Measurement Uncertainty
Every measurement made in physics carries an inherent limitation: no instrument can measure a quantity with perfect exactness. Measurement uncertainty is the quantitative expression of this doubt — it tells us the range of values within which the true value of a measured quantity is likely to lie. Writing a result as m means the true length probably falls between 5.39 m and 5.45 m. Uncertainty is not a mistake or a failure; it is an honest statement about the limits of our knowledge. Uncertainty arises from several sources. Random errors cause repeated measurements to scatter around a central value — these are unpredictable fluctuations due to noise, vibration, or the limits of human reaction time. Systematic errors shift every reading in the same direction, perhaps because a ruler starts at 1 mm instead of 0 mm, or a balance is not zeroed. Resolution uncertainty is set by the smallest division on an instrument: a ruler marked in millimetres cannot reliably report a length to the nearest 0.01 mm. Understanding and quantifying these contributions is the first skill of experimental physics. The formal treatment of uncertainty follows rules developed over centuries of careful measurement science, standardised today by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM). Mastering these rules allows scientists and engineers to judge whether two measurements agree, whether an experiment supports a theory, and how much trust to place in any reported value. This article explains absolute and percentage uncertainty, how uncertainties combine when quantities are added, subtracted, multiplied, or divided, and how to express a final result correctly.
- Absolute Uncertainty
- Percentage (Relative) Uncertainty
- Combining Uncertainties: Addition and Subtraction
- Combining Uncertainties: Multiplication and Division
- Mean Value and Uncertainty from Repeated Readings
- Significant Figures and Correct Presentation
Absolute Uncertainty
The absolute uncertainty is expressed in the same units as the measured quantity . When reading an analogue instrument, the absolute uncertainty is typically half the smallest scale division. For example, a ruler with 1 mm divisions gives mm. For a digital instrument, take the last displayed digit as the absolute uncertainty, e.g. a voltmeter reading 3.47 V has V. The result is written .
Percentage (Relative) Uncertainty
The percentage uncertainty expresses the absolute uncertainty as a fraction of the measured value, multiplied by 100: \text{Percentage uncertainty} = \frac{\Delta x}{x} \times 100\%. A short pencil of length 50 mm measured with mm has a 1 % uncertainty, whereas a 300 mm ruler length measured with the same instrument has only 0.17 % uncertainty. Percentage uncertainty reveals how significant the error is relative to the measurement itself.
Combining Uncertainties: Addition and Subtraction
When two quantities are added or subtracted to find a result , the absolute uncertainties add: \Delta z = \Delta x + \Delta y. This is the most conservative rule — uncertainties never cancel when combined. Example: measuring a rod by finding both ends on a ruler gives a length , so . Even though one reading is subtracted, both uncertainties contribute positively to .
Combining Uncertainties: Multiplication and Division
When quantities are multiplied or divided to give or , the percentage uncertainties add: \frac{\Delta z}{z} = \frac{\Delta x}{x} + \frac{\Delta y}{y}. This rule extends to powers: if , then . For example, if you calculate the area of a square from a measured side , the percentage uncertainty in the area is twice the percentage uncertainty in , because .
Mean Value and Uncertainty from Repeated Readings
When a measurement is repeated times, giving values , the best estimate is the mean . The uncertainty can be estimated as half the range of the readings: . In more advanced work, the standard error of the mean, , is used, where is the standard deviation of the data set. Both approaches acknowledge that more repeated readings reduce the random component of uncertainty.
Significant Figures and Correct Presentation
An uncertainty should be quoted to one or two significant figures, and the measured value must be rounded to the same decimal place as the uncertainty. Writing m s is incorrect because the value is quoted to four decimal places but the uncertainty is only known to one. The correct form is m s. This discipline prevents the false impression of precision that would mislead anyone using the result.
The Key Equation
V = 119 \pm 4 \text{ cm}^3
Origins · 1 minCarl Friedrich Gauss and how this was discovered
Gauss developed the method of least squares around 1795 (published 1809), providing the mathematical foundation for minimising measurement errors when fitting a model to data. He showed that, for random errors following a normal distribution, the arithmetic mean is the best estimate of the true value. The bell-shaped Gaussian distribution that describes random measurement errors is named in his honour. Gauss reportedly discovered the method of least squares at age 18, before the French mathematician Legendre published it independently in 1805 — a priority dispute that became one of mathematics' most famous controversies.
Related Concepts
- Systematic and Random Errors — Uncertainty arises from both random scatter and systematic offsets; distinguishing these two types of error is essential for understanding and reducing overall measurement uncertainty.
- Significant Figures — The rules for significant figures determine how a result and its uncertainty are correctly rounded and presented, preventing the false impression of precision.
- Units and Dimensions — Absolute uncertainty must always be expressed in the same physical units as the measured quantity; understanding dimensional analysis ensures uncertainties are handled consistently.
- Graphs and Data Analysis in Experiments — Error bars on graphs are a visual representation of measurement uncertainty, and the range of possible gradients through error bars propagates uncertainty into any calculated physical constant.