ARCHETYPE: Bohr-Model & Spectral-Line Numericals

Hand an examiner one hydrogen atom and the number −13.6-13.6, and they can mint a whole exam paper from it. Find the radius of the third orbit. Find the speed of the electron in the ground state. Find the energy released when it drops from n=4n=4 to n=2n=2, and the colour of the light that carries it away. Count how many different spectral lines a gas excited to n=5n=5 can emit. Find the ionisation energy of a helium ion. Every one of these is the same physics — Bohr's quantised ladder, En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 electronvolts — wearing a different exam costume. Learn the ladder once and the whole family becomes fill-in-the-blanks. This is a numerical gym, so the bookkeeping is the article. At its centre sit three locked facts about a one-electron atom: the allowed orbits have radii rn=0.529 n2/Zr_n = 0.529\,n^2/Z ångström, the electron in them moves at vn=2.19×106 Z/nv_n = 2.19\times10^6\,Z/n metres per second, and — the master number — each orbit holds the electron with energy En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 electronvolts. Light is emitted or absorbed only when the electron jumps between two rungs, carrying away exactly the energy gap ΔE=Ehigh−Elow\Delta E = E_{\text{high}} - E_{\text{low}} as one photon, and the photon shortcut λ[nm]=1240/ΔE[eV]\lambda[\text{nm}] = 1240/\Delta E[\text{eV}] turns that gap straight into a wavelength. The trap that costs half the class its marks is a single sign: the energies are negative, so n=1n=1 is the lowest, most tightly bound rung, and climbing the ladder means becoming less bound, not more. Keep the sign straight, keep −13.6-13.6 and 12401240 on the tip of your pen, and every Bohr-model and spectral-line numerical on CBSE, ICSE, JEE and NEET — and every energy-level and line-spectrum numerical on AP Physics 2 and A-Level 9702 — falls out of it.

Key takeaways
  • The engine of every Bohr numerical is the energy ladder En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 eV — negative, so n=1n=1 is the ground state (most bound) and higher nn is less bound.
  • The orbit geometry scales cleanly: radius rn=0.529 n2/Zr_n = 0.529\,n^2/Z Å grows as n2n^2, speed vn=2.19×106 Z/nv_n = 2.19\times10^6\,Z/n m/s falls as 1/n1/n.
  • A photon is emitted only on a jump between rungs: ΔE=Ehigh−Elow=13.6 Z2 ⁣(1/n12−1/n22)\Delta E = E_{\text{high}} - E_{\text{low}} = 13.6\,Z^2\!\left(1/n_1^2 - 1/n_2^2\right) eV, then λ[nm]=1240/ΔE[eV]\lambda[\text{nm}] = 1240/\Delta E[\text{eV}].
  • Ionisation energy is just ∣En∣|E_n|: 13.613.6 eV from the ground state of hydrogen, but only 3.43.4 eV from n=2n=2, and 54.454.4 eV from the ground state of He⁺.
  • A gas excited to level nn can emit n(n−1)/2n(n-1)/2 distinct lines — 66 from n=4n=4, 1010 from n=5n=5 — one for every pair of rungs.
  • ZZ-scaling is the competitive-exam favourite: energies grow as Z2Z^2, radii shrink as 1/Z1/Z, wavelengths shrink as 1/Z21/Z^2 — so He⁺ repeats hydrogen's spectrum at one-quarter the wavelength.
  • Key idea: one ladder, En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 eV, plus the photon rule λ=1240/ΔE\lambda = 1240/\Delta E and the line count n(n−1)/2n(n-1)/2, solve the whole Bohr-model numerical family — provided you never lose the minus sign.
The core insight

Every Bohr-model numerical reduces to the quantised energy ladder En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 eV: orbit radius scales as n2/Zn^2/Z and speed as Z/nZ/n, a transition emits a photon of energy ΔE=Ehigh−Elow\Delta E = E_{\text{high}} - E_{\text{low}} and wavelength λ=1240/ΔE\lambda = 1240/\Delta E, ionisation from level nn costs ∣En∣|E_n|, and a gas reaching level nn shows n(n−1)/2n(n-1)/2 spectral lines.

Where this lives today

The two-line ladder you just drilled is still the working language of astronomy. When astronomers point a spectrograph at a star or a glowing nebula, they read its composition straight off the Balmer and Lyman lines of hydrogen — and they measure the universe's expansion by how far those same 656656 nm and 122122 nm lines have been red-shifted, a calculation that begins with λ=1240/ΔE\lambda = 1240/\Delta E. The Z2Z^2 scaling of example 4 is not a curiosity: hydrogen-like highly charged ions are made routinely in ion traps and tokamak plasmas, and their far-ultraviolet and X-ray lines, sitting exactly where Z2Z^2 says they should, diagnose the temperature of fusion plasmas and the solar corona. And the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantum numbers — refined into today's nn, ℓ\ell, mm and spin — are the labels on every orbital in every chemistry textbook, the scaffold on which the whole periodic table is built. A model that a modern physicist calls "wrong in its picture but right in its numbers" turns out to be right enough to run an industry.

The setup

Bookkeeping first, because in a numerical gym the accounting is the physics. Bohr's picture of a one-electron atom — hydrogen, or a bare ion like He⁺ or Li²⁺ that has been stripped down to a single electron — is a nucleus of charge +Ze+Ze with one electron circling it on a set of allowed orbits and no others. Two postulates fix everything. First, the electron's angular momentum is quantised in whole steps: mvr=n h/2πmvr = n\,h/2\pi, with n=1,2,3,…n = 1, 2, 3, \dots the principal quantum number. Second, while it sits on an allowed orbit it does not radiate — it is a stationary state — and light appears only when the electron jumps from one orbit to another, carrying off the energy difference as a single photon, ΔE=hf\Delta E = hf. Feed the quantisation rule into Newton's second law for a circular orbit (Coulomb attraction supplying the centripetal force) and three results drop out, one for each thing you can be asked to find. The orbit radius, the orbital speed, and the total energy of the nn-th level of a hydrogen-like atom of nuclear charge ZeZe are

rn=0.529 n2Z A˚,vn=2.19×106 Zn m/s,En=−13.6 Z2n2 eV.(1)r_n = 0.529\,\frac{n^2}{Z}\ \text{Å}, \qquad v_n = 2.19\times10^6\,\frac{Z}{n}\ \text{m/s}, \qquad E_n = -13.6\,\frac{Z^2}{n^2}\ \text{eV}. \qquad (1)

where: nn — the principal quantum number (11 for the ground state, 2,3,…2, 3, \dots for excited states); ZZ — the nuclear charge number (11 for hydrogen, 22 for He⁺, 33 for Li²⁺); 0.5290.529 Å is the Bohr radius a0a_0; 2.19×1062.19\times10^6 m/s is the ground-state speed of the electron in hydrogen; and −13.6-13.6 eV is the ground-state energy of hydrogen. Read the three scalings off the exponents: the orbit swells as n2n^2 and shrinks as 1/Z1/Z, the electron slows as 1/n1/n and speeds up as ZZ, and the binding deepens as Z2Z^2 and weakens as 1/n21/n^2. The single most important line is the energy. It is negative — the electron is bound, trapped in the nucleus's well, and you would have to add energy to free it. So n=1n=1 (energy −13.6-13.6 eV for hydrogen) is the deepest, most tightly held rung, the ground state; n=2n=2 at −3.4-3.4 eV is higher up and less bound; and n=∞n=\infty at 00 eV is the top of the well, where the electron is just barely free. Climbing the ladder costs energy; falling down it releases energy as light.

Figure
Energy-level ladder of the hydrogen atom drawn to scale from minus 13.6 electronvolts at n equals one up to zero at n equals infinity with downward arrows marking the Lyman Balmer and Paschen series and the Balmer alpha line at 656 nanometres and the Lyman alpha line at 122 nanometres
The hydrogen ladder: E n = minus 13.6 over n squared eV — levels crowd toward zero 0 eV −3.4 −13.6 energy (eV) n = ∞ (0 eV) n = 5 (−0.54) n = 4 (−0.85) n = 3 (−1.51) n = 2 (−3.4) n = 1 (−13.6, ground) Lyman α 122 nm Balmer α (Hα) 656 nm Hβ 486 nm Paschen (IR) emission = a jump DOWN · ΔE = E high − E low · λ in nm = 1240 divided by ΔE in eV a gas reaching level n can emit n(n−1)/2 different lines, one per pair of rungs

To turn a jump into a wavelength you do not need any new physics — just the second postulate and the photon shortcut. When the electron falls from a higher rung n2n_2 to a lower rung n1n_1, the emitted photon carries the whole gap,

ΔE=En2−En1=13.6 Z2 ⁣(1n12−1n22) eV,λ=1240ΔE[eV] nm.(2)\Delta E = E_{n_2} - E_{n_1} = 13.6\,Z^2\!\left(\frac{1}{n_1^2} - \frac{1}{n_2^2}\right)\ \text{eV}, \qquad \lambda = \frac{1240}{\Delta E[\text{eV}]}\ \text{nm}. \qquad (2)

where: n1n_1 — the lower level (smaller nn, the one landed on); n2n_2 — the upper level (larger nn, the one started from); ΔE\Delta E — the photon energy; λ\lambda — its wavelength. The bracket is always positive because the lower level has the larger 1/n21/n^2: this is the arithmetic guard that keeps your energy release positive. For hydrogen's famous red line, the 3→23\to2 Balmer-α\alpha, this gives ΔE=13.6(1/4−1/9)=1.89\Delta E = 13.6(1/4 - 1/9) = 1.89 eV and λ=1240/1.89=656\lambda = 1240/1.89 = 656 nm — the wavelength Ångström had measured in 1868 and that Balmer's 1885 formula reproduced, decades before Bohr explained why.

The four master relations

Four tools run the entire family, and every question is one of them solved for whichever letter is hidden. The first is the energy ladder of equation (1), En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 eV. Committing three numbers unlocks most of hydrogen: E1=−13.6E_1 = -13.6, E2=−3.4E_2 = -3.4, E3=−1.51E_3 = -1.51, and thereafter it flattens fast toward 00. The whole point of the negative sign is that it makes two quantities free at once — the energy of a level and the energy to remove the electron from it. The second tool is the ionisation energy, the energy needed to lift the electron from level nn all the way out to n=∞n=\infty where E=0E=0. That cost is simply the depth of the well at that rung:

Eion(n)=0−En=∣En∣=13.6 Z2n2 eV.(3)E_{\text{ion}}(n) = 0 - E_n = |E_n| = \frac{13.6\,Z^2}{n^2}\ \text{eV}. \qquad (3)

where: Eion(n)E_{\text{ion}}(n) — the ionisation energy measured from level nn. This is where marks bleed away: 13.613.6 eV is the ionisation energy of hydrogen only from its ground state. From the first excited state n=2n=2 it is just 13.6/4=3.413.6/4 = 3.4 eV; for a helium ion (He⁺, Z=2Z=2) from its ground state it is 13.6×4=54.413.6\times4 = 54.4 eV. State the level and the charge before you quote a number. The third tool is the transition-to-wavelength rule of equation (2), λ=1240/ΔE\lambda = 1240/\Delta E. Because a photon's energy is the difference of two ladder rungs, the same jump written for a hydrogen-like ion of charge ZZ has every energy multiplied by Z2Z^2, so its wavelength is divided by Z2Z^2: He⁺ emits hydrogen's 656656 nm red line at 656/4=164656/4 = 164 nm, out in the ultraviolet. This Z2Z^2-shrink of the whole spectrum is the single most-tested competitive-exam idea in the topic. The fourth tool is the line count. If a gas is excited so that its atoms reach level nn, the electrons can cascade back down by any route, and the number of distinct photon energies — hence distinct spectral lines — is the number of ways to pick two rungs out of nn:

Nlines=(n2)=n(n−1)2.(4)N_{\text{lines}} = \binom{n}{2} = \frac{n(n-1)}{2}. \qquad (4)

where: NlinesN_{\text{lines}} — the number of different wavelengths the de-exciting gas can emit. Excite to n=4n=4 and you get 4×3/2=64\times3/2 = 6 lines; to n=5n=5, 5×4/2=105\times4/2 = 10. The classic error is to answer n−1n-1 (only the lines that land on the ground state) — that counts one series, not the whole spectrum.

Figure
Bohr orbits of hydrogen drawn to scale with radius growing as n squared so the second orbit is four times and the third orbit nine times the first with the electron speed falling as one over n and a photon emitted when the electron drops from the third to the second orbit
Bohr orbits: r n = 0.529 n squared Å (ratio 1 : 4 : 9), speed v n falls as 1 over n +Ze n=1: r₁ = 0.529 Å n=2: r₂ = 2.12 Å n=3: r₃ = 4.76 Å photon, 3→2 speed v n v₁ = 2.19×10⁶ m/s v₂ = 1.1×10⁶ m/s v₃ = 0.73×10⁶ m/s energy E n E₁ = −13.6 eV E₂ = −3.4 eV E₃ = −1.51 eV big orbit = slow electron = shallow (less-bound) energy · everything scales by powers of n and Z

The variants examiners actually pose

Find an orbit's size, speed or energy. Plug nn and ZZ straight into equation (1). For hydrogen (Z=1Z=1) the n=3n=3 orbit has r3=0.529×9=4.76r_3 = 0.529\times9 = 4.76 Å, v3=2.19×106/3=0.73×106v_3 = 2.19\times10^6/3 = 0.73\times10^6 m/s and E3=−13.6/9=−1.51E_3 = -13.6/9 = -1.51 eV. One substitution each.

Find the wavelength of a transition. Compute the gap with equation (2), ΔE=13.6 Z2(1/n12−1/n22)\Delta E = 13.6\,Z^2(1/n_1^2 - 1/n_2^2), then λ=1240/ΔE\lambda = 1240/\Delta E. Keep n1n_1 as the lower level so the bracket is positive. Absorption is the same arithmetic run upward: a photon of exactly ΔE\Delta E lifts the electron from n1n_1 to n2n_2.

Find an ionisation energy. Read off ∣En∣|E_n| from equation (3): the depth of the rung you start on. Watch the two variables the examiner changes to trip you — the starting level nn (divides by n2n^2) and the charge ZZ (multiplies by Z2Z^2).

Count the spectral lines and sort them into series. Equation (4) gives the total, n(n−1)/2n(n-1)/2. Then group by landing level: jumps that end on n1=1n_1=1 are the Lyman series (ultraviolet), on n1=2n_1=2 the Balmer series (the visible lines), on n1=3n_1=3 the Paschen series (infrared). The series limit — the shortest-wavelength edge of a series — is the jump from n=∞n=\infty, i.e. ΔE=13.6/n12\Delta E = 13.6/n_1^2.

Scale to a hydrogen-like ion. Multiply every energy by Z2Z^2, divide every radius by ZZ, multiply every speed by ZZ, and divide every wavelength by Z2Z^2. He⁺ (Z=2Z=2) is the stock example: ground energy −54.4-54.4 eV, first Bohr radius 0.2640.264 Å, and a Balmer-α\alpha line at 164164 nm.

Derivation AThe Bohr ladder from the two postulates: where r, v and E come from

The goal is to build the three master formulas of equation (1) — rnr_n, vnv_n and EnE_n — from Bohr's two postulates using nothing heavier than school algebra, so that when a question hides one of them you can see exactly which knob to turn. The strategy is to write down the two physical statements Bohr insisted on (a mechanical one and a quantum one), treat them as two simultaneous equations in the two unknowns rr and vv, and solve. No calculus enters anywhere; the electron is treated as a particle on a circle held in by the electrostatic pull of the nucleus.

Step 1. Balance the forces. For a circular orbit of radius rr, the Coulomb attraction of a nucleus of charge +Ze+Ze on the electron supplies the centripetal force: kZe2r2=mv2r\dfrac{kZe^2}{r^2} = \dfrac{mv^2}{r}, where k=1/4πε0k = 1/4\pi\varepsilon_0. Cancel one power of rr to get the mechanical relation mv2=kZe2rmv^2 = \dfrac{kZe^2}{r}. Notice already that the electron's kinetic energy 12mv2=12kZe2/r\tfrac12 mv^2 = \tfrac12 kZe^2/r is half the size of the potential well — a fact we cash in at Step 4.

Step 2. Impose quantisation. Bohr's rule is that angular momentum comes only in whole multiples of h/2πh/2\pi: mvr=n h2πmvr = n\,\dfrac{h}{2\pi}. Solve this for the speed, v=nh2πmrv = \dfrac{nh}{2\pi m r}, so the quantum condition has pinned the speed to the radius.

Step 3. Solve the pair for the radius. Substitute the Step-2 speed into the Step-1 force balance: m ⁣(nh2πmr)2=kZe2rm\!\left(\dfrac{nh}{2\pi m r}\right)^{2} = \dfrac{kZe^2}{r}. The rr's and constants rearrange to rn=n2h24π2mkZe2r_n = \dfrac{n^2 h^2}{4\pi^2 m k Z e^2}. Everything on the right is a constant except n2n^2 and ZZ, and collecting the constants gives rn=a0 n2/Zr_n = a_0\,n^2/Z with the Bohr radius a0=0.529a_0 = 0.529 Å. Feed rnr_n back into the Step-2 speed to get vn=2πkZe2nh=2.19×106 (Z/n)v_n = \dfrac{2\pi k Z e^2}{n h} = 2.19\times10^6\,(Z/n) m/s.

Step 4. Total the energy. The total energy is kinetic plus potential, E=12mv2−kZe2rE = \tfrac12 mv^2 - \dfrac{kZe^2}{r}. By Step 1 the kinetic term equals +12kZe2/r+\tfrac12 kZe^2/r, so the two combine to E=−12kZe2rE = -\dfrac12\dfrac{kZe^2}{r} — exactly half the potential energy, and negative because the electron is bound. Insert rnr_n from Step 3 and the constants collapse to En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 eV. The same −13.6-13.6 that anchors every problem in this article is kZ2e2/2a0k Z^2 e^2/2a_0 evaluated for hydrogen. Verified: rn=0.529 n2/Zr_n = 0.529\,n^2/Z Å, vn=2.19×106 Z/nv_n = 2.19\times10^6\,Z/n m/s and En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 eV are recomputed from the constants (independently of the quoted anchors) in verify_hs2-bohr-transition-numericals.py.

Go deeper · Derivation B · 1 minFrom two rungs to a spectral line: the transition-wavelength recipe
Derivation BFrom two rungs to a spectral line: the transition-wavelength recipe

The goal is to turn any pair of levels (n1,n2)(n_1, n_2) into the wavelength of the light emitted or absorbed, and to see why hydrogen's lines fall into neat series and why the whole pattern shifts for a heavier nucleus. The strategy is pure subtraction on the ladder of equation (1), followed by the photon shortcut — algebra only, no differential equations. The reward is equation (2) and the Rydberg cross-check that examiners use as a second road.

Step 1. Take the energy difference. A jump from the upper rung n2n_2 down to the lower rung n1n_1 frees ΔE=En2−En1=−13.6 Z2/n22−(−13.6 Z2/n12)=13.6 Z2 ⁣(1n12−1n22)\Delta E = E_{n_2} - E_{n_1} = -13.6\,Z^2/n_2^2 - (-13.6\,Z^2/n_1^2) = 13.6\,Z^2\!\left(\dfrac{1}{n_1^2} - \dfrac{1}{n_2^2}\right) eV. Because n1<n2n_1 < n_2 the first fraction is bigger, so ΔE>0\Delta E > 0 — energy is genuinely released.

Step 2. Convert to a wavelength. One photon carries this whole gap, ΔE=hf=hc/λ\Delta E = hf = hc/\lambda, and in exam units hc=1240hc = 1240 eV·nm, so λ[nm]=1240/ΔE[eV]\lambda[\text{nm}] = 1240/\Delta E[\text{eV}]. For the Balmer-α\alpha line (n1=2n_1=2, n2=3n_2=3, Z=1Z=1): ΔE=13.6(1/4−1/9)=13.6×0.1389=1.89\Delta E = 13.6(1/4 - 1/9) = 13.6\times0.1389 = 1.89 eV, hence λ=1240/1.89=656\lambda = 1240/1.89 = 656 nm.

Step 3. Recognise the Rydberg form. Dividing Step 1 by hchc gives 1λ=13.6 Z2hc ⁣(1n12−1n22)=R Z2 ⁣(1n12−1n22)\dfrac{1}{\lambda} = \dfrac{13.6\,Z^2}{hc}\!\left(\dfrac{1}{n_1^2} - \dfrac{1}{n_2^2}\right) = R\,Z^2\!\left(\dfrac{1}{n_1^2} - \dfrac{1}{n_2^2}\right) with the Rydberg constant R=1.097×107R = 1.097\times10^7 m⁻¹. This is Rydberg's 1888 empirical formula, now derived: for Balmer-α\alpha it gives 1/λ=1.097×107(1/4−1/9)=1.524×1061/\lambda = 1.097\times10^7(1/4-1/9) = 1.524\times10^6 m⁻¹, so λ=656\lambda = 656 nm — the same answer by a different road, which is exactly how you check yourself in the exam.

Step 4. Read the series and the Z2Z^2 shift. Fixing the landing rung n1n_1 names the series (Lyman n1=1n_1=1, Balmer n1=2n_1=2, Paschen n1=3n_1=3); letting n2→∞n_2\to\infty gives that series' short-wavelength limit, λlimit=1240/(13.6 Z2/n12)\lambda_{\text{limit}} = 1240/(13.6\,Z^2/n_1^2). And since every ΔE\Delta E carries a factor Z2Z^2, every wavelength of a hydrogen-like ion is hydrogen's divided by Z2Z^2: He⁺'s Balmer-α\alpha sits at 656/4=164656/4 = 164 nm. Verified: ΔE\Delta E and λ\lambda for Balmer-α\alpha (1.89 eV, 656 nm), the Rydberg cross-check, the series limits and the He⁺ 164 nm line are recomputed by two independent roads in verify_hs2-bohr-transition-numericals.py.

Trap table and limiting cases

pitfall or limiting casewhat actually happensthe fix
is n=1n=1 the highest energy?no — it is the lowest (−13.6-13.6 eV), the ground stateenergies are negative; bigger nn means less bound
ionisation energy of hydrogen13.613.6 eV from the ground state onlyfrom level nn it is 13.6/n213.6/n^2; from n=2n=2 it is 3.43.4 eV
lines emitted from level nnn(n−1)/2n(n-1)/2, not n−1n-1n−1n-1 counts one series; the full spectrum pairs every two rungs
n→∞n\to\infty (top of the ladder)En→0E_n\to 0, rn→∞r_n\to\infty: the electron is freethe well has finite depth 13.6 Z213.6\,Z^2 eV
adjacent high rungs (n→n−1n\to n-1, large nn)ΔE→0\Delta E\to 0, λ\lambda huge (radio)levels crowd near 00; big jumps need small nn
a hydrogen-like ion, charge ZZE∝Z2E\propto Z^2, r∝1/Zr\propto 1/Z, v∝Zv\propto Z, λ∝1/Z2\lambda\propto 1/Z^2He⁺ repeats H at one-quarter the wavelength
which fraction goes first in ΔE\Delta Ethe lower level supplies the larger 1/n21/n^2write 1/n12−1/n221/n_1^2 - 1/n_2^2 with n1<n2n_1<n_2 to stay positive

Worked examples

1 · Board level — the nth orbit of hydrogen (CBSE and NEET pattern)

For the hydrogen atom, find the radius, the electron's speed, and the total energy of the second Bohr orbit (n=2n=2). Compare each with the ground-state value.

Step 1. Radius, from equation (1): r2=0.529 n2=0.529×4=2.12 A˚r_2 = 0.529\,n^2 = 0.529\times4 = \boxed{2.12\ \text{Å}} — four times the ground-state r1=0.529r_1 = 0.529 Å, because r∝n2r\propto n^2.

Step 2. Speed, from equation (1): v2=2.19×106/n=2.19×106/2=1.1×106 m/sv_2 = 2.19\times10^6/n = 2.19\times10^6/2 = \boxed{1.1\times10^6\ \text{m/s}} — half the ground-state v1=2.19×106v_1 = 2.19\times10^6 m/s, because v∝1/nv\propto 1/n.

Step 3. Energy, from equation (1): E2=−13.6/n2=−13.6/4=−3.4 eVE_2 = -13.6/n^2 = -13.6/4 = \boxed{-3.4\ \text{eV}} — one-quarter as deep as the ground-state −13.6-13.6 eV, so the electron is less tightly bound.

Step 4. Sense-check: a bigger, slower orbit that is less bound — exactly the trend of the ladder. The electron in n=2n=2 is farther out, dawdling, and easier to knock free.

2 · Board level — the Balmer-alpha line and its ionisation partner (ICSE and CBSE pattern)

A hydrogen atom emits light when its electron drops from n=3n=3 to n=2n=2. Find the energy and wavelength of the emitted photon, and separately state how much energy is needed to ionise a hydrogen atom starting from n=2n=2.

Step 1. Energy gap, from equation (2): ΔE=13.6(1/22−1/32)=13.6(1/4−1/9)=13.6×0.1389=1.89 eV\Delta E = 13.6(1/2^2 - 1/3^2) = 13.6(1/4 - 1/9) = 13.6\times0.1389 = \boxed{1.89\ \text{eV}}. The lower level n1=2n_1=2 supplies the larger fraction, keeping ΔE\Delta E positive.

Step 2. Wavelength, from the photon shortcut: λ=1240/ΔE=1240/1.89=656 nm\lambda = 1240/\Delta E = 1240/1.89 = \boxed{656\ \text{nm}} — deep red, the signature Balmer-α\alpha line you see in every hydrogen discharge tube.

Step 3. Cross-check with Rydberg: 1/λ=R(1/4−1/9)=1.097×107×0.1389=1.524×1061/\lambda = R(1/4 - 1/9) = 1.097\times10^7\times0.1389 = 1.524\times10^6 m⁻¹, so λ=656\lambda = 656 nm — same answer, second road.

Step 4. Ionisation from n=2n=2, from equation (3): Eion(2)=∣E2∣=13.6/4=3.4 eVE_{\text{ion}}(2) = |E_2| = 13.6/4 = \boxed{3.4\ \text{eV}} — not 13.6 eV, because the electron started halfway up the well, not at the bottom.

3 · Competitive level — count the lines and find the series limits (JEE-Main and NEET pattern)

A sample of atomic hydrogen is excited so that every atom reaches the n=4n=4 level. How many distinct spectral lines can the gas emit as the electrons cascade down? Identify the shortest-wavelength line of the resulting spectrum, and quote the series limit of the Balmer series.

Step 1. Line count, from equation (4): N=n(n−1)/2=4×3/2=6N = n(n-1)/2 = 4\times3/2 = \boxed{6} distinct lines — the six ways of pairing the four rungs {1,2,3,4}\{1,2,3,4\}.

Step 2. The shortest wavelength is the biggest energy jump, which is 4→14\to1 (a Lyman line landing on the ground state): ΔE=13.6(1−1/16)=13.6×0.9375=12.75\Delta E = 13.6(1 - 1/16) = 13.6\times0.9375 = 12.75 eV, so λ=1240/12.75=97.3 nm\lambda = 1240/12.75 = \boxed{97.3\ \text{nm}} — far ultraviolet.

Step 3. The longest wavelength is the smallest jump, 4→34\to3 (Paschen): ΔE=13.6(1/9−1/16)=13.6×0.04861=0.661\Delta E = 13.6(1/9 - 1/16) = 13.6\times0.04861 = 0.661 eV, so λ=1240/0.661=1876\lambda = 1240/0.661 = 1876 nm — infrared. The six lines thus span from 9797 nm (UV) to 18761876 nm (IR).

Step 4. Balmer series limit (n2→∞n_2\to\infty, landing on n1=2n_1=2): ΔE=13.6/4=3.4\Delta E = 13.6/4 = 3.4 eV, so λlimit=1240/3.4=365 nm\lambda_{\text{limit}} = 1240/3.4 = \boxed{365\ \text{nm}} — the near-UV edge where the Balmer lines pile up and the series ends. Timing note: about 90 seconds. Do not compute all six wavelengths — the examiner only wants the count (n(n−1)/2n(n-1)/2) plus the two extremes, which are always the largest jump (to n=1n=1) and the smallest jump (n→n−1n\to n-1). Find those two and you have bracketed the whole spectrum.

4 · Competitive level — scaling to a helium ion (JEE-Advanced pattern)

The singly-ionised helium atom He⁺ (Z=2Z=2) is a one-electron atom like hydrogen. Find the energy and radius of its ground state, its ionisation energy from the ground state, and the wavelength of its Balmer-α\alpha (3→23\to2) line. Compare each with hydrogen.

Step 1. Ground-state energy, from equation (1) with Z=2Z=2: E1=−13.6 Z2/n2=−13.6×4/1=−54.4 eVE_1 = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 = -13.6\times4/1 = \boxed{-54.4\ \text{eV}} — four times deeper than hydrogen's −13.6-13.6 eV, because E∝Z2E\propto Z^2.

Step 2. Ground-state radius: r1=0.529 n2/Z=0.529/2=0.264 A˚r_1 = 0.529\,n^2/Z = 0.529/2 = \boxed{0.264\ \text{Å}} — half of hydrogen's 0.5290.529 Å, because r∝1/Zr\propto 1/Z; the doubled nuclear charge pulls the electron in tighter.

Step 3. Ionisation energy from the ground state, from equation (3): Eion(1)=∣E1∣=54.4 eVE_{\text{ion}}(1) = |E_1| = \boxed{54.4\ \text{eV}} — you must supply the full well depth to free the electron.

Step 4. Balmer-α\alpha wavelength, from equation (2) with Z=2Z=2: ΔE=13.6×4×(1/4−1/9)=54.4×0.1389=7.56\Delta E = 13.6\times4\times(1/4 - 1/9) = 54.4\times0.1389 = 7.56 eV, so λ=1240/7.56=164 nm\lambda = 1240/7.56 = \boxed{164\ \text{nm}} — hydrogen's 656656 nm red line, divided by Z2=4Z^2 = 4, now a far-UV line. Every He⁺ line is a hydrogen line shifted to one-quarter the wavelength. Timing note: about 60 seconds if you scale rather than recompute. Never redo the arithmetic from constants — take the hydrogen answer and apply the four scalings (E×Z2E\times Z^2, r/Zr/Z, v×Zv\times Z, λ/Z2\lambda/Z^2). For Z=2Z=2 that is just "energies ×4\times4, radii ÷2\div2, wavelengths ÷4\div4", and the whole problem is mental arithmetic.

Exam traps

Dropping the minus sign. Bohr energies are negative: En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 eV. The ground state n=1n=1 is the most negative and most bound; higher nn is less negative. A positive Bohr energy is always a slip. When you subtract for a transition, write ΔE=13.6 Z2(1/n12−1/n22)\Delta E = 13.6\,Z^2(1/n_1^2 - 1/n_2^2) with the lower level n1n_1 first, so the result comes out positive automatically.

Quoting 13.613.6 eV for the wrong level or atom. 13.613.6 eV is the ionisation energy of hydrogen from its ground state only. From n=2n=2 it is 3.43.4 eV; for He⁺ from its ground state it is 54.454.4 eV. Ionisation from level nn is ∣En∣=13.6 Z2/n2|E_n| = 13.6\,Z^2/n^2 — check the level and the charge every time.

Miscounting spectral lines. A gas reaching level nn emits n(n−1)/2n(n-1)/2 lines, not n−1n-1. The value n−1n-1 is only the number of lines in a single series (those ending on one particular rung). Excite to n=4n=4: six lines, not three.

Forgetting the Z2Z^2 (and 1/Z1/Z) scalings. For a hydrogen-like ion, energies scale as Z2Z^2, radii as 1/Z1/Z, speeds as ZZ and wavelengths as 1/Z21/Z^2. The commonest competitive-exam blunder is scaling the wavelength by ZZ instead of Z2Z^2 — He⁺'s Balmer-α\alpha is at 164164 nm (656/4656/4), not 328328 nm.

Unit slips. Radii come out in ångström (11 Å =10−10=10^{-10} m), energies in electronvolts, wavelengths in nanometres via λ=1240/ΔE\lambda = 1240/\Delta E. Convert ΔE\Delta E to joules (×1.6×10−19\times1.6\times10^{-19}) only if the question explicitly wants f=ΔE/hf = \Delta E/h in hertz or an SI wavelength. Carry four significant figures and present two or three.

Board scope. The Bohr model, hydrogen energy levels, the line spectrum and these numerical families are firmly examined on CBSE, ICSE, JEE-Main, JEE-Advanced and NEET, and the energy-level and line-spectrum reasoning is on AP Physics 2 (Modern Physics) and A-Level 9702. IB Physics does not carry the quantitative Bohr rnr_n/vnv_n/EnE_n treatment in its core — energy levels and photon transitions appear (HL more than SL), but the orbit-radius and orbit-speed numericals do not — so this gym is not IB revision. IGCSE 0625 has no quantitative atomic physics at all, so do not revise this lane for an IGCSE paper.

Origins · 1 minArnold Sommerfeld and how this was discovered
AS
Arnold Sommerfeld
1868–1951 · Munich, Germany

Arnold Sommerfeld was the German theorist who took Bohr's 1913 sketch and turned it into a precision instrument. Where Bohr allowed only circular orbits fixed by one quantum number nn, Sommerfeld in 1916 let the orbits be ellipses and added a second (azimuthal) quantum number, and by folding in Einstein's special relativity for the fast inner-orbit electron he explained the atom's fine structure — the tiny splitting of spectral lines that Bohr's single number could not touch. Out of that work came the fine-structure constant α≈1/137\alpha \approx 1/137, the dimensionless number that measures how strongly light and matter couple and that still sits at the heart of quantum electrodynamics. The refined scheme is called the Bohr–Sommerfeld model, and although the full wave-mechanical theory soon superseded it, Sommerfeld's quantum numbers survive intact in the modern atom. He was also the century's great teacher of physics: an extraordinary number of his students and assistants — Heisenberg, Pauli, Debye, Bethe among them — went on to win the Nobel Prize, though the prize itself, nominated a record number of times, always eluded Sommerfeld.

History
1885
— Johann Balmer finds an empirical formula for hydrogen's four visible lines, with no idea why it works.
1888
— Johannes Rydberg generalises Balmer to all series, one over lambda equals R times one over n one squared minus one over n two squared.
1911
— Ernest Rutherford analyses the 1909 Geiger-Marsden alpha-scattering results and infers the tiny dense nucleus, demanding a new model of the atom.
1913
— Niels Bohr quantises the orbits, derives the minus 13.6 over n squared ladder, and explains Balmer's formula at a stroke.
1916
— Arnold Sommerfeld extends Bohr to elliptical orbits and introduces the fine-structure constant near one over 137.

Going further

Texts. NCERT Physics Class 12, Ch. 12 ("Atoms"), the Bohr-model derivation and the spectral-series exercises · H. C. Verma, Concepts of Physics Vol. 2, "Bohr's Model and Physics of the Atom," worked problems · D. C. Pandey / Irodov atomic-physics problem sets (for the ZZ-scaling and line-count variants) · Cambridge A-Level 9702, atomic-spectra and energy-level problems.

Provenance. Standard exam-archive problems on Bohr's one-electron atom. Recompute: master ladder rn=0.529 n2/Zr_n = 0.529\,n^2/Z Å, vn=2.19×106 Z/nv_n = 2.19\times10^6\,Z/n m/s, En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 eV; n=2n=2 hydrogen ⇒r2=2.12\Rightarrow r_2 = 2.12 Å, v2=1.1×106v_2 = 1.1\times10^6 m/s, E2=−3.4E_2 = -3.4 eV; n=3⇒r3=4.76n=3 \Rightarrow r_3 = 4.76 Å, v3=0.73×106v_3 = 0.73\times10^6 m/s, E3=−1.51E_3 = -1.51 eV; Balmer-α\alpha (3→23\to2) ⇒ΔE=1.89\Rightarrow \Delta E = 1.89 eV, λ=656\lambda = 656 nm (Rydberg cross-check 1/λ=1.524×1061/\lambda = 1.524\times10^6 m⁻¹); Hβ (4→24\to2) λ=486\lambda = 486 nm; Lyman-α\alpha (2→12\to1) ⇒10.2\Rightarrow 10.2 eV, 122122 nm; ionisation from n=2⇒3.4n=2 \Rightarrow 3.4 eV; excite to n=4⇒6n=4 \Rightarrow 6 lines, shortest 4→14\to1 at 97.397.3 nm, longest 4→34\to3 at 18761876 nm; series limits Lyman 91.291.2 nm, Balmer 365365 nm, Paschen 821821 nm; lines from n=5⇒10n=5 \Rightarrow 10; He⁺ (Z=2Z=2) ⇒E1=−54.4\Rightarrow E_1 = -54.4 eV, r1=0.264r_1 = 0.264 Å, ionisation 54.454.4 eV, Balmer-α\alpha 164164 nm.

Prerequisites. Energy Levels and the Hydrogen Spectrum — the concept article that builds the En=−13.6/n2E_n = -13.6/n^2 ladder, the Rydberg formula and the Lyman/Balmer/Paschen series this gym drills. Leads to. the university seam The Bohr Model of Hydrogen (`aq-optics-bohr-model-hydrogen`), which re-derives the levels and prepares the ground for the full quantum theory.

Go deeper (UG). The rigorous quantum-mechanical account — the hydrogen atom as a solution of the Schrödinger equation, the true orbital shapes, the angular-momentum and spin quantum numbers, and the fine-structure corrections that Sommerfeld first glimpsed — is developed in The Bohr Model of Hydrogen and its successors. That machinery is beyond this article's algebra-and-trig level; here we quote its result, which for a one-electron atom is exactly Bohr's ladder. Enrichment only; nothing in this gym depends on it.

Why are the Bohr energies negative, and what does the sign actually mean?

The negative sign means the electron is bound — trapped in the electrical well of the nucleus. We set the zero of energy at n=∞n=\infty, the point where the electron has just escaped and sits at rest infinitely far away. Any state where the electron is still attached is below that, so it has less energy than zero: hence negative. The number En=−13.6/n2E_n = -13.6/n^2 eV is therefore how far below freedom the electron sits. It also tells you the escape cost directly: to ionise from level nn you must add exactly ∣En∣|E_n| to lift the electron up to E=0E=0. So the sign is not a nuisance — it is the whole bookkeeping. A bound-orbit Bohr energy that comes out positive is always an arithmetic slip.

How do I know which level to write first when I compute a transition energy?

Always put the lower level (smaller nn) first inside the bracket: ΔE=13.6 Z2 ⁣(1/n12−1/n22)\Delta E = 13.6\,Z^2\!\left(1/n_1^2 - 1/n_2^2\right) with n1<n2n_1 < n_2. The lower level has the larger value of 1/n21/n^2, so the bracket is positive and your emitted energy comes out positive, as it must. Physically, emission is a jump down the ladder and absorption is a jump up, but the size of the energy gap is identical either way — a 3→23\to2 emission and a 2→32\to3 absorption involve the very same 1.891.89 eV photon. So you never need two formulas: compute the gap with the lower level first, and then just say "emitted" if the electron fell and "absorbed" if it climbed. This one habit kills the most common sign error in the topic.

Why does exciting a gas to level n give n(n-1)/2 lines rather than n-1?

Because the electrons do not all fall straight to the ground state — they cascade down by every possible route. An atom in n=4n=4 might drop 4→34\to3, then 3→13\to1; another might go 4→24\to2, then 2→12\to1; another 4→14\to1 in one leap. Each distinct pair of levels (n1,n2)(n_1,n_2) produces its own photon energy, hence its own spectral line, and the number of ways to choose two rungs out of nn is n(n−1)/2n(n-1)/2. The tempting answer n−1n-1 counts only the jumps that land on one particular level — that is a single series (for example, only the Lyman lines ending on n=1n=1), not the whole spectrum. For n=4n=4: six lines total, of which three are Lyman (4→1,3→1,2→14\to1,3\to1,2\to1), two Balmer (4→2,3→24\to2,3\to2) and one Paschen (4→34\to3). Add them up — 3+2+1=63+2+1=6 — and you see the formula is just the sum 1+2+⋯+(n−1)1+2+\dots+(n-1).

What is the difference between a spectral series and its series limit?

A series is the family of all lines that end on one common lower level. The Lyman series are all the jumps down to n=1n=1 (ultraviolet); the Balmer series all the jumps down to n=2n=2 (these are hydrogen's visible lines); the Paschen series all the jumps down to n=3n=3 (infrared). Within a series, as the upper level n2n_2 climbs from just above n1n_1 toward infinity, the lines get closer and closer together and shorter and shorter in wavelength, piling up at a sharp edge called the series limit — the wavelength of the jump from n2=∞n_2=\infty. For Balmer that limit is λ=1240/(13.6/4)=365\lambda = 1240/(13.6/4) = 365 nm; for Lyman it is 1240/13.6=91.21240/13.6 = 91.2 nm; for Paschen 1240/(13.6/9)=8211240/(13.6/9) = 821 nm. Beyond the limit (shorter wavelengths still) the spectrum becomes continuous, because the incoming electron was free and could have had any energy.

How can the Bohr model be right about the numbers if physicists say it is wrong?

Both are true. Bohr's picture — a point electron on a definite circular track at a definite radius and speed — is genuinely wrong: quantum mechanics replaced it with a smeared-out probability cloud (an orbital) in which the electron has no single position or path. Yet Bohr's energy levels for a one-electron atom, En=−13.6 Z2/n2E_n = -13.6\,Z^2/n^2 eV, come out exactly right — the full Schrödinger-equation treatment (beyond this article's algebra-and-trig level, so we quote its result) reproduces the same ladder, a lucky feature of the pure 1/r1/r Coulomb force. So for anything that depends only on the energy levels — line wavelengths, ionisation energies, the Rydberg formula — the Bohr model is correct and remains the fastest route through an exam. It fails only when you ask about things the crude picture cannot hold: fine structure, orbital shapes, and multi-electron atoms.

Which constants and shortcuts should I actually use under exam time?

Carry six numbers: h=6.63×10−34h = 6.63\times10^{-34} J·s =4.14×10−15= 4.14\times10^{-15} eV·s, c=3.0×108c = 3.0\times10^{8} m/s, e=1.6×10−19e = 1.6\times10^{-19} C, Bohr radius a0=0.529a_0 = 0.529 Å, ground energy −13.6-13.6 eV, and Rydberg R=1.097×107R = 1.097\times10^7 m⁻¹. For transitions the fastest road is energy-first: ΔE=13.6 Z2(1/n12−1/n22)\Delta E = 13.6\,Z^2(1/n_1^2 - 1/n_2^2) eV, then λ[nm]=1240/ΔE\lambda[\text{nm}] = 1240/\Delta E. Only drop to SI (joules, hertz, metres) when a question explicitly asks for a frequency or an SI wavelength. Use the Rydberg formula 1/λ=RZ2(1/n12−1/n22)1/\lambda = RZ^2(1/n_1^2 - 1/n_2^2) as your second road to check a wavelength — it is independent of the 13.613.6-and-12401240 route and should agree to about 0.1%0.1\%. Quote whichever constants your board's data sheet prints, and keep four significant figures so rounding never bites the third digit.

Is this gym the same as the concept articles on the Bohr model and hydrogen energy levels?

It shares their physics but not their purpose. The concept articles derive the model — why angular momentum is quantised, why the energies come out negative, why the spectral lines fall into series — and explain the meaning of every symbol. This article assumes all of that and drills using it fast and correctly under exam pressure: the orbit substitutions, the transition-to-wavelength recipe, the ionisation-energy read-off, the line count, the Z2Z^2 scaling. Think of the concept articles as the theory lectures and this as the problem class. If a formula here feels unmotivated, revisit The Bohr Model of the Atom or Energy Levels and the Hydrogen Spectrum; if you understand the physics but keep losing marks to a dropped minus sign or a mis-scaled wavelength, this gym is where you fix them.

Before this

Where this leads