ARCHETYPE: Bohr-Model & Spectral-Line Numericals
Hand an examiner one hydrogen atom and the number , and they can mint a whole exam paper from it. Find the radius of the third orbit. Find the speed of the electron in the ground state. Find the energy released when it drops from to , and the colour of the light that carries it away. Count how many different spectral lines a gas excited to can emit. Find the ionisation energy of a helium ion. Every one of these is the same physics — Bohr's quantised ladder, electronvolts — wearing a different exam costume. Learn the ladder once and the whole family becomes fill-in-the-blanks. This is a numerical gym, so the bookkeeping is the article. At its centre sit three locked facts about a one-electron atom: the allowed orbits have radii ångström, the electron in them moves at metres per second, and — the master number — each orbit holds the electron with energy electronvolts. Light is emitted or absorbed only when the electron jumps between two rungs, carrying away exactly the energy gap as one photon, and the photon shortcut turns that gap straight into a wavelength. The trap that costs half the class its marks is a single sign: the energies are negative, so is the lowest, most tightly bound rung, and climbing the ladder means becoming less bound, not more. Keep the sign straight, keep and on the tip of your pen, and every Bohr-model and spectral-line numerical on CBSE, ICSE, JEE and NEET — and every energy-level and line-spectrum numerical on AP Physics 2 and A-Level 9702 — falls out of it.
- The engine of every Bohr numerical is the energy ladder eV — negative, so is the ground state (most bound) and higher is less bound.
- The orbit geometry scales cleanly: radius Å grows as , speed m/s falls as .
- A photon is emitted only on a jump between rungs: eV, then .
- Ionisation energy is just : eV from the ground state of hydrogen, but only eV from , and eV from the ground state of He⁺.
- A gas excited to level can emit distinct lines — from , from — one for every pair of rungs.
- -scaling is the competitive-exam favourite: energies grow as , radii shrink as , wavelengths shrink as — so He⁺ repeats hydrogen's spectrum at one-quarter the wavelength.
- Key idea: one ladder, eV, plus the photon rule and the line count , solve the whole Bohr-model numerical family — provided you never lose the minus sign.
Every Bohr-model numerical reduces to the quantised energy ladder eV: orbit radius scales as and speed as , a transition emits a photon of energy and wavelength , ionisation from level costs , and a gas reaching level shows spectral lines.
Where this lives today
The two-line ladder you just drilled is still the working language of astronomy. When astronomers point a spectrograph at a star or a glowing nebula, they read its composition straight off the Balmer and Lyman lines of hydrogen — and they measure the universe's expansion by how far those same nm and nm lines have been red-shifted, a calculation that begins with . The scaling of example 4 is not a curiosity: hydrogen-like highly charged ions are made routinely in ion traps and tokamak plasmas, and their far-ultraviolet and X-ray lines, sitting exactly where says they should, diagnose the temperature of fusion plasmas and the solar corona. And the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantum numbers — refined into today's , , and spin — are the labels on every orbital in every chemistry textbook, the scaffold on which the whole periodic table is built. A model that a modern physicist calls "wrong in its picture but right in its numbers" turns out to be right enough to run an industry.
The setup
Bookkeeping first, because in a numerical gym the accounting is the physics. Bohr's picture of a one-electron atom — hydrogen, or a bare ion like He⁺ or Li²⁺ that has been stripped down to a single electron — is a nucleus of charge with one electron circling it on a set of allowed orbits and no others. Two postulates fix everything. First, the electron's angular momentum is quantised in whole steps: , with the principal quantum number. Second, while it sits on an allowed orbit it does not radiate — it is a stationary state — and light appears only when the electron jumps from one orbit to another, carrying off the energy difference as a single photon, . Feed the quantisation rule into Newton's second law for a circular orbit (Coulomb attraction supplying the centripetal force) and three results drop out, one for each thing you can be asked to find. The orbit radius, the orbital speed, and the total energy of the -th level of a hydrogen-like atom of nuclear charge are
where: — the principal quantum number ( for the ground state, for excited states); — the nuclear charge number ( for hydrogen, for He⁺, for Li²⁺); Å is the Bohr radius ; m/s is the ground-state speed of the electron in hydrogen; and eV is the ground-state energy of hydrogen. Read the three scalings off the exponents: the orbit swells as and shrinks as , the electron slows as and speeds up as , and the binding deepens as and weakens as . The single most important line is the energy. It is negative — the electron is bound, trapped in the nucleus's well, and you would have to add energy to free it. So (energy eV for hydrogen) is the deepest, most tightly held rung, the ground state; at eV is higher up and less bound; and at eV is the top of the well, where the electron is just barely free. Climbing the ladder costs energy; falling down it releases energy as light.
To turn a jump into a wavelength you do not need any new physics — just the second postulate and the photon shortcut. When the electron falls from a higher rung to a lower rung , the emitted photon carries the whole gap,
where: — the lower level (smaller , the one landed on); — the upper level (larger , the one started from); — the photon energy; — its wavelength. The bracket is always positive because the lower level has the larger : this is the arithmetic guard that keeps your energy release positive. For hydrogen's famous red line, the Balmer-, this gives eV and nm — the wavelength Ångström had measured in 1868 and that Balmer's 1885 formula reproduced, decades before Bohr explained why.
The four master relations
Four tools run the entire family, and every question is one of them solved for whichever letter is hidden. The first is the energy ladder of equation (1), eV. Committing three numbers unlocks most of hydrogen: , , , and thereafter it flattens fast toward . The whole point of the negative sign is that it makes two quantities free at once — the energy of a level and the energy to remove the electron from it. The second tool is the ionisation energy, the energy needed to lift the electron from level all the way out to where . That cost is simply the depth of the well at that rung:
where: — the ionisation energy measured from level . This is where marks bleed away: eV is the ionisation energy of hydrogen only from its ground state. From the first excited state it is just eV; for a helium ion (He⁺, ) from its ground state it is eV. State the level and the charge before you quote a number. The third tool is the transition-to-wavelength rule of equation (2), . Because a photon's energy is the difference of two ladder rungs, the same jump written for a hydrogen-like ion of charge has every energy multiplied by , so its wavelength is divided by : He⁺ emits hydrogen's nm red line at nm, out in the ultraviolet. This -shrink of the whole spectrum is the single most-tested competitive-exam idea in the topic. The fourth tool is the line count. If a gas is excited so that its atoms reach level , the electrons can cascade back down by any route, and the number of distinct photon energies — hence distinct spectral lines — is the number of ways to pick two rungs out of :
where: — the number of different wavelengths the de-exciting gas can emit. Excite to and you get lines; to , . The classic error is to answer (only the lines that land on the ground state) — that counts one series, not the whole spectrum.
The variants examiners actually pose
Find an orbit's size, speed or energy. Plug and straight into equation (1). For hydrogen () the orbit has Å, m/s and eV. One substitution each.
Find the wavelength of a transition. Compute the gap with equation (2), , then . Keep as the lower level so the bracket is positive. Absorption is the same arithmetic run upward: a photon of exactly lifts the electron from to .
Find an ionisation energy. Read off from equation (3): the depth of the rung you start on. Watch the two variables the examiner changes to trip you — the starting level (divides by ) and the charge (multiplies by ).
Count the spectral lines and sort them into series. Equation (4) gives the total, . Then group by landing level: jumps that end on are the Lyman series (ultraviolet), on the Balmer series (the visible lines), on the Paschen series (infrared). The series limit — the shortest-wavelength edge of a series — is the jump from , i.e. .
Scale to a hydrogen-like ion. Multiply every energy by , divide every radius by , multiply every speed by , and divide every wavelength by . He⁺ () is the stock example: ground energy eV, first Bohr radius Å, and a Balmer- line at nm.
The goal is to build the three master formulas of equation (1) — , and — from Bohr's two postulates using nothing heavier than school algebra, so that when a question hides one of them you can see exactly which knob to turn. The strategy is to write down the two physical statements Bohr insisted on (a mechanical one and a quantum one), treat them as two simultaneous equations in the two unknowns and , and solve. No calculus enters anywhere; the electron is treated as a particle on a circle held in by the electrostatic pull of the nucleus.
Step 1. Balance the forces. For a circular orbit of radius , the Coulomb attraction of a nucleus of charge on the electron supplies the centripetal force: , where . Cancel one power of to get the mechanical relation . Notice already that the electron's kinetic energy is half the size of the potential well — a fact we cash in at Step 4.
Step 2. Impose quantisation. Bohr's rule is that angular momentum comes only in whole multiples of : . Solve this for the speed, , so the quantum condition has pinned the speed to the radius.
Step 3. Solve the pair for the radius. Substitute the Step-2 speed into the Step-1 force balance: . The 's and constants rearrange to . Everything on the right is a constant except and , and collecting the constants gives with the Bohr radius Å. Feed back into the Step-2 speed to get m/s.
Step 4. Total the energy. The total energy is kinetic plus potential, . By Step 1 the kinetic term equals , so the two combine to — exactly half the potential energy, and negative because the electron is bound. Insert from Step 3 and the constants collapse to eV. The same that anchors every problem in this article is evaluated for hydrogen. Verified: Å, m/s and eV are recomputed from the constants (independently of the quoted anchors) in verify_hs2-bohr-transition-numericals.py.
Go deeper · Derivation B · 1 minFrom two rungs to a spectral line: the transition-wavelength recipe
The goal is to turn any pair of levels into the wavelength of the light emitted or absorbed, and to see why hydrogen's lines fall into neat series and why the whole pattern shifts for a heavier nucleus. The strategy is pure subtraction on the ladder of equation (1), followed by the photon shortcut — algebra only, no differential equations. The reward is equation (2) and the Rydberg cross-check that examiners use as a second road.
Step 1. Take the energy difference. A jump from the upper rung down to the lower rung frees eV. Because the first fraction is bigger, so — energy is genuinely released.
Step 2. Convert to a wavelength. One photon carries this whole gap, , and in exam units eV·nm, so . For the Balmer- line (, , ): eV, hence nm.
Step 3. Recognise the Rydberg form. Dividing Step 1 by gives with the Rydberg constant m⁻¹. This is Rydberg's 1888 empirical formula, now derived: for Balmer- it gives m⁻¹, so nm — the same answer by a different road, which is exactly how you check yourself in the exam.
Step 4. Read the series and the shift. Fixing the landing rung names the series (Lyman , Balmer , Paschen ); letting gives that series' short-wavelength limit, . And since every carries a factor , every wavelength of a hydrogen-like ion is hydrogen's divided by : He⁺'s Balmer- sits at nm. Verified: and for Balmer- (1.89 eV, 656 nm), the Rydberg cross-check, the series limits and the He⁺ 164 nm line are recomputed by two independent roads in verify_hs2-bohr-transition-numericals.py.
Trap table and limiting cases
| pitfall or limiting case | what actually happens | the fix |
|---|---|---|
| is the highest energy? | no — it is the lowest ( eV), the ground state | energies are negative; bigger means less bound |
| ionisation energy of hydrogen | eV from the ground state only | from level it is ; from it is eV |
| lines emitted from level | , not | counts one series; the full spectrum pairs every two rungs |
| (top of the ladder) | , : the electron is free | the well has finite depth eV |
| adjacent high rungs (, large ) | , huge (radio) | levels crowd near ; big jumps need small |
| a hydrogen-like ion, charge | , , , | He⁺ repeats H at one-quarter the wavelength |
| which fraction goes first in | the lower level supplies the larger | write with to stay positive |
Worked examples
1 · Board level — the nth orbit of hydrogen (CBSE and NEET pattern)
For the hydrogen atom, find the radius, the electron's speed, and the total energy of the second Bohr orbit (). Compare each with the ground-state value.
Step 1. Radius, from equation (1): — four times the ground-state Å, because .
Step 2. Speed, from equation (1): — half the ground-state m/s, because .
Step 3. Energy, from equation (1): — one-quarter as deep as the ground-state eV, so the electron is less tightly bound.
Step 4. Sense-check: a bigger, slower orbit that is less bound — exactly the trend of the ladder. The electron in is farther out, dawdling, and easier to knock free.
2 · Board level — the Balmer-alpha line and its ionisation partner (ICSE and CBSE pattern)
A hydrogen atom emits light when its electron drops from to . Find the energy and wavelength of the emitted photon, and separately state how much energy is needed to ionise a hydrogen atom starting from .
Step 1. Energy gap, from equation (2): . The lower level supplies the larger fraction, keeping positive.
Step 2. Wavelength, from the photon shortcut: — deep red, the signature Balmer- line you see in every hydrogen discharge tube.
Step 3. Cross-check with Rydberg: m⁻¹, so nm — same answer, second road.
Step 4. Ionisation from , from equation (3): — not 13.6 eV, because the electron started halfway up the well, not at the bottom.
3 · Competitive level — count the lines and find the series limits (JEE-Main and NEET pattern)
A sample of atomic hydrogen is excited so that every atom reaches the level. How many distinct spectral lines can the gas emit as the electrons cascade down? Identify the shortest-wavelength line of the resulting spectrum, and quote the series limit of the Balmer series.
Step 1. Line count, from equation (4): distinct lines — the six ways of pairing the four rungs .
Step 2. The shortest wavelength is the biggest energy jump, which is (a Lyman line landing on the ground state): eV, so — far ultraviolet.
Step 3. The longest wavelength is the smallest jump, (Paschen): eV, so nm — infrared. The six lines thus span from nm (UV) to nm (IR).
Step 4. Balmer series limit (, landing on ): eV, so — the near-UV edge where the Balmer lines pile up and the series ends. Timing note: about 90 seconds. Do not compute all six wavelengths — the examiner only wants the count () plus the two extremes, which are always the largest jump (to ) and the smallest jump (). Find those two and you have bracketed the whole spectrum.
4 · Competitive level — scaling to a helium ion (JEE-Advanced pattern)
The singly-ionised helium atom He⁺ () is a one-electron atom like hydrogen. Find the energy and radius of its ground state, its ionisation energy from the ground state, and the wavelength of its Balmer- () line. Compare each with hydrogen.
Step 1. Ground-state energy, from equation (1) with : — four times deeper than hydrogen's eV, because .
Step 2. Ground-state radius: — half of hydrogen's Å, because ; the doubled nuclear charge pulls the electron in tighter.
Step 3. Ionisation energy from the ground state, from equation (3): — you must supply the full well depth to free the electron.
Step 4. Balmer- wavelength, from equation (2) with : eV, so — hydrogen's nm red line, divided by , now a far-UV line. Every He⁺ line is a hydrogen line shifted to one-quarter the wavelength. Timing note: about 60 seconds if you scale rather than recompute. Never redo the arithmetic from constants — take the hydrogen answer and apply the four scalings (, , , ). For that is just "energies , radii , wavelengths ", and the whole problem is mental arithmetic.
Exam traps
Dropping the minus sign. Bohr energies are negative: eV. The ground state is the most negative and most bound; higher is less negative. A positive Bohr energy is always a slip. When you subtract for a transition, write with the lower level first, so the result comes out positive automatically.
Quoting eV for the wrong level or atom. eV is the ionisation energy of hydrogen from its ground state only. From it is eV; for He⁺ from its ground state it is eV. Ionisation from level is — check the level and the charge every time.
Miscounting spectral lines. A gas reaching level emits lines, not . The value is only the number of lines in a single series (those ending on one particular rung). Excite to : six lines, not three.
Forgetting the (and ) scalings. For a hydrogen-like ion, energies scale as , radii as , speeds as and wavelengths as . The commonest competitive-exam blunder is scaling the wavelength by instead of — He⁺'s Balmer- is at nm (), not nm.
Unit slips. Radii come out in ångström ( Å m), energies in electronvolts, wavelengths in nanometres via . Convert to joules () only if the question explicitly wants in hertz or an SI wavelength. Carry four significant figures and present two or three.
Board scope. The Bohr model, hydrogen energy levels, the line spectrum and these numerical families are firmly examined on CBSE, ICSE, JEE-Main, JEE-Advanced and NEET, and the energy-level and line-spectrum reasoning is on AP Physics 2 (Modern Physics) and A-Level 9702. IB Physics does not carry the quantitative Bohr // treatment in its core — energy levels and photon transitions appear (HL more than SL), but the orbit-radius and orbit-speed numericals do not — so this gym is not IB revision. IGCSE 0625 has no quantitative atomic physics at all, so do not revise this lane for an IGCSE paper.
Origins · 1 minArnold Sommerfeld and how this was discovered
Arnold Sommerfeld was the German theorist who took Bohr's 1913 sketch and turned it into a precision instrument. Where Bohr allowed only circular orbits fixed by one quantum number , Sommerfeld in 1916 let the orbits be ellipses and added a second (azimuthal) quantum number, and by folding in Einstein's special relativity for the fast inner-orbit electron he explained the atom's fine structure — the tiny splitting of spectral lines that Bohr's single number could not touch. Out of that work came the fine-structure constant , the dimensionless number that measures how strongly light and matter couple and that still sits at the heart of quantum electrodynamics. The refined scheme is called the Bohr–Sommerfeld model, and although the full wave-mechanical theory soon superseded it, Sommerfeld's quantum numbers survive intact in the modern atom. He was also the century's great teacher of physics: an extraordinary number of his students and assistants — Heisenberg, Pauli, Debye, Bethe among them — went on to win the Nobel Prize, though the prize itself, nominated a record number of times, always eluded Sommerfeld.
Going further
Texts. NCERT Physics Class 12, Ch. 12 ("Atoms"), the Bohr-model derivation and the spectral-series exercises · H. C. Verma, Concepts of Physics Vol. 2, "Bohr's Model and Physics of the Atom," worked problems · D. C. Pandey / Irodov atomic-physics problem sets (for the -scaling and line-count variants) · Cambridge A-Level 9702, atomic-spectra and energy-level problems.
Provenance. Standard exam-archive problems on Bohr's one-electron atom. Recompute: master ladder Å, m/s, eV; hydrogen Å, m/s, eV; Å, m/s, eV; Balmer- () eV, nm (Rydberg cross-check m⁻¹); Hβ () nm; Lyman- () eV, nm; ionisation from eV; excite to lines, shortest at nm, longest at nm; series limits Lyman nm, Balmer nm, Paschen nm; lines from ; He⁺ () eV, Å, ionisation eV, Balmer- nm.
Prerequisites. Energy Levels and the Hydrogen Spectrum — the concept article that builds the ladder, the Rydberg formula and the Lyman/Balmer/Paschen series this gym drills. Leads to. the university seam The Bohr Model of Hydrogen (`aq-optics-bohr-model-hydrogen`), which re-derives the levels and prepares the ground for the full quantum theory.
Go deeper (UG). The rigorous quantum-mechanical account — the hydrogen atom as a solution of the Schrödinger equation, the true orbital shapes, the angular-momentum and spin quantum numbers, and the fine-structure corrections that Sommerfeld first glimpsed — is developed in The Bohr Model of Hydrogen and its successors. That machinery is beyond this article's algebra-and-trig level; here we quote its result, which for a one-electron atom is exactly Bohr's ladder. Enrichment only; nothing in this gym depends on it.
Why are the Bohr energies negative, and what does the sign actually mean?
The negative sign means the electron is bound — trapped in the electrical well of the nucleus. We set the zero of energy at , the point where the electron has just escaped and sits at rest infinitely far away. Any state where the electron is still attached is below that, so it has less energy than zero: hence negative. The number eV is therefore how far below freedom the electron sits. It also tells you the escape cost directly: to ionise from level you must add exactly to lift the electron up to . So the sign is not a nuisance — it is the whole bookkeeping. A bound-orbit Bohr energy that comes out positive is always an arithmetic slip.
How do I know which level to write first when I compute a transition energy?
Always put the lower level (smaller ) first inside the bracket: with . The lower level has the larger value of , so the bracket is positive and your emitted energy comes out positive, as it must. Physically, emission is a jump down the ladder and absorption is a jump up, but the size of the energy gap is identical either way — a emission and a absorption involve the very same eV photon. So you never need two formulas: compute the gap with the lower level first, and then just say "emitted" if the electron fell and "absorbed" if it climbed. This one habit kills the most common sign error in the topic.
Why does exciting a gas to level n give n(n-1)/2 lines rather than n-1?
Because the electrons do not all fall straight to the ground state — they cascade down by every possible route. An atom in might drop , then ; another might go , then ; another in one leap. Each distinct pair of levels produces its own photon energy, hence its own spectral line, and the number of ways to choose two rungs out of is . The tempting answer counts only the jumps that land on one particular level — that is a single series (for example, only the Lyman lines ending on ), not the whole spectrum. For : six lines total, of which three are Lyman (), two Balmer () and one Paschen (). Add them up — — and you see the formula is just the sum .
What is the difference between a spectral series and its series limit?
A series is the family of all lines that end on one common lower level. The Lyman series are all the jumps down to (ultraviolet); the Balmer series all the jumps down to (these are hydrogen's visible lines); the Paschen series all the jumps down to (infrared). Within a series, as the upper level climbs from just above toward infinity, the lines get closer and closer together and shorter and shorter in wavelength, piling up at a sharp edge called the series limit — the wavelength of the jump from . For Balmer that limit is nm; for Lyman it is nm; for Paschen nm. Beyond the limit (shorter wavelengths still) the spectrum becomes continuous, because the incoming electron was free and could have had any energy.
How can the Bohr model be right about the numbers if physicists say it is wrong?
Both are true. Bohr's picture — a point electron on a definite circular track at a definite radius and speed — is genuinely wrong: quantum mechanics replaced it with a smeared-out probability cloud (an orbital) in which the electron has no single position or path. Yet Bohr's energy levels for a one-electron atom, eV, come out exactly right — the full Schrödinger-equation treatment (beyond this article's algebra-and-trig level, so we quote its result) reproduces the same ladder, a lucky feature of the pure Coulomb force. So for anything that depends only on the energy levels — line wavelengths, ionisation energies, the Rydberg formula — the Bohr model is correct and remains the fastest route through an exam. It fails only when you ask about things the crude picture cannot hold: fine structure, orbital shapes, and multi-electron atoms.
Which constants and shortcuts should I actually use under exam time?
Carry six numbers: J·s eV·s, m/s, C, Bohr radius Å, ground energy eV, and Rydberg m⁻¹. For transitions the fastest road is energy-first: eV, then . Only drop to SI (joules, hertz, metres) when a question explicitly asks for a frequency or an SI wavelength. Use the Rydberg formula as your second road to check a wavelength — it is independent of the -and- route and should agree to about . Quote whichever constants your board's data sheet prints, and keep four significant figures so rounding never bites the third digit.
Is this gym the same as the concept articles on the Bohr model and hydrogen energy levels?
It shares their physics but not their purpose. The concept articles derive the model — why angular momentum is quantised, why the energies come out negative, why the spectral lines fall into series — and explain the meaning of every symbol. This article assumes all of that and drills using it fast and correctly under exam pressure: the orbit substitutions, the transition-to-wavelength recipe, the ionisation-energy read-off, the line count, the scaling. Think of the concept articles as the theory lectures and this as the problem class. If a formula here feels unmotivated, revisit The Bohr Model of the Atom or Energy Levels and the Hydrogen Spectrum; if you understand the physics but keep losing marks to a dropped minus sign or a mis-scaled wavelength, this gym is where you fix them.