Buoyancy, Archimedes' Principle & Floatation

A steel nail sinks like the stone it almost is. A steel ship — a hundred thousand tonnes of the same metal — rides the ocean for decades. Meanwhile you can lie back in the Dead Sea and read a newspaper, but try that in a swimming pool and you sink to your chin. Something in the water is pushing up, it pushes on everything, and its strength has nothing to do with what the object is made of and everything to do with how much water the object shoves aside. That push is buoyancy, and it is not a new force of nature. It is the previous article's depth law caught in the act: pressure grows with depth, so the water below any submerged object pushes up harder than the water above pushes down. The mismatch is a net upward force, and Archimedes of Syracuse computed it twenty-two centuries ago with an argument so clean it still wins marks verbatim: the upthrust equals the weight of the displaced fluid. From that single sentence flow the ship, the swimmer, the iceberg's hidden 90%, the hot-air balloon, and the submarine's ballast tanks. For exams this is prime territory on every board that kept fluids: CBSE/ISC derivations, NEET's beloved fraction-submerged numericals, JEE's apparent-weight-in-a-liquid twists, AP's new fluids unit, and A-Level's freshly added upthrust calculation. The archetype article that follows drills the problem families; here we build the principle, the float/sink logic, and the apparent-weight accounting they all rest on.

Key takeaways
  • Buoyant force (upthrust) is the net upward push a fluid exerts on any body in it, caused by pressure increasing with depth.
  • Archimedes' principle: the upthrust equals the weight of the fluid displaced: FB=ρf Vdisp gF_B = \rho_f\,V_{\text{disp}}\,g — fluid's density, displaced volume, nothing about the body's material.
  • Sink or float is a density contest: ρbody>ρf\rho_{\text{body}} > \rho_f sinks, == hovers (neutral), << floats with just enough submerged to balance.
  • A floating body displaces its weight of fluid; a fully submerged body displaces its volume of fluid — the two bookkeeping modes of every problem.
  • Fraction submerged when floating: VsubV=ρbodyρf\dfrac{V_{\text{sub}}}{V} = \dfrac{\rho_{\text{body}}}{\rho_f} (iceberg: 917/1025 ≈ 90% under seawater).
  • Apparent weight when submerged: Wapp=W−FBW_{\text{app}} = W - F_B — the "loss of weight" equals the displaced fluid's weight.
  • Key idea: a fluid pushes up on any body with the weight of the fluid the body displaced.
The core insight

When a body is partially or wholly immersed in a fluid, the fluid exerts an upward buoyant force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced (FB=ρfVdisp gF_B = \rho_f V_{\text{disp}}\, g), acting through the centre of gravity of the displaced fluid.

Where this lives today

Every cargo ship's hull wears a Plimsoll line — a legally enforced set of marks showing the maximum safe waterline in summer seawater, winter North Atlantic, tropical fresh water and more, because equation (3) says the same ship floats deeper in warmer, fresher, less dense water. Submarines fly through the density contest deliberately: flood the ballast tanks to nudge average density above seawater's and dive; blow compressed air in to rise; hold it exactly equal and hover. Astronauts train for spacewalks in NASA's Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory, a 23-million-litre pool where suits are weighted to hover — buoyancy cancelling weight is the cheapest imitation of orbit we have. Fish beat engineers to all of it: the swim bladder is a biological ballast tank, inflated or deflated to hold depth without swimming. And meteorologists launch three thousand radiosonde balloons daily — hydrogen or helium filled, ρairVg\rho_{\text{air}}Vg doing the lifting all the way to the stratosphere.

The physical picture

Push a beach ball under water and hold it there. Your arms feel the fluid fighting back — tens of newtons of it. Where does that force actually come from? Not from some special "floating tendency": from plain pressure. The ball's lower surface sits deeper than its upper surface, and pressure grows with depth (P=P0+ρghP = P_0 + \rho gh). So the water presses up on the bottom harder than it presses down on the top. Horizontal pushes cancel by symmetry; the vertical mismatch survives. Buoyancy is the depth law's vertical imbalance, integrated over the body's skin.

Figure
Where upthrust comes from — deeper means harder push, and the mismatch points up
body P(top)·A down P(bottom)·A up — bigger sides cancel; bottom beats top F_B = ρ_f V g weight of displaced fluid, through the centre of buoyancy W = ρ_body V g sink / hover / float = the density contest Buoyancy = the depth law's vertical mismatch

Archimedes' genius was to skip the integration with a replacement argument. Freeze the fluid everywhere except a body-shaped region, and let that region be filled with fluid for a moment. That parcel of fluid floats in equilibrium — it doesn't sink or rise — so the surrounding fluid must be supplying an upward force exactly equal to the parcel's weight, acting through the parcel's centre of gravity. Now swap the parcel for the actual body. The surrounding fluid hasn't changed, so it exerts the same force: up, equal to the weight of the fluid that would fill that space — the displaced fluid. That is the whole principle, derived in a paragraph, valid for any shape, any fluid, any depth. Three consequences organize every problem you will meet. If the body is denser than the fluid, its weight beats the maximum possible upthrust (even fully submerged, ρbodyVg>ρfVg\rho_{\text{body}}Vg > \rho_f Vg): it sinks — though it weighs less on the way down. If densities match, it hovers, indifferent to depth: neutral buoyancy, the submarine's and the scuba diver's operating point. If the body is less dense, full submersion would overpay: the body rises and pokes out of the surface, shedding submerged volume until the upthrust from what remains under water exactly matches its weight. Floating is equilibrium by partial withdrawal.

The math: the principle and its two bookkeeping modes

The buoyant force on a body displacing volume VdispV_{\text{disp}} of a fluid of density ρf\rho_f is

FB=ρf Vdisp g(1)F_B = \rho_f\, V_{\text{disp}}\, g \qquad (1)

where: ρf\rho_f — the fluid's density (the most-tested substitution slip in the chapter: never the body's); VdispV_{\text{disp}} — the volume of fluid pushed aside, which is the body's full volume only if fully submerged; gg — as your board prescribes. Read the structure: the body's material, mass, and depth are absent. A 1-litre lump of lead and a 1-litre lump of wood, both held fully under water, feel the same 9.8 N upthrust — they respond differently only because their weights differ.

Derivation AArchimedes' principle from the depth law

We derive FB=ρfVgF_B = \rho_f V g two ways in one card — first honestly from pressure on a simple shape, then by the replacement argument that generalizes it to any shape. The strategy for the first: take a cylinder (height hh, base area AA) fully submerged with its top at depth dd, and total the pressure forces on its surfaces. Watch which quantities cancel: the depth dd must drop out, or buoyancy would depend on how deep you are — which for an incompressible fluid it does not.

Step 1. Pressure forces on the cylinder. Top face, pushed down: Ftop=(P0+ρfgd)AF_{\text{top}} = (P_0 + \rho_f g d)A. Bottom face at depth d+hd + h, pushed up: Fbot=(P0+ρfg(d+h))AF_{\text{bot}} = (P_0 + \rho_f g (d+h))A. Side walls: horizontal pushes, cancelling in pairs by symmetry.

Step 2. Net upward force:

FB=Fbot−Ftop=ρf g hA=ρf g VF_B = F_{\text{bot}} - F_{\text{top}} = \rho_f\, g\, h A = \rho_f\, g\, V

Why dd and P0P_0 vanished: both press top and bottom alike; only the extra ρfgh\rho_f g h across the body's own height survives. Buoyancy is depth-blind (until compressibility or non-uniform fluids enter).

Step 3. Any shape, by replacement: imagine the body's region occupied by fluid instead. That fluid parcel is in equilibrium, so the surrounding fluid pushes up on it with exactly its weight, ρfVg\rho_f V g, through its centre of gravity (the centre of buoyancy). The surrounding pressure field doesn't care what fills the region — so the same force acts on the actual body. Why this argument is exam gold: it is two sentences, it needs no integration, and it also delivers the line of action — the upthrust passes through the centroid of the displaced fluid, the fact behind ship-stability questions. *Verified: units — kg/m3⋅m/s2⋅m3=N\mathrm{kg/m^3 \cdot m/s^2 \cdot m^3} = \mathrm{N} ✓. Limits — ρf→0\rho_f \to 0 (vacuum): no upthrust; body fully out of fluid: Vdisp=0V_{\text{disp}} = 0, none ✓. Anchor — 1 litre displaced in water: FB=1000×9.8×10−3=9.8F_B = 1000 \times 9.8 \times 10^{-3} = 9.8 N, one kilogram's weight ✓. Standard: NCERT Ch. 9; On Floating Bodies, Prop. 5–7.*

Problems then split into two bookkeeping modes — identify which before touching numbers.

Fully submerged (sunk, held, or hovering): Vdisp=VV_{\text{disp}} = V, the body's whole volume. The net downward force is W−FB=(ρbody−ρf)VgW - F_B = (\rho_{\text{body}} - \rho_f)Vg, and the apparent weight — what a spring balance or your muscles feel — is

Wapp=W−FB=W(1−ρfρbody)(2)W_{\text{app}} = W - F_B = W\left(1 - \frac{\rho_f}{\rho_{\text{body}}}\right) \qquad (2)

where: the bracketed factor is the fraction of weight surviving immersion. The "loss of weight" is exactly FBF_B — Archimedes' own crown test: weigh in air, weigh in water, and the difference hands you the volume, hence the density, of any irregular object. For aluminium (ρ=2700\rho = 2700) in water the factor is 1−1000/2700=0.631 - 1000/2700 = 0.63: it "loses" 37% of its weight.

Floating: the body chooses how much to submerge. Equilibrium demands FB=WF_B = W:

ρf Vsub g=ρbody Vg⇒VsubV=ρbodyρf(3)\rho_f\, V_{\text{sub}}\, g = \rho_{\text{body}}\, V g \quad\Rightarrow\quad \frac{V_{\text{sub}}}{V} = \frac{\rho_{\text{body}}}{\rho_f} \qquad (3)

where: VsubV_{\text{sub}} — the submerged volume. The fraction submerged is the density ratio, with gg cancelled (so the same iceberg floats identically on the Moon). Ice at 917 kg/m3917\ \mathrm{kg/m^3} in seawater at 10251025: 917/1025=0.895917/1025 = 0.895 — the famous nine-tenths of the iceberg below the waterline. Equivalently, a floating body displaces its own weight of fluid — the form that instantly answers "a 200,000-tonne ship displaces how much water?" (200,000 tonnes of it.)

Figure
Floating is a density ratio — the fraction submerged IS ρ_body/ρ_fluid
waterline iceberg 917/1025 89.5% below wood 600 60% below cork 240: rides high steel 7800: sinks V_sub / V = ρ_body / ρ_fluid — g cancels; the fluid decides the waterline
situationdisplaced volumegoverning equation
fully submerged, denserVV (all of it)Wapp=(ρb−ρf)VgW_{\text{app}} = (\rho_b - \rho_f)Vg; sinks
hovering (neutral)VVρb=ρf\rho_b = \rho_f exactly
floatingVsub<VV_{\text{sub}} < VVsub/V=ρb/ρfV_{\text{sub}}/V = \rho_b/\rho_f; FB=WF_B = W
held under, less denseVVnet upward (ρf−ρb)Vg(\rho_f - \rho_b)Vg — the beach ball's escape force

Limiting cases

caseresultmeaning
ρb=ρf\rho_b = \rho_ffloats fully submerged, any depthneutral buoyancy: submarines, neutrally weighted divers
ρf≫ρb\rho_f \gg \rho_btiny fraction submergedcork on mercury: barely dents the surface
ρf→ρb\rho_f \to \rho_b from abovefraction submerged →1\to 1Dead Sea reader vs pool swimmer: less margin, less freeboard
fluid = airFB=ρairVgF_B = \rho_{\text{air}}Vg, small but realballoons run entirely on it; precision weighing corrects for it
free-falling containergeff=0g_{\text{eff}} = 0: no pressure gradient, no buoyancya bubble in free-falling water stops rising — a JEE trap built from a limit
body resting on the sea floor, sealed to itreduced/absent upthrustno fluid beneath = no bottom push; suction-cup physics

Worked examples

1 · Board level — apparent weight of a submerged stone (CBSE/ICSE pattern, 3 marks)

A stone of mass 2.5 kg2.5\ \mathrm{kg} and density 2500 kg/m32500\ \mathrm{kg/m^3} hangs from a spring balance, fully submerged in water (ρf=1000 kg/m3\rho_f = 1000\ \mathrm{kg/m^3}, g=9.8 m/s2g = 9.8\ \mathrm{m/s^2}). Find (a) the buoyant force and (b) the balance reading.

Step 1. Volume from mass and density: V=m/ρb=2.5/2500=1.0×10−3 m3V = m/\rho_b = 2.5/2500 = 1.0\times10^{-3}\ \mathrm{m^3} — one litre.

Step 2. (a) Upthrust, equation (1) with the fluid's density: FB=1000×1.0×10−3×9.8=9.8 NF_B = 1000 \times 1.0\times10^{-3} \times 9.8 = \boxed{9.8\ \mathrm{N}}.

Step 3. (b) True weight W=2.5×9.8=24.5 NW = 2.5 \times 9.8 = 24.5\ \mathrm{N}; apparent weight Wapp=24.5−9.8=14.7 NW_{\text{app}} = 24.5 - 9.8 = \boxed{14.7\ \mathrm{N}} — the balance reads 1.5 kg1.5\ \mathrm{kg}.

Step 4. Cross-check with equation (2): W(1−ρf/ρb)=24.5(1−0.4)=14.7W(1 - \rho_f/\rho_b) = 24.5(1 - 0.4) = 14.7 N ✓. The stone "lost" 40% of its weight — exactly ρf/ρb\rho_f/\rho_b.

2 · Competitive level — the iceberg and its cousins (NEET/JEE-Main pattern, ~90 seconds)

Ice has density 917 kg/m3917\ \mathrm{kg/m^3}. (a) What fraction of an iceberg lies below the surface in seawater (1025 kg/m31025\ \mathrm{kg/m^3})? (b) A block floats in water with one-third of its volume above the surface — find its density.

Step 1. (a) Equation (3): VsubV=9171025=0.895\dfrac{V_{\text{sub}}}{V} = \dfrac{917}{1025} = \boxed{0.895} — about 90% hidden. (In fresh water, 917/1000=0.917917/1000 = 0.917: even more submerged. Denser fluid = higher ride.)

Step 2. (b) One-third above means two-thirds submerged: ρbρf=23\dfrac{\rho_b}{\rho_f} = \dfrac{2}{3}, so ρb=23×1000=667 kg/m3\rho_b = \dfrac{2}{3}\times1000 = \boxed{667\ \mathrm{kg/m^3}}. Timing note: fraction-floating questions are pure ratio — no gg, no volumes, 30 seconds each. The reliable trap is "above" vs "below": underline which fraction the question states, then convert. An option matching the wrong side (333 kg/m³ here) is always planted.

3 · Competitive level — two weighings, two liquids (JEE-Main pattern, ~3 minutes)

A metal piece weighs 7.86 N7.86\ \mathrm{N} in air, 6.86 N6.86\ \mathrm{N} fully submerged in water, and 7.06 N7.06\ \mathrm{N} fully submerged in an unknown oil. Take ρwater=1000 kg/m3\rho_{\text{water}} = 1000\ \mathrm{kg/m^3}, g=10 m/s2g = 10\ \mathrm{m/s^2}. Find (a) the metal's volume and density, (b) the oil's density.

Step 1. Water's upthrust = weight loss in water: FBw=7.86−6.86=1.00 NF_B^{w} = 7.86 - 6.86 = 1.00\ \mathrm{N}.

Step 2. (a) Volume from FBw=ρwVgF_B^w = \rho_w V g: V=1.001000×10=1.0×10−4 m3V = \dfrac{1.00}{1000\times10} = \boxed{1.0\times10^{-4}\ \mathrm{m^3}} (100 cm³). Mass =7.86/10=0.786= 7.86/10 = 0.786 kg, so ρb=0.786/10−4=7860 kg/m3\rho_b = 0.786/10^{-4} = \boxed{7860\ \mathrm{kg/m^3}} — iron.

Step 3. (b) Oil's upthrust: 7.86−7.06=0.80 N7.86 - 7.06 = 0.80\ \mathrm{N} on the same volume, so ρoil=0.8010−4×10=800 kg/m3\rho_{\text{oil}} = \dfrac{0.80}{10^{-4}\times10} = \boxed{800\ \mathrm{kg/m^3}}.

Step 4. Shortcut worth memorizing: ρoilρw=loss in oilloss in water=0.801.00\dfrac{\rho_{\text{oil}}}{\rho_w} = \dfrac{\text{loss in oil}}{\text{loss in water}} = \dfrac{0.80}{1.00} — relative density by two weighings, no volume needed. Timing note: this is Archimedes' crown method in modern dress and a JEE regular. The weight-loss-ratio shortcut (step 4) turns a 3-minute solve into 60 seconds; it works because the same VV and gg cancel.

Exam traps

Wrong density in FBF_B. The formula takes the fluid's density and the displaced volume. Writing ρbody\rho_{\text{body}} in the upthrust (or the body's full VV for a floating object) is the chapter's top mark-loser. Say it as a sentence — "weight of displaced fluid" — before substituting.

Floating vs submerged bookkeeping. Floating: force balance FB=WF_B = W, displaced weight = body's weight. Submerged: Vdisp=VV_{\text{disp}} = V, apparent weight =W−ρfVg= W - \rho_f Vg. Misfiling the problem costs every subsequent line.

"Above" vs "below" fractions. Vsub/V=ρb/ρfV_{\text{sub}}/V = \rho_b/\rho_f gives the fraction below. Questions quote the fraction visible; subtract from 1 first. Both numbers appear in the options.

Buoyancy doesn't grow with depth. In an incompressible fluid the upthrust on a fully submerged body is the same at 1 m and 100 m (dd cancelled in the derivation). Distractors claiming "sinks faster because buoyancy weakens" are false at HS level (real-world compressibility subtleties are beyond board scope).

Buoyancy needs a pressure gradient, i.e. effective gravity. In a freely falling lift (or orbiting station), geff=0g_{\text{eff}} = 0: no depth law, no upthrust — a cork released underwater in free fall stays put. In an accelerating lift, replace g→g+ag \to g + a in both weight and upthrust; the fraction submerged of a floater is unchanged (both scale together — a favourite assertion–reason item).

Air is a fluid too. A helium balloon rises because ρairVg>W\rho_{\text{air}}Vg > W; a body's "weight in air" is already minutely reduced by air's upthrust (precision chemistry corrects for it). If a question compares vacuum and air weighings, that correction is the question.

The upthrust's line of action. Through the centre of buoyancy — the centroid of the displaced fluid — not the body's centre of gravity. For a uniform fully submerged body the two coincide; for a floating ship they don't, and their interplay decides stability (archetype territory).

Which gg? CBSE 9.8; JEE/NEET usually 10 as stated; A-Level 9.81. Fraction-submerged answers are gg-free — if your fraction contains gg, you've made an algebra slip.

Origins · 1 minArchimedes and how this was discovered
A
Archimedes
c. 287–212 BC · Syracuse, Sicily

Archimedes was the ancient world's supreme mathematician-engineer: he computed π to two decimal places by exhausting polygons, found the volume of a sphere (and asked for the result on his tombstone), built compound pulleys that let one man haul a loaded ship, and — per the story told by Vitruvius — solved King Hiero's crown problem in the bath, noticing the water rise as he lowered himself in and running home shouting "Eureka!". Whether or not the run happened, his treatise On Floating Bodies survives, and it derives the buoyancy principle with full rigour, then goes far past any modern syllabus into the stability of floating paraboloids — ship-hull mathematics, twenty-two centuries early. He died in the Roman sack of Syracuse, reportedly telling a soldier not to disturb his diagrams.

History
c. 250 BC — Archimedes' On Floating Bodies states the principle and analyses floating equilibrium and stability.
c. 25 BC — Vitruvius records the golden-crown story: density testing by displacement enters engineering folklore.
1586
— Simon Stevin's hydrostatics revives and extends Archimedes; Galileo builds la bilancetta, a hydrostatic balance for density.
1783
— The Montgolfier brothers' balloon flies: buoyancy in air carries passengers.
1900
— The first modern submarines make neutral buoyancy an operational technology — trim tanks tune ρ to match seawater.

Going further

Texts. NCERT Physics Class 11, Ch. 9 · HC Verma Vol. 1, Ch. 13 · Archimedes, On Floating Bodies (Prop. 5–7, in translation — genuinely readable).

Provenance. All results standard. A verifier should recompute: the derivation's FB=ρfghAF_B = \rho_f ghA; example 1's 9.8 N and 14.7 N; example 2's 0.895 and 667 kg/m³; example 3's 10−410^{-4} m³, 7860 kg/m³ (iron ✓), 800 kg/m³.

Prerequisites. Fluids at Rest: Pressure & Pascal's Law. Leads to. Floating-Body Problems (archetype) · Continuity & Bernoulli · The Bobbing Float (SHM archetype).

If pressure pushes on the object from all sides, why is the net force exactly the displaced fluid's weight — that seems too neat.

The replacement argument makes it inevitable. The surrounding fluid produces some net force on whatever occupies the body-shaped region; that force depends only on the pressure field outside, which doesn't know what's inside. Fill the region with fluid, and that occupant is in equilibrium — so the net force must be exactly its weight, upward. Swap in the real body: same surroundings, same force. The "too neat" feeling is just equilibrium doing the integral for you.

How can a steel ship float when steel is eight times denser than water?

Because the ship is not solid steel — it is steel plus a vast enclosed volume of air. What matters is the average density of the whole hull-shaped object, hull cavity included, and that is well below water's. Equivalently: the hull's shape lets a modest weight of ship displace an enormous volume of water. Puncture the hull, let water replace the air, and the average density climbs past 1000 kg/m³ — which is the physics of sinking, Titanic included.

Why do I float better in the sea than in a pool, and better still in the Dead Sea?

Your density is fixed (≈ 985–1005 kg/m³, depending on lungs); the fluid's isn't. Fraction submerged = ρ_you/ρ_fluid: in fresh water (1000) you barely float — nearly all of you under; in seawater (1025) a bit more of you rides above; in the Dead Sea (~1240) only about 80% of you needs to be submerged, so you bob like a cork and can hold a newspaper dry. Same body, three fluids, three waterlines.

Does the buoyant force act at a single point? Where?

It is really distributed pressure over the whole wetted surface, but its resultant acts through the centre of buoyancy — the centre of gravity of the displaced fluid (the centroid of the underwater shape). For a fully submerged uniform body this coincides with the body's own centre of gravity; for a floating ship it sits below the waterline while the ship's CG may sit high. The pair form a torque when the ship tilts, and whether that torque rights or capsizes her is the metacentre analysis of naval architecture — HS exams stop at "through the centroid of displaced fluid."

When ice floating in a full glass of water melts, does the glass overflow?

No — the level stays exactly put, and the one-line proof is pure Archimedes: the floating ice displaces its weight of water. When it melts, it becomes that same weight of water, which fills precisely the volume it was displacing. (Twist for the exam: ice floating in salt water melts into fresh water that is less dense than what it displaced — the level rises slightly. And ice containing a stone: the level falls when it melts, because the sunken stone displaces its volume, less than its weight's worth.) This family is a NEET/JEE perennial.

Is there buoyancy in space, inside an orbiting spacecraft?

Effectively no. Buoyancy requires a pressure gradient, and the gradient comes from effective gravity: ΔP=ρgeffh\Delta P = \rho g_{\text{eff}} h. In free fall (orbit), geff=0g_{\text{eff}} = 0: no up, no down, no depth law, no upthrust. That is why candle flames aboard the ISS burn as little blue spheres — hot, light air no longer rises away — and why bubbles in a drink don't rise, which is why astronauts drink from sealed pouches. The same physics in miniature: a falling jar of water during the drop is buoyancy-free.

Archimedes supposedly caught a fake crown with this. What exactly did he do?

The Vitruvius version: compare the crown against an equal mass of pure gold. Weigh both in air (equal), then in water: the denser pure gold has less volume, displaces less water, and so loses less weight. If the crown loses more, it is bulkier for its mass — silver has been mixed in. Worked example 3 is the same method with a spring balance: weight loss in water ∝ volume, and two weighings hand you density. Modern labs still call it hydrostatic weighing; it remains a standard density technique for irregular solids (and for measuring human body-fat fractions).

Before this

Where this leads