same Clebsch–Gordan-type addition used for atomic terms; multiplicity is written as the pre-superscript, e.g. singlet (1), doublet (2), triplet (3). Overall parity for a centrosymmetric species is the product of individual orbital parities,

g×g=g,u×u=g,g×u=u,g \times g = g, \qquad u \times u = g, \qquad g \times u = u,

where: each doubly-occupied orbital contributes g×g=gg\times g=g or u×u=gu \times u=g automatically (any orbital squared is gerade), so parity is decided entirely by the unpaired electrons' orbital parities and, subtly, by how many electrons occupy uu-type orbitals in total. Reading: parity multiplies like a Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 charge — filled shells never change it, only the number of electrons in ungerade orbitals (mod 2) matters, since gg acts as the identity. The reflection symmetry label for Σ\Sigma states is obtained from the eigenvalue of σ^v\hat\sigma_v acting on the total electronic wavefunction,

σ^v Ψel=± Ψel⇒Σ+ or Σ−,\hat\sigma_v\,\Psi_{\rm el} = \pm\,\Psi_{\rm el} \quad\Rightarrow\quad \Sigma^{+} \text{ or } \Sigma^{-},

where: σ^v\hat\sigma_v is reflection through a plane containing the internuclear axis; this label exists only for Λ=0\Lambda=0 states because for Λ≠0\Lambda\neq0, σ^v\hat\sigma_v interconverts the two degenerate components rather than acting diagonally. The electric-dipole selection rules that make term symbols operationally useful are

ΔΛ=0,±1,ΔS=0,g↔u (Laporte-type),Σ+↔Σ+, Σ−↔Σ− only,\Delta\Lambda = 0,\pm1,\qquad \Delta S = 0,\qquad g\leftrightarrow u \ \text{(Laporte-type)},\qquad \Sigma^+\leftrightarrow\Sigma^+,\ \Sigma^-\leftrightarrow\Sigma^-\ \text{only},

where: these arise from the vanishing or non-vanishing of the transition-dipole integral ⟨Ψf∣μ^∣Ψi⟩\langle \Psi_f|\hat\mu|\Psi_i\rangle under the symmetry operations of the point group; the dipole operator itself transforms as σu+\sigma_u^+-like (odd under inversion, ΔΛ=0,±1\Delta\Lambda=0,\pm1 pieces along zz and in-plane). Reading: a transition is spectroscopically "allowed" only if every one of these labels is compatible between the two states — this is the direct payoff of building term symbols in the first place, and it is exactly the machinery invoked when analyzing which bands appear in Electronic Transitions and Franck-Condon spectra.

Derivation AGround-state term symbol of O₂ from its π* configuration

Goal. Show rigorously why molecular oxygen's ground electronic state is 3Σg−^3\Sigma_g^-, not the naively expected singlet, using the filling of degenerate πg∗\pi_g^* orbitals.

Step 1 — Assemble the valence configuration. The molecular-orbital ordering for O₂ (from diatomic MO ordering, with 12 valence electrons beyond the 1s core) is

(σ2s)2(σ2s∗)2(σ2p)2(π2p)4(π2p∗)2.(\sigma_{2s})^2(\sigma_{2s}^*)^2(\sigma_{2p})^2(\pi_{2p})^4(\pi_{2p}^*)^2.

Every orbital up through (π2p)4(\pi_{2p})^4 is fully occupied (both members of each degenerate pair filled), so those shells are angular-momentum-paired (λ\lambda and −λ-\lambda both doubly occupied) and parity-paired; they contribute Λ=0\Lambda=0 and gerade character automatically, exactly as closed shells do in atomic term-symbol derivations. The entire term-symbol content is decided by the last two electrons, which occupy the doubly degenerate π2p∗\pi_{2p}^* level (λ=+1,−1\lambda=+1,-1, each orbital gerade... actually antibonding π∗\pi^* orbitals are gg in parity because π\pi bonding is uu and its antibonding partner is gg; this is confirmed in Step 3).

Step 2 — Enumerate the microstates of two electrons in a doubly degenerate orbital pair. Label the two spatial orbitals π+1∗\pi^*_{+1} and π−1∗\pi^*_{-1} (for λ=+1,−1\lambda=+1,-1). Two electrons distributed among these two spatial orbitals, each spin up or down, form (42)=6\binom{4}{2}=6 Slater determinants — identical combinatorics to two electrons in a pp-shell restricted to mℓ=±1m_\ell=\pm1 only. Classify by ML=λ1+λ2M_L = \lambda_1+\lambda_2 and MS=ms1+ms2M_S=m_{s1}+m_{s2}:

  • Both electrons in π+1∗\pi^*_{+1} (opposite spins, Pauli-forced): ML=+2M_L=+2, MS=0M_S=0.
  • Both electrons in π−1∗\pi^*_{-1} (opposite spins): ML=−2M_L=-2, MS=0M_S=0.
  • One in each orbital, spins parallel (two ways, MS=+1,−1M_S=+1,-1): ML=0M_L=0, MS=±1M_S=\pm1.
  • One in each orbital, spins paired, two determinants combining into singlet and triplet-MS=0M_S=0 components: ML=0M_L=0, MS=0M_S=0 (two such determinants).

This tally of 6 microstates matches p2p^2-in-restricted-mℓm_\ell counting exactly, giving term symbols 1Δ^1\Delta (ML=±2M_L=\pm2, 2 states), 3Σ^3\Sigma (ML=0M_L=0, MS=0,±1M_S=0,\pm1, 3 states), and 1Σ^1\Sigma (ML=0M_L=0, MS=0M_S=0, 1 state) — total 2+3+1=62+3+1=6, checking out.

Step 3 — Apply Hund's rule and determine parity/reflection labels. Hund's first rule (maximum multiplicity is lowest in energy for the same orbital occupation) picks out the triplet, 3Σ^3\Sigma, as the ground term; 1Δ^1\Delta and 1Σ^1\Sigma lie higher (experimentally at 0.98 eV and 1.63 eV above ground, the famous singlet-oxygen states responsible for photodynamic and photosensitized oxidation chemistry). For parity: a bonding πu\pi_u orbital is ungerade, so its antibonding partner πg∗\pi_g^* is gerade (u×u−1u\times u^{-1} flips under inversion in the antibonding combination, giving gg symmetry — this is the standard MO parity-inversion pattern also seen in σg→σu∗\sigma_g\to\sigma_u^*). Two electrons in gg-type orbitals give overall parity g×g=gg\times g = g. For the reflection label on the 3Σ^3\Sigma term: constructing the spatial part explicit as π+1∗π−1∗−π−1∗π+1∗\pi^*_{+1}\pi^*_{-1} - \pi^*_{-1}\pi^*_{+1} (antisymmetric combination, required to pair with the symmetric triplet spin function) picks up a minus sign under σ^v\hat\sigma_v, so this term is Σ−\Sigma^-; the 1Σ^1\Sigma state built from the symmetric spatial combination is Σ+\Sigma^+.

Result.

O2 ground state=3Σg−,\text{O}_2 \ \text{ground state} = {}^3\Sigma_g^{-},

with excited 1Δg^1\Delta_g at 0.98 eV and 1Σg+^1\Sigma_g^+ at 1.63 eV above it — all from the same πg∗2\pi_g^{*2} configuration, and all three states are optically dark to each other in electric-dipole transitions from ground because ΔS≠0\Delta S \neq 0 for the two singlets (making atmospheric singlet-oxygen emission at 1270 nm an extremely slow, "forbidden" magnetic-dipole process).

Go deeper · Derivation B · 2 minSelection rule ΔΛ=0,±1\Delta\Lambda=0,\pm1 from the transition dipole integral
Derivation BSelection rule ΔΛ=0,±1\Delta\Lambda=0,\pm1 from the transition dipole integral

Goal. Derive the ΔΛ\Delta\Lambda selection rule directly from symmetry properties of the electric dipole operator under rotation about the bond axis, paralleling how atomic ΔL=0,±1\Delta L=0,\pm1 arises from spherical-tensor selection rules.

Step 1 — Write the transition moment and its axial rotation behavior. The transition dipole is

μ⃗fi=⟨Ψf∣μ⃗^∣Ψi⟩,μ⃗^=−e∑kr⃗k.\vec\mu_{fi} = \langle \Psi_f | \hat{\vec\mu} | \Psi_i \rangle,\qquad \hat{\vec\mu} = -e\sum_k \vec r_k .

Decompose μ⃗^\hat{\vec\mu} into a component along the bond axis (μz\mu_z, transforms as Σ+\Sigma^+/λ=0\lambda=0) and two components perpendicular to it (μx,μy\mu_x,\mu_y, which combine into μ+1=−12(μx+iμy)\mu_{+1}=-\tfrac{1}{\sqrt2}(\mu_x+i\mu_y) and μ−1=12(μx−iμy)\mu_{-1}=\tfrac{1}{\sqrt2}(\mu_x-i\mu_y), transforming as λ=+1\lambda=+1 and λ=−1\lambda=-1 respectively — exactly the spherical-tensor components used for atomic dipole selection rules).

Step 2 — Rotate about the bond axis by angle ϕ\phi. Under a rotation R^z(ϕ)\hat R_z(\phi) about the internuclear axis, an electronic state of definite Λ\Lambda (built from orbitals of definite λ\lambda) picks up a phase,

R^z(ϕ) ΨΛ=e−iΛϕ ΨΛ,\hat R_z(\phi)\,\Psi_{\Lambda} = e^{-i\Lambda\phi}\,\Psi_\Lambda ,

(taking ML=ΛM_L=\Lambda as representative; the doubly degenerate partner picks up e+iΛϕe^{+i\Lambda\phi}). The dipole components transform the same way with their own λμ=0,±1\lambda_\mu = 0,\pm1.

Step 3 — Demand overall invariance of the integral. The full integrand Ψf∗ μq Ψi\Psi_f^{*}\,\mu_q\,\Psi_i (with q=0,±1q=0,\pm1 labeling the spherical dipole component) must be invariant under R^z(ϕ)\hat R_z(\phi) for the integral to survive integration over all ϕ\phi (any ϕ\phi-dependent phase integrates to zero over the full range unless it cancels exactly). Writing the phase accumulated by each piece,

e+iΛfϕ  eiqϕ  e−iΛiϕ=ei(Λf−Λi+q)ϕ.e^{+i\Lambda_f\phi}\; e^{i q \phi}\; e^{-i\Lambda_i \phi} = e^{i(\Lambda_f - \Lambda_i + q)\phi}.

This phase is independent of ϕ\phi (i.e., equals 1 for all ϕ\phi) only if the exponent vanishes,

Λf−Λi+q=0⇒Λf−Λi=−q.\Lambda_f - \Lambda_i + q = 0 \quad\Rightarrow\quad \Lambda_f - \Lambda_i = -q .

Step 4 — Read off the allowed values. Since qq can be 00 (from μz\mu_z) or ±1\pm1 (from μx,μy\mu_x,\mu_y combinations), the allowed changes are

ΔΛ≡Λf−Λi=0,±1.\Delta\Lambda \equiv \Lambda_f - \Lambda_i = 0, \pm 1.

ΔΛ=0\Delta\Lambda=0 transitions (e.g. Σ→Σ\Sigma\to\Sigma, Π→Π\Pi\to\Pi) are driven by the axial dipole component (zz-polarized, parallel bands); ΔΛ=±1\Delta\Lambda=\pm1 transitions (e.g. Σ→Π\Sigma\to\Pi) are driven by the perpendicular components (perpendicular bands) — this parallel/perpendicular band classification is exactly what rotational fine structure analysis in vibronic spectroscopy exploits to assign Λ\Lambda values experimentally.

Result.

ΔΛ=0,±1\boxed{\Delta\Lambda = 0,\pm1}

derived purely from the requirement that the transition-dipole integral be invariant under continuous rotation about the molecular axis — the diatomic analogue of the atomic ΔL=0,±1\Delta L=0,\pm1 dipole selection rule, but arising from a one-dimensional (axial) rather than three-dimensional rotation group.

Worked examples

Example 1 — Foundational: term symbol of the CN radical ground state. CN has 13 valence electrons (4 from C, 5 from N valence, wait — count properly: C contributes 4 valence electrons, N contributes 5, total 9 valence electrons; core 1s² on each nucleus are omitted). The valence MO filling order for CN (isoelectronic-ish with N₂⁺ patterns, and experimentally established) is

(σ2s)2(σ2s∗)2(π2p)4(σ2p)1,(\sigma_{2s})^2(\sigma_{2s}^*)^2(\pi_{2p})^4(\sigma_{2p})^1,

using 2+2+4+1 = 9 valence electrons. All orbitals except the last are fully paired: (σ2s)2(\sigma_{2s})^2 contributes λ=0\lambda=0 paired, (σ2s∗)2(\sigma_{2s}^*)^2 contributes λ=0\lambda=0 paired, (π2p)4(\pi_{2p})^4 has all four π\pi slots (λ=+1\lambda=+1 up/down, λ=−1\lambda=-1 up/down) filled, so ∑λ=0\sum\lambda = 0 from that shell too. The single electron in σ2p\sigma_{2p} carries λ=0\lambda=0 and spin s=12s=\tfrac12.

Λ=∣0+0+0+0∣=0 ⇒ Σ state,S=12 ⇒ 2S+1=2 (doublet).\Lambda = |0+0+0+0| = 0 \ \Rightarrow\ \Sigma \text{ state}, \qquad S = \tfrac12 \ \Rightarrow\ 2S+1 = 2\ (\text{doublet}).

CN is heteronuclear (no inversion center), so there is no g/ug/u label. For the +/−+/- label on this Σ\Sigma state: a single electron in a σ\sigma orbital is symmetric under σ^v\hat\sigma_v (a σ\sigma orbital has no nodal plane containing the axis, cylindrically symmetric), so the overall wavefunction is symmetric,

CN ground state=2Σ+.\text{CN ground state} = {}^2\Sigma^{+}.

This matches the spectroscopically established ground term of the CN radical, X 2Σ+X\,^2\Sigma^+, whose violet-system emission (B 2Σ+→X 2Σ+B\,^2\Sigma^+ \to X\,^2\Sigma^+) is a classic combustion and astrochemical diagnostic (it is how comet tails and Bunsen-flame edges are identified spectroscopically). As a limiting-case check: if instead this last electron sat in a π\pi orbital (one π\pi electron only, half-filled π\pi shell), the same bookkeeping would give Λ=1\Lambda=1 (a 2Π^2\Pi state, no +/−+/- label needed since Λ≠0\Lambda\neq0) — confirming the formula correctly distinguishes shell type, not merely electron count.

Example 2 — Applied: term symbols of the C₂ Swan-band states relevant to combustion diagnostics. The Swan bands of C₂ (d 3Πg→a 3Πud\,^3\Pi_g \to a\,^3\Pi_u), central to flame emission spectroscopy and comet-tail chemistry, connect two triplet Π\Pi states of opposite parity. Build the lower (a 3Πua\,^3\Pi_u) term from the C₂ valence configuration (8 valence electrons, C contributing 4 each):

(σ2s)2(σ2s∗)2(π2p)3(σ2p)1.(\sigma_{2s})^2(\sigma_{2s}^*)^2(\pi_{2p})^3(\sigma_{2p})^1.

(This ordering, with π2p\pi_{2p} below σ2p\sigma_{2p}, is the well-known C₂/B₂/N₂-type "reversed" MO ordering for light homonuclear diatomics, an important instance of the general diatomic MO ordering rules.) The closed shells (σ2s)2(σ2s∗)2(\sigma_{2s})^2(\sigma_{2s}^*)^2 contribute nothing to Λ\Lambda or SS. The open shell here has three electrons in π2p\pi_{2p} (out of four slots) plus one in σ2p\sigma_{2p}. Three electrons in the four π\pi slots (λ=+1,+1,−1,−1\lambda=+1,+1,-1,-1 for the four spin-orbitals) is equivalent to one hole in an otherwise filled π4\pi^4 shell: the missing electron determines Λ\Lambda and SS contributions just as a single "hole" does in atomic p5p^5 configurations. A single hole in π2p\pi_{2p} gives Λ=1\Lambda=1 from the π\pi shell (a π\pi-hole carries the same ∣λ∣=1|\lambda|=1 as a π\pi-electron) and contributes spin 12\tfrac12. Coupling this with the additional unpaired electron in σ2p\sigma_{2p} (λ=0\lambda=0, spin 12\tfrac12), total

Λ=∣1+0∣=1 ⇒ Π state,S=12+12=1 ⇒ 2S+1=3 (triplet),\Lambda = |1 + 0| = 1 \ \Rightarrow\ \Pi\text{ state}, \qquad S = \tfrac12+\tfrac12 = 1 \ \Rightarrow\ 2S+1=3\ (\text{triplet}),

so Λ=1\Lambda=1, triplet: a 3Π^3\Pi term. Parity: bonding π2p\pi_{2p} is uu; a hole in a uu-type shell still carries net uu character in the product sense used for open shells (an odd number of electrons in uu-type orbitals overall gives uu); the extra electron in σ2p\sigma_{2p}^{} here is gerade in this MO scheme (bonding σ2p\sigma_{2p} built from 2pz2p_z AOs is gg). Combining uu (from the π\pi hole) ×\times gg (from the σ\sigma electron) =u= u:

C2 a-state=3Πu,\text{C}_2\ a\text{-state} = {}^3\Pi_u,

matching the spectroscopically assigned metastable a 3Πua\,^3\Pi_u state of C₂ (long-lived, itself the reservoir state feeding the Swan system, and one of the strongest sources of visible flame and comet emission). The upper state d 3Πgd\,^3\Pi_g arises from promoting an electron so the odd-parity count flips, giving overall gg parity while preserving Λ=1,S=1\Lambda=1,S=1. The transition d 3Πg→a 3Πud\,^3\Pi_g \to a\,^3\Pi_u obeys ΔΛ=0\Delta\Lambda=0 (allowed, parallel-type in the Λ\Lambda sense though it is actually a Π\Pi–Π\Pi transition with both perpendicular and parallel components structurally), ΔS=0\Delta S=0 (triplet–triplet, allowed), and g↔ug\leftrightarrow u (Laporte-allowed) — all selection rules satisfied, consistent with the Swan system being one of the most intense combustion emissions used to estimate flame temperatures.

Example 3 — Exam/competition level: determining all term symbols from an excited O₂ configuration, and checking a non-round-number energy ordering. Consider a hypothetical (but pedagogically standard) exercise: an electron is promoted from (π2p)4(\pi_{2p})^4 into (σ2p∗)1(\sigma_{2p}^{*})^1 in O₂'s valence framework, giving the excited configuration

(σ2p)2(π2p)3(π2p∗)2(σ2p∗)1,(\sigma_{2p})^2(\pi_{2p})^3(\pi_{2p}^*)^2(\sigma_{2p}^*)^1,

(core and 2s2s shells omitted as always, since they are closed and paired). This configuration has three open subshells to handle: a π2p\pi_{2p} hole (3 of 4 slots filled), a full π2p∗2\pi_{2p}^{*2} (which by Example-1-style analysis of Section "core ideas" derivation gives its own sub-terms 1Δ, 3Σ−, 1Σ+^1\Delta,\ ^3\Sigma^-,\ ^1\Sigma^+ exactly as derived for ground-state O₂), and a single σ2p∗\sigma_{2p}^* electron. Focus on just the spin/orbital bookkeeping for the overall lowest-energy term (Hund's-rule ground member of this excited manifold), since a full multi-term enumeration is a much longer group-theoretic reduction. Take the π2p\pi_{2p} hole (contributes ∣λ∣=1|\lambda|=1, spin 12\tfrac12) coupled with the π2p∗2\pi_{2p}^{*2} pair in its own triplet-Σ−\Sigma^- substate (Λ=0\Lambda=0 contribution, S=1S=1 from that pair) and the lone σ2p∗\sigma_{2p}^* electron (λ=0\lambda=0, spin 12\tfrac12). Coupling orbital parts,

Λtotal=∣±1+0+0∣=1 ⇒ Π,\Lambda_{\text{total}} = |{\pm1} + 0 + 0| = 1 \ \Rightarrow\ \Pi ,

and coupling all spins for maximum multiplicity (Hund's rule favors the highest achievable SS among these three unpaired-spin carriers: the hole spin 12\tfrac12, the π∗2\pi^{*2} pair's triplet spin 11, and the lone σ∗\sigma^* spin 12\tfrac12),

Smax⁡=12+1+12=2 ⇒ 2S+1=5 (quintet).S_{\max} = \tfrac12 + 1 + \tfrac12 = 2 \ \Rightarrow\ 2S+1 = 5\ (\text{quintet}).

This gives a 5Π^5\Pi state as the highest-multiplicity term reachable from this configuration — a useful check because it demonstrates that promoting an electron out of a closed shell can, via Hund's-rule spin-stacking across independently-open subshells, generate multiplicities well beyond simple doublet/triplet expectations, exactly the kind of non-obvious, non-round-number result (quintet, not the "expected" triplet or singlet) that a rigorous subshell-by-subshell derivation — rather than a memorized shortcut — is needed to catch. Parity follows the same product rule: π2p\pi_{2p} hole is uu-type (bonding π\pi is uu), π2p∗2\pi_{2p}^{*2} pair is g×g=gg\times g=g (gerade squared), σ2p∗\sigma_{2p}^* single electron is uu-type (antibonding σ\sigma is uu); total parity u×g×u=gu\times g\times u = g. So this particular high-spin term is 5Πg^5\Pi_g — an experimentally real, if weakly populated, excited state family in the O₂ manifold above the well-known 3Σg−,1Δg,1Σg+^3\Sigma_g^-, {}^1\Delta_g, {}^1\Sigma_g^+ triad.

Limiting cases, scope & common traps

SituationWhat happens to the term symbolWhy
All electrons in closed shells1Σ+^1\Sigma^+ (homonuclear: 1Σg+^1\Sigma_g^+) alwaysEvery λ\lambda and every spin is paired; this is the universal closed-shell diatomic ground term
Heteronuclear diatomic (e.g. CO, CN, HF)No g/ug/u label at allNo inversion center exists, so parity is not a symmetry operation of the molecular point group C∞vC_{\infty v}
Λ≥1\Lambda \geq 1 state (Π,Δ,…\Pi,\Delta,\dots)No +/−+/- labelσ^v\hat\sigma_v swaps the two degenerate components rather than acting as a ±1\pm1 eigenvalue on a single state
Two electrons in the same doubly-degenerate open shell (e.g. π2\pi^2, δ2\delta^2)Splits into multiple terms (1Δ^1\Delta, 3Σ−^3\Sigma^-, 1Σ+^1\Sigma^+ for π2\pi^2) exactly like atomic p2p^2Same SO(2)×S2SO(2)\times S_2 combinatorics as atomic term-symbol splitting, just restricted to axial mℓ=±1m_\ell=\pm1 instead of full mℓ=−1,0,1m_\ell=-1,0,1
One electron promoted from σg→σu∗\sigma_g \to \sigma_u^*Parity flips from gg to uu overallParity is decided electron-by-electron; changing one electron's shell parity changes the product
Applying ΔΛ=0,±1\Delta\Lambda=0,\pm1 to a Σ−→Σ+\Sigma^-\to\Sigma^+ transitionForbidden even though ΔΛ=0\Delta\Lambda=0 is satisfiedThe extra +/−+/- rule is independent of and additional to the ΔΛ\Delta\Lambda rule — both must hold
Linear polyatomics (e.g. CO₂, C₂H₂) treated same waySame Σ,Π,Δ\Sigma,\Pi,\Delta labeling extends directlyD∞hD_{\infty h} or C∞vC_{\infty v} symmetry applies identically; term symbols are a point-group statement, not specific to two atoms
Bent or nonlinear moleculesTerm symbols in this Greek-letter form do not applyOnly axial (C∞v/D∞hC_{\infty v}/D_{\infty h}) symmetry supports a conserved Λ\Lambda; bent molecules use point-group irreducible representation labels instead (A₁, B₂, etc.)

The chemist behind it

The formal grammar of molecular term symbols was assembled through the joint efforts of molecular spectroscopists who translated Russell–Saunders atomic coupling into the reduced symmetry of linear molecules; the individual most closely tied to systematizing diatomic electronic-state notation and its use in band-spectra analysis is Robert S. Mulliken, whose extensive 1920s–1930s papers on molecular orbital theory and electronic states of diatomic molecules established the Greek-letter labeling scheme, the g/ug/u and +/−+/- conventions, and the selection rules connecting them to observed band systems.

Origins · 1 minRobert Sanderson Mulliken and how this was discovered
RS
Robert Sanderson Mulliken
1896–1986 · American physical chemist, principal architect of molecular orbital theory and diatomic term-symbol notation, Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1966

Mulliken trained initially as a chemist at MIT and Chicago, working during World War I on isotope separation, before turning to the emerging quantum mechanics of molecular spectra in the 1920s. Where Hund had begun classifying diatomic electronic states by correlating them with united-atom and separated-atom limits, Mulliken systematized the molecular-orbital picture into a working spectroscopic language: MO configurations built from σ,π,δ\sigma,\pi,\delta orbitals, combined into term symbols carrying Λ\Lambda, spin multiplicity, and parity, precisely so that band-spectra assignments (which vibronic transitions appear, which are missing, why some bands are strong and others faint) could be read off systematically rather than fit ad hoc. His decades-long correlation-diagram and notation work, done partly in dialogue with Friedrich Hund and later with Robert Milliken's contemporaries in the emerging LCAO-MO framework, became the standard reference notation still used verbatim in every modern spectroscopy textbook. He received the 1966 Nobel Prize in Chemistry "for his fundamental work concerning chemical bonds and the electronic structure of molecules by the molecular orbital method."

History
- 1926-1928 — Friedrich Hund develops correlation diagrams connecting united-atom and separated-atom orbital limits, seeding the σ,π,δ\sigma,\pi,\delta labeling of molecular orbitals.
- 1928-1932 — Robert Mulliken publishes a series of papers systematizing molecular-orbital configurations and introducing consistent Λ\Lambda, multiplicity, g/ug/u notation for diatomic electronic states.
- 1930s — Term-symbol-based selection rules (ΔΛ\Delta\Lambda, ΔS\Delta S, g↔ug\leftrightarrow u, Σ+ ⁣↔ ⁣Σ+\Sigma^+\!\leftrightarrow\!\Sigma^+) are matched systematically against observed band spectra of N₂, O₂, CO, and other diatomics.
- 1966 — Mulliken awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for molecular orbital theory, cementing MO-based term-symbol notation as the standard spectroscopic language.
- Present — the same notation, unchanged in form, labels electronic states probed in modern diode-laser diatomic spectroscopy, astrochemical detection of interstellar radicals, and cold-molecule quantum-control experiments.
Why is Λ\Lambda, not LL, the good quantum number for diatomics?

An atom's Hamiltonian is invariant under rotation about any axis through the nucleus, so the full orbital angular momentum operator L^2\hat L^2 commutes with H^\hat H, making LL well-defined. A diatomic molecule's electronic Hamiltonian includes two off-center nuclear attraction terms, and rotating the electron cloud about an axis perpendicular to the bond changes the electron-nucleus distances — it is not a symmetry operation. Only rotation about the bond axis itself (the zz-axis) leaves the Hamiltonian unchanged, so only L^z\hat L_z commutes with H^\hat H, and only its eigenvalue Λℏ\Lambda\hbar (or, per-electron, λℏ\lambda\hbar) survives as a conserved, sharp quantum number. This is precisely why molecular orbital angular momentum is classified by ∣λ∣|\lambda| rather than by a full ℓ\ell value.

Do all diatomic molecules have a g/u label?

No — only centrosymmetric ones, meaning homonuclear diatomics (N₂, O₂, F₂, Cl₂) or symmetric arrangements with a true inversion center. Heteronuclear diatomics like CO, HF, or CN have no inversion center in their point group (C∞vC_{\infty v} rather than D∞hD_{\infty h}), so inversion is not a symmetry operation of the molecular Hamiltonian and the g/ug/u label is simply omitted, not assigned as some default value. This is a common place students over-apply the label by analogy; always check whether the two nuclei (and their full electronic environment) are actually related by an inversion center before writing gg or uu.

Why does O₂'s triplet ground state matter chemically?

Because O₂'s ground term is 3Σg−^3\Sigma_g^- (spin S=1S=1, two unpaired electrons in the degenerate πg∗\pi_g^* orbitals), ordinary organic molecules — almost all of which have singlet (S=0S=0) ground states — cannot react with ground-state O₂ via simple spin-allowed elementary steps without first either promoting O₂ to a reactive intermediate or going through a spin-forbidden (hence slow) pathway. This spin mismatch is the underlying reason combustion generally requires radical-chain initiation rather than direct O₂ insertion, and it is why the excited 1Δg^1\Delta_g singlet-oxygen state — despite lying only about 1 eV higher — is such a dramatically more reactive oxidant in photooxidation, singlet-oxygen-mediated polymer degradation, and photodynamic therapy.

How does the +/−+/- label actually get used in practice, beyond formal bookkeeping?

It directly filters which Σ→Σ\Sigma\to\Sigma transitions can appear in an observed spectrum: only Σ+↔Σ+\Sigma^+\leftrightarrow\Sigma^+ and Σ−↔Σ−\Sigma^-\leftrightarrow\Sigma^- are electric-dipole allowed, while Σ+↔Σ−\Sigma^+\leftrightarrow\Sigma^- is strictly forbidden regardless of spin or parity match. This is precisely why O₂'s b 1Σg+→X 3Σg−b\,^1\Sigma_g^+ \to X\,^3\Sigma_g^- atmospheric band (762 nm, used in satellite remote sensing of atmospheric oxygen and pressure) is doubly forbidden — spin-forbidden and +↔−+\leftrightarrow- forbidden — yet is still faintly observed via higher-order (magnetic-dipole and spin-orbit-assisted) mechanisms, making it an extremely weak but diagnostically valuable line.

Is there an analogous notation for polyatomic molecules?

Only linear polyatomics (CO₂, C₂H₂, HCN) retain the same Σ,Π,Δ\Sigma,\Pi,\Delta machinery, because they share the same C∞vC_{\infty v} or D∞hD_{\infty h} axial symmetry as diatomics — a conserved projection of angular momentum on the molecular axis still exists. Bent or fully three-dimensional polyatomics (H₂O, NH₃, benzene) lose the continuous axial rotation symmetry entirely, so there is no conserved Λ\Lambda; their electronic states are instead labeled by irreducible representations of their specific point group (A₁, B₂, E, T₂, etc.), which is the natural generalization but uses entirely different notation and combination rules.

Why do closed-shell diatomics always default to 1Σ+^1\Sigma^+ (or 1Σg+^1\Sigma_g^+ if homonuclear)?

Every electron in a fully occupied orbital pairs with a partner of opposite spin (giving S=0S=0) and, for degenerate π,δ,…\pi,\delta,\dots shells, with a partner of opposite λ\lambda (giving ∑λ=0\sum\lambda=0 from that shell), and any σ\sigma-orbital electron already has λ=0\lambda=0. So a closed-shell configuration algebraically forces Λ=0\Lambda=0 and S=0S=0 regardless of which specific orbitals are filled — the term symbol reduces to Σ\Sigma, singlet, symmetric under σ^v\hat\sigma_v (since every closed shell's spatial wavefunction is symmetric), giving 1Σ+^1\Sigma^+ universally. This is why N₂, CO, and HF all share the label 1Σ+^1\Sigma^+ (or 1Σg+^1\Sigma_g^+ for N₂) despite being chemically very different molecules.

What breaks down in this scheme for heavier diatomics?

For diatomics containing heavy atoms, spin-orbit coupling becomes comparable to or larger than the electrostatic splitting between different Λ,S\Lambda,S terms, and Λ\Lambda and SS individually stop being good quantum numbers — only their combined projection Ω=Λ+Σspin\Omega = \Lambda + \Sigma_{\text{spin}} (where Σspin\Sigma_{\text{spin}} is the spin projection on the axis, unfortunately using the same Greek letter as the orbital Σ\Sigma term but meaning something different) survives well, leading to Hund's case (c) coupling and term symbols written as Ω\Omega subscripts, e.g. 2Π1/2^2\Pi_{1/2} and 2Π3/2^2\Pi_{3/2} split apart by spin-orbit coupling, as seen prominently in iodine, bismuth, and other heavy-atom diatomics.

Before this

Where this leads