Some Basic Concepts of Chemistry

Pick up any object in the room — this page, a glass of water, the air you are breathing — and chemistry asks the same three questions of it. What is it made of? How much of each thing is in it? And how do we know, with honest uncertainty, the numbers we write down? This chapter builds the entire toolkit CBSE Class 11 Chemistry rests on for the rest of the year: the vocabulary of matter (elements, compounds, mixtures), the SI system of units that every physical quantity is reported in, the discipline of significant figures that keeps a measurement honest, and the single most powerful counting idea in all of chemistry — the mole. Chemistry works with numbers of staggering scale in both directions: about 602,200,000,000,000,000,000,000602{,}200{,}000{,}000{,}000{,}000{,}000{,}000 molecules in two grams of hydrogen gas, and a single hydrogen atom weighing about 0.000000000000000000000001670.00000000000000000000000167 gram. Scientific notation and significant figures exist to tame exactly this problem. Once quantities can be measured and expressed honestly, the historical laws of chemical combination — conservation of mass, definite proportions, multiple proportions, Gay Lussac's law of gaseous volumes, and Avogadro's law — show that matter combines in fixed, countable ratios, which is exactly what Dalton's atomic theory predicts and what the mole concept lets us calculate. By the end of this chapter you will be able to move fluidly between mass, moles and number of particles for any substance; determine a compound's empirical and molecular formula from nothing but percentage composition and molar mass; balance a chemical equation and use it to calculate exactly how much product a reaction can yield, including when one reactant runs out first; and express the strength of a solution in whichever of four standard ways — mass percent, mole fraction, molarity or molality — a problem demands. These are not isolated skills: every later chapter, from atomic structure to electrochemistry to organic reaction yields, is a mole-concept calculation wearing a different costume.

Key takeaways
  • Matter is classified at the macroscopic level into mixtures (homogeneous or heterogeneous) and pure substances, which split further into elements and compounds; only physical methods separate a mixture, only chemical methods separate a compound.
  • SI units give seven base physical quantities — length (m), mass (kg), time (s), electric current (A), temperature (K), amount of substance (mol) and luminous intensity (cd) — from which every other unit is derived.
  • Significant figures record how certain a measurement is; addition and subtraction are limited by the fewest decimal places, multiplication and division by the fewest significant figures overall.
  • Precision is closeness of repeated measurements to each other; accuracy is closeness to the true value — a data set can be precise without being accurate.
  • Five laws of chemical combination — conservation of mass (Lavoisier), definite proportions (Proust), multiple proportions (Dalton), Gay Lussac's law of gaseous volumes, and Avogadro's law — together justify Dalton's atomic theory: matter is made of indivisible atoms that combine in fixed whole-number ratios.
  • Atomic mass is measured relative to 112\dfrac{1}{12} the mass of one carbon-12 atom (1 u); the average atomic mass used in calculations is the isotope-abundance-weighted mean, e.g. chlorine's 35.4535.45 u even though no single chlorine atom weighs that.
  • The mole is the SI unit of amount of substance: 1 mol=6.022×10231\ \text{mol} = 6.022\times10^{23} entities (the Avogadro constant NAN_A), and the molar mass in grams is numerically equal to the atomic, molecular or formula mass in u.
  • Empirical formula (simplest whole-number atom ratio) and molecular formula (actual atom count, an integer multiple nn of the empirical formula) are found from mass percentage composition plus the compound's molar mass.
  • Stoichiometry turns a balanced equation's coefficients into mole ratios, then mass ratios; when reactants are not in the exact stoichiometric ratio, the limiting reagent — whichever runs out first — fixes the maximum product possible.
  • Solution strength is reported as mass percent, mole fraction, molarity (mol per litre of solution, temperature-dependent) or molality (mol per kilogram of solvent, temperature-independent).
  • Key idea: every quantitative question in chemistry — how much, how many, in what ratio — is answered by converting mass to moles using molar mass, converting moles to particle number using the Avogadro constant, and reading the mole ratios straight off a correctly balanced equation.
The core insight

Chemistry's quantitative core is a single conversion chain — mass divided by molar mass gives moles, moles multiplied by the Avogadro constant gives particle count, and mole ratios read directly from a balanced equation (respecting whichever reactant is limiting) predict exactly how much product any reaction will yield.

What this chapter covers

This chapter lays the measurement and counting foundation for the entire Class 11–12 chemistry syllabus. The guided map below follows the logical order the NCERT text itself builds in.

  • Nature and classification of matter — the three states, and the mixture/pure-substance/element/compound hierarchy.
  • Measurement in chemistry — the SI base units, mass versus weight, volume, density and the three temperature scales.
  • Handling uncertain numbers — scientific notation, the rules for counting significant figures, precision versus accuracy, and dimensional analysis (the unit-factor method).
  • The historical laws of chemical combination and how they add up to Dalton's atomic theory.
  • Atomic mass, average atomic mass, molecular mass and formula mass — how "the" atomic mass of an element is actually a weighted average over isotopes.
  • The mole concept and molar mass — the bridge between the microscopic (atoms, molecules) and the macroscopic (grams you can weigh).
  • Percentage composition and empirical/molecular formula — working backward from experimental mass data to a compound's identity.
  • Stoichiometry and the limiting reagent — using a balanced equation to calculate exact masses of reactants consumed and products formed.
  • Concentration of solutions — mass percent, mole fraction, molarity and molality, and why only some of these change with temperature.

The core ideas

Matter: states and classification

Matter is anything that has mass and occupies space, and it exists in three familiar physical states — solid, liquid and gas — distinguished purely by how tightly and how orderly the constituent particles are packed and how freely they can move. In a solid the particles sit very close together in an orderly arrangement with little freedom of movement, which is why solids have a definite shape and a definite volume. In a liquid the particles are still close but can move past one another, so a liquid has a definite volume but takes the shape of its container. In a gas the particles are far apart and move fast and freely, so a gas has neither a definite shape nor a definite volume — it expands to fill whatever container holds it. Heating drives a substance solid to liquid to gas; cooling reverses the sequence.

Figure
Arrangement of particles in the solid liquid and gaseous states showing an ordered close packed grid for the solid a close but disordered cluster for the liquid and widely spaced fast moving particles for the gas
Particle arrangement in the three states of matter Solid — ordered, close fixed shape, fixed volume Liquid — close, disordered no fixed shape, fixed volume Gas — sparse, fast no fixed shape, no fixed volume

At the macroscopic level, matter is either a mixture or a pure substance. A mixture contains two or more pure substances in variable proportion; it can be separated back into its components by purely physical methods such as filtration, distillation or crystallisation. A mixture is homogeneous if the composition is uniform throughout (sugar solution, air) or heterogeneous if it is not (salt mixed with sand). A pure substance has a fixed composition throughout and splits further into elements, whose particles (atoms or, for gases like hydrogen and oxygen, molecules made of one kind of atom) are all of one type, and compounds, in which atoms of two or more different elements combine in a fixed, definite ratio — and which can only be broken back into elements by chemical, not physical, means.

Figure
A branching classification diagram of matter splitting first into mixtures and pure substances then mixtures into homogeneous and heterogeneous and pure substances into elements and compounds
Classification of matter Matter Mixtures (variable ratio) Pure substances (fixed comp.) Homogeneous sugar solution, air Heterogeneous salt and sand, grains Elements one kind of atom: Na, O2 Compounds fixed atom ratio: H2O, NaCl Mixtures are separated by physical methods; compounds only by chemical methods.

Measurement: SI units, mass, volume, density and temperature

Any physical property worth reporting is a number followed by a unit — "6 m6\ \text{m}" means nothing without the metre. Chemistry has settled on the International System of Units (SI), established by the General Conference on Weights and Measures, which fixes seven base quantities: length (metre, m), mass (kilogram, kg), time (second, s), electric current (ampere, A), thermodynamic temperature (kelvin, K), amount of substance (mole, mol) and luminous intensity (candela, cd). Every other unit — speed, volume, density — is derived from these seven. SI also allows standard prefixes (kilo- for 10310^3, milli- for 10−310^{-3}, micro- for 10−610^{-6}, nano- for 10−910^{-9}, and so on) so that a quantity is never written with an unwieldy string of zeros. A distinction the chapter insists on: mass is the amount of matter in an object and is constant wherever the object goes, while weight is the force gravity exerts on that mass and therefore varies from place to place. In the laboratory mass is measured with an analytical balance and reported in grams, a convenient fraction of the SI kilogram. Volume, the space a substance occupies, has SI units of m3\text{m}^3 but is more conveniently expressed in a chemistry lab as cm3\text{cm}^3 or dm3\text{dm}^3, or using the non-SI litre, where 1 L=1000 mL=1000 cm3=1 dm31\ \text{L} = 1000\ \text{mL} = 1000\ \text{cm}^3 = 1\ \text{dm}^3. Density links mass and volume:

Density=MassVolume.(1)\text{Density} = \frac{\text{Mass}}{\text{Volume}}. \qquad (1)

where: density carries SI units of kg m−3\text{kg m}^{-3}, but a chemist almost always reports it in g cm−3\text{g cm}^{-3}, since laboratory masses and volumes are small. A denser substance packs more mass into the same volume — its particles are more closely packed. Three temperature scales are in everyday use — Celsius (∘C^\circ\text{C}), Fahrenheit (∘F^\circ\text{F}) and the SI unit, kelvin (K) — related by

F=95 ∘C+32,K=∘C+273.15.(2)F = \frac{9}{5}\,^\circ C + 32, \qquad K = {}^\circ C + 273.15. \qquad (2)

where: the Celsius scale is pinned so that water freezes at 0∘C0^\circ\text{C} and boils at 100∘C100^\circ\text{C}; the Fahrenheit scale runs from 32∘32^\circ to 212∘212^\circ over the same physical span. Negative temperatures are perfectly ordinary in Celsius, but the kelvin scale starts at absolute zero, so a negative kelvin temperature is never possible — this is the reason thermodynamic calculations later in the course are always done in kelvin.

Uncertainty in measurement: scientific notation, significant figures, precision and accuracy

Because chemistry deals with numbers as large as 6.022×10236.022\times10^{23} molecules and as small as 1.66×10−241.66\times10^{-24} g, every quantity is written in scientific notation, N×10nN \times 10^{n}, where NN is a digit term between 1.000…1.000\ldots and 9.999…9.999\ldots and nn is a positive or negative integer exponent. Thus 232.508232.508 becomes 2.32508×1022.32508 \times 10^{2} (decimal moved two places left, exponent +2+2) and 0.000160.00016 becomes 1.6×10−41.6 \times 10^{-4} (decimal moved four places right, exponent −4-4). Multiplication and division of numbers in this form multiply or divide the digit terms and add or subtract the exponents; addition and subtraction require both numbers to first share the same exponent, after which only the digit terms are combined. Every real measurement carries some uncertainty from the limits of the instrument and the observer's skill, and significant figures are how that honesty is recorded: they are all the digits known with certainty plus one final estimated digit. The standard rules are that every non-zero digit is significant; zeros before the first non-zero digit are never significant (they only fix the decimal point, so 0.00520.0052 has two significant figures); zeros sandwiched between non-zero digits are always significant (2.0052.005 has four); trailing zeros after a decimal point are significant (0.2000.200 has three), but trailing zeros in a number with no decimal point are ambiguous and best avoided by writing in scientific notation (1.00×1021.00\times10^{2} unambiguously carries three significant figures); and counted (exact) numbers, like 2020 eggs, have effectively infinite significant figures. When combining measured numbers, addition and subtraction are limited by the operand with the fewest digits after the decimal point, while multiplication and division are limited by the operand with the fewest significant figures overall — these are different rules, and mixing them up is one of the most common marks lost in this chapter. Rounding follows the standard "round half to even" convention: if the digit being dropped is 55 exactly, the preceding digit is left unchanged if it is already even and increased by one if it is odd (so 6.25→6.26.25 \to 6.2 but 6.35→6.46.35 \to 6.4).

Precision and accuracy answer different questions. Precision is how close repeated measurements of the same quantity are to each other; accuracy is how close a measurement (or its average) is to the true value. A student who measures 1.95 g1.95\ \text{g} and 1.93 g1.93\ \text{g} against a true value of 2.00 g2.00\ \text{g} is precise (the two readings agree closely) but not accurate (both miss the true value); a student who gets 1.94 g1.94\ \text{g} and 2.05 g2.05\ \text{g} is neither precise nor accurate; a student who gets 2.01 g2.01\ \text{g} and 1.99 g1.99\ \text{g} is both. High precision never guarantees high accuracy — a systematically miscalibrated instrument can give beautifully consistent, uniformly wrong readings. Finally, dimensional analysis (also called the factor-label or unit-factor method) is the systematic technique for converting a quantity from one system of units to another. It rests on constructing a unit factor — a ratio built from an equivalence such as 1 in=2.54 cm1\ \text{in} = 2.54\ \text{cm}, so that 2.54 cm1 in=1\frac{2.54\ \text{cm}}{1\ \text{in}} = 1 — and multiplying the original quantity by whichever orientation of that ratio cancels the unwanted unit and leaves the desired one. Because the unit factor equals exactly 11, multiplying by it never changes the physical quantity, only how it is expressed. This method is developed fully, and generalised to a chain of several conversions at once, in the derivation below.

Laws of chemical combination and Dalton's atomic theory

Long before atoms could be seen, five carefully measured experimental regularities forced chemists to conclude that matter is discrete rather than continuous. The Law of Conservation of Mass (Antoine Lavoisier, 1789) states that in any physical or chemical change, the total mass of the system stays exactly the same — matter is neither created nor destroyed, only rearranged. The Law of Definite Proportions (Joseph Proust) states that a given compound always contains the same elements combined in exactly the same proportion by mass, regardless of the source or method of preparation — Proust proved this by showing natural and synthetic cupric carbonate both contained 51.35%51.35\% copper, 9.74%9.74\% carbon and 38.91%38.91\% oxygen. The Law of Multiple Proportions (John Dalton, 1803) states that when two elements combine to form more than one compound, the different masses of one element that combine with a fixed mass of the other are in a ratio of small whole numbers — hydrogen and oxygen form both water (2 g H2\ \text{g H} with 16 g O16\ \text{g O}) and hydrogen peroxide (2 g H2\ \text{g H} with 32 g O32\ \text{g O}), and the two oxygen masses, 16 g16\ \text{g} and 32 g32\ \text{g}, stand in the small whole-number ratio 1:21:2. Gay Lussac's Law of Gaseous Volumes (1808) states that gases combine, or are produced, in a simple whole-number ratio by volume at the same temperature and pressure — 100 mL100\ \text{mL} hydrogen reacts with 50 mL50\ \text{mL} oxygen to give 100 mL100\ \text{mL} water vapour, a 2:1:22:1:2 volume ratio. Avogadro's Law (1811) then supplied the explanation: equal volumes of any gas, at the same temperature and pressure, contain equal numbers of molecules — a claim that only made sense once elements like hydrogen and oxygen were accepted as existing as diatomic molecules, H2\text{H}_2 and O2\text{O}_2, rather than single atoms.

Figure
A box diagram showing two equal boxes of hydrogen molecules combining with one equal box of oxygen molecules to give two equal boxes of water vapour illustrating Gay Lussac and Avogadro together
Gay Lussac plus Avogadro — 2 volumes H2 + 1 volume O2 gives 2 volumes H2O vapour 2 volumes H2 + 1 volume O2 → 2 volumes H2O vapour Each box holds an equal number of molecules — this is Avogadro's law. This forces hydrogen and oxygen to exist as diatomic molecules, H2 and O2.

Dalton's atomic theory (1808) is the single framework that accounts for all five laws at once: matter consists of indivisible atoms; all atoms of a given element are identical, including in mass, and atoms of different elements have different masses; compounds form when atoms of different elements combine in a fixed ratio; and chemical reactions merely reorganise atoms — none are created or destroyed. Conservation of mass follows because atoms are neither created nor destroyed; definite proportions follows because a compound always has the same atom ratio; multiple proportions follows because atoms combine in small whole numbers. What Dalton's original theory could not explain was Gay Lussac's law of gaseous volumes — that gap was closed only by Avogadro's distinction between atoms and molecules.

Atomic mass, average atomic mass, molecular mass and formula mass

A single atom is far too light to weigh directly, so atomic masses are reported relative to a standard. The modern standard, agreed in 1961, is the carbon-12 isotope: one atomic mass unit (u), also written amu, is defined as exactly 112\dfrac{1}{12} the mass of one 12C^{12}\text{C} atom, so that 12C^{12}\text{C} itself has a mass of exactly 12 u12\ \text{u}, and 1 u=1.66×10−24 g1\ \text{u} = 1.66\times10^{-24}\ \text{g}. On this scale a hydrogen atom, whose true mass is 1.6736×10−24 g1.6736\times10^{-24}\ \text{g}, works out to 1.008 u1.008\ \text{u}. Most elements occur naturally as a mixture of isotopes — atoms with the same number of protons but different numbers of neutrons, hence different masses — so the atomic mass quoted in a periodic table is really the average atomic mass, the abundance-weighted mean over all naturally occurring isotopes of that element. Carbon, for example, occurs as 12C^{12}\text{C} (98.892%98.892\% abundant, mass 12 u12\ \text{u} exactly), 13C^{13}\text{C} (1.108%1.108\%, mass 13.00335 u13.00335\ \text{u}) and a trace of 14C^{14}\text{C}, giving the familiar 12.011 u12.011\ \text{u} used throughout the syllabus — never 1212 exactly. Molecular mass is the sum of the atomic masses of every atom in one molecule of a compound, so methane's molecular mass is 12.011+4(1.008)=16.043 u12.011 + 4(1.008) = 16.043\ \text{u} and water's is 2(1.008)+16.00=18.02 u2(1.008) + 16.00 = 18.02\ \text{u} (NCERT Problem 1.1 works the same idea for glucose, C6H12O6\text{C}_6\text{H}_{12}\text{O}_6, below). Ionic solids such as sodium chloride do not exist as discrete NaCl molecules — Na⁺ and Cl⁻ ions instead pack into an extended three-dimensional lattice, with each Na⁺ surrounded by six Cl⁻ and vice versa — so chemists instead quote a formula mass, computed exactly like a molecular mass from the formula unit: NaCl's formula mass is 23.0+35.5=58.5 u23.0 + 35.5 = 58.5\ \text{u}.

The mole concept and molar mass

Just as a dozen always means 1212 items and a gross always means 144144, chemists needed one fixed number to count atoms, molecules and ions at the microscopic scale, because the actual numbers involved in any weighable sample are always astronomically large. That number is the mole, the seventh SI base quantity: one mole contains exactly 6.02214076×10236.02214076\times10^{23} elementary entities, a constant known as the Avogadro constant, NA≈6.022×1023 mol−1N_A \approx 6.022\times10^{23}\ \text{mol}^{-1}. It was fixed historically by dividing the mass of one mole of 12C^{12}\text{C} (12 g12\ \text{g}, by definition) by the mass of a single 12C^{12}\text{C} atom measured with a mass spectrometer (1.992648×10−23 g1.992648\times10^{-23}\ \text{g}).

n=mM,N=n NA.(3)n = \frac{m}{M}, \qquad N = n \, N_A. \qquad (3)

where: nn is the amount of substance in moles, mm is the sample's mass in grams, MM is its molar mass in g mol−1\text{g mol}^{-1}, and NN is the number of elementary entities (atoms, molecules, ions or formula units, whichever the substance is made of). The molar mass, the mass of one mole of a substance, is numerically equal in grams to the atomic, molecular or formula mass already computed in u — so water's molar mass is 18.02 g mol−118.02\ \text{g mol}^{-1} and sodium chloride's is 58.5 g mol−158.5\ \text{g mol}^{-1}. Equation (3) is the single most-used relation in the whole chapter: it is the two-way bridge between what a balance can weigh (mass) and what a chemical equation actually counts (moles of particles).

Percentage composition and empirical/molecular formula

Given an unknown compound, the first practical question is what elements it contains and in what ratio. This is answered by the mass percentage of each element:

Mass % of an element=mass of that element in one mole of compoundmolar mass of the compound×100.(4)\text{Mass \%\ of an element} = \frac{\text{mass of that element in one mole of compound}}{\text{molar mass of the compound}} \times 100. \qquad (4)

where: the numerator is the total mass contributed by all atoms of that element in the formula (for water's hydrogen: 2×1.008=2.016 g2\times1.008 = 2.016\ \text{g} out of a 18.02 g18.02\ \text{g} molar mass, giving 11.18%11.18\% hydrogen and, by difference, 88.79%88.79\% oxygen). The empirical formula is the simplest whole-number ratio of atoms in a compound, while the molecular formula gives the actual number of each type of atom in one molecule; the molecular formula is always a positive-integer multiple nn of the empirical formula, n=molar massempirical formula massn = \dfrac{\text{molar mass}}{\text{empirical formula mass}}, and the two coincide exactly when n=1n = 1 (water and methane are their own empirical formulas). The full working, from raw mass-percent data to a final molecular formula, is carried out step by step in the derivation below, reusing NCERT's own Problem 1.2.

Stoichiometry, balanced equations and the limiting reagent

A balanced chemical equation, obeying the law of conservation of mass, has the same number of atoms of every element on both sides; its coefficients (the stoichiometric coefficients) give the mole ratio — and therefore, through molar mass, the mass ratio — in which reactants combine and products form. For the combustion of methane,

CH4(g)+2O2(g)⟶CO2(g)+2H2O(g),(5)\text{CH}_4(g) + 2\text{O}_2(g) \longrightarrow \text{CO}_2(g) + 2\text{H}_2\text{O}(g), \qquad (5)

where: the coefficients read that 1 mol CH41\ \text{mol CH}_4 reacts with 2 mol O22\ \text{mol O}_2 to give 1 mol CO21\ \text{mol CO}_2 and 2 mol H2O2\ \text{mol H}_2\text{O} — equivalently, 16 g CH416\ \text{g CH}_4 reacts with 64 g O264\ \text{g O}_2 to give 44 g CO244\ \text{g CO}_2 and 36 g H2O36\ \text{g H}_2\text{O} (mass is conserved: 16+64=80=44+3616+64=80=44+36). Balancing itself is done by inspection: write the correct formulas first (subscripts, once fixed by the actual compound, are never altered to balance an equation — only the coefficients in front of a formula may change), then balance one element at a time, usually finishing with oxygen, and finally re-check every element on both sides. In practice, reactants are rarely supplied in the exact mole ratio a reaction demands. Whichever reactant would be completely consumed first, if the reaction ran to completion, is the limiting reagent — it caps how much product can possibly form, no matter how much excess of the other reactant is present. Identifying it, and computing the resulting product mass, is the subject of the stoichiometry derivation below, worked with NCERT's own ammonia-synthesis data.

Concentration of solutions

Most reactions in a laboratory happen in solution, so chemists need a compact way to state how much solute is dissolved in how much solvent or solution. Four standard measures cover almost every situation.

Molarity, M=nsoluteVsolution (L),Molality, m=nsolutewsolvent (kg).(6)\text{Molarity},\ M = \frac{n_{\text{solute}}}{V_{\text{solution}}\ (\text{L})}, \qquad \text{Molality},\ m = \frac{n_{\text{solute}}}{w_{\text{solvent}}\ (\text{kg})}. \qquad (6)

where: molarity (MM, mol L−1\text{mol L}^{-1}) is moles of solute per litre of solution (not solvent), while molality (mm, mol kg−1\text{mol kg}^{-1}) is moles of solute per kilogram of solvent. Because volume expands and contracts with temperature, molarity is temperature-dependent; because mass does not change with temperature, molality is not — this is exactly why molality, not molarity, is the concentration unit used in precise, temperature-sensitive work such as colligative-property calculations later in the syllabus. Diluting a stock solution obeys the simple identity M1V1=M2V2M_1V_1 = M_2V_2, since the moles of solute present are unchanged by adding solvent — only the volume, and hence the concentration, changes.

Mole fraction of A, xA=nAnA+nB.(7)\text{Mole fraction of A},\ x_A = \frac{n_A}{n_A + n_B}. \qquad (7)

where: xAx_A is dimensionless and the mole fractions of all components of a solution always sum to 11 (xA+xB=1x_A + x_B = 1 for a two-component solution). Mass percent (or weight percent, w/w %) is simply mass of solutemass of solution×100\dfrac{\text{mass of solute}}{\text{mass of solution}} \times 100, structurally identical to equation (4) but applied to a solute-in-solvent mixture rather than to a compound's own atoms. As a quick illustration of why the molarity/molality distinction matters: a 3 M3\ \text{M} NaCl solution of density 1.25 g mL−11.25\ \text{g mL}^{-1} contains 175.5 g175.5\ \text{g} NaCl and 1074.5 g1074.5\ \text{g} water per litre, giving a molality of 31.0745=2.79 m\dfrac{3}{1.0745} = 2.79\ \text{m} — a different number from the molarity, and one that would stay 2.79 m2.79\ \text{m} even if the same solution were warmed until its volume, and hence its molarity, changed.

Derivation AAverage atomic mass from isotopic abundances

The goal here is to turn "atomic mass" from a single mysterious number quoted in the periodic table into a plain weighted average that a student can reconstruct from raw isotope data, and then to apply that formula to two of NCERT's own data sets — carbon and chlorine — to confirm the familiar values 12.011 u12.011\ \text{u} and 35.45 u35.45\ \text{u}, neither of which is the mass of any single atom that actually exists.

Step 1. Convert each isotope's percentage abundance into a fractional abundance by dividing by 100100, so that fi=%abundancei100f_i = \dfrac{\%\text{abundance}_i}{100} and the fractions of all isotopes of one element sum to 11, ∑ifi=1\sum_i f_i = 1.

Step 2. Write the average atomic mass as the abundance-weighted sum of the isotopic masses, Aˉ=∑ifiAi\bar{A} = \sum_i f_i A_i, where AiA_i is the exact mass of isotope ii in u. This is an ordinary weighted mean — every isotope contributes to the average in direct proportion to how common it actually is in nature, exactly as a class average is weighted by how many students score each mark.

Step 3. Apply the formula to carbon's three natural isotopes: 12C^{12}\text{C} at 98.892%98.892\% with mass 12 u12\ \text{u} exactly, 13C^{13}\text{C} at 1.108%1.108\% with mass 13.00335 u13.00335\ \text{u}, and 14C^{14}\text{C} at a trace 2×10−10%2\times10^{-10}\% with mass 14.00317 u14.00317\ \text{u}. Then AˉC=(0.98892)(12)+(0.01108)(13.00335)+(2×10−12)(14.00317)=11.867+0.1441+(negligible)=12.011 u\bar{A}_{\text{C}} = (0.98892)(12) + (0.01108)(13.00335) + (2\times10^{-12})(14.00317) = 11.867 + 0.1441 + (\text{negligible}) = 12.011\ \text{u}, exactly the value used everywhere else in this syllabus.

Step 4. Apply the same formula to chlorine, which has essentially two isotopes: 35Cl^{35}\text{Cl} at 75.77%75.77\% abundance with mass 34.9689 u34.9689\ \text{u}, and 37Cl^{37}\text{Cl} at 24.23%24.23\% abundance with mass 36.9659 u36.9659\ \text{u}. Then AˉCl=(0.7577)(34.9689)+(0.2423)(36.9659)=26.496+8.957=35.45 u\bar{A}_{\text{Cl}} = (0.7577)(34.9689) + (0.2423)(36.9659) = 26.496 + 8.957 = 35.45\ \text{u}. No single chlorine atom weighs 35.45 u35.45\ \text{u} — every real atom is either ≈35\approx 35 or ≈37\approx 37 u — the average is a statistical property of the bulk sample, which is exactly the value every stoichiometric calculation in this chapter is required to use.

Go deeper · Derivation B · 1 minPercentage composition to empirical and molecular formula
Derivation BPercentage composition to empirical and molecular formula

The goal is to build, from nothing but experimentally measured mass percentages and a separately measured molar mass, the complete chemical formula of an unknown compound — the same five-step sequence NCERT's Problem 1.2 walks through for a compound found to be 4.07%4.07\% hydrogen, 24.27%24.27\% carbon and 71.65%71.65\% chlorine by mass, with a measured molar mass of 98.96 g mol−198.96\ \text{g mol}^{-1}.

Step 1. Fix a convenient basis. Since only percentages are given, assume exactly 100 g100\ \text{g} of the compound, which immediately converts every percentage into a mass in grams: 4.07 g4.07\ \text{g} hydrogen, 24.27 g24.27\ \text{g} carbon and 71.65 g71.65\ \text{g} chlorine.

Step 2. Convert each element's mass into moles using n=m/Mn = m/M (equation 3) with that element's own atomic mass: moles of H =4.07/1.008=4.04= 4.07/1.008 = 4.04; moles of C =24.27/12.01=2.021= 24.27/12.01 = 2.021; moles of Cl =71.65/35.453=2.021= 71.65/35.453 = 2.021. This step is the entire point of the mole concept — it converts three masses, which cannot meaningfully be compared to each other directly, into three particle counts, which can.

Step 3. Divide every mole value by the smallest one among them to obtain the simplest ratio. Here the smallest is 2.0212.021 (both C and Cl), giving H:C:Cl=4.042.021:2.0212.021:2.0212.021≈2:1:1\text{H} : \text{C} : \text{Cl} = \dfrac{4.04}{2.021} : \dfrac{2.021}{2.021} : \dfrac{2.021}{2.021} \approx 2 : 1 : 1. If a ratio does not land on whole numbers, every value is multiplied by the same small integer (2, 3, ...) until all are whole.

Step 4. Write the empirical formula directly from that whole-number ratio: CH2Cl\text{CH}_2\text{Cl}, with an empirical formula mass of 12.01+2(1.008)+35.453=49.48 g mol−112.01 + 2(1.008) + 35.453 = 49.48\ \text{g mol}^{-1}.

Step 5. Recover the molecular formula using the separately measured molar mass. Compute n=molar massempirical formula mass=98.9649.48=2.0n = \dfrac{\text{molar mass}}{\text{empirical formula mass}} = \dfrac{98.96}{49.48} = 2.0, then multiply every subscript in the empirical formula by nn: molecular formula =C2H4Cl2= \text{C}_2\text{H}_4\text{Cl}_2. Notice that percentage composition alone (Steps 1–4) can never distinguish CH2Cl\text{CH}_2\text{Cl} from C2H4Cl2\text{C}_2\text{H}_4\text{Cl}_2 or C3H6Cl3\text{C}_3\text{H}_6\text{Cl}_3 — a separately measured molar mass, from a technique such as mass spectrometry, is always required to fix nn and therefore the true molecular formula.

Go deeper · Derivation C · 1 minStoichiometric mass relations and the limiting reagent test
Derivation CStoichiometric mass relations and the limiting reagent test

The goal is to derive, in general terms, how to go from the raw masses of two reactants mixed together to (a) a decision about which one is limiting and (b) the exact mass of product formed — then apply the general method to NCERT's own ammonia synthesis, 50.0 kg50.0\ \text{kg} of N2\text{N}_2 mixed with 10.0 kg10.0\ \text{kg} of H2\text{H}_2.

Step 1. Write the balanced equation and read off its mole ratio. For ammonia synthesis, N2(g)+3H2(g)→2NH3(g)\text{N}_2(g) + 3\text{H}_2(g) \rightarrow 2\text{NH}_3(g), so every 1 mol1\ \text{mol} of N2\text{N}_2 that reacts requires exactly 3 mol3\ \text{mol} of H2\text{H}_2, and produces exactly 2 mol2\ \text{mol} of NH3\text{NH}_3.

Step 2. Convert each given mass to moles using equation (3). Moles of N2=50,000 g28.0 g mol−1=1786 mol\text{N}_2 = \dfrac{50{,}000\ \text{g}}{28.0\ \text{g mol}^{-1}} = 1786\ \text{mol}; moles of H2=10,000 g2.016 g mol−1=4960 mol\text{H}_2 = \dfrac{10{,}000\ \text{g}}{2.016\ \text{g mol}^{-1}} = 4960\ \text{mol}.

Step 3. Test which reactant is limiting by asking how much of the other reactant the available moles of one would fully consume, and comparing that to what is actually on hand. The 1786 mol1786\ \text{mol} of N2\text{N}_2 present would require 1786×3=5358 mol1786 \times 3 = 5358\ \text{mol} of H2\text{H}_2 to react completely — but only 4960 mol4960\ \text{mol} of H2\text{H}_2 is available, which is less than required. Hydrogen therefore runs out first: H2\text{H}_2 is the limiting reagent, and nitrogen is present in excess.

Step 4. Compute the product formed from the limiting reagent's moles only, using the product mole ratio, then convert to mass with the product's molar mass. From 3 mol H2→2 mol NH33\ \text{mol H}_2 \to 2\ \text{mol NH}_3, the 4960 mol4960\ \text{mol} of H2\text{H}_2 available gives 4960×23=3307 mol NH34960 \times \dfrac{2}{3} = 3307\ \text{mol NH}_3, which is 3307×17.0 g mol−1=56,200 g=56.2 kg NH33307 \times 17.0\ \text{g mol}^{-1} = 56{,}200\ \text{g} = 56.2\ \text{kg NH}_3 — matching NCERT's own answer of 56.1 kg56.1\ \text{kg} to rounding. The excess N2\text{N}_2 actually consumed is 49603=1653 mol\dfrac{4960}{3} = 1653\ \text{mol}, leaving 1786−1653=133 mol1786 - 1653 = 133\ \text{mol}, or about 3.7 kg3.7\ \text{kg}, of unreacted nitrogen once the reaction stops — a leftover that exists precisely because the reactants were not supplied in the reaction's exact 1:31:3 mole ratio.

Go deeper · Derivation D · 1 minDimensional analysis: chaining unit factors for compound conversions
Derivation DDimensional analysis: chaining unit factors for compound conversions

The goal is to generalise the unit-factor method beyond a single conversion (inches to centimetres) to a chain of several conversions performed in one line, and to use it to derive a conversion every chemistry student eventually needs: how a density in kg m−3\text{kg m}^{-3} becomes a density in g cm−3\text{g cm}^{-3}, confirming that water's familiar 1 g cm−31\ \text{g cm}^{-3} is the same physical density as 1000 kg m−31000\ \text{kg m}^{-3}.

Step 1. Build a unit factor from any known equivalence by writing it as a fraction equal to 11. From 1 kg=1000 g1\ \text{kg} = 1000\ \text{g}, both 1000 g1 kg\dfrac{1000\ \text{g}}{1\ \text{kg}} and its reciprocal 1 kg1000 g\dfrac{1\ \text{kg}}{1000\ \text{g}} equal exactly 11; from 1 m=100 cm1\ \text{m} = 100\ \text{cm}, both 100 cm1 m\dfrac{100\ \text{cm}}{1\ \text{m}} and 1 m100 cm\dfrac{1\ \text{m}}{100\ \text{cm}} equal exactly 11. Multiplying any quantity by a unit factor cannot change its physical value, only the units it is expressed in.

Step 2. Choose the orientation of each unit factor so that the unwanted unit sits where it will cancel against the quantity already in hand — the unwanted unit must appear once in a numerator and once in a denominator across the whole chain.

Step 3. Chain several unit factors together in a single multiplication when more than one unit must change at once. To convert 1000 kg m−31000\ \text{kg m}^{-3} into g cm−3\text{g cm}^{-3}, both the mass unit and the (cubed) length unit must change, so write 1000 kgm3×1000 g1 kg×(1 m100 cm)31000\ \dfrac{\text{kg}}{\text{m}^3} \times \dfrac{1000\ \text{g}}{1\ \text{kg}} \times \left(\dfrac{1\ \text{m}}{100\ \text{cm}}\right)^{3} — note the length unit factor is cubed because the original unit, m3\text{m}^3, is itself a cube.

Step 4. Carry out the arithmetic and confirm the kilograms and metres fully cancel. 1000×1000×11003=1000×1000×11,000,000=1 gcm31000 \times 1000 \times \dfrac{1}{100^3} = 1000 \times 1000 \times \dfrac{1}{1{,}000{,}000} = 1\ \dfrac{\text{g}}{\text{cm}^3}. So 1000 kg m−3=1 g cm−31000\ \text{kg m}^{-3} = 1\ \text{g cm}^{-3} exactly — the SI density of water, 1000 kg m−31000\ \text{kg m}^{-3}, and the laboratory density of water, 1 g cm−31\ \text{g cm}^{-3}, are the identical physical fact expressed in two different but equally valid unit systems, and the same chain-of-unit-factors method converts any compound unit (speed, molarity, density, or the days-to-seconds conversion NCERT itself works through) with no risk of arithmetic error if every unit factor is written out explicitly.

Worked examples

Board level - Scientific notation, significant figures and molecular mass of glucose (reusing NCERT Problem 1.1)

Express 602,200,000,000,000,000,000,000602{,}200{,}000{,}000{,}000{,}000{,}000{,}000 in scientific notation to four significant figures, and calculate the molecular mass of glucose, C6H12O6\text{C}_6\text{H}_{12}\text{O}_6, using AC=12.011 uA_{\text{C}} = 12.011\ \text{u}, AH=1.008 uA_{\text{H}} = 1.008\ \text{u}, AO=16.00 uA_{\text{O}} = 16.00\ \text{u}.

Step 1. Convert the large number to scientific notation: moving the decimal point 2323 places to the left gives 6.022×10236.022\times10^{23} — this is simply the Avogadro constant, NAN_A, written out in full, and it already has exactly four significant figures.

Step 2. Multiply each atomic mass by the number of atoms of that element in one glucose molecule: carbon contributes 6×12.011=72.066 u6\times12.011 = 72.066\ \text{u}; hydrogen contributes 12×1.008=12.096 u12\times1.008 = 12.096\ \text{u}; oxygen contributes 6×16.00=96.00 u6\times16.00 = 96.00\ \text{u}.

Step 3. Add the three contributions: 72.066+12.096+96.00=180.162 u72.066 + 12.096 + 96.00 = 180.162\ \text{u}. Answer: 6.022×10236.022\times10^{23} (Avogadro's number in scientific notation), and the molecular mass of glucose is 180.162 u180.162\ \text{u}, so one mole of glucose weighs 180.162 g180.162\ \text{g}.

Board level - Percentage composition of ethanol and mass of oxygen in a sample

Ethanol has molecular formula C2H5OH\text{C}_2\text{H}_5\text{OH}, molar mass 46.068 g mol−146.068\ \text{g mol}^{-1}. Find its percentage composition, then find the mass of oxygen contained in a 23.034 g23.034\ \text{g} sample of pure ethanol.

Step 1. Compute each element's mass in one mole of ethanol: carbon =2×12.01=24.02 g= 2\times12.01 = 24.02\ \text{g}; hydrogen =6×1.008=6.048 g= 6\times1.008 = 6.048\ \text{g}; oxygen =16.00 g= 16.00\ \text{g}.

Step 2. Apply equation (4) to each: mass \% carbon =24.0246.068×100=52.14%= \dfrac{24.02}{46.068}\times100 = 52.14\%; mass \% hydrogen =6.04846.068×100=13.13%= \dfrac{6.048}{46.068}\times100 = 13.13\%; mass \% oxygen =16.0046.068×100=34.73%= \dfrac{16.00}{46.068}\times100 = 34.73\% (the three percentages sum to 100.00%100.00\%, a useful self-check).

Step 3. The 23.034 g23.034\ \text{g} sample is exactly half a mole of ethanol (23.034/46.068=0.500 mol23.034/46.068 = 0.500\ \text{mol}), so it contains exactly half of one mole's worth of oxygen mass: 0.500×16.00 g=8.00 g0.500\times16.00\ \text{g} = 8.00\ \text{g}. Equivalently, using the percentage directly: 23.034×0.3473=8.00 g23.034\times0.3473 = 8.00\ \text{g}. Answer: ethanol is 52.14%52.14\% C, 13.13%13.13\% H, 34.73%34.73\% O by mass, and a 23.034 g23.034\ \text{g} sample contains 8.00 g8.00\ \text{g} of oxygen.

Competitive level (JEE / NEET) - Empirical and molecular formula from mass percentage (reusing NCERT Problem 1.2)

A compound is found by analysis to contain 4.07%4.07\% hydrogen, 24.27%24.27\% carbon and 71.65%71.65\% chlorine by mass, with a measured molar mass of 98.96 g mol−198.96\ \text{g mol}^{-1}. Determine its empirical and molecular formulas.

Step 1. Take 100 g100\ \text{g} of compound as the basis, giving 4.07 g4.07\ \text{g} H, 24.27 g24.27\ \text{g} C and 71.65 g71.65\ \text{g} Cl, and convert each to moles: nH=4.07/1.008=4.04n_{\text{H}} = 4.07/1.008 = 4.04, nC=24.27/12.01=2.021n_{\text{C}} = 24.27/12.01 = 2.021, nCl=71.65/35.453=2.021n_{\text{Cl}} = 71.65/35.453 = 2.021.

Step 2. Divide by the smallest value, 2.0212.021: H:C:Cl=2:1:1\text{H} : \text{C} : \text{Cl} = 2 : 1 : 1, giving empirical formula CH2Cl\text{CH}_2\text{Cl} with empirical formula mass 12.01+2.016+35.453=49.48 g mol−112.01 + 2.016 + 35.453 = 49.48\ \text{g mol}^{-1}.

Step 3. Find n=98.9649.48=2.0n = \dfrac{98.96}{49.48} = 2.0 and scale every subscript in the empirical formula by 22. Answer: empirical formula CH2Cl\text{CH}_2\text{Cl}; molecular formula C2H4Cl2\text{C}_2\text{H}_4\text{Cl}_2 (this is 1,2-dichloroethane). Timing note: under two minutes if the moles are computed in one pass. The single biggest speed trap is stopping at the empirical formula and forgetting the question asked for the molecular formula too — always check whether a molar mass is given in the problem statement, because its presence is the signal that a Step 3 (find nn) is expected. Keep atomic masses to four significant figures throughout so the final nn lands cleanly on a whole number; sloppy intermediate rounding is what makes nn come out as 1.971.97 or 2.042.04 instead of a clean 2.02.0.

Competitive level (JEE / NEET) - Limiting reagent and mass of ammonia formed (reusing NCERT Problem 1.5)

50.0 kg50.0\ \text{kg} of N2(g)\text{N}_2(g) and 10.0 kg10.0\ \text{kg} of H2(g)\text{H}_2(g) are mixed and allowed to react completely by N2(g)+3H2(g)→2NH3(g)\text{N}_2(g) + 3\text{H}_2(g) \rightarrow 2\text{NH}_3(g). Calculate the mass of NH3\text{NH}_3 formed, identify the limiting reagent, and state which reactant remains and how much.

Step 1. Convert both masses to moles: nN2=50,000/28.0=1786 moln_{\text{N}_2} = 50{,}000/28.0 = 1786\ \text{mol}; nH2=10,000/2.016=4960 moln_{\text{H}_2} = 10{,}000/2.016 = 4960\ \text{mol}.

Step 2. Test the limiting reagent: fully consuming 1786 mol N21786\ \text{mol}\ \text{N}_2 would need 1786×3=5358 mol H21786\times3 = 5358\ \text{mol}\ \text{H}_2, but only 4960 mol4960\ \text{mol} is available — so H2\text{H}_2 is exhausted first and is the limiting reagent.

Step 3. Base the product calculation entirely on the limiting reagent: 4960 mol H2×2 mol NH33 mol H2=3307 mol NH34960\ \text{mol}\ \text{H}_2 \times \dfrac{2\ \text{mol NH}_3}{3\ \text{mol H}_2} = 3307\ \text{mol NH}_3, which is 3307×17.0=56,200 g=56.2 kg NH33307\times17.0 = 56{,}200\ \text{g} = 56.2\ \text{kg NH}_3.

Step 4. Find the leftover reactant: N2\text{N}_2 actually consumed is 4960/3=1653 mol4960/3 = 1653\ \text{mol}, so unreacted N2\text{N}_2 is 1786−1653=133 mol×28.0 g mol−1=3.7 kg1786 - 1653 = 133\ \text{mol} \times 28.0\ \text{g mol}^{-1} = 3.7\ \text{kg}. Answer: 56.2 kg NH356.2\ \text{kg}\ \text{NH}_3 forms; H2\text{H}_2 is the limiting reagent; about 3.7 kg3.7\ \text{kg} of N2\text{N}_2 remains unreacted. Timing note: about two to three minutes. JEE/NEET routinely disguise a limiting-reagent question as a plain "calculate the mass of product" problem with two reactant masses given instead of one — seeing two masses for two different reactants is itself the cue to run the limiting-reagent test before touching the product calculation. Never average, add or otherwise combine the two reactant masses; always convert both independently to moles first, then compare via the stoichiometric ratio as in Step 2.

Common traps

Confusing the significant-figure rule for addition/subtraction with the rule for multiplication/division. Addition and subtraction are limited by the fewest decimal places among the operands; multiplication and division are limited by the fewest significant figures overall. Applying the wrong rule silently drops or invents precision in the final answer.

Treating trailing zeros in a whole number as automatically significant. 100100 has one significant figure unless a decimal point or scientific notation says otherwise; write 1.00×1021.00\times10^{2} if all three digits are meant to be significant. This ambiguity is exactly why scientific notation exists.

Mixing up empirical formula and molecular formula. Percentage composition data alone, no matter how carefully worked, can only ever deliver the empirical (simplest-ratio) formula. A separately measured molar mass is always required to compute nn and recover the true molecular formula — a formula question that gives only mass percentages, with no molar mass, is asking for the empirical formula and nothing more.

Forgetting that molarity depends on temperature while molality does not. Molarity is defined per litre of solution, and solution volume expands on heating; molality is defined per kilogram of solvent mass, which heating does not change. Using molarity in a context that assumes a temperature-independent concentration is a conceptual, not just an arithmetic, error.

Skipping the limiting-reagent test whenever two reactant masses are given. If a problem states the amounts of both reactants, it is testing whether the student checks which one runs out first before computing the product mass — computing product yield directly from just one reactant's moles, without comparing, is the single most common stoichiometry error.

Changing subscripts to balance an equation. Only the coefficients in front of a formula may be changed when balancing; the subscripts inside a formula are fixed by the compound's actual composition and altering them describes an entirely different (and usually non-existent) substance.

Assuming average atomic mass is the mass of a real atom. No chlorine atom actually has a mass of 35.45 u35.45\ \text{u} — every real atom is close to 3535 or 3737 u. The average is a weighted statistical property of a natural sample, valid for bulk calculations but not for any single atom.

You should be able to…

  • Classify any given sample of matter as a homogeneous mixture, a heterogeneous mixture, an element or a compound, and justify the classification.
  • Convert a measured physical quantity between SI base units and their common prefixed multiples using the chained unit-factor method.
  • State the correct number of significant figures in a given measurement and apply the correct rounding rule when the operations are addition/subtraction versus multiplication/division.
  • Distinguish precision from accuracy and identify which, both, or neither a given data set demonstrates.
  • State all five laws of chemical combination in your own words and connect each one to a postulate of Dalton's atomic theory.
  • Calculate the average atomic mass of an element from isotopic abundance data.
  • Calculate molecular mass or formula mass for any given chemical formula, and convert freely between mass, moles and number of particles using n=m/Mn = m/M and N=nNAN = nN_A.
  • Determine a compound's empirical formula from percentage composition and its molecular formula given the molar mass.
  • Balance a chemical equation by inspection and use its coefficients to calculate reactant or product masses, correctly identifying the limiting reagent when two reactant amounts are given.
  • Compute and convert between mass percent, mole fraction, molarity and molality for a solution.

Ask the tutor: Can you walk me through a limiting reagent problem where three reactants are mixed together instead of two?

Why is the atomic mass of chlorine given as 35.5 u when no single chlorine atom actually has that mass?

Because the number quoted in the periodic table is not the mass of any one atom — it is the average atomic mass, the abundance-weighted mean over all the isotopes chlorine actually occurs as in nature. Chlorine exists as two isotopes, 35Cl^{35}\text{Cl} (about 76%76\% abundant) and 37Cl^{37}\text{Cl} (about 24%24\% abundant), and every real chlorine atom has one of those two exact masses, never 35.535.5. But because any weighable sample of chlorine gas contains billions of atoms in that same natural 76:2476:24 mixture, using the weighted average of 35.45 u35.45\ \text{u} in mole and mass calculations gives the correct bulk result every time, which is exactly why chemists use it instead of tracking individual isotopes.

What is the real difference between an empirical formula and a molecular formula, and when are they ever the same?

The empirical formula is the simplest whole-number ratio of atoms a compound contains; the molecular formula is the actual number of each atom in one real molecule of that compound. The molecular formula is always the empirical formula multiplied by some positive integer nn, found from n=molar mass/empirical formula massn = \text{molar mass}/\text{empirical formula mass}. They are identical exactly when n=1n = 1 — water (H2O\text{H}_2\text{O}), methane (CH4\text{CH}_4) and glucose's simplest ratio, interestingly, is CH2O\text{CH}_2\text{O} but its actual molecular formula is C6H12O6\text{C}_6\text{H}_{12}\text{O}_6 with n=6n = 6. Percentage composition data alone can never tell nn apart from 11; a separately measured molar mass is always required.

How do I decide how many significant figures to keep in a multi-step calculation without losing marks?

Carry one or two extra guard digits through every intermediate step of the calculation, and only round to the correct number of significant figures at the very final answer — rounding too early at each step compounds small errors and can shift the last significant digit of your final result. To decide the correct number of significant figures for that final rounding, apply the addition/subtraction rule (limited by fewest decimal places) or the multiplication/division rule (limited by fewest significant figures) to whichever operation was performed last, since that is the operation whose precision actually survives into the answer.

What exactly is a limiting reagent, and why doesn't adding more of the other reactant help?

The limiting reagent is whichever reactant would be used up first if the reaction ran to completion, and it caps the maximum amount of product no matter how much of the other reactant is sitting around unused. Adding more of the excess reactant does not help because that reactant was never the bottleneck — the reaction physically cannot proceed once the limiting reagent runs out, since there is nothing left for the excess reactant to combine with in the required ratio. The only way to increase yield further is to add more of the reactant that is actually limiting, in the correct stoichiometric proportion to the rest.

Is molarity or molality used more often, and does it matter which one a problem asks for?

Molarity is used far more often in everyday laboratory work — titrations, dilutions and most exam problems — because volumes are easy to measure with a burette or volumetric flask. Molality is preferred specifically when temperature is going to change during an experiment, because it is defined using the solvent's mass, which does not change with temperature, whereas molarity's volume-based definition means the same solution can report a different molarity at a different temperature purely because it has expanded or contracted. Always use exactly the unit the question specifies; converting between them requires knowing the solution's density, which is why NCERT's Problem 1.8 gives density explicitly whenever a molarity-to-molality conversion is asked.

Where this leads