Mechanical Properties of Solids

Push on a steel bridge girder, hang a chandelier from a ceiling wire, or pile a mountain of rock ten kilometres high, and every one of these solids answers the same silent question: how much will I give, and will I spring back? No real solid is the perfectly rigid body of earlier chapters. Every solid bends, stretches, twists or compresses at least a little under load, and the amount it yields — and whether it recovers when the load is removed — is what this chapter teaches you to calculate. The whole chapter builds from one simple idea: a deforming force per unit area is a stress, and the fractional deformation it causes is a strain. Within limits, the two are directly proportional — Hooke's law — and the constant of proportionality is a modulus of elasticity, a single number that tells you how stiff a material is. Three such moduli cover almost every situation an engineer or an exam meets: Young's modulus for stretching and compressing lengths, the shear modulus for twisting shapes, and the bulk modulus for squeezing volumes. You will learn to read a stress-strain graph like a story — the straight-line region where Hooke's law rules, the yield point where permanent damage begins, and the fracture point where the material finally breaks apart — and to tell a ductile metal from a brittle one just from that shape. By the end you will be able to compute the elongation of a loaded wire, the sideways slip of a sheared block, the fractional compression of water at the bottom of the ocean, and the energy stored in a stretched spring or cable. You will also see why cranes use braided steel rope rather than a single rigid bar, why bridge girders and railway tracks are shaped like the letter I, and why no mountain on Earth grows taller than about ten kilometres. Mechanical properties of solids is the physics hiding inside every building, bridge and bone around you.

Key takeaways
  • Stress is restoring force per unit area, stress=F/A\text{stress} = F/A, SI unit N m−2\text{N m}^{-2} or pascal (Pa); strain is the fractional change in dimension and has no units.
  • Three kinds of stress-strain pairs cover solids: longitudinal (tensile or compressive) strain ΔL/L\Delta L/L, shearing strain Δx/L=tan⁡θ≈θ\Delta x/L = \tan\theta \approx \theta, and volume strain ΔV/V\Delta V/V.
  • Hooke's law: for small deformations, stress is directly proportional to strain, stress=k×strain\text{stress} = k \times \text{strain}, where kk is a modulus of elasticity.
  • The stress-strain curve for a metal is linear up to the proportional limit, curves to the yield point (elastic limit), rises to the ultimate tensile strength, then falls to fracture; a material is ductile if fracture is far past the ultimate strength and brittle if the two are close.
  • Young's modulus Y=σ/ε=(FL)/(A ΔL)Y = \sigma/\varepsilon = (FL)/(A\,\Delta L) governs stretching; shear modulus G=(F/A)/θG = (F/A)/\theta governs shape change; bulk modulus B=−p/(ΔV/V)B = -p/(\Delta V/V) governs volume change, and for most solids G≈Y/3G \approx Y/3.
  • Poisson's ratio, lateral strain over longitudinal strain in a stretched wire, is a pure number, about 0.30.3 for steel.
  • Elastic potential energy per unit volume of a stretched wire is u=12σε=12Yε2u = \tfrac{1}{2}\sigma\varepsilon = \tfrac{1}{2}Y\varepsilon^2; the total energy is 12F ΔL\tfrac{1}{2} F\,\Delta L.
  • Solids are far less compressible than liquids, which are far less compressible than gases, since interatomic bonds resist volume change most strongly in a solid lattice.
  • Engineering applications — crane ropes sized by yield strength, beams sagging as δ=Wl3/(4bd3Y)\delta = Wl^3/(4bd^3Y), I-shaped cross-sections, and the roughly 10 km10\ \text{km} maximum mountain height — all follow directly from the three moduli.
  • Key idea: every solid's response to a force is captured by matching a stress to a strain through a modulus of elasticity — Young's modulus for length, shear modulus for shape, bulk modulus for volume — and the stress-strain curve tells you exactly how far that proportionality can be pushed before the material yields and finally breaks.
The core insight

A solid's mechanical behaviour reduces to stress proportional to strain through a modulus of elasticity — Young's, shear or bulk — valid up to a yield point, beyond which the stress-strain curve bends into permanent deformation and eventually fracture.

What this chapter covers

This chapter answers a single practical question — how much does a solid deform under a given force, and when does that deformation become permanent or fatal — by building a toolkit in a fixed order. It opens with stress and strain, the three kinds of loading a solid can experience: pulling or pushing along a length, sliding one face past another, and squeezing from every side. It then states Hooke's law and shows how a real material's stress-strain curve departs from that line as load grows, marking out the elastic limit, yield point, ultimate tensile strength and fracture. The heart of the chapter is the three elastic moduli — Young's, shear and bulk — each a ratio of a stress to its matching strain, together with Poisson's ratio and elastic potential energy. The chapter closes with the applications that shape real engineering: how thick a crane rope must be, why deep beams sag less, why beams are I-shaped, and why mountains cannot grow indefinitely tall.

The physical picture

Elasticity, plasticity and the restoring force

A rigid body, in the sense used for rotational motion, has a perfectly fixed shape and size. Real solids are not like this: apply a force and every solid deforms by some amount, however small. If a body returns to its original size and shape the instant the deforming force is removed, that behaviour is elasticity, and the deformation is elastic deformation — a stretched helical spring that snaps back is the everyday example. If the body stays deformed with no tendency to recover, that is plasticity; putty and wet mud are close to ideal plastic materials. Almost every engineered structure — buildings, bridges, aeroplanes, artificial limbs — is designed to stay firmly in the elastic regime under normal use, which is why elastic behaviour matters so much to engineering design. When a deforming force acts on a body held in static equilibrium, the body develops an internal restoring force equal and opposite to the applied force. This restoring force per unit area is what the chapter calls stress.

Stress and the three ways a solid can be loaded

Stress=FA.(1)\text{Stress} = \frac{F}{A}. \qquad (1)

where: FF is the magnitude of the applied (equally, the internal restoring) force acting normal or tangential to a surface, and AA is the cross-sectional area it acts over. The SI unit is N m−2\text{N m}^{-2}, the pascal (Pa), with dimensional formula [ML−1T−2][\text{ML}^{-1}\text{T}^{-2}]. There are exactly three geometrically distinct ways a solid can be stressed, each with its own name and matching strain. A cylinder pulled by two equal, opposite forces normal to its cross-section develops tensile stress; pushed together, the same geometry gives compressive stress — together, longitudinal stress, since the change is along the body's length. If two equal, opposite forces instead act tangentially, parallel to a face, the restoring force per unit area is a shearing stress, sliding one face relative to the opposite face rather than stretching the body. If a solid is immersed in a fluid under pressure acting perpendicular to the surface at every point equally, the body is under hydraulic stress, numerically equal to the fluid pressure, shrinking in volume with no change of shape.

Figure
Three ways a solid can be loaded tensile stress stretches a cylinder along its length shearing stress slides one face sideways relative to the opposite face and hydraulic stress squeezes a body uniformly from every side
The three ways a solid is loaded (a) Tensile stress length grows by ΔL longitudinal strain = ΔL / L (b) Shearing stress θ top face slides by Δx shearing strain = Δx / L = tan θ (c) Hydraulic stress volume shrinks by ΔV volume strain = ΔV / V, shape unchanged Stress = restoring force per unit area, in each case pointing normal or tangential to the loaded surface Stress has SI unit newton per square metre, the pascal, and dimensional formula M L to the power minus one T to the power minus two

Strain: how we measure the deformation

Each stress in the figure above produces its own matching strain, and all three strains are pure numbers with no units, since each is a ratio of two lengths, areas or volumes of the same kind. Longitudinal strain is the fractional change in length,

Longitudinal strain=ΔLL.(2)\text{Longitudinal strain} = \frac{\Delta L}{L}. \qquad (2)

Shearing strain is the ratio of the sideways displacement Δx\Delta x of one face to the perpendicular distance LL between the faces, which equals tan⁡θ\tan\theta for the angular displacement θ\theta of the body from its original shape,

Shearing strain=ΔxL=tan⁡θ≈θ(θ small).(3)\text{Shearing strain} = \frac{\Delta x}{L} = \tan\theta \approx \theta \quad (\theta \text{ small}). \qquad (3)

where: the small-angle approximation is excellent for the tiny deformations solids actually undergo — at θ=10∘\theta = 10^{\circ} the difference between θ\theta (in radians) and tan⁡θ\tan\theta is only about 1%1\%, and real elastic shear angles are far smaller than that. Volume strain, produced by hydraulic stress, is the fractional change in volume,

Volume strain=ΔVV.(4)\text{Volume strain} = \frac{\Delta V}{V}. \qquad (4)

Hooke's law and the stress-strain curve

For small deformations, stress and strain are directly proportional to each other in almost every material — this empirical statement is Hooke's law:

stress=k×strain,(5)\text{stress} = k \times \text{strain}, \qquad (5)

where: kk, the constant of proportionality, is called the modulus of elasticity, and its value and its physical meaning depend on which stress-strain pair is in play. Hooke's law is empirical, not a fundamental law, and some materials — notably elastomers such as rubber and the elastic tissue of the aorta — never obey it over any appreciable range even though they are highly elastic. The relationship between stress and strain for a real material, found by gradually loading a test wire or cylinder and recording the stress it develops against the strain produced, traces out a stress-strain curve. For a typical metal this curve has a well-defined shape and vocabulary that every subsequent calculation in the chapter depends on.

Figure
Stress strain curve for a typical ductile metal a straight line from the origin O through point A the proportional limit continuing to yield point B where the curve bends sharply then rising to point D the ultimate tensile strength and dropping to fracture at point E
A typical stress-strain curve for a ductile metal strain stress O A proportional limit B yield point (elastic limit) D ultimate tensile strength E fracture O to A: Hooke's law obeyed, elastic and linear A to B: still elastic, no longer linear. B to D: plastic, permanent set remains after unloading

Between OO and AA the curve is a straight line, the region where Hooke's law holds. Between AA and BB, stress and strain are no longer proportional, but the body still returns fully to its original dimensions when unloaded; BB is the yield point (elastic limit), and the stress there is the yield strength σy\sigma_y. Beyond BB, a small stress increase produces a rapid strain increase, and unloading anywhere between BB and DD leaves a permanent set — plastic deformation. Point DD is the ultimate tensile strength σu\sigma_u, the maximum stress the material can bear; beyond it the material finally snaps at the fracture point EE. A material is ductile if DD and EE are far apart (structural steel), and brittle if they are close together (glass, cast iron).

The three elastic moduli: Young's, shear and bulk

Within the proportional region OAOA, the ratio of stress to strain is a constant characteristic of the material, called its modulus of elasticity. Three different moduli correspond to the three kinds of stress described above.

Young's modulus YY is the ratio of tensile or compressive stress to the resulting longitudinal strain, and it applies only to solids, since only a solid has a definite length to stretch or compress:

Y=σε=F/AΔL/L=F LA ΔL.(6)Y = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon} = \frac{F/A}{\Delta L/L} = \frac{F\,L}{A\,\Delta L}. \qquad (6)

where: σ=F/A\sigma = F/A is the longitudinal stress, ε=ΔL/L\varepsilon = \Delta L/L the longitudinal strain, and since strain is dimensionless, YY carries stress's unit, N m−2\text{N m}^{-2}. Metals have large Young's moduli — steel's is about 2.0×1011 N m−22.0\times10^{11}\ \text{N m}^{-2} — needing a large force for even a small strain; wood, bone and glass have smaller values, stretching more readily for the same stress. The everyday intuition that "stretchier means more elastic" is backwards: resisting stretching (larger YY) is what makes a material more elastic technically. The shear modulus GG, also called the modulus of rigidity, is the ratio of shearing stress to shearing strain:

G=σsΔx/L=F/Aθ=F LA Δx.(7)G = \frac{\sigma_s}{\Delta x/L} = \frac{F/A}{\theta} = \frac{F\,L}{A\,\Delta x}. \qquad (7)

where: σs=F/A\sigma_s = F/A is the tangential stress and θ≈Δx/L\theta \approx \Delta x/L the shearing strain in radians. GG shares YY's unit, and for most solids G≈Y/3G \approx Y/3 — shape distorts more readily than length changes. Like YY, shear modulus applies only to solids, since liquids and gases have no fixed shape to shear. The bulk modulus BB is the ratio of hydraulic stress to volume strain:

B=− pΔV/V.(8)B = -\,\frac{p}{\Delta V/V}. \qquad (8)

where: pp is the hydraulic pressure and ΔV/V\Delta V/V the volume strain. The minus sign exists because increasing pressure always decreases volume, so BB itself comes out positive. Its reciprocal, k=1/Bk = 1/B, is compressibility. Unlike YY and GG, bulk modulus applies to solids, liquids and gases alike; solids have the largest bulk moduli, liquids intermediate values, gases the smallest by far — air is roughly a million times more compressible than a solid, since tight interatomic bonding resists volume change far more than loose liquid or gas coupling.

Poisson's ratio: the sideways shrink

When a wire is stretched, it does not merely elongate — it also grows very slightly thinner. The strain perpendicular to the applied force is lateral strain, and Siméon Poisson showed that within the elastic limit it is proportional to the longitudinal strain that caused it. The ratio of the two,

Poisson’s ratio=lateral strainlongitudinal strain=Δd/dΔL/L,(9)\text{Poisson's ratio} = \frac{\text{lateral strain}}{\text{longitudinal strain}} = \frac{\Delta d/d}{\Delta L/L}, \qquad (9)

where: dd is the original diameter of the wire and Δd\Delta d its (negative) change as the wire stretches, LL is the original length and ΔL\Delta L the elongation. Being a ratio of two strains, Poisson's ratio is a dimensionless pure number depending only on the material — about 0.280.28 to 0.300.30 for steels, about 0.330.33 for aluminium alloys — and is why a single modulus never fully describes a general deformation: a force in one direction always strains the perpendicular directions too.

Elastic potential energy in a stretched wire

Stretching a wire does work against the interatomic forces holding it together, and that work does not vanish — it is stored as elastic potential energy, exactly as work done compressing a spring is stored in the spring. This energy, and the energy density u=12σεu = \tfrac{1}{2}\sigma\varepsilon obtained from it, is derived in full below and used throughout the applications that follow, from the crane rope to the loaded beam.

Engineering applications: ropes, beams, pillars and mountains

Every application here is the moduli above put to work with a safety margin. A steel crane rope must stay comfortably below the yield strength σy\sigma_y, so its minimum cross-section is A≥W/σyA \geq W/\sigma_y (with a generous safety factor, typically about ten, on top); it is then braided from many thin wires rather than cast as one rigid rod, for flexibility as much as strength. A beam of length ll, breadth bb and depth dd, loaded at its centre and supported near its ends, sags by an amount

δ=W l34 b d3 Y,(10)\delta = \frac{W\,l^3}{4\,b\,d^3\,Y}, \qquad (10)

where: WW is the central load and YY the Young's modulus of the beam's material. Because δ\delta falls off as d−3d^{-3} but only as b−1b^{-1}, increasing depth reduces sagging far more effectively than increasing breadth — why joists and rails stand tall rather than lie flat. Pushed too far, though, a very deep, thin bar can buckle sideways instead of bending cleanly, so real beams compromise with an I-shaped cross-section: material concentrated far from the centre, where it resists bending most, with just enough web to hold the flanges apart and prevent buckling.

Figure
Cross section comparison a solid rectangular bar next to an I shaped beam of the same amount of material showing the I beam concentrates material in flanges far from the centre to resist bending while a thin bar of the same depth would buckle sideways
Why load-bearing beams are shaped like the letter I (a) solid rectangular bar depth d material near the centre does little work (b) thin deep bar (buckles) unsupported depth buckles sideways (c) I-beam material moved into flanges, web prevents buckling Sag falls off as depth cubed but only as breadth to the first power, so depth matters most The I-beam gets the bending resistance of a deep bar without its tendency to buckle

The same reasoning, applied vertically, explains why a heap of sand settles into a pyramidal shape, why load-bearing pillars distribute their end loads rather than concentrating them at a point, and — pushed to its geological limit in the third derivation below — why no mountain on Earth stands taller than about ten kilometres.

Derivation AElastic potential energy stored in a stretched wire

The goal of this derivation is to find how much energy is stored inside a wire of original length LL and cross-sectional area AA when it is stretched by an amount ll under a force FF, and then to express that stored energy per unit volume purely in terms of stress and strain, so the result applies to any elastically stretched solid. The physical idea is that stretching a wire does work against interatomic restoring forces exactly as compressing a spring does work against the spring force, and by Hooke's law that restoring force grows in direct proportion to how far the wire is already stretched, so the work must be found by summing a continuously changing force rather than a single multiplication.

Step 1. Write the tension at an intermediate elongation xx (running from 00 up to the final elongation ll). Young's modulus gives the force needed to hold it there as F(x)=YA (x/L)F(x) = YA\,(x/L), from Eq. (6) rearranged — zero when unstretched, reaching F=YA(l/L)F = YA(l/L) only at the end.

Step 2. Find the work for one infinitesimal further stretch. Stretching from xx to x+dxx + dx against F(x)F(x) requires dW=F(x) dx=YAL x dxdW = F(x)\,dx = \dfrac{YA}{L}\,x\,dx — the standard trick of treating a changing force as constant only over an infinitesimal step, then summing the steps.

Step 3. Integrate from zero to the final elongation ll: W=∫0lYAL x dx=YA l22L=12 Y(lL)2(AL)=12 Y ε2×(volume)W = \displaystyle\int_0^{l} \frac{YA}{L}\,x\,dx = \frac{YA\,l^2}{2L} = \dfrac{1}{2}\, Y \left(\dfrac{l}{L}\right)^2 (A L) = \dfrac{1}{2}\,Y\,\varepsilon^2 \times (\text{volume}), where ε=l/L\varepsilon = l/L is the final strain and ALAL the original volume.

Step 4. Divide by the volume ALAL to get the energy density u=12Yε2u = \tfrac{1}{2}Y\varepsilon^2. Since σ=Yε\sigma = Y\varepsilon, this is also u=12σεu = \tfrac{1}{2}\sigma\varepsilon, and the total stored energy is U=12σε×(volume)=12F lU = \tfrac{1}{2}\sigma\varepsilon \times (\text{volume}) = \tfrac{1}{2}F\,l — half the final force times the final elongation, exactly the rule for an ordinary spring, since a Hookean wire under tension is mechanically just a very stiff spring.

Go deeper · Derivation B · 1 minCombined elongation of two wires joined end to end
Derivation BCombined elongation of two wires joined end to end

The goal of this derivation is to work out, for two wires of different lengths and moduli but the same area, joined end to end under a common load, how the total measured elongation splits between them — and then to use that split to recover the unknown load, the reasoning needed whenever a composite structure is stretched as one unit. The key fact is that both wires, joined in series, carry the same tension FF and hence the same stress, since the same force is transmitted along an unbranched wire regardless of what it is made of.

Step 1. Note what is common to both wires: the tension FF in each is identical, and since Example 8.2 of the chapter uses wires of the same diameter (same area AA), the stress F/AF/A is also identical in both, even though the materials and lengths differ.

Step 2. Write Hooke's law for each wire. For wire 1 (length L1L_1, modulus Y1Y_1) and wire 2 (length L2L_2, modulus Y2Y_2), F/A=Y1(ΔL1/L1)=Y2(ΔL2/L2)F/A = Y_1 (\Delta L_1/L_1) = Y_2 (\Delta L_2 / L_2), since both equal the same common stress.

Step 3. Eliminate the stress to get the ratio of elongations: ΔL1ΔL2=Y2Y1×L1L2\dfrac{\Delta L_1}{\Delta L_2} = \dfrac{Y_2}{Y_1}\times\dfrac{L_1}{L_2}. This ratio is fixed entirely by the two moduli and two lengths — it does not depend on the unknown load, which is what lets the elongation split be found before the load itself is known.

Step 4. Combine the ratio with the measured total elongation ΔL1+ΔL2\Delta L_1 + \Delta L_2: substituting ΔL1=(Y2L1/Y1L2) ΔL2\Delta L_1 = (Y_2 L_1 / Y_1 L_2)\,\Delta L_2 gives one linear equation in ΔL2\Delta L_2, solved directly; ΔL1\Delta L_1 then follows from Step 3. The common load is then recovered from either wire, F=Y1A (ΔL1/L1)F = Y_1 A\,(\Delta L_1/L_1).

Go deeper · Derivation C · 1 minMaximum height of a mountain from the elastic limit of rock
Derivation CMaximum height of a mountain from the elastic limit of rock

The goal of this derivation is to explain, using only the shear modulus idea, why mountains on Earth cannot grow indefinitely tall — arriving at a numerical ceiling of about ten kilometres from the elastic properties of rock alone, matching the fact that even Mount Everest, at under nine kilometres, sits below that ceiling. The idea is that the base of a very tall mountain is not under simple, uniform compression, which rock could withstand almost indefinitely, but is pushed sideways relative to its surroundings, since the sides are exposed to open air while the base is squeezed by everything piled above — and that sideways push is precisely a shearing stress, which rock can only resist up to its elastic limit before it begins to flow.

Step 1. Find the stress at the base of a mountain of height hh. The material there supports the weight of a column of rock of height hh and density ρ\rho, so the force per unit area, exactly as for a column of fluid, is hρgh\rho g, with gg the acceleration due to gravity.

Step 2. Identify this as a shearing stress rather than a bulk (hydraulic) stress. Because the sides of the mountain are free surfaces while the base carries this vertical load, the loading is not uniform in all directions — there is a shear component in the base rock, of magnitude approximately hρgh\rho g.

Step 3. Set this shear stress equal to the critical shear stress rock can sustain before it flows plastically, about σcrit=30×107 N m−2\sigma_{\text{crit}} = 30\times10^{7}\ \text{N m}^{-2}. Setting hρg=σcrith\rho g = \sigma_{\text{crit}} gives the tallest height rock can support before the base exceeds its elastic limit and slowly flows outward.

Step 4. Solve for hh numerically. With ρ=3×103 kg m−3\rho = 3\times10^{3}\ \text{kg m}^{-3} and g=10 m s−2g = 10\ \text{m s}^{-2}, h=σcritρg=30×107(3×103)(10)=10×103 m=10 kmh = \dfrac{\sigma_{\text{crit}}}{\rho g} = \dfrac{30\times10^{7}}{(3\times10^{3})(10)} = 10\times10^{3}\ \text{m} = 10\ \text{km} — comfortably above Everest's roughly 8.85 km8.85\ \text{km}, consistent with no mountain on Earth ever challenging the elastic limit of its own base rock.

Worked examples

Board level - stress, strain and elongation of a loaded steel rod

A structural steel rod has a radius of 10 mm10\ \text{mm} and a length of 1.0 m1.0\ \text{m}. A 100 kN100\ \text{kN} force stretches it along its length. Take Young's modulus of structural steel as Y=2.0×1011 N m−2Y = 2.0\times10^{11}\ \text{N m}^{-2}. Find (a) the stress, (b) the elongation, and (c) the strain in the rod.

Step 1. Find the area and stress. A=πr2=π(0.01 m)2=3.14×10−4 m2A = \pi r^2 = \pi (0.01\ \text{m})^2 = 3.14\times10^{-4}\ \text{m}^2, so σ=F/A=(1.0×105 N)/(3.14×10−4 m2)=3.18×108 N m−2\sigma = F/A = (1.0\times10^{5}\ \text{N})/(3.14\times10^{-4}\ \text{m}^2) = 3.18\times10^{8}\ \text{N m}^{-2}.

Step 2. Find the elongation using Eq. (6) rearranged: ΔL=(F/A) LY=(3.18×108)(1.0)2.0×1011=1.59×10−3 m\Delta L = \dfrac{(F/A)\,L}{Y} = \dfrac{(3.18\times10^{8})(1.0)}{2.0\times10^{11}} = 1.59\times10^{-3}\ \text{m}.

Step 3. Convert to strain: Strain=ΔL/L=1.59×10−3\text{Strain} = \Delta L/L = 1.59\times10^{-3}. Answer: stress =3.18×108 N m−2= 3.18\times10^{8}\ \text{N m}^{-2}, elongation ΔL=1.59 mm\Delta L = 1.59\ \text{mm}, strain ≈0.16%\approx 0.16\%.

Board level - fractional compression of ocean water from its bulk modulus

The average depth of the Indian Ocean is about 3000 m3000\ \text{m}. The bulk modulus of water is B=2.2×109 N m−2B = 2.2\times10^{9}\ \text{N m}^{-2}. Taking the density of water as 1000 kg m−31000\ \text{kg m}^{-3} and g=10 m s−2g = 10\ \text{m s}^{-2}, find the fractional compression ΔV/V\Delta V/V of water at the bottom of the ocean.

Step 1. Find the hydraulic pressure at the bottom, treating the ocean as a column of height h=3000 mh = 3000\ \text{m}: p=hρg=(3000)(1000)(10)=3×107 N m−2p = h\rho g = (3000)(1000)(10) = 3\times10^{7}\ \text{N m}^{-2}.

Step 2. Apply Eq. (8): ΔVV=pB=3×1072.2×109=1.36×10−2\dfrac{\Delta V}{V} = \dfrac{p}{B} = \dfrac{3\times10^{7}}{2.2\times10^{9}} = 1.36\times10^{-2}. Answer: the water is compressed by about 1.36%1.36\% even at the ocean floor — a striking demonstration of how large water's bulk modulus really is.

Competitive level - composite copper-steel wire (JEE and NEET pattern)

A copper wire of length 2.2 m2.2\ \text{m} and a steel wire of length 1.6 m1.6\ \text{m}, both of diameter 3.0 mm3.0\ \text{mm}, are joined end to end and stretched by a load. The net elongation is found to be 0.70 mm0.70\ \text{mm}. Take Ycopper=1.1×1011 N m−2Y_{\text{copper}} = 1.1\times10^{11}\ \text{N m}^{-2} and Ysteel=2.0×1011 N m−2Y_{\text{steel}} = 2.0\times10^{11}\ \text{N m}^{-2}. Find (a) the applied load, and (b) the total elastic potential energy stored in the two wires together.

Step 1. Use the series-wire result from the second derivation above: ΔLcΔLs=YsYc×LcLs=2.0×10111.1×1011×2.21.6=2.5\dfrac{\Delta L_c}{\Delta L_s} = \dfrac{Y_s}{Y_c}\times\dfrac{L_c}{L_s} = \dfrac{2.0\times10^{11}}{1.1\times10^{11}}\times\dfrac{2.2}{1.6} = 2.5. With ΔLc+ΔLs=7.0×10−4 m\Delta L_c + \Delta L_s = 7.0\times10^{-4}\ \text{m}, solving gives ΔLs=2.0×10−4 m\Delta L_s = 2.0\times10^{-4}\ \text{m} and ΔLc=5.0×10−4 m\Delta L_c = 5.0\times10^{-4}\ \text{m}.

Step 2. Recover the load from copper's Hooke's-law relation. A=π(1.5×10−3)2=7.07×10−6 m2A = \pi(1.5\times10^{-3})^2 = 7.07\times10^{-6}\ \text{m}^2, so F=A Yc ΔLcLc=(7.07×10−6)(1.1×1011)(5.0×10−4)2.2≈1.8×102 NF = \dfrac{A\,Y_c\,\Delta L_c}{L_c} = \dfrac{(7.07\times10^{-6})(1.1\times10^{11})(5.0\times10^{-4})}{2.2} \approx 1.8\times10^{2}\ \text{N}, the tension every cross-section of the composite wire carries.

Step 3. Find the elastic potential energy using the shortcut U=12F ΔLU = \tfrac{1}{2}F\,\Delta L from the first derivation, since F≈176.7 NF \approx 176.7\ \text{N} acts throughout. Uc≈0.044 JU_c \approx 0.044\ \text{J} and Us≈0.018 JU_s \approx 0.018\ \text{J}. Answer: load F≈1.8×102 NF \approx 1.8\times10^{2}\ \text{N}; total stored energy Uc+Us≈0.062 JU_c + U_s \approx 0.062\ \text{J}. Timing note: about three minutes. The problem collapses once you notice "joined end to end, same diameter" forces identical stress in both wires — write that ratio first. Recognising that 12F ΔL\tfrac{1}{2}F\,\Delta L gives the stored energy, rather than a fresh integral, saves time under exam pressure.

Common traps

The single most common slip is applying Hooke's law, or a modulus value, beyond the elastic limit — σ=Yε\sigma = Y\varepsilon is only true up to point AA; using it between BB and DD silently gives a wrong, too-large strain. A related error is confusing the yield point (BB, where permanent deformation begins) with the ultimate tensile strength (DD, the maximum stress the material can bear) — only σy\sigma_y, not σu\sigma_u, is the safe design limit. Students often treat "stretches more easily" as "more elastic," which is backwards: a large Young's modulus means a material resists stretching, and that resistance is what makes it more elastic technically. Sign errors are common with bulk modulus: forgetting the minus sign in B=−p/(ΔV/V)B = -p/(\Delta V/V) misses that BB is always positive even though ΔV\Delta V is negative under compression. Unit slips too — strain and Poisson's ratio have no units, while stress and every modulus share the unit N m−2\text{N m}^{-2}. In series-wire problems, students often assume the wires share the same strain rather than the same stress — it is the force that is identical along an unbranched series connection.

You should be able to…

  • Identify tensile, compressive, shearing and hydraulic stress from how forces act on a body, and write F/AF/A for each.
  • Compute longitudinal, shearing and volume strain from given deformation data, remembering all three are dimensionless.
  • State Hooke's law and identify the proportional region on a stress-strain curve where it holds.
  • Read a stress-strain graph, correctly label the elastic limit, ultimate tensile strength and fracture point, and classify a material as ductile or brittle.
  • Calculate Young's, shear and bulk modulus from experimental data, and use G≈Y/3G \approx Y/3 as a sanity check for solids.
  • Define Poisson's ratio and recall it is a dimensionless number, roughly 0.30.3 for common metals.
  • Derive and apply the elastic potential energy per unit volume of a stretched wire, u=12σεu = \tfrac{1}{2}\sigma\varepsilon, and U=12F ΔLU = \tfrac{1}{2}F\,\Delta L.
  • Solve series (composite wire) problems by recognising equal tension, not equal strain, as the shared quantity.
  • Apply elastic-modulus reasoning to engineering: sizing a crane rope, computing beam sag from Eq. (10), the I-beam cross-section, and the maximum height of a mountain.

Ask the tutor: if you would like, I can walk through a mixed problem combining all three moduli on one composite structure, or work backwards from a given stress-strain graph to identify a material.

Why does strain have no unit while stress is measured in pascals?

Strain is always a ratio of two quantities of the same kind — change in length over original length, change in volume over original volume, or displacement over length for shear — so the units cancel exactly, leaving a pure number. That is why strain and Poisson's ratio (a ratio of two strains) never carry a unit. Stress, by contrast, is force divided by area, so it keeps the dimensions of pressure, [ML−1T−2][\text{ML}^{-1}\text{T}^{-2}], measured in pascals. Every elastic modulus shares stress's unit too, since dividing stress by a dimensionless strain leaves the unit unchanged.

If steel stretches less than rubber for the same force, how can steel be called more elastic than rubber?

Daily language and the physics definition point in opposite directions here. In physics, a large Young's modulus (small strain for a given stress) marks a highly elastic material — it resists deformation strongly while still restoring itself. Steel needs an enormous force to stretch even slightly, so it counts as very elastic. Rubber deforms hugely for a small force — a small Young's modulus — even though it also snaps back completely: elastic in the everyday sense of springy, not the technical sense of resisting deformation. Rubber also does not obey Hooke's law over most of its stretch.

Why is a crane's lifting cable made of many thin wires braided together instead of one solid rod of the same total cross-section?

Sizing a rope by strength alone (area at least W/σyW/\sigma_y, with a safety margin) for a heavy load like ten tonnes on mild steel gives a cross-section corresponding to a solid rod a few centimetres in radius — practically rigid, impossible to coil onto a drum or bend around a pulley. Braiding many thin wires gives the same total area, so essentially the same strength, while each wire stays thin enough to bend freely; the rope stays flexible even though its net strength matches a rigid bar. It is a manufacturing and flexibility choice, not a difference in the underlying physics.

Why do beams and railway tracks have an I-shaped cross-section instead of a plain rectangular one?

A beam's sag falls off as the cube of its depth but only the first power of its breadth (Eq. 10), so a deeper beam resists bending far more effectively than a wider one — material far from the centre line does the most work, material near the centre contributes little. A plain bar made very deep to exploit this, though, becomes thin and prone to buckling sideways. The I-shape compromises: most material sits in the two flanges, as far from the centre as possible, while a thin web holds them apart and stops buckling — nearly the resistance of a deep solid bar without its weight or instability.

Why can't mountains grow taller than about 10 kilometres, and does that mean Mount Everest is close to some real physical limit?

A tall mountain's base is not squeezed uniformly the way a submerged object is by water pressure — its sides are open to air while the base bears the full weight above, so the rock there feels a shearing stress of roughly hρgh\rho g. Rock's elastic limit in shear is about 30×107 N m−230\times10^{7}\ \text{N m}^{-2}; once the base stress would exceed that, the rock slowly flows sideways instead of holding its shape, capping the height. That works out to about 10 km10\ \text{km}, comfortably above Everest's roughly 8.85 km8.85\ \text{km} — tall, but not yet pressing against its own rock's elastic limit.

Before this

Where this leads