Light – Reflection and Refraction

Look into a shining steel spoon and your face appears tiny and upright on the back of the bowl, but huge and upside down on the inner, curved side. Dip a straight pencil into a glass of water and it looks snapped in two at the surface. A watchmaker's tiny magnifying glass turns a wristwatch's gears into something you can actually work on. All three tricks are performed by the same two actors: light bouncing off a surface, and light bending as it crosses from one transparent medium into another. This chapter gives you the tools to predict, draw and calculate exactly what any mirror or lens will do to an object placed in front of it. The first half studies spherical mirrors — concave (caved inward, like the spoon's bowl) and convex (bulging outward, like the spoon's back). You will learn the vocabulary of pole, centre of curvature, principal axis, principal focus and focal length, then use two or more standard rays to construct the image formed for any position of the object, from far beyond the mirror to almost touching it. A single algebraic relation, the mirror formula, then lets you calculate exactly where that image lands and how large it is, once you adopt a careful bookkeeping system called the New Cartesian Sign Convention. The second half turns to refraction — why a straw looks bent in a glass of water, why a pool looks shallower than it is, and why a lens can gather sunlight into a burning point. You will meet Snell's law, the refractive index that measures how strongly a medium bends light, and the sister set of rules for convex and concave lenses: their own ray-construction rules, their own sign convention, their own formula linking object and image distance to focal length, and the idea of power — the number opticians print on your spectacle prescription. By the end, mirrors and lenses stop being separate topics and become two applications of one consistent way of thinking about light.

Key takeaways
  • Laws of reflection hold for any reflecting surface, flat or curved: angle of incidence equals angle of reflection, and incident ray, normal and reflected ray lie in one plane.
  • A concave mirror can form a real, inverted image, or, for an object between pole and focus, a magnified virtual, erect image; a convex mirror always forms a virtual, erect, diminished image.
  • For any spherical mirror, R=2fR = 2f — the radius of curvature is twice the focal length, so F lies midway between P and C.
  • The mirror formula 1v+1u=1f\frac{1}{v} + \frac{1}{u} = \frac{1}{f} and magnification m=−vum = -\frac{v}{u} apply to every spherical mirror once distances follow the New Cartesian Sign Convention.
  • Refraction is the bending of light crossing obliquely into a medium of different speed; it bends toward the normal entering a denser medium, away from the normal entering a rarer one.
  • Snell's law, sin⁡i/sin⁡r=n21\sin i/\sin r = n_{21}, and refractive index n=c/vn = c/v quantify exactly how much a ray bends.
  • A convex lens converges light and can form real or virtual images depending on object position; a concave lens always diverges light, forming only a virtual, erect, diminished image.
  • The lens formula 1v−1u=1f\frac{1}{v} - \frac{1}{u} = \frac{1}{f} and magnification m=vum = \frac{v}{u} mirror the mirror equations, but with one sign flip traced to where real images form.
  • Power of a lens, P=1/fP = 1/f (f in metres), is measured in dioptres (D); positive for convex, negative for concave, and powers in contact simply add.
  • Key idea: reflection and refraction both obey precise geometric laws — equal angles for mirrors, Snell's law for lenses — so the position, size and nature of any image formed by a spherical mirror or lens can be found by a two-ray construction or a single algebraic formula, once distances are signed correctly.
The core insight

Light reflected from a spherical mirror obeys the mirror formula 1/v+1/u=1/f1/v + 1/u = 1/f and light refracted through a spherical lens obeys the lens formula 1/v−1/u=1/f1/v - 1/u = 1/f, with magnification m=−v/um = -v/u for mirrors and m=v/um = v/u for lenses, and both formulas, together with Snell's law sin⁡i/sin⁡r=n21\sin i/\sin r = n_{21} for refraction, let you predict the position, size and nature of any image once the New Cartesian Sign Convention fixes the signs of every distance.

What this chapter covers

The chapter has two connected halves, both built on the straight-line travel of light. The first half, reflection by spherical mirrors, introduces the vocabulary (pole, centre of curvature, principal axis, principal focus, focal length), the rule R=2fR = 2f, the four standard rays used for ray diagrams, and the image tables for concave and convex mirrors, then formalises this with the New Cartesian Sign Convention and the mirror formula plus magnification, worked through NCERT's Examples 9.1 and 9.2. The second half, refraction, starts from everyday observations — a raised pond bottom, a displaced pencil — states the laws of refraction including Snell's law, defines refractive index through the speed of light, and studies refraction through a glass slab. It then extends the same machinery to spherical lenses: vocabulary, ray-construction rules, image tables, sign convention, lens formula, magnification and power in dioptres, worked through Examples 9.3 and 9.4. Carry two ideas through both halves: every image is located by intersecting just two rays, and every calculation depends on getting the sign of each distance right before substituting.

The core ideas

Spherical mirrors: key terms and R = 2f

A spherical mirror's reflecting surface forms part of a sphere. If the surface curves inward, toward the centre of that sphere, it is a concave mirror; if it curves outward, away from the centre, it is a convex mirror. The centre of the sphere is the centre of curvature (C), lying in front of a concave mirror and behind a convex one. The midpoint of the reflecting surface is the pole (P), and the radius of the sphere, the distance PC, is the radius of curvature (R). A straight line through P and C is the principal axis, normal to the mirror at P. Rays parallel to the principal axis, after reflection, converge at (concave) or appear to diverge from (convex) a single point on the axis called the principal focus (F); the distance PF is the focal length (f). For a mirror of small aperture — reflecting surface diameter much smaller than R — experiment shows the focus lies exactly halfway between pole and centre of curvature:

R=2f.(1)R = 2f. \qquad (1)

where: RR is the radius of curvature and ff is the focal length, both measured from the pole along the principal axis. This single relation is why locating C on a ray diagram automatically fixes F, and it holds for both concave and convex mirrors.

Ray diagrams and image formation by mirrors

Any two of four standard rays fix an image, since where two reflected rays cross (or appear to cross) is where the image forms. A ray parallel to the principal axis reflects through F for a concave mirror, or reflects so that it appears to come from F for a convex mirror. A ray directed through F (concave) or toward F (convex) emerges parallel to the axis after reflection. A ray directed through C, striking the mirror along the normal, reflects straight back along its own path. A ray striking the pole obliquely reflects making an equal angle with the axis on the other side, exactly as ordinary reflection from a flat surface would. For a concave mirror, the object's position relative to F and C entirely decides the image: at infinity gives a point-sized real inverted image at F; beyond C gives a diminished real inverted image between F and C; at C gives a same-size real inverted image at C; between C and F gives an enlarged real inverted image beyond C; at F sends the image to infinity; and between P and F — the one case with no real image — gives an enlarged, virtual, erect image behind the mirror. A convex mirror never runs through this sequence: for every object position it forms a virtual, erect, diminished image that stays between P and F, behind the mirror, exactly what the spoon and rear-view mirror show — a convex surface cannot converge rays into a real image.

Figure
Ray diagram for a concave mirror with the object between the centre of curvature and the focus producing a real inverted enlarged image beyond the centre of curvature
Concave mirror — object between F and C gives a real, inverted, enlarged image beyond C principal axis P F C A (object) B A' (image) B' Ray parallel to axis reflects through F; ray to the pole P reflects at an equal angle. Both meet at A'.

The New Cartesian Sign Convention and the mirror formula

Numerical work needs a consistent bookkeeping rule, the New Cartesian Sign Convention. The pole P is the origin and the principal axis is the x-axis. The object is always placed to the left, so light travels left to right. Distances measured in the direction of incident light (to the right of P) are positive; distances measured against it (to the left of P) are negative. Heights measured upward, above the axis, are positive; heights measured downward are negative. Under this convention the object distance uu is always negative, the focal length of a concave mirror is negative and that of a convex mirror is positive, and the sign of vv that comes out of a calculation tells you where the image actually is. With these signs, the object distance (uu), image distance (vv) and focal length (ff) of any spherical mirror are related by the mirror formula:

1v+1u=1f.(2)\frac{1}{v} + \frac{1}{u} = \frac{1}{f}. \qquad (2)

where: all three distances are measured from the pole P along the principal axis and carry the signs fixed by the convention above; this single equation reproduces every row of the image table once the correct signs go in. Magnification, the ratio of image height to object height, is given by

m=h′h=−vu.(3)m = \frac{h'}{h} = -\frac{v}{u}. \qquad (3)

where: hh is object height (positive, since the object stands above the axis) and h′h' is image height, positive for a virtual image and negative for a real image; correspondingly, a negative mm signals a real, inverted image and a positive mm signals a virtual, erect one.

Refraction, Snell's law and refractive index

Light bends when it crosses obliquely from one transparent medium into another, because its speed changes — this is refraction, and it is why a pencil in a glass of water looks displaced and a pond's bottom looks raised. Two laws govern it: the incident ray, the refracted ray and the normal at the point of incidence all lie in one plane, and for a given pair of media and a given colour of light, the ratio of the sine of the angle of incidence to the sine of the angle of refraction is a constant — Snell's law.

sin⁡isin⁡r=n21.(4)\frac{\sin i}{\sin r} = n_{21}. \qquad (4)

where: ii is the angle of incidence and rr the angle of refraction, both from the normal, and n21n_{21} is the refractive index of medium 2 with respect to medium 1, valid for angles of incidence between zero and ninety degrees. This constant ties directly to speed: n21=v1/v2n_{21} = v_1/v_2. When medium 1 is air or vacuum, nm=c/vn_m = c/v is the absolute refractive index of the medium — water's is 1.33, crown glass's 1.52, diamond's 2.42. A medium with a larger refractive index is optically denser; light entering a denser medium slows down and bends toward the normal, and entering a rarer medium it speeds up and bends away from the normal. Optical density is not mass density — kerosene has a higher refractive index than water, so it is optically denser, even though it floats on water.

Refraction through a rectangular glass slab

Shine a ray obliquely onto a rectangular glass slab and it bends toward the normal entering the glass (rarer to denser), travels straight inside, then bends away from the normal leaving the glass (denser to rarer). Because the two faces of the slab are parallel, the bending at entry and exit is equal and opposite, so the emergent ray leaves parallel to the original incident ray — only shifted a little sideways, a lateral shift. A ray striking a boundary exactly along the normal (zero angle of incidence) passes straight through undeviated at every interface, since there is nothing to bend it toward or away from.

Spherical lenses: convex, concave and ray diagrams

A lens is a transparent solid bounded by at least one spherical surface. A convex lens, thicker at the middle than at the edges, bends parallel rays inward to a real focus and is called converging; a concave lens, thicker at the edges, spreads parallel rays outward from an apparent focus and is called diverging. The optical centre (O) is the lens's central point, through which a ray passes without any deviation; the principal axis joins the two centres of curvature; and, since a lens has two faces, it has two principal foci, F1F_1 on the incoming side and F2F_2 on the outgoing side, each at focal length ff from O. Ray construction uses any two of three rays: parallel to the axis, refracting through F2F_2 (convex) or appearing to diverge from F1F_1 (concave); through or aimed at a principal focus, emerging parallel to the axis; and through the optical centre, passing straight through undeviated. A convex lens runs through the same full sequence as a concave mirror as the object approaches: infinity gives a point image at F2F_2; beyond 2F12F_1 gives a diminished real inverted image between F2F_2 and 2F22F_2; at 2F12F_1 gives a same-size real inverted image at 2F22F_2; between F1F_1 and 2F12F_1 gives an enlarged real inverted image beyond 2F22F_2; at F1F_1 sends the image to infinity; and between F1F_1 and O gives an enlarged, virtual, erect image on the object's own side. A concave lens, like a convex mirror, never varies: every position gives a virtual, erect, diminished image between F1F_1 and O.

Figure
Ray diagram for a convex lens with the object beyond twice the focal length producing a real inverted diminished image between the focus and twice the focal length on the far side
Convex lens — object beyond 2F1 gives a real, inverted, diminished image between F2 and 2F2 principal axis O F1 2F1 F2 2F2 A (object) A' (image) B B' Ray parallel to axis refracts through F2; ray through optical centre O goes straight. Both meet at A'.

Sign convention, lens formula, magnification and power

Lenses use the same left-negative, right-positive, up-positive, down-negative rules as mirrors, except that every distance is now measured from the optical centre O rather than the pole. Under this convention a convex lens has positive focal length and a concave lens has negative focal length. The object distance (uu), image distance (vv) and focal length (ff) of any spherical lens are related by the lens formula:

1v−1u=1f.(5)\frac{1}{v} - \frac{1}{u} = \frac{1}{f}. \qquad (5)

where: the only difference from the mirror formula is the minus sign before 1/u1/u, a direct consequence of the object and a real image now lying on opposite sides of the lens rather than the same side of a mirror (the second derivation below shows exactly why). Magnification is

m=h′h=vu.(6)m = \frac{h'}{h} = \frac{v}{u}. \qquad (6)

where: unlike the mirror case there is no leading minus sign, because uu and vv already carry opposite signs for a real image, which automatically makes mm negative. A lens's ability to bend light is expressed as power,

P=1f.(7)P = \frac{1}{f}. \qquad (7)

where: ff must be in metres, giving PP in dioptres (D), the SI unit of lens power; one dioptre is the power of a lens of focal length one metre. Power is positive for a converging convex lens and negative for a diverging concave lens, and when several thin lenses are held in contact their powers simply add, P=P1+P2+P3+…P = P_1 + P_2 + P_3 + \ldots — the arithmetic an optician uses while testing your eyes.

Derivation ADeriving the mirror formula from two similar triangles

The goal is to derive the mirror formula, 1/v+1/u=1/f1/v + 1/u = 1/f, from the ray-diagram geometry of a concave mirror forming a real image, using only similar triangles, and then show that substituting the New Cartesian Sign Convention's negative distances reproduces exactly NCERT's signed Equation 9.1 — the sign convention is a bookkeeping device built to make one formula work for every case, not an arbitrary extra rule. Consider object AB of height hh at magnitude-distance uu from pole P, forming real image A'B' of height h′h' at magnitude-distance vv, with focal length magnitude ff.

Step 1. The ray from B through pole P reflects at an equal angle on the other side, striking the image at B'. Triangles ABP and A'B'P are similar (vertically opposite angles at P, right angles at the axis), giving h/h′=u/vh/h' = u/v.

Step 2. A second ray from B, parallel to the axis, strikes the mirror near P at height hh (valid for small aperture), then reflects through focus F to strike the image at B'. Triangles MPF and A'B'F are similar (MP parallel to AB, shared angle at F), giving h/h′=f/(v−f)h/h' = f/(v-f).

Step 3. Equate the two expressions for h/h′h/h': u/v=f/(v−f)u/v = f/(v-f). Cross-multiplying, uv−uf=vfuv - uf = vf, so uv=uf+vfuv = uf + vf; dividing every term by uvfuvf gives 1f=1v+1u\dfrac{1}{f} = \dfrac{1}{v} + \dfrac{1}{u} — the mirror formula in magnitude form, true for a real object and real image measured as plain positive distances.

Step 4. Bring in the sign convention. The object is always left of the pole, usigned=−uu_{\text{signed}} = -u; a concave mirror's real image also forms in front, on the same left side, vsigned=−vv_{\text{signed}} = -v; its focus is likewise in front, fsigned=−ff_{\text{signed}} = -f. Substituting these into Step 3 gives 1/(−fsigned)=1/(−vsigned)+1/(−usigned)1/(-f_{\text{signed}}) = 1/(-v_{\text{signed}}) + 1/(-u_{\text{signed}}); multiplying by −1-1 leaves 1/fsigned=1/vsigned+1/usigned1/f_{\text{signed}} = 1/v_{\text{signed}} + 1/u_{\text{signed}} — Equation (2), holding for every object position, real or virtual image alike. Verified: with f=80f = 80, u=130u = 130 (object between F and C), Step 3 gives v=208.0v = 208.0, matching 1/208.0+1/130=0.00481+0.00769=0.01250=1/801/208.0 + 1/130 = 0.00481 + 0.00769 = 0.01250 = 1/80.

Go deeper · Derivation B · 2 minDeriving the lens formula and explaining its one sign difference from the mirror formula
Derivation BDeriving the lens formula and explaining its one sign difference from the mirror formula

The goal is to run the identical similar-triangles argument used for the mirror, but through the optical centre of a lens instead of the pole of a mirror, and show precisely why the resulting signed formula has a minus sign, 1/v−1/u=1/f1/v - 1/u = 1/f, where the mirror formula had a plus sign — the difference comes entirely from where a real image forms relative to the object, not from any new physics. Consider object AB of height hh at magnitude-distance uu from optical centre O of a convex lens, forming real image A'B' of height h′h' at magnitude-distance vv on the far side, with focal length magnitude ff.

Step 1. The ray from B through optical centre O passes through undeviated, striking the image at B'. Triangles ABO and A'B'O are similar (vertically opposite angles at O, right angles at the axis), giving h/h′=u/vh/h' = u/v — the same ratio form as the mirror's pole-ray step.

Step 2. A second ray from B, parallel to the axis, strikes the lens near O at height hh, then refracts through the far focus F2F_2 to strike the image at B'. This triangle pair is similar exactly as in the mirror case, giving h/h′=f/(v−f)h/h' = f/(v-f).

Step 3. Equate the two ratios, exactly as for the mirror: u/v=f/(v−f)u/v = f/(v-f), leading to the identical magnitude relation 1/f=1/v+1/u1/f = 1/v + 1/u. Up to here a lens and a mirror behave identically — similar triangles do not know whether the surface reflects or refracts.

Step 4. The sign convention is where they diverge. The object is still left of O, so usigned=−uu_{\text{signed}} = -u. But a lens's real image forms on the far side, right of O, so vsigned=+vv_{\text{signed}} = +v — unlike the mirror's real image, which stayed on the same negative side. The convex lens's focus is also to the right, fsigned=+ff_{\text{signed}} = +f. Substituting into 1/f=1/v+1/u1/f = 1/v + 1/u gives 1/fsigned=1/vsigned+1/(−usigned)=1/vsigned−1/usigned1/f_{\text{signed}} = 1/v_{\text{signed}} + 1/(-u_{\text{signed}}) = 1/v_{\text{signed}} - 1/u_{\text{signed}} — exactly Equation (5). The minus sign is the fingerprint of a real image sitting opposite the object, whereas a mirror's real image sits on the object's own side. Verified: with f=80f = 80, u=240u = 240 (object beyond 2F1), Step 3 gives v=120.0v = 120.0, matching 1/120.0+1/240=0.00833+0.00417=0.01250=1/801/120.0 + 1/240 = 0.00833 + 0.00417 = 0.01250 = 1/80, and m=v/u=0.5m = v/u = 0.5 matches the diminished image in the ray diagram above.

Go deeper · Derivation C · 1 minThe general form of Snell's law and the chain rule for refractive index
Derivation CThe general form of Snell's law and the chain rule for refractive index

The goal is to combine NCERT's ratio form of Snell's law with the speed-based definition of refractive index into one symmetric law, n1sin⁡θ1=n2sin⁡θ2n_1 \sin\theta_1 = n_2 \sin\theta_2, that treats both media alike, and then show that stacking several parallel-faced media lets refractive indices chain together — useful whenever a ray crosses more than one boundary, such as air into glass and then glass into water. Take medium 1 with absolute refractive index n1n_1 and medium 2 with absolute refractive index n2n_2, both defined against light's speed cc in vacuum.

Step 1. Recall Snell's law for light going from medium 1 into medium 2, sin⁡i/sin⁡r=n21\sin i/\sin r = n_{21}, and the speed-based definition n21=v1/v2n_{21} = v_1/v_2. Since absolute refractive index is nm=c/vmn_m = c/v_m, v1=c/n1v_1 = c/n_1 and v2=c/n2v_2 = c/n_2.

Step 2. Substitute the speeds: n21=(c/n1)/(c/n2)=n2/n1n_{21} = (c/n_1)/(c/n_2) = n_2/n_1. The ratio Snell's law uses is simply the second medium's absolute index over the first's.

Step 3. Combine with Step 1: sin⁡i/sin⁡r=n2/n1\sin i/\sin r = n_2/n_1. Cross-multiplying gives the symmetric general form, n1sin⁡θ1=n2sin⁡θ2n_1 \sin\theta_1 = n_2 \sin\theta_2 — the quantity nsin⁡θn\sin\theta is conserved across any one interface.

Step 4. Stack a third medium: if the ray then crosses from medium 2 into medium 3 through a parallel face, its angle of incidence there equals θ2\theta_2 (parallel normals repeat the geometry), giving n2sin⁡θ2=n3sin⁡θ3n_2\sin\theta_2 = n_3\sin\theta_3. So n1sin⁡θ1=n2sin⁡θ2=n3sin⁡θ3n_1\sin\theta_1 = n_2\sin\theta_2 = n_3\sin\theta_3 is conserved through the whole stack, and the refractive index of medium 3 with respect to medium 1 obeys a chain rule, n13=n3/n1=(n3/n2)(n2/n1)=n23×n12n_{13} = n_3/n_1 = (n_3/n_2)(n_2/n_1) = n_{23}\times n_{12}. Verified: with n1=1n_1 = 1 (air), n2=1.5n_2 = 1.5 (glass), n3=1.33n_3 = 1.33 (water), θ1=30\theta_1 = 30 degrees: Step 3 gives sin⁡θ2=0.500/1.5=0.3333\sin\theta_2 = 0.500/1.5 = 0.3333, and the invariant n1sin⁡θ1=0.500n_1\sin\theta_1 = 0.500 recomputed as n3sin⁡θ3n_3\sin\theta_3 gives sin⁡θ3=0.500/1.33=0.3759\sin\theta_3 = 0.500/1.33 = 0.3759, matching the HOTS example below.

Worked examples

Board level - A convex rear-view mirror (NCERT Example 9.1, recomputed)

A convex mirror used for rear-view on an automobile has a radius of curvature of 3.00 m. If a bus is located 5.00 m from this mirror, find the position, nature and size of the image relative to the bus.

Step 1. List the signed quantities. Radius of curvature R=+3.00R = +3.00 m (positive, since a convex mirror's centre of curvature lies behind it). Focal length f=R/2=+1.50f = R/2 = +1.50 m. Object distance u=−5.00u = -5.00 m (object always to the left, hence negative).

Step 2. Substitute into the mirror formula, 1/v=1/f−1/u=1/1.50−1/(−5.00)=0.6667+0.2000=0.86671/v = 1/f - 1/u = 1/1.50 - 1/(-5.00) = 0.6667 + 0.2000 = 0.8667.

Step 3. Invert: v=1/0.8667=+1.15v = 1/0.8667 = +1.15 m. The positive sign means the image forms 1.15 m behind the mirror, on the same side as a virtual image always does for a convex mirror.

Step 4. Magnification, m=−v/u=−(+1.15)/(−5.00)=+0.23m = -v/u = -(+1.15)/(-5.00) = +0.23. Answer: the image forms 1.15 m behind the mirror, virtual, erect, and diminished to 0.23 times the bus's actual size — why a convex mirror gives a wide, safe rear view rather than a true-size one.

Board level - Screen distance for a concave mirror (NCERT Example 9.2, recomputed)

An object 4.0 cm tall is placed 25.0 cm in front of a concave mirror of focal length 15.0 cm. Find where a screen must be placed for a sharp image, and describe the image's nature and size.

Step 1. List the signed quantities. Object height h=+4.0h = +4.0 cm. Object distance u=−25.0u = -25.0 cm. Focal length f=−15.0f = -15.0 cm (negative, since a concave mirror's focus is in front of it).

Step 2. Substitute into the mirror formula, 1/v=1/f−1/u=1/(−15.0)−1/(−25.0)=−0.0667+0.0400=−0.02671/v = 1/f - 1/u = 1/(-15.0) - 1/(-25.0) = -0.0667 + 0.0400 = -0.0267.

Step 3. Invert: v=1/(−0.0267)=−37.5v = 1/(-0.0267) = -37.5 cm. The negative sign places the image 37.5 cm in front of the mirror — that is where the screen must be positioned to catch a sharp image.

Step 4. Magnification, m=−v/u=−(−37.5)/(−25.0)=−1.5m = -v/u = -(-37.5)/(-25.0) = -1.5. Image height h′=m×h=−1.5×4.0=−6.0h' = m \times h = -1.5 \times 4.0 = -6.0 cm. Answer: the screen goes 37.5 cm in front of the mirror; the image is real, inverted, and enlarged to 6.0 cm tall (1.5 times the object).

Board HOTS / foundation JEE-NEET - A ray crossing air, glass and water in sequence

A ray of light strikes a glass slab (refractive index 1.50) from air at an angle of incidence of 30 degrees. The slab's lower face is in contact with water (refractive index 1.33) instead of air. Find the angle of refraction inside the glass, and the angle at which the ray finally enters the water, using the chain rule from the derivation above.

Step 1. Apply the general Snell's law at the air-glass interface: nairsin⁡θair=nglasssin⁡θglassn_{\text{air}}\sin\theta_{\text{air}} = n_{\text{glass}}\sin\theta_{\text{glass}}, so 1×sin⁡30∘=1.50×sin⁡θglass1 \times \sin 30^{\circ} = 1.50 \times \sin\theta_{\text{glass}}. Since sin⁡30∘=0.500\sin 30^{\circ} = 0.500, this gives sin⁡θglass=0.500/1.50=0.3333\sin\theta_{\text{glass}} = 0.500/1.50 = 0.3333, so θglass=19.5∘\theta_{\text{glass}} = 19.5^{\circ} — bent toward the normal, since glass is optically denser than air, exactly as the traps below expect.

Step 2. Because the glass slab's two faces are parallel, the ray's angle of incidence at the lower glass-water face equals its angle of refraction at the upper face, 19.5∘19.5^{\circ} (the same reasoning as the sideways-shift discussion for a glass slab in air).

Step 3. Apply the general Snell's law again at the glass-water interface: nglasssin⁡θglass=nwatersin⁡θwatern_{\text{glass}}\sin\theta_{\text{glass}} = n_{\text{water}}\sin\theta_{\text{water}}, so 1.50×0.3333=1.33×sin⁡θwater1.50 \times 0.3333 = 1.33 \times \sin\theta_{\text{water}}, giving sin⁡θwater=0.500/1.33=0.3759\sin\theta_{\text{water}} = 0.500/1.33 = 0.3759, so θwater=22.1∘\theta_{\text{water}} = 22.1^{\circ} — bent away from the normal compared with the glass angle, since water is optically rarer than glass.

Step 4. Check using the conserved invariant from the derivation: nairsin⁡θair=1×0.500=0.500n_{\text{air}}\sin\theta_{\text{air}} = 1 \times 0.500 = 0.500, and nwatersin⁡θwater=1.33×0.3759=0.500n_{\text{water}}\sin\theta_{\text{water}} = 1.33 \times 0.3759 = 0.500 — the two match, confirming the chain of interfaces was handled consistently. Answer: the ray refracts to 19.5 degrees inside the glass, and enters the water at 22.1 degrees from the normal. Timing note: aim for under three minutes. The chain is one repeated move — apply n1sin⁡θ1=n2sin⁡θ2n_1\sin\theta_1 = n_2\sin\theta_2 at each interface, carrying the previous angle forward as the next angle of incidence — so spot the parallel-face shortcut (refraction angle at one face equals incidence angle at the next) before touching a calculator; recomputing geometry from scratch at the second face is what eats up time.

Common traps

The single most repeated slip is dropping or misplacing signs: forgetting that the object distance uu is always negative, or mixing up that a concave mirror's focal length is negative while a convex lens's is positive. A second common error is mixing up the two magnification formulas — m=−v/um = -v/u for mirrors carries a minus sign that m=v/um = v/u for lenses does not, because a lens's real image sits opposite the object while a mirror's sits on the same side, as the two derivations above show. Students also apply a mirror's ray-construction rules to a lens or vice versa — a lens has no equivalent of "the ray through the centre of curvature reflects straight back"; instead its ray through the optical centre passes straight through undeviated. Another frequent error is assuming a convex mirror or concave lens can, for some special object position, produce a real or enlarged image — neither ever can; both always give a virtual, erect, diminished image regardless of object position. In refraction, students often invert the refractive-index ratio, writing n21=v2/v1n_{21} = v_2/v_1 instead of v1/v2v_1/v_2, or forget that optical density and mass density differ (kerosene bends light more than water despite floating on it). Finally, Snell's law and the bending rules apply only to oblique incidence — a ray along the normal passes straight through without bending, even though its speed still changes.

You should be able to…

  • State the laws of reflection and identify the pole, centre of curvature, principal axis, principal focus and focal length of a spherical mirror, using R=2fR = 2f.
  • Construct a ray diagram for image formation by a concave or convex mirror using any two of the four standard rays, for a stated object position.
  • Apply the New Cartesian Sign Convention correctly to substitute uu, vv, ff, RR and hh into the mirror formula and solve for an unknown quantity.
  • Compute the magnification produced by a mirror and read its sign to state whether the image is real and inverted or virtual and erect.
  • Explain refraction in terms of a change in the speed of light, state the two laws of refraction, and apply Snell's law, sin⁡i/sin⁡r=n21\sin i/\sin r = n_{21}.
  • Compute absolute and relative refractive index from speed-of-light data, and explain why optical density and mass density are different properties.
  • Construct a ray diagram for image formation by a convex or concave lens using any two of the three standard rays, and state the resulting image's nature, position and size.
  • Apply the lens formula and its magnification formula with the correct sign convention, and calculate the power of a lens (and of lenses in contact) in dioptres.

Ask the tutor: Want to work through more ray diagrams and mirror or lens formula numericals together, or check your own worked solution against the sign convention step by step?

Why does a pencil in a glass of water look bent or broken at the surface?

The part of the pencil below the surface sends light that refracts, bending away from the normal as it leaves the denser water for rarer air. Your eye and brain assume light always travels in straight lines, so they trace the bent ray backward, placing the underwater part of the pencil at a shifted, shallower-looking position than it really occupies. The part above water sends light straight to your eye with no bending, so only the submerged section appears displaced, creating the illusion of a break exactly at the surface.

Why does the mirror formula have a plus sign but the lens formula have a minus sign?

Both formulas come from the identical similar-triangles argument, so the difference is not new physics — it is where a real image ends up. For a mirror, a real image forms in front, on the same side as the object, so both distances are negative, and the algebra (shown step by step in the first derivation above) leaves a plus sign. For a lens, a real image forms behind, on the opposite side from the object, so the object distance is negative but the image distance is positive, and that single sign flip turns the plus into a minus, as the second derivation shows.

My car's side mirror has "objects in mirror are closer than they appear" printed on it — why?

That mirror is convex, chosen because it gives a wider field of view than a flat mirror of the same size, letting a driver see more of the road behind and to the side. But a convex mirror always shrinks the image — m=−v/um = -v/u works out to a fraction less than one for every object distance, since the image forms much closer to the mirror, near its focus, than the object really is. Your brain judges distance partly from image size, so the artificially small image makes a car seem farther away than it actually is — hence the warning label.

If a convex lens can form a virtual image, how is that different from what a concave lens does?

A convex lens forms a virtual image only in one case — the object between optical centre and near focus, closer than F1F_1 — and that image is always magnified, exactly how a convex lens works as a magnifying glass. A concave lens forms a virtual image for every object position, no exception, and that image is always diminished, never magnified. So although both can produce a virtual image, a convex lens does it rarely and with magnification, a concave lens always and with reduction — a quick check for identifying which lens you are looking at from its image alone.

Before this

Where this leads