Integrals
Differentiation asks: given a function, what is its instantaneous rate of change? Integration asks the reverse question: given a rate of change, can we recover the function it came from? This chapter is the systematic answer. If a function has derivative , then is called an antiderivative of , and because a constant differentiates to zero, that antiderivative is never unique — the entire family is bundled into one symbol, the indefinite integral . Chasing down this family for every standard function, and for combinations that resist direct inspection, is the first half of the chapter, and it forces the development of three genuinely different techniques: substitution (changing the variable to expose a hidden derivative), decomposition into partial fractions (breaking a rational function into simpler pieces), and integration by parts (unwinding the product rule). The second half turns the same machinery toward a completely different-looking problem: the area under a curve. The definite integral is defined as a number — the signed area swept out between a curve and the -axis over — and it seems, at first glance, to have nothing to do with antiderivatives. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is the bridge: it proves that this area can be computed, without ever summing a single rectangle, simply by evaluating any antiderivative of at the two endpoints and subtracting. That one theorem is why "integral calculus" is really one subject and not two, and it is the single most consequential result in this entire book. By the end of the chapter you will have a working toolkit for both halves — the standard formulas, the four integration techniques, the Fundamental Theorem, and eight symmetry properties of definite integrals that routinely turn an intractable-looking integral into a two-line calculation. This is also one of the highest-yield chapters for JEE and NEET: definite-integral property tricks, integration-by-parts loops, and partial-fraction decompositions appear across nearly every paper.
- An antiderivative of is any with ; the indefinite integral is the entire family of antiderivatives, differing only by the arbitrary constant of integration .
- Integration is linear: , which is why every standard-formula list can be combined term by term.
- Substitution ( or ) turns an integral into a simpler one whenever the integrand contains a function and (a multiple of) its own derivative.
- Six master formulas — built by partial fractions or trigonometric substitution — handle , , and their logarithmic and inverse-trigonometric cousins; every quadratic-denominator integral reduces to one of these after completing the square.
- Partial fractions rewrite a proper rational function as a sum of simple pieces (linear, repeated-linear, or irreducible-quadratic denominators) that each integrate by inspection.
- Integration by parts, , comes directly from the product rule and is the tool for products like , , or — the last solved by a self-referential loop.
- The definite integral is a specific real number, defined as a signed area; the Second Fundamental Theorem of Calculus evaluates it as for any antiderivative of .
- Eight properties of definite integrals (P0–P7), especially replacing by and the even/odd-function shortcuts, let you evaluate integrals that no direct antiderivative can crack.
- Key idea: integration is the inverse of differentiation — every elementary integral reduces, via substitution, partial fractions, or integration by parts, to a short list of standard forms, and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus converts the resulting antiderivative into the exact signed area of a definite integral.
Every indefinite integral is a family of antiderivatives found by substitution, partial fractions, or integration by parts, and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, , converts that family into the exact signed area under , with eight symmetry properties (P0–P7) offering a shortcut whenever the integral itself resists direct antidifferentiation.
What this chapter covers
The chapter runs in two large, connected halves. The first half builds the indefinite integral: it opens with the definition of an antiderivative and the standard list of integrals read straight off the derivative table (Section 7.2), states the linearity properties that let those formulas combine, and then develops the three real techniques of integration in turn — substitution and trigonometric identities (7.3), the six standard formulas for quadratic-denominator integrals built by completing the square (7.4), partial fractions for rational functions (7.5), and integration by parts for products, including the special shortcut and the , family (7.6). The second half turns to the definite integral, introduced first as a signed area (7.7), then unlocked by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in its two parts — the area function's derivative equals the integrand, and the evaluation shortcut (7.8). Section 7.9 shows how to evaluate a definite integral by substitution, most efficiently by changing the limits along with the variable. The chapter closes with eight properties of definite integrals, P0 through P7 (7.10), which use symmetry — reversing limits, splitting the interval, or replacing by — to evaluate integrals that would otherwise need no antiderivative to exist in closed form at all.
The core ideas
Antiderivatives and the indefinite integral
Differential calculus hands you a function and asks for its derivative. Integral calculus reverses the question: given a derivative, find the function. If is any function with on an interval , then is called an antiderivative (or primitive) of . Because the derivative of a constant is zero, is an antiderivative of for every real number , and it can be proved (by the mean value theorem, sketched in the first derivation below) that these are the only antiderivatives — any two functions with the same derivative on an interval differ by a constant. The entire family is bundled into one notation, the indefinite integral:
where: is the integrand, is the variable of integration, and is the constant of integration — an arbitrary real number, never to be dropped, since two different values of give genuinely different curves in the family. Reading formula (1) as a statement about derivatives, differentiating an indefinite integral undoes it, , and integrating a derivative recovers the function up to a constant, — the two together are the working definition of "inverse process." From the standard derivative table, a list of standard integrals follows immediately: for ; (the case , handled separately because it needs the absolute value to be valid for negative too); ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and . These formulas are the alphabet every other integral in the chapter is spelled with. Integration is linear, which is what makes term-by-term integration legitimate:
where: is any real constant, and both rules generalise to any finite combination . Finding an antiderivative by pattern-matching against the standard list is called integration by inspection; for example, since , an antiderivative of is , found purely by recognising the derivative. Inspection is fast but limited — most integrands need one of the three systematic techniques below.
Integration by substitution
When an integrand contains a function together with (a constant multiple of) its own derivative, changing the variable strips that structure away. Given , substitute , so that :
where: the substitution is chosen so the new integral in is a standard form. The commonest pattern is (the "inner" function), (its derivative) : for , put , , so the integral becomes . Trigonometric identities often prepare an integrand for substitution or direct standard-form matching — writing , or , or , converts a power or product of trigonometric functions into a sum of terms that integrate directly. Four integrals worth memorising as standard results, each derivable by substitution, are , , , and .
Integrals of some particular functions
A second family of integrals — those with a quadratic in the denominator, or under a square root — is handled by reducing to six master formulas:
where: the first two come from partial fractions, the middle pair from the substitution or , and the last two from or (the first derivation below proves the first and fifth in full). Any quadratic that does not already look like or is forced into that shape by completing the square: , after which the substitution reduces the integral to one of the six formulas. When the numerator is linear, , it is split as , matching coefficients to find and ; the -part integrates by the substitution (giving a logarithm), and the -part reduces to one of formulas (4)–(5) after completing the square.
Integration by partial fractions
A rational function is proper if the degree of is less than the degree of ; an improper rational function is first reduced to a polynomial plus a proper part by long division, , and integrates termwise as a polynomial. A proper rational function, in turn, is rewritten as a sum of simpler fractions according to the shape of its denominator: for distinct linear factors, ; for a repeated linear factor, ; for three distinct linear factors, three separate terms ; for a repeated factor alongside a simple one, ; and when an irreducible quadratic sits alongside a linear factor, , where cannot be factored further over the reals.
where: in every pattern, the unknown constants , , are found by clearing denominators to get a polynomial identity, then either equating coefficients of matching powers of on both sides, or substituting convenient values of (such as or , which kill all but one term at once). Once decomposed, each piece is a standard form: for a simple linear factor, and for a repeated one, while the irreducible-quadratic piece is split further (as in the previous subsection) into a logarithmic part and an inverse-tangent part.
Integration by parts
For products of functions that inspection cannot crack, integration by parts unwinds the product rule of differentiation. If is the first function and gives the second function, then
where: in words — the integral of a product equals (first function) times (integral of the second) minus the integral of [(derivative of the first) times (integral of the second)]. The choice of which factor is "first" is decisive: choosing badly turns a solvable integral into a harder one (as happens if is taken first in , which increases the power of instead of removing it). The standard priority, remembered by the acronym ILATE — Inverse trigonometric, Logarithmic, Algebraic, Trigonometric, Exponential — picks the first function as whichever type appears earliest in that list; algebraic functions like are usually taken first over trigonometric or exponential partners, but inverse-trigonometric and logarithmic functions, which have no elementary antiderivative of their own to guess by inspection, are always taken first, paired with the constant function when nothing else is present (as in ). A named shortcut saves repeated work whenever the integrand has the shape :
where: this follows from applying (6) once, with as the first function and as the second, and watching the two leftover integrals cancel exactly — it is proved in full in the second derivation below and reused constantly, since it converts what looks like integration by parts into a one-line pattern match. A further pair of standard results, proved by taking the constant function as the second function, gives closed forms for and ; these too are self-referential, and the technique of solving for the unknown integral algebraically after it reappears on the right-hand side is the same one used for .
The definite integral and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
A definite integral , with lower limit and upper limit , is a specific real number — geometrically, the area of the region bounded by , the ordinates and , and the -axis (formally introduced as a limit of Riemann sums, though this chapter's working tool is the theorem below rather than the sum). Define the area function , the running area from up to a variable point inside . Two theorems, together called the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, connect this area function to antiderivatives.
where: is any antiderivative of (continuous on ) — not necessarily the area function itself. The practical procedure, proved in the third derivation below, is always the same: find one antiderivative of , ignoring the constant (it cancels automatically, since ), then evaluate . The Second FTC is what makes definite integrals computable without ever summing a rectangle, and it is why the entire indefinite-integral toolkit built earlier in the chapter feeds directly into area calculations.
Evaluating definite integrals by substitution
When a definite integral is evaluated by the substitution method, the fastest route changes the limits of integration along with the variable, so there is no need to substitute back to at the end: given with substitution , find the new limits and , integrate the transformed integrand in , and evaluate directly at the new limits. For , putting gives , and the limits transform from to , so the whole computation stays in until the final subtraction — no resubstitution to is ever needed.
Properties of definite integrals
Eight properties, labelled P0 through P7, use symmetry to evaluate definite integrals that direct antidifferentiation cannot reach in closed form (a striking number of JEE and board problems are solved only by one of these):
where: says the name of the dummy variable is irrelevant; says reversing the limits flips the sign; splits the interval at any interior point ; and replace by (or , when the lower limit is ) without changing the integral's value — the workhorse of definite-integral tricks, proved in the fourth derivation below, and used by adding the original and transformed integrals to eliminate an awkward that appears explicitly in the integrand; and extend the same idea to an interval of length ; and is the even/odd shortcut, either halving the work over a symmetric interval or annihilating the integral outright.
Derivations
The goal is to prove two of the six master formulas of Section 7.4 from scratch — using algebraic partial fractions, and using a trigonometric substitution — because between them these two techniques (splitting a rational expression into simpler pieces, and substituting a trigonometric parametrisation to simplify a square root) are the two tactics that every other formula in Section 7.4 reduces to, once a quadratic has been completed to the square.
Step 1. Factor the denominator: , so . Write this as and clear denominators: .
Step 2. Match coefficients of and the constant term: and , giving and . Substituting back, , and integrating termwise gives , exactly formula (4).
Step 3. Now turn to , where partial fractions do not apply because the expression under the root is not a product of linear factors over the reals. Substitute , so and , so (taking on the relevant range).
Step 4. Substitute into the integral: . Since gives , the result is , exactly formula (5). The same substitution pattern — for a denominator, for under a root — produces every remaining formula in (4)–(5), which is why the six results, though they look unrelated at first glance, are really only two ideas applied six times.
Go deeper · Derivation B · 1 minIntegration by parts from the product rule, and the loop trick for e to the x sin x
The goal is to derive the integration-by-parts formula directly from the product rule for differentiation — no new axiom is needed, only integrating an identity that is already known — and then to apply the resulting formula to , an integral where naive integration by parts appears to run forever until the same integral reappears on the right-hand side and can be solved for algebraically, a signature technique tested heavily at JEE level.
Step 1. Start from the product rule: , valid for any two differentiable functions and . Integrate both sides with respect to : , using that integrating a derivative recovers the original function.
Step 2. Rearrange to isolate the integral of interest: . Writing and so that , this is exactly formula (6), the integration-by-parts rule — derived, not assumed.
Step 3. Apply it to , taking as the first function () and as the second (), so . Then . Call the new integral , so .
Step 4. Apply integration by parts to the same way, taking first and second: . Substitute this back into : , so , giving . The original integral reappeared on the right, with a minus sign, after two rounds of integration by parts, turning what looked like an infinite regress into a one-line algebraic equation — the same loop technique proves the shortcut formula by an identical two-step unwinding.
Go deeper · Derivation C · 1 minThe Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, from the area function to the evaluation shortcut
The goal is to give the standard reasoning — the argument used at board and JEE level, since NCERT itself states that a fully rigorous proof lies beyond the syllabus — for why the area function has derivative , and then to use that single fact to derive the practical shortcut that converts every definite integral into an arithmetic subtraction.
Step 1. Let be continuous on and define the area function for — the accumulated signed area under from the fixed point up to the moving point , as shown in the figure above.
Step 2. Consider a small increment . The difference equals , the extra sliver of area swept out as the right endpoint moves from to . Because is continuous, over the short interval the value of stays close to , so this sliver is well approximated by a thin rectangle of height and width : .
Step 3. Divide by and let : , since the approximation in Step 2 becomes exact in the limit (continuity is exactly what guarantees this). This is the First Fundamental Theorem: the area function is itself an antiderivative of .
Step 4. Now let be any antiderivative of . Since is also an antiderivative and antiderivatives of the same function differ by a constant, for some constant . Setting gives (by ), so . Setting gives , so . But is precisely the definite integral sought, so — the Second Fundamental Theorem, and the reason no definite integral in this book is ever evaluated by summing rectangles directly.
Go deeper · Derivation D · 1 minProperty P4 of definite integrals, and the even and odd function shortcuts
The goal is to derive property — that replacing by inside a definite integral over leaves its value unchanged — using nothing but a single change of variable, and then to specialise the argument to symmetric limits to derive the even and odd function shortcuts of , which let a definite integral be doubled or annihilated without finding any antiderivative at all.
Step 1. Start from and substitute , so . When , ; when , . The integral becomes , where the sign flip from exactly cancels the flip from reversing the limits (property ).
Step 2. The dummy variable can be renamed without changing the integral's value (property ), giving — property , proved by nothing more than one substitution.
Step 3. Specialise to symmetric limits: let , split at using as , and in the first piece substitute (so , limits become ): . Renaming to , .
Step 4. If is even, , so the bracket becomes and — the integral is computed over only half the interval and doubled. If is odd, , so the bracket is identically zero and without evaluating a single antiderivative — the positive and negative halves of the graph cancel exactly, which is why on sight (the integrand is odd), and why the same substitution used here, applied more generally via or and then added to the original integral, is the standard route to definite integrals such as , where appears explicitly and blocks direct antidifferentiation.
Worked examples
Board level - completing the square to a standard inverse-trigonometric form
Evaluate .
Step 1. Complete the square in the denominator: .
Step 2. Substitute , so , reducing the integral to the standard form , which matches formula (4) with .
Step 3. Apply the standard formula directly: . Answer: .
Board level - a definite integral evaluated by changing the limits under substitution
Evaluate .
Step 1. Substitute , so — exactly the combination sitting in the integrand — and change the limits immediately: when , ; when , .
Step 2. The integral becomes entirely a -integral with the new limits, no resubstitution to needed: .
Step 3. Evaluate at the limits: . Answer: .
Competitive level (JEE / NEET) - the self-referential integration-by-parts loop
Find .
Step 1. Take as the first function and as the second, so . Integration by parts gives , where .
Step 2. Apply integration by parts to the same way — first, second, so — giving .
Step 3. Substitute back: , so , and . Answer: . Timing note: about ninety seconds once the loop is recognised. The trap is switching which function is "first" between the two rounds — keep first both times, since swapping regenerates the same integral with the opposite sign instead of the same integral you started with, and the algebra never closes. Recognise the pattern instantly and commit to the loop rather than searching for a substitution; JEE frequently disguises this as or similar, solved by the identical two-round trick.
Competitive level (JEE / NEET) - a definite integral collapsed by the a+b-x property
Evaluate .
Step 1. Apply property with , , so : replace by throughout the integrand. Since , this gives .
Step 2. Rationalise the new integrand: , so .
Step 3. Add this to the original expression for : .
Step 4. Solve for : . Answer: . Timing note: under two minutes once is recognised, and it is entirely algebra-free — no antiderivative of is ever found, or needs to exist in closed form. The signal to look for is limits that sum to a recognisable angle ( here) paired with an integrand that turns into a companion expression (here ) under ; whenever adding the original and transformed integrands produces something constant, the property will collapse the problem instantly.
Common traps
Dropping the constant of integration , or writing it twice. Every indefinite integral is a family of curves, not one curve; forgetting loses marks even when the "shape" of the answer is right, and after a definite integral is evaluated, must not reappear at all — it cancels automatically in and should never be written in a numerical final answer.
Losing the absolute value in logarithmic integrals. , not — the domain of excludes negative numbers, but is defined for all . The same care is needed in every partial-fraction and standard-form answer that produces a logarithm.
Choosing the wrong "first function" in integration by parts. Picking as first and as second in increases the power of instead of eliminating it, sending the calculation in the wrong direction; the ILATE priority exists precisely to avoid this trap.
Forgetting to change the limits during substitution in a definite integral. If the variable is changed from to , either change the limits to the corresponding -values and finish entirely in , or resubstitute back to before applying the original limits — mixing the two (new limits with the old variable, or vice versa) gives a wrong numerical answer even when every other step is correct.
Misusing the properties / in the wrong direction, or on the wrong interval. and replace by (or ) only when the limits themselves are and (or and ) — applying the substitution with the wrong pair of numbers, or forgetting that the technique requires adding the transformed integral to the original one to make progress, is the single most common way these otherwise-powerful shortcuts are misapplied.
Assuming a rational function is proper before decomposing it. If the numerator's degree is not less than the denominator's, partial fractions cannot be applied directly — long division must strip off the polynomial part first, or the coefficient-matching step will not have a consistent solution.
You should be able to…
- State the definition of an antiderivative and explain why the indefinite integral must always include an arbitrary constant .
- Recall and apply the full list of standard integrals — powers, trigonometric, exponential, logarithmic, and inverse-trigonometric forms — directly from memory.
- Decide which technique (inspection, substitution, a trigonometric identity, partial fractions, or integration by parts) fits a given integrand, and justify the choice.
- Complete the square on any quadratic and reduce the resulting integral to one of the six standard forms in (4)-(5).
- Decompose a proper rational function into partial fractions for all five standard denominator patterns, and reduce an improper one first by long division.
- Apply integration by parts correctly using the ILATE priority, including the shortcut and the self-referential loop used for integrals like .
- State both parts of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus and use the second part to evaluate any definite integral whose antiderivative is known.
- Evaluate a definite integral by substitution while correctly changing the limits of integration, without needing to resubstitute back to the original variable.
- Apply the eight properties through of definite integrals, especially the substitution and the even/odd shortcuts, to integrals that resist direct antidifferentiation.
Ask the tutor: Want to work through a batch of mixed integration-technique problems, starting from spotting which method fits and finishing with a full solution?
Why do we always add plus C to an indefinite integral but never to a definite integral?
An indefinite integral represents an entire family of antiderivatives — every function whose derivative is — and since any two of them differ by a constant, that constant has to be written to show the answer is the whole family, not one member of it. A definite integral , by contrast, is a single number: when you compute , the appears in both and and cancels exactly when you subtract, which is why the Second Fundamental Theorem lets you drop entirely while finding the antiderivative for a definite integral. Writing in a definite integral's final numeric answer is always a mistake.
How do I know whether to use substitution, partial fractions, or integration by parts on a given integral?
Look at the shape first. If the integrand contains a function together with a recognisable multiple of its own derivative (like next to , or next to ), try substitution. If the integrand is a ratio of polynomials, check whether it is proper, then decompose it using partial fractions — this is the only reliable method for rational functions whose denominator factors. If the integrand is a product of two structurally different functions (a polynomial with a trig function, a log, an exponential, or an inverse trig function) where neither factor's derivative appears elsewhere, integration by parts is almost always the route, with ILATE guiding which factor to differentiate first. Many JEE-level integrals combine two of these in sequence — a substitution first to expose a standard form, then partial fractions or parts on what remains.
Why does the integral of 1 over x need an absolute value when the derivative of log x does not?
Because the two functions have different domains. is only defined for , so when you differentiate it you automatically stay inside that domain and is unambiguous there. But itself is defined for every , including negative numbers, and integration is expected to recover an antiderivative valid on the whole domain of the integrand. For negative , as well, so works there. Combining both cases into one formula gives , valid and correct on both halves of the domain at once — dropping the absolute value silently loses the entire negative- branch of the antiderivative.
In a definite integral solved by substitution, do I have to convert back to x before plugging in the limits?
No, and in fact it is usually faster not to. There are two equally correct routes: either change the limits of integration to match the new variable at the moment you substitute (so you finish the whole calculation in the new variable and never need to go back to ), or keep the original limits and resubstitute back to before plugging them in. The mistake to avoid is mixing the two — using the new variable's formula but the old variable's limits, or vice versa. NCERT's own convention, and the faster exam habit, is to change the limits immediately and never resubstitute.
Why do so many JEE integrals suddenly become solvable using the property that turns x into a plus b minus x?
Because that single substitution, property (or its special case ), leaves the limits of a definite integral completely unchanged while transforming the integrand into a companion expression — and when you add the original integral to this transformed version, awkward pieces (very often the variable itself, when it multiplies a trigonometric function, or a square root that pairs with its reciprocal-looking partner) cancel or combine into something constant. The result is that you never need to find an antiderivative of the original integrand at all; you only need the antiderivative of whatever remains after the two versions are added, which is often just . This is why so many definite integrals that look impossible to integrate directly turn out to have very short, clean solutions once you spot the symmetry.