Sequences and Series
Look at the numbers — the count of a person's ancestors doubling every generation — or at — the successive decimal approximations you get dividing by . Both are ordered lists of numbers, one term after another, each pinned to a position: first, second, third, and so on. Mathematics gives this idea a name, sequence, and gives the running total of its terms another name, series. That is the whole chapter in one sentence — but inside that simple idea sits one of the most useful tools in the whole of school and competitive mathematics: the geometric progression (G.P.), a sequence in which every term is a constant multiple of the one before it. This chapter builds the vocabulary of sequences and series from scratch — general term, recursive definition, sigma notation for a sum — before turning to the two progressions that dominate the syllabus. You already met the arithmetic progression (A.P.) in Class 10, where each term adds a fixed amount to the last; here it is recapped just far enough to set up a comparison, because the chapter's real destination is the G.P., where each term is multiplied by a fixed ratio instead. You will derive the formula for the th term of a G.P., the formula for the sum of its first terms (and, pushed further, the sum of infinitely many terms when the ratio is small enough), the geometric mean of two numbers, and the single most quoted inequality in the chapter — that the arithmetic mean of two positive numbers is never smaller than their geometric mean. A final section turns sigma notation into three closed-form results — the sums of the first natural numbers, their squares, and their cubes — extending the sum-formula idea to series that are not geometric at all. Compound interest, population growth, radioactive decay, loan instalments, and the "chain letter" problem all reduce to a G.P. sum once you see the constant ratio hiding inside them. By the end of this chapter you should be able to recognise a progression on sight, write down its general term, sum any finite (or, for a G.P., suitable infinite) run of its terms, and move fluently between the algebraic formula and the real-world story it is modelling.
- A sequence is an ordered list ; formally a function with domain (or a subset for a finite sequence). The number at the th position, , is the general term.
- A series is the indicated sum of a sequence's terms, , compactly written with sigma notation as .
- An arithmetic progression (A.P.) has a constant common difference : , and its sum to terms is .
- A geometric progression (G.P.) has a constant common ratio : general term .
- Sum of a finite G.P.: for , and for — two genuinely different cases, not one formula in disguise.
- Sum of an infinite G.P. exists only when , and equals — this is how a repeating decimal like collapses to the fraction .
- The geometric mean (G.M.) of two positive numbers is , so that forms a G.P.; more generally geometric means can be inserted between and using a common ratio .
- A.M. G.M.: for positive reals , , with equality exactly when — proved from the single fact that a real square can never be negative.
- Three special series close the chapter: , , and .
- Key idea: every sequence problem reduces to writing down its general term correctly, and every series problem reduces to choosing the right closed-form sum — arithmetic (constant difference), geometric (constant ratio, with a genuinely different formula at r = 1), or one of the three natural-number power sums.
A sequence is fixed once you know its general term ; a series is that sequence added up, and the two progressions that make the addition tractable are the arithmetic progression (, sum , built by constant addition) and the geometric progression (, sum for , built by constant multiplication), with the geometric mean and the inequality tying the two progressions together.
What this chapter covers
The chapter opens by defining a sequence as an ordered list of numbers indexed by position, distinguishing finite from infinite sequences and explicit formulas (like ) from recursive definitions (like the Fibonacci rule ). It then defines the associated series and introduces sigma notation for writing sums compactly. A short recap of the arithmetic progression — general term and sum formula — sets up the central comparison of the chapter: constant addition versus constant multiplication. The bulk of the chapter is then the geometric progression: its general term , the sum to terms (split carefully into the and cases), and, as a natural extension, the sum to infinitely many terms when . The geometric mean of two numbers and the technique of inserting several geometric means between two numbers follow directly from the general-term formula. The relationship between A.M. and G.M. — the inequality — is proved algebraically and used to solve "given the A.M. and G.M., find the two numbers" problems. The chapter closes with special series: closed-form sums for the first natural numbers, their squares, and their cubes, each derived by the telescoping-sum technique rather than assumed.
The core ideas
Sequences: definition, notation and the general term
A sequence is an arrangement of numbers in a definite order — formally, a function whose domain is the set of natural numbers or a subset of the form . The terms are written , where the subscript records the position of the term, not its value; , the term at the th position, is called the general term of the sequence, and knowing as a function of fixes the entire sequence. A sequence with a fixed, finite number of terms is a finite sequence (the ten generations of a person's ancestors, , is finite); a sequence that never ends is an infinite sequence (the successive quotients obtained by dividing by never terminate).
where: these are explicit formulas — substitute directly to generate every term (NCERT Example 1 builds exactly this skill: for , substituting gives ; for , the first three terms are ). Not every sequence has an explicit formula — the sequence of primes has no known algebraic formula for its th term at all and can only be described in words. Many sequences instead obey a recursive rule, where each term is defined in terms of the ones before it: the Fibonacci sequence is generated by and for (NCERT Example 3 works a similar recursive case, , , giving ). Both explicit and recursive definitions count as a valid sequence — what matters is that there is some rule, however stated, that determines every term.
Series and sigma notation
Given a sequence , the expression formed by adding its terms, , is called the series associated with that sequence. A series is finite or infinite exactly according to whether the underlying sequence is finite or infinite. It is worth being precise about a common source of confusion: the sequence is the ordered list, the series is the indicated sum, and "the sum of the series" refers to the single number you get after actually adding — for the finite series , the sum is .
where: (capital sigma) is read "the sum of", is the running index taking every integer value from the lower limit () to the upper limit (), and is the general term being summed — sigma notation is nothing more than shorthand for a long addition, and it is the notation used throughout the special-series results at the end of this chapter.
A quick recap: arithmetic progression
Before contrasting it with the geometric progression, recall the arithmetic progression (A.P.) you built in Class 10: a sequence in which every term after the first is obtained by adding a fixed number, the common difference , to the term before it — . The general term and the sum to terms are the two working formulas you will need again in this chapter, especially when a problem mixes a G.P. with an A.P. (as several of this chapter's own miscellaneous problems do — for instance, subtracting fixed amounts from three numbers in G.P. to leave three numbers in A.P.).
where: is the first term, is the constant common difference (the defining test of an A.P. — the difference between consecutive terms is constant, in contrast with the G.P.'s constant ratio), is the number of terms, and is the last term of a finite A.P. The arithmetic mean (A.M.) of two numbers and is the single number that makes an A.P., which forces — the ordinary average, and the quantity compared against the geometric mean later in this chapter.
Geometric progression: definition and the general term
Now contrast that constant addition with constant multiplication. Consider the sequences and (reversed for illustration) — in each, every term except the first bears a constant ratio to the term immediately before it: in the first case. Such a sequence is called a geometric progression, abbreviated G.P. Formally, a sequence (every term non-zero) is a G.P. if
where: is the common ratio and is the first term; writing , the G.P. reads . The general-term formula follows the same pattern-spotting NCERT uses to introduce it: , , , and so the exponent is always one less than the term's position (NCERT Example 4 applies this directly: for the G.P. , , , so and, in general, ). A finite G.P. is written ; an infinite one drops the final term and continues with dots.
Sum to n terms of a G.P.
The whole practical value of a G.P. lies in being able to add a large number of its terms without adding them one by one. Denote the sum of the first terms by .
where: is the first term, is the common ratio, and is the number of terms summed. The two cases are genuinely different formulas, not one written two ways — when every term equals , so the sum is simply copies of added, and the formula would in fact divide by zero if you tried to force into it. The full derivation of the case, by the classic "multiply by and subtract" trick, is given below as the first derivation. NCERT Example 7 shows the formula in action for (here , ): , and in particular .
Sum to infinity of a G.P.
Push the finite-sum formula further: what happens as grows without bound? If , then as (each multiplication by shrinks the term further toward zero), so the finite sum approaches a fixed, finite limit instead of growing forever.
where: this sum exists — the series converges — only when ; for the terms do not shrink to zero and the sum grows without bound or oscillates, so is simply not defined. This is exactly the mechanism behind a recurring decimal: is a G.P. with and , so — the familiar fraction for the repeating decimal, produced entirely from the infinite-G.P. formula.
Geometric mean and inserting means
The geometric mean (G.M.) of two positive numbers and is defined as — the number that makes a three-term G.P., since gives exactly . The idea generalises: given two positive numbers and , any number of terms can be inserted between them so that the whole extended list is a G.P.
where: with numbers inserted, becomes the th term of the sequence , so , which is solved for as shown. NCERT Example 12 works the case between and : here , giving (taking real roots), so gives , and gives — a reminder that an even-power equation for has more than one real solution.
The relationship between A.M. and G.M.
Let and be the arithmetic mean and geometric mean, respectively, of two given positive real numbers and : and . These two "average-like" numbers are not equal in general, and the precise relationship between them is one of the most quoted inequalities in the chapter.
where: the inequality holds for any two positive reals , and it becomes an equality in exactly one situation — when and are equal, so that both averages collapse to the same number. The full algebraic proof is the second derivation below; NCERT Example 13 shows the reverse use of the relationship — given and , recovering the original numbers (or ) by solving and together.
Special series: sums of natural numbers, squares and cubes
Not every series you meet is arithmetic or geometric — a very common type is a series built from powers of the natural numbers themselves, . Three such sums recur constantly, in this chapter's problems and throughout Class 11–12 mathematics, and each has a clean closed form.
where: the first result is simply the sum of an A.P. with , applied to ; the second and third are proved by the telescoping-sum technique — writing a difference of consecutive cubes (or fourth powers) so that a sum collapses, worked in full as the third derivation below. Notice the elegant fact hidden in the third formula: the sum of the first cubes equals the square of the sum of the first natural numbers, .
Derivations
The goal is to derive the closed-form expression for , the sum of the first terms of a G.P. with first term and common ratio , splitting the argument into the two genuinely distinct cases and rather than treating them as a single formula — the standard method multiplies the whole sum by and subtracts, which cancels every term except the first and the last, leaving an equation that can be solved directly for .
Step 1. Dispose of the trivial case first. If , every term of the G.P. equals (since for every ), so . This case needs no further algebra and, importantly, cannot be folded into the formula below without dividing by zero.
Step 2. For , write out the sum explicitly: , labelled equation (I). Multiply both sides by : , labelled equation (II). Every term of (II) except the last, , also appears in (I); every term of (I) except the first, , also appears in (II) — the two sums are the same list of terms, shifted by one position.
Step 3. Subtract (II) from (I): . On the right, every middle term appears once with a plus sign (from (I)) and once with a minus sign (from (II)), so all of them cancel, leaving only the first term of (I) and the negative of the last term of (II): .
Step 4. Since , divide both sides by to isolate : , equivalently written by multiplying numerator and denominator by — both forms are standard and interchangeable. As a check, take (the ten-generation ancestor G.P.): , matching NCERT Example 11 exactly.
Go deeper · Derivation B · 1 minProving the arithmetic mean is never smaller than the geometric mean
The goal is to prove that for any two positive real numbers and , the arithmetic mean is never smaller than the geometric mean , i.e. , using nothing beyond the single fact that the square of any real number is non-negative — the same "sum of squares can't be negative" idea NCERT itself leans on in the chapter's harder miscellaneous problems (its four-variable G.P.-detection example rests on exactly this trick).
Step 1. Form the difference directly and try to show it is never negative: . Put this over a common denominator of : .
Step 2. Recognise the numerator as a perfect square. Since and are positive, write and ; then , the expansion of a perfect square run in reverse.
Step 3. Substitute this back: . The numerator is a real number squared, and the square of any real number is always greater than or equal to zero; the denominator is positive. A non-negative numerator divided by a positive number is itself non-negative, so , that is, .
Step 4. Pin down equality. exactly when , which happens exactly when , i.e. . So the inequality is strict, , whenever , and becomes the equality only in the degenerate case — geometrically, the moment the two numbers coincide, both averages coincide with them. Since and were arbitrary positive reals, this proves for every pair, which is exactly what the semicircle figure above shows visually: the radius (A.M.) only shrinks to equal the chord (G.M.) when the dividing point sits at the centre, i.e. .
Go deeper · Derivation C · 1 minDeriving the sum of the squares of the first n natural numbers by telescoping
The goal is to derive the closed-form result without guessing the formula and checking it afterwards, using a telescoping sum — a technique with no direct counterpart in the A.P./G.P. formulas above, but essential for the special-series results this chapter promises and for later calculus. The trick is to find an expression whose consecutive differences involve , then sum those differences so that all the middle terms cancel, leaving only a first and last piece.
Step 1. Start from the algebraic identity , obtained simply by expanding and subtracting it from . This identity holds for every integer , and its right-hand side contains exactly the term we are trying to sum.
Step 2. Sum both sides of the identity from to : . The left-hand side telescopes — write out the first few and last few terms: , and every term except the very first (, really cancels nothing) and the very last positive piece cancels against its neighbour, leaving simply .
Step 3. Expand the right-hand side using linearity of summation: , using the already-established sum from equation and the fact that summing the constant a total of times gives .
Step 4. Equate the two sides and solve for : , so . Factor the numerator: . Hence , giving exactly. As a check: gives , and the formula gives — matching. (The cube sum is proved the same way, starting instead from .)
Worked examples
Board level - the tenth term of a G.P. given two later terms (NCERT Example 6 pattern)
In a G.P., the 3rd term is and the 6th term is . Find the 10th term.
Step 1. Translate both given terms into the general-term formula : , labelled (I), and , labelled (II).
Step 2. Divide (II) by (I) to eliminate in one step: , which simplifies to , so .
Step 3. Substitute back into (I) to find : .
Step 4. Apply the general-term formula once more for : . Answer: the 10th term is .
Board level - recovering two numbers from their A.M. and G.M. (NCERT Example 13 pattern)
The A.M. and G.M. of two positive numbers and are and respectively. Find the numbers.
Step 1. Write both conditions as equations using the definitions in and the G.M. definition: , labelled (I); , labelled (II).
Step 2. Two numbers are known once both their sum and product are known, using the identity . Substitute: .
Step 3. Take the square root, keeping both signs since has two real roots: , labelled (III).
Step 4. Solve (I) and (III) together. Taking with gives ; taking gives instead — the same pair of numbers in the other order. Answer: the numbers are and (in either order), and indeed and , confirming as the A.M.–G.M. inequality demands.
Competitive level (JEE / NEET) - a functional equation hiding a geometric progression
A function satisfies for all , with . If , find the value of .
Step 1. Decode the functional equation. Setting repeatedly, — every term is exactly times the one before it. That is precisely the defining property of a G.P. with common ratio , and first term . So , i.e. .
Step 2. Recognise as the sum of the first terms of this G.P. and apply formula with : .
Step 3. Set this equal to the given total and solve for : .
Step 4. Since , and the exponential function is one-to-one (strictly increasing) for positive , this equation has exactly one solution. Answer: . Timing note: under two minutes once the functional equation is decoded. The entire problem is a disguise — the moment is spotted, it collapses into a completely ordinary G.P.-sum question. The trap is trying to solve the functional equation "from scratch" instead of testing the single substitution , which is the standard opening move for any equation of the form .
Common traps
The most damaging slip in this chapter is applying the G.P. sum formula blindly when , where it divides by zero and is simply undefined — always check first and switch to if . A second very common error is testing the "constant ratio" condition using only the first two terms of a sequence and assuming it holds throughout; the definition requires to equal the same for every consecutive pair, so a sequence like (ratios ) is not a G.P. even though its first ratio looks promising. Sign errors are frequent with a negative common ratio: if , then alternates sign depending on whether is odd or even, so oscillates in sign, and forgetting this leads to wrong-signed answers in problems like Example 12's case. Taking an even root (square root, fourth root, and so on) to solve for or for a mean routinely loses a valid solution — always keep both roots until the problem's context (for example, "positive numbers only") rules one out. Students often confuse the arithmetic mean and geometric mean formulas under exam pressure, writing or instead of and — keeping the mnemonic "A.M. adds, then halves; G.M. multiplies, then roots" avoids this. Finally, the infinite-sum formula is sometimes applied to a G.P. with , where no finite sum exists at all — always check before reaching for it, and recall that finite-G.P. sums have no such restriction on .
You should be able to…
- State the definition of a sequence as an ordered list (or function on ), and distinguish an explicit general-term formula from a recursive definition.
- Translate between a series written in full and the same series written in sigma notation, in both directions.
- Recall the A.P. formulas and from Class 10 well enough to use them inside a mixed A.P./G.P. problem.
- Recognise a geometric progression by testing whether is constant across every consecutive pair, not just the first two terms.
- Write the general term of a G.P. and solve for any one of , , or given the other three.
- Derive and correctly apply the sum-to--terms formula for a G.P., choosing the right case at versus .
- State the condition for an infinite G.P. to have a sum, and compute when it applies.
- Compute the geometric mean of two positive numbers, and insert geometric means between two given numbers.
- Prove the inequality from the single fact that a real square is non-negative, and use it to recover two numbers from their given A.M. and G.M.
- State and apply the three special-series formulas for , and , and explain how the telescoping-sum technique produces them.
Ask the tutor: Want to work through NCERT's four-number G.P.-detection problem — where a sum-of-squares inequality forces into a geometric progression — using the same A.M.–G.M. proof technique step by step?
What exactly is the difference between a sequence and a series? I keep mixing them up.
A sequence is the ordered list of numbers itself, like — you can point to its third term or its tenth term without doing any arithmetic. A series is what you get when you add the terms of a sequence together, like ; the phrase "sum of the series" then refers to the single number that addition produces, here . Every sequence has an associated series, but they are different objects: the sequence has terms at positions, the series has a running total. Sigma notation, , is simply a compact way to write the series belonging to the sequence .
Why does the sum-to-n-terms formula for a G.P. need two separate cases instead of one formula?
Because at the standard formula divides by zero, which is not a small numerical glitch but a genuine breakdown — the algebra used to derive that formula (multiplying by and subtracting) relies on dividing by at the very last step, and that step is only valid when . When the G.P. is just a constant sequence , and its sum is found far more directly by simple multiplication, , with no subtraction trick needed at all. Both cases are equally "real" G.P.s; the formula just genuinely forks in two depending on whether the ratio is or not.
Is the A.M. always bigger than the G.M., or can they ever be equal?
The arithmetic mean is always at least as large as the geometric mean for positive numbers, , and the two become exactly equal in precisely one situation: when the two original numbers are themselves equal, . You can see this in the derivation above — the gap works out to , and a square can only be zero when the thing being squared, , is itself zero. So as soon as , no matter how close together they are, is strictly larger than ; the geometric picture (radius versus chord in the semicircle figure) makes the same point visually.
When does an infinite geometric series actually have a sum, and why does the common ratio matter so much?
An infinite G.P. has a finite sum only when , because only then do the terms shrink toward zero as grows, letting the running total settle down to the fixed value . If , the terms either stay the same size or grow, so the running total either grows without any bound (for ) or oscillates forever without settling (for ) — in both cases there is simply no single number the sum approaches, so does not exist. Always check before writing down the infinite-sum formula; it is the one condition every exam question testing this idea is designed to make you verify.
My problem gives me three numbers in G.P. and asks about them also being related to an A.P. — how do I even start?
This is a very common competitive-exam pattern, and this chapter's own miscellaneous problems include one just like it (three numbers summing to a fixed total form a G.P., but subtracting fixed constants from them in order produces an A.P.). The reliable method is to name the G.P. terms symmetrically as (rather than ) — this makes the product of the three terms simply , which usually simplifies the algebra dramatically when a product is given. Write the G.P. sum condition and the A.P. condition as two separate equations in and , use the product (or sum) condition to pin down first, and then solve the remaining equation for — exactly the structure used in NCERT Example 9, where the three G.P. terms summing to with product pins down immediately, before is found from a quadratic.