Electromagnetic Waves

Point a television at a dead channel, tune a car radio, or simply open your eyes in daylight, and you are using the same physics: a coupled electric and magnetic field travelling through empty space at 3×108 m/s3\times10^8\ \text{m/s}. Radio waves, microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, X-rays and gamma rays look utterly different in how we make and detect them, yet they are one family — electromagnetic waves — differing only in wavelength and frequency. This chapter tells the story of how that unification was discovered on paper before it was ever confirmed in a laboratory. The trigger was a small crack James Clerk Maxwell found in Ampere's circuital law. Charging a capacitor with a steady current seemed to produce a magnetic field that depended on which imaginary surface you used to calculate it — an outright contradiction. Maxwell's fix was to notice that a changing electric field between the plates behaves exactly like a current for the purpose of producing a magnetic field. He called it the displacement current, and adding it to Ampere's law restored consistency and, remarkably, symmetry: just as a changing magnetic field creates an electric field (Faraday's law, Chapter 6), a changing electric field creates a magnetic field. Two time-varying fields that regenerate each other can then travel through space on their own, needing no wire, no charge nearby, not even a medium. Maxwell calculated the speed of this self-sustaining disturbance from purely electric and magnetic constants, μ0\mu_0 and ε0\varepsilon_0, and got almost exactly the measured speed of light — the moment light stopped being a separate mystery and became an electromagnetic wave. This article rebuilds that reasoning end to end: why Ampere's law needed a new term, how the Ampere-Maxwell law and Maxwell's four equations complete the classical theory of electricity and magnetism, why only accelerating charges radiate, how the transverse, mutually perpendicular electric and magnetic fields of a plane wave are written down and manipulated, and how the vast electromagnetic spectrum — from kilometre-long radio waves to gamma rays a million times smaller than an atomic nucleus — is organised by wavelength alone. Three worked derivations and three worked numericals connect every formula to the kind of question that actually appears on CBSE boards and in JEE/NEET.

Key takeaways
  • Ampere's circuital law is incomplete without displacement current. A changing electric field between capacitor plates acts as a source of magnetic field exactly like a real current: id=ε0 dΦE/dti_d = \varepsilon_0\, d\Phi_E/dt.
  • The Ampere-Maxwell law fixes the inconsistency. ∮B⃗⋅dl⃗=μ0ic+μ0ε0 dΦE/dt\oint \vec B \cdot d\vec l = \mu_0 i_c + \mu_0\varepsilon_0\, d\Phi_E/dt gives the same magnetic field no matter which surface bounded by the loop is used.
  • Maxwell's four equations in vacuum unify all of electromagnetism: Gauss's law for E, Gauss's law for B (no magnetic monopoles), Faraday's law, and the Ampere-Maxwell law.
  • Only accelerated charges radiate electromagnetic waves. A charge oscillating at frequency ν\nu produces an electromagnetic wave of the very same frequency ν\nu; stationary or uniformly moving charges do not radiate.
  • Electromagnetic waves are transverse and self-sustaining. E⃗\vec E and B⃗\vec B oscillate sinusoidally, perpendicular to each other and to the direction of propagation, regenerating each other with no material medium needed.
  • The speed comes out of the fields themselves. c=1/μ0ε0≈3.0×108 m/sc = 1/\sqrt{\mu_0\varepsilon_0} \approx 3.0\times10^8\ \text{m/s}, and the field amplitudes are locked together by B0=E0/cB_0 = E_0/c.
  • In a medium the speed drops. v=1/μεv = 1/\sqrt{\mu\varepsilon}, with μ\mu and ε\varepsilon the medium's permeability and permittivity, which is why light bends on entering glass.
  • The electromagnetic spectrum is one family sorted by wavelength, from radio waves (>0.1 m>0.1\ \text{m}) through microwaves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet, X-rays, to gamma rays (<10−3 nm<10^{-3}\ \text{nm}), with no sharp boundaries between neighbours.
  • The average energy densities of the E and B fields are equal in an electromagnetic wave, each contributing half the total energy the wave carries.
  • Key idea: a time-varying electric field produces a magnetic field exactly as a current does (displacement current), so oscillating E and B fields regenerate each other and propagate through vacuum at c = 1/√(μ₀ε₀) as a self-sustaining, transverse electromagnetic wave, of which visible light is just one narrow band.
The core insight

A changing electric field acts as a source of magnetic field (Maxwell's displacement current), so oscillating, mutually perpendicular electric and magnetic fields regenerate each other and propagate through vacuum at the fixed speed c=1/μ0ε0≈3×108 m/sc = 1/\sqrt{\mu_0\varepsilon_0} \approx 3\times10^8\ \text{m/s}, forming the single family of electromagnetic waves that spans radio waves to gamma rays, with visible light as one narrow slice.

What this chapter covers

This article follows the chapter's own two-part structure. The first half fixes Ampere's circuital law: the contradiction that arises when charging a capacitor, the displacement current that resolves it, the corrected Ampere-Maxwell law, and all four of Maxwell's equations in vacuum, which with the Lorentz force law complete classical electromagnetism. The second half turns to electromagnetic waves themselves — why only accelerated charges radiate, why the fields are transverse and locked together by B0=E0/cB_0 = E_0/c, how the wave speed c=1/μ0ε0c = 1/\sqrt{\mu_0\varepsilon_0} emerges from the fields' own equations, and how a medium slows the wave once μ0,ε0\mu_0, \varepsilon_0 are replaced by μ,ε\mu, \varepsilon. The chapter closes with the electromagnetic spectrum — the seven named bands from radio waves to gamma rays, their production, detection and everyday uses. Three derivations make the displacement current, the wave speed, and the E-B energy-sharing rigorous; three worked examples apply all of it numerically, in the style of NCERT's own Examples 8.1, 8.2 and its end-of-chapter exercises.

The core ideas

Ampere's circuital law runs into a contradiction

Ampere's circuital law from Chapter 4 states that the line integral of the magnetic field around any closed loop equals μ0\mu_0 times the current threading that loop:

∮B⃗⋅dl⃗=μ0 i(t).(1)\oint \vec B \cdot d\vec l = \mu_0\, i(t). \qquad (1)

where: the integral is taken around a closed path, and i(t)i(t) is the current passing through any surface bounded by that path. Ordinarily it does not matter which surface you pick — a flat disc or a bulging balloon-shaped surface with the same rim give the same threading current, because charge is conserved and current is continuous along a wire. Now consider a parallel-plate capacitor being charged by a time-dependent current i(t)i(t). Draw a circular loop of radius rr around the connecting wire, well outside the plates, to find the magnetic field at a point PP on that loop. A flat disc bounded by this loop is pierced by the wire, so Equation (1) gives B(2πr)=μ0i(t)B(2\pi r) = \mu_0 i(t). But bulge the same-rimmed surface into a pot-like or tiffin-box shape that dips between the plates without touching the wire: no conduction current pierces it at all, so Ampere's law now predicts B=0B = 0 at the very same point PP. Same loop, same physical setup, two different answers, depending purely on an arbitrary choice of surface. Something is missing from Equation (1), and it must be found between the plates, the only place the two calculations disagree.

The displacement current

The missing ingredient is the electric field between the plates. If the plates have area AA and instantaneous charge QQ, the field between them is E=Q/(ε0A)E = Q/(\varepsilon_0 A) (uniform, perpendicular to the plates), so the electric flux through the bulging surface is

ΦE=EA=Qε0.(2)\Phi_E = EA = \frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0}. \qquad (2)

As the capacitor charges, QQ changes with time at the rate i=dQ/dti = dQ/dt, so differentiating Equation (2) gives ε0 dΦE/dt=dQ/dt=i\varepsilon_0\, d\Phi_E/dt = dQ/dt = i. This changing electric flux, multiplied by ε0\varepsilon_0, has exactly the units and the value of a current, and Maxwell proposed that it acts as a genuine source of magnetic field in its own right. He named it the displacement current:

id=ε0dΦEdt.(3)i_d = \varepsilon_0 \frac{d\Phi_E}{dt}. \qquad (3)

where: ΦE\Phi_E is the electric flux through the surface in question and ε0=8.854×10−12 C2N−1m−2\varepsilon_0 = 8.854\times10^{-12}\ \text{C}^2\text{N}^{-1}\text{m}^{-2} is the permittivity of free space. Outside the plates there is only conduction current (ic=ii_c = i, id=0i_d = 0); between the plates it is the reverse (ic=0i_c = 0, id=ii_d = i). Every surface bounded by the loop, however it bulges, now carries the same total current ic+idi_c + i_d, and the contradiction disappears.

Figure
A parallel plate capacitor being charged by a current, with a circular Amperian loop around the wire and two alternative bounding surfaces, a flat disc pierced by the conduction current and a pot shaped surface passing between the plates pierced instead by the changing electric flux, both giving the same magnetic field once displacement current is included
Two surfaces, same loop rim — Ampere's law needs displacement current flat disc: pierced by conduction current i i(t) P B circulates around loop capacitor B(2πr) = μ0 ic pot surface: dips between the plates i(t) P E field, changing flux B(2πr) = μ0 id, id = ε0 dΦE/dt = i Same rim, same current i, same field B at P — the contradiction is resolved by adding id to Ampere's law.

The Ampere-Maxwell law and Maxwell's equations in vacuum

Generalising Equation (1) to include displacement current gives the corrected law, valid for any surface bounded by the loop:

∮B⃗⋅dl⃗=μ0ic+μ0ε0dΦEdt.(4)\oint \vec B \cdot d\vec l = \mu_0 i_c + \mu_0\varepsilon_0 \frac{d\Phi_E}{dt}. \qquad (4)

where: ici_c is the conduction current (moving charges) and the second term is μ0\mu_0 times the displacement current of Equation (3). This is the Ampere-Maxwell law: displacement current has exactly the same physical effect as conduction current, sourcing a magnetic field circulating around it by the right-hand rule, and it can exist entirely alone with no conduction current nearby — precisely the case between capacitor plates, and, as the next section shows, in the empty space an electromagnetic wave travels through. Maxwell's achievement was to collect four such equations, which together with the Lorentz force law F⃗=qE⃗+qv⃗×B⃗\vec F = q\vec E + q\vec v \times \vec B express the entire classical theory of electricity and magnetism:

∮E⃗⋅dA⃗=Qε0(Gauss’s law for electricity)\oint \vec E \cdot d\vec A = \frac{Q}{\varepsilon_0} \quad \text{(Gauss's law for electricity)}
∮B⃗⋅dA⃗=0(Gauss’s law for magnetism)\oint \vec B \cdot d\vec A = 0 \quad \text{(Gauss's law for magnetism)}
∮E⃗⋅dl⃗=−dΦBdt(Faraday’s law)\oint \vec E \cdot d\vec l = -\frac{d\Phi_B}{dt} \quad \text{(Faraday's law)}
∮B⃗⋅dl⃗=μ0ic+μ0ε0dΦEdt(Ampere-Maxwell law)\oint \vec B \cdot d\vec l = \mu_0 i_c + \mu_0\varepsilon_0 \frac{d\Phi_E}{dt} \quad \text{(Ampere-Maxwell law)}

where: the second equation states that magnetic field lines never begin or end, since isolated magnetic monopoles analogous to electric charge have never been found — the one asymmetry left in an otherwise symmetric set of four laws. The third and fourth equations together state the symmetry plainly: a changing magnetic field produces an electric field (Faraday), and, Maxwell's addition, a changing electric field produces a magnetic field (Ampere-Maxwell). Time-varying EE and BB thus continuously regenerate each other — the mechanism behind every electromagnetic wave.

Sources of electromagnetic waves: only accelerated charges radiate

Neither a stationary charge nor a charge in uniform motion (a steady current) radiates an electromagnetic wave. A stationary charge produces only a static electric field; a steady current produces a magnetic field that does not change with time, and an unchanging field cannot regenerate anything through Faraday's or the Ampere-Maxwell law. Only when a charge accelerates — speeds up, slows down, or changes direction — does its field change with time in a way that keeps propagating outward. The simplest case is a charge oscillating harmonically at frequency ν\nu: it produces an oscillating electric field, which by the Ampere-Maxwell law produces an oscillating magnetic field, which by Faraday's law produces an oscillating electric field further out, and so on, the two fields regenerating each other as the disturbance spreads at speed cc. The radiated frequency exactly equals the source's oscillation frequency, and the wave's energy is drawn from the accelerating charge's own energy — an oscillating electric dipole is the most basic radiating source, and the working principle behind every transmitting antenna. Demonstrating this with an oscillating circuit tuned to visible light is hopeless in practice: yellow light oscillates at about 6×1014 Hz6\times10^{14}\ \text{Hz}, while even modern circuits struggle past 1011 Hz10^{11}\ \text{Hz}. Heinrich Hertz instead worked in the radio-wave region in 1887, generating and detecting metre-wavelength electromagnetic waves whose reflection, refraction and speed matched Maxwell's predictions exactly — the first experimental proof of Maxwell's theory. J. C. Bose, in Calcutta seven years later, produced still shorter waves (25 mm to 5 mm), and Marconi transmitted electromagnetic waves over many kilometres, founding wireless communication.

Nature of electromagnetic waves: transverse and mutually perpendicular

For a plane electromagnetic wave travelling along the zz-direction, the electric field oscillates along xx and the magnetic field oscillates along yy, both varying sinusoidally with zz at any fixed instant:

Ex=E0sin⁡(kz−ωt),By=B0sin⁡(kz−ωt).(5)E_x = E_0 \sin(kz - \omega t), \qquad B_y = B_0 \sin(kz - \omega t). \qquad (5)

where: E0E_0 and B0B_0 are the field amplitudes, k=2π/λk = 2\pi/\lambda is the magnitude of the wave vector (its direction gives the direction of propagation), λ\lambda is the wavelength, and ω\omega is the angular frequency; the speed of propagation is ω/k\omega/k. The essential geometric fact — already visible in the capacitor picture, where the E field between the plates is perpendicular to the plates and the displacement-current B field circulates parallel to them — is that E⃗\vec E, B⃗\vec B and the propagation direction are mutually perpendicular at every point: the wave is transverse, propagating along E⃗×B⃗\vec E \times \vec B. Substituting Equation (5) into Maxwell's equations gives two further results. First, the wave speed is fixed by the electric and magnetic constants alone:

ω=ck,c=1μ0ε0.(6)\omega = ck, \qquad c = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu_0\varepsilon_0}}. \qquad (6)

where: μ0=4π×10−7 T m/A\mu_0 = 4\pi\times10^{-7}\ \text{T m/A} is the permeability of free space. Written in terms of frequency ν=ω/2π\nu = \omega/2\pi and wavelength λ=2π/k\lambda = 2\pi/k, this is the familiar wave relation νλ=c\nu\lambda = c. Second, the two field amplitudes are locked together, not independent:

B0=E0c.(7)B_0 = \frac{E_0}{c}. \qquad (7)

Electromagnetic waves are self-sustaining oscillations of E⃗\vec E and B⃗\vec B that need no material medium at all — unlike sound or water waves, there is nothing physically vibrating in the usual sense, just the fields themselves. If a medium of permittivity ε\varepsilon and permeability μ\mu is actually present, these constants replace ε0\varepsilon_0 and μ0\mu_0 and the wave slows to

v=1με,(8)v = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\mu\varepsilon}}, \qquad (8)

which is why light travels slower in glass or water than in vacuum, and is the physical basis of refractive index (Chapter 9). The vacuum speed cc is measured to be independent of wavelength to within a few metres per second — a constancy so well established that cc is now used to define the metre.

Figure
A linearly polarised electromagnetic wave travelling along the z direction, with the electric field oscillating sinusoidally along the x axis and the magnetic field oscillating sinusoidally along the y axis, ninety degrees apart in orientation but in phase, both fields tracing out a sine wave as a function of z
A plane electromagnetic wave — E along x, B along y, propagating along z z Ex (electric field, x direction) By (magnetic field, y direction, into/out of page sense) x y Ex = E0 sin(kz - ωt), By = B0 sin(kz - ωt), with B0 = E0 / c and E perpendicular to B perpendicular to z

The electromagnetic spectrum

The classification of electromagnetic waves by frequency (equivalently wavelength) is the electromagnetic spectrum. There is no sharp cut-off between neighbouring bands; the names reflect mainly how the waves are produced and detected, not any fundamental physical difference — every band obeys exactly the same Equations (5) to (8).

typewavelength rangetypical productiontypical detection or use
radio waves>0.1 m> 0.1\ \text{m}accelerated charges in aerials, oscillating circuitsreceiver aerials; AM 530 kHz to 1710 kHz, FM 88 to 108 MHz, TV 54 to 890 MHz
microwaves0.1 m0.1\ \text{m} to 1 mm1\ \text{mm}klystron, magnetron, Gunn dioderadar, microwave ovens (tuned to water's resonance), point-contact diodes
infrared1 mm1\ \text{mm} to 700 nm700\ \text{nm}vibration of hot atoms and moleculesthermopiles, bolometers; greenhouse effect, remote controls, physiotherapy
visible light700 nm700\ \text{nm} to 400 nm400\ \text{nm}electrons in atoms dropping to a lower energy levelthe eye, photocells, photographic film
ultraviolet400 nm400\ \text{nm} to 1 nm1\ \text{nm}very hot bodies, special lamps, the Sunphotocells; absorbed by ordinary glass and by the ozone layer at 40 to 50 km altitude
X-rays1 nm1\ \text{nm} to 10−3 nm10^{-3}\ \text{nm}electrons bombarding a metal target; inner-shell transitionsmedical imaging and cancer therapy; Geiger tubes, ionisation chambers
gamma rays<10−3 nm< 10^{-3}\ \text{nm}radioactive decay of nuclei, nuclear reactionsmedicine (destroying cancer cells); ionisation chambers

A few details are worth holding onto. Infrared waves are called heat waves because water and CO2\text{CO}_2 molecules absorb them readily, raising internal (thermal) energy — the mechanism behind the greenhouse effect and physiotherapy lamps. Ultraviolet in excess causes skin tanning and sunburn and is largely blocked by the ozone layer, so its depletion by chlorofluorocarbons is an international concern; welders wear UV-blocking goggles for this reason. X-rays, made by decelerating high-energy electrons at a metal target, damage living tissue, so medical use is carefully dose-controlled.

Figure
A horizontal ladder of the electromagnetic spectrum arranged by decreasing wavelength from gamma rays through X-rays, ultraviolet, visible light, infrared, microwaves to radio waves, with approximate wavelength values marked at each boundary
The electromagnetic spectrum — one family, sorted by wavelength gamma X-ray UV visible infrared microwave radio waves 10-14 m 10-9 m 4x10-7 m 7x10-7 m 10-3 m 0.1 m 106 m increasing wavelength, decreasing frequency, decreasing photon energy, left to right All bands travel at the same speed c in vacuum; boundaries are not sharp, only conventional. Visible light, the narrow slice the eye detects, runs only from about 400 nm to 700 nm.

Energy carried by an electromagnetic wave

Electromagnetic waves matter technologically above all because they carry energy — radio and TV signals, and, most vitally, sunlight carrying energy from the Sun to the Earth. The instantaneous energy density in the electric field alone is uE=12ε0E2u_E = \tfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 E^2, and in the magnetic field alone uB=B2/2μ0u_B = B^2/2\mu_0, exactly as in Chapters 2 and 6. Because B0=E0/cB_0 = E_0/c, the two are equal on time-average (proved below), so each field carries exactly half the wave's total energy — which also gives the wave's intensity (average energy per unit area per unit time), I=12ε0cE02I = \tfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 c E_0^2. Beyond this chapter, an electromagnetic wave also carries momentum, p=U/cp = U/c for absorbed energy UU, which is why sunlight exerts a tiny but measurable radiation pressure.

Derivation ADisplacement current from the capacitor-charging paradox

The goal is to derive the exact expression for displacement current, id=ε0 dΦE/dti_d = \varepsilon_0\, d\Phi_E/dt, starting only from Gauss's law for a parallel-plate capacitor and the definition of current as rate of flow of charge — the route Maxwell himself used to patch Ampere's circuital law. The subtlety to track is where the electric flux is evaluated, and why it must equal the same conduction current charging the plates, so the flat-surface and bulging-surface calculations are forced to agree.

Step 1. Write the electric field between the plates using Gauss's law. For a parallel-plate capacitor of plate area AA carrying charge QQ, the field between the plates is uniform, perpendicular to the plates, E=Q/(ε0A)E = Q/(\varepsilon_0 A), and essentially zero outside — the same result used throughout electrostatics (Chapter 2).

Step 2. Compute the electric flux through a flat surface SS lying entirely between the plates, parallel to them, with area equal to the plate area AA. Since EE is uniform over SS and zero outside it, ΦE=EA=Qε0A×A=Qε0\Phi_E = EA = \dfrac{Q}{\varepsilon_0 A} \times A = \dfrac{Q}{\varepsilon_0}.

Step 3. Differentiate with respect to time, since QQ changes as the capacitor charges: dΦEdt=1ε0dQdt\dfrac{d\Phi_E}{dt} = \dfrac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{dQ}{dt}. But dQ/dtdQ/dt is, by definition, the conduction current ici_c in the wire feeding the plates, so ε0 dΦE/dt=dQ/dt=ic\varepsilon_0\, d\Phi_E/dt = dQ/dt = i_c.

Step 4. Identify the new source term, id≡ε0 dΦE/dti_d \equiv \varepsilon_0\, d\Phi_E/dt. Step 3 shows id=ici_d = i_c numerically for the capacitor, even though no charge physically crosses the gap. Because idi_d has exactly the value needed to replace the "missing" current on the bulging surface, adding it to Ampere's law as ∮B⃗⋅dl⃗=μ0(ic+id)\oint \vec B\cdot d\vec l = \mu_0(i_c + i_d) makes the calculated BB independent of which bounding surface is chosen — the flat disc sees ici_c and no idi_d, the bulging surface sees idi_d and no ici_c, both totals μ0i\mu_0 i. Displacement current is thus not a flow of charge; it is a bookkeeping term, equal to a rate of change of electric flux, with the same magnetic effect as a real current.

Go deeper · Derivation B · 2 minSpeed of an electromagnetic wave from Maxwell's equations
Derivation BSpeed of an electromagnetic wave from Maxwell's equations

The goal is to show that c=1/μ0ε0c = 1/\sqrt{\mu_0\varepsilon_0} and B0=E0/cB_0 = E_0/c, both simply stated as facts by NCERT, fall directly out of Faraday's law and the Ampere-Maxwell law once a travelling-wave form is assumed for EE and BB. This turns "electric and magnetic fields regenerate each other" from a qualitative story into a specific, checkable number — the speed of light.

Step 1. Apply Faraday's law, ∮E⃗⋅dl⃗=−dΦB/dt\oint \vec E \cdot d\vec l = -d\Phi_B/dt, to a thin rectangular loop in the xzxz-plane straddling the wave as it moves along zz, with ExE_x the only nonzero field along the loop's sides. Working through the loop integral, exactly as for a changing BB inducing an emf in Chapter 6, gives a local relation: how steeply ExE_x varies with position zz equals minus how fast ByB_y varies with time, at the same point and instant.

Step 2. Apply the Ampere-Maxwell law with no conduction current (empty space), ∮B⃗⋅dl⃗=μ0ε0 dΦE/dt\oint \vec B\cdot d\vec l = \mu_0\varepsilon_0\, d\Phi_E/dt, to a second thin loop in the yzyz-plane. The matching bookkeeping gives: minus how steeply ByB_y varies with zz equals μ0ε0\mu_0\varepsilon_0 times how fast ExE_x varies with time.

Step 3. Combine Steps 1 and 2 into one equation for ExE_x alone. Differentiating the Step 1 relation once more with respect to zz and substituting Step 2 for the resulting time-derivative eliminates ByB_y entirely, leaving the classic wave equation: the second rate of change of ExE_x with zz equals μ0ε0\mu_0\varepsilon_0 times its second rate of change with tt. Comparing this to the standard wave equation (Class XI, Chapter 14) identifies v2=1/(μ0ε0)v^2 = 1/(\mu_0\varepsilon_0), so c=1/μ0ε0c = 1/\sqrt{\mu_0\varepsilon_0} — fixed purely by the electric and magnetic constants of free space.

Step 4. Extract the amplitude relation. Substituting Ex=E0sin⁡(kz−ωt)E_x = E_0\sin(kz-\omega t) and By=B0sin⁡(kz−ωt)B_y = B_0\sin(kz-\omega t) into the Step 1 relation cancels a common cos⁡(kz−ωt)\cos(kz-\omega t) factor on both sides, leaving E0k=ωB0E_0 k = \omega B_0. Since ω/k=c\omega/k = c, this rearranges to B0=E0k/ω=E0/cB_0 = E_0 k/\omega = E_0/c — the field amplitudes are locked together the moment the wave speed is fixed. Numeric check: μ0ε0=(4π×10−7)(8.854×10−12)=1.1127×10−17 s2/m2\mu_0\varepsilon_0 = (4\pi\times10^{-7})(8.854\times10^{-12}) = 1.1127\times10^{-17}\ \text{s}^2/\text{m}^2, so c=1/1.1127×10−17=2.998×108 m/sc = 1/\sqrt{1.1127\times10^{-17}} = 2.998\times10^{8}\ \text{m/s}, matching the independently measured speed of light to five figures — the result that convinced Maxwell that light itself is an electromagnetic wave.

Go deeper · Derivation C · 1 minThe average energy densities of the E and B fields are equal
Derivation CThe average energy densities of the E and B fields are equal

The goal is to prove, using only the standard energy-density formulas from electrostatics and magnetostatics, a fact stated without proof in the chapter's own end-of-chapter exercise: for an electromagnetic wave, the time-averaged energy density in the electric field equals that in the magnetic field, so each carries exactly half the wave's total energy — even though E0E_0 in volts per metre looks numerically much larger than B0B_0 in tesla.

Step 1. Write the instantaneous energy densities, exactly as in electrostatics (Chapter 2) and magnetostatics (Chapter 5): uE=12ε0Ex2u_E = \tfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 E_x^2 and uB=By2/(2μ0)u_B = B_y^2/(2\mu_0), each evaluated at the same point and instant.

Step 2. Substitute the wave forms Ex=E0sin⁡(kz−ωt)E_x = E_0\sin(kz-\omega t), By=B0sin⁡(kz−ωt)B_y = B_0\sin(kz-\omega t): uE=12ε0E02sin⁡2(kz−ωt)u_E = \tfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 E_0^2\sin^2(kz-\omega t) and uB=B022μ0sin⁡2(kz−ωt)u_B = \dfrac{B_0^2}{2\mu_0}\sin^2(kz-\omega t) — both oscillate with the same sin⁡2\sin^2 pattern, in phase, since ExE_x and ByB_y vanish and peak together.

Step 3. Time-average each, using sin⁡2\sin^2 averaging to 12\tfrac{1}{2} over a full cycle: ⟨uE⟩=14ε0E02\langle u_E\rangle = \tfrac{1}{4}\varepsilon_0 E_0^2 and ⟨uB⟩=B024μ0\langle u_B\rangle = \dfrac{B_0^2}{4\mu_0}.

Step 4. Substitute B0=E0/cB_0 = E_0/c and c2=1/(μ0ε0)c^2 = 1/(\mu_0\varepsilon_0) into ⟨uB⟩\langle u_B\rangle: ⟨uB⟩=(E0/c)24μ0=E02μ0ε04μ0=ε0E024=⟨uE⟩\langle u_B\rangle = \dfrac{(E_0/c)^2}{4\mu_0} = \dfrac{E_0^2 \mu_0\varepsilon_0}{4\mu_0} = \dfrac{\varepsilon_0 E_0^2}{4} = \langle u_E\rangle. The averages are identical, so the total average energy density is ⟨u⟩=12ε0E02\langle u\rangle = \tfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 E_0^2, and intensity — energy crossing unit area per unit time — is this times the wave speed, I=c⟨u⟩=12ε0cE02I = c\langle u\rangle = \tfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon_0 c E_0^2.

Worked examples

Board level - electric field to magnetic field in a plane wave

A plane electromagnetic wave of frequency 25 MHz25\ \text{MHz} travels in free space along the xx-direction. At a particular point in space and time, E⃗=6.3 j^ V/m\vec E = 6.3\, \hat{j}\ \text{V/m}. What is B⃗\vec B at this point, and what is the wavelength of the wave?

Step 1. Find the magnitude of BB using B0=E0/cB_0 = E_0/c: B=6.3 V/m3×108 m/s=2.1×10−8 TB = \dfrac{6.3\ \text{V/m}}{3\times10^8\ \text{m/s}} = 2.1\times10^{-8}\ \text{T}.

Step 2. Find the direction of B⃗\vec B. The wave propagates along +x+x, and E⃗\vec E is along +y+y (j^\hat{j}). Since E⃗\vec E, B⃗\vec B and the propagation direction are mutually perpendicular with propagation along E⃗×B⃗\vec E\times\vec B, and j^×k^=i^\hat{j}\times\hat{k} = \hat{i}, the magnetic field must point along k^\hat{k}, the zz-direction.

Step 3. Find the wavelength from c=νλc = \nu\lambda: λ=c/ν=(3×108)/(25×106)=12 m\lambda = c/\nu = (3\times10^8)/(25\times10^6) = 12\ \text{m}. Answer: B⃗=2.1×10−8 k^ T\vec B = 2.1\times10^{-8}\, \hat{k}\ \text{T}, and the wavelength is 12 m12\ \text{m}.

Board level - full wave description from the electric field amplitude

The electric field amplitude of an electromagnetic wave in vacuum is E0=120 N/CE_0 = 120\ \text{N/C} and its frequency is ν=50.0 MHz\nu = 50.0\ \text{MHz}. The wave travels along the xx-direction with EE along yy and BB along zz. Determine B0B_0, ω\omega, kk and λ\lambda, and write expressions for EE and BB.

Step 1. Field amplitude: B0=E0/c=120/(3×108)=4.0×10−7 TB_0 = E_0/c = 120/(3\times10^8) = 4.0\times10^{-7}\ \text{T}.

Step 2. Angular frequency: ω=2πν=2π×(5.0×107)=3.14×108 rad/s\omega = 2\pi\nu = 2\pi\times(5.0\times10^7) = 3.14\times10^8\ \text{rad/s}.

Step 3. Wavelength and wave number: λ=c/ν=(3×108)/(5.0×107)=6.0 m\lambda = c/\nu = (3\times10^8)/(5.0\times10^7) = 6.0\ \text{m}, so k=2π/λ=2π/6.0=1.05 rad/mk = 2\pi/\lambda = 2\pi/6.0 = 1.05\ \text{rad/m} (a quick check: ω/k=3.14×108/1.05=3.0×108 m/s=c\omega/k = 3.14\times10^8/1.05 = 3.0\times10^8\ \text{m/s} = c, confirming consistency).

Step 4. Assemble the expressions, taking propagation along xx this time (so kz−ωtkz-\omega t becomes kx−ωtkx - \omega t): Ey=120sin⁡(1.05x−3.14×108t) V/mE_y = 120\sin(1.05x - 3.14\times10^8 t)\ \text{V/m} and Bz=4.0×10−7sin⁡(1.05x−3.14×108t) TB_z = 4.0\times10^{-7}\sin(1.05x - 3.14\times10^8 t)\ \text{T}. Answer: B0=4.0×10−7 TB_0 = 4.0\times10^{-7}\ \text{T}, ω=3.14×108 rad/s\omega = 3.14\times10^8\ \text{rad/s}, k=1.05 rad/mk = 1.05\ \text{rad/m}, λ=6.0 m\lambda = 6.0\ \text{m}, with EE and BB as written above.

Competitive level (JEE / NEET) - displacement current and the magnetic field inside a charging capacitor

A parallel-plate capacitor made of circular plates, each of radius R=6.0 cmR = 6.0\ \text{cm}, has capacitance C=100 pFC = 100\ \text{pF}. It is connected to a 230 V230\ \text{V} AC supply of angular frequency ω=300 rad/s\omega = 300\ \text{rad/s}. Find (a) the rms conduction current, (b) whether it equals the displacement current, and (c) the amplitude of BB at a point r=3.0 cmr = 3.0\ \text{cm} from the axis, between the plates.

Step 1. Find the rms conduction current using the capacitive relation Irms=Vrms ωCI_{\text{rms}} = V_{\text{rms}}\,\omega C: Irms=230×300×(100×10−12)=6.9×10−6 A=6.9 μAI_{\text{rms}} = 230 \times 300 \times (100\times10^{-12}) = 6.9\times10^{-6}\ \text{A} = 6.9\ \mu\text{A}.

Step 2. For this circuit — a capacitor in series with the source, nothing else — the conduction current in the wires and the displacement current between the plates must be equal at every instant, since Kirchhoff's junction rule is only rescued by treating ici_c outside and idi_d between the plates as segments of one continuous total current. So yes, id=ici_d = i_c always, including rms and peak values.

Step 3. Find the peak (amplitude) current, since the requested BB is an amplitude, not an rms value: i0=2 Irms=1.414×6.9×10−6=9.76×10−6 Ai_0 = \sqrt{2}\, I_{\text{rms}} = 1.414 \times 6.9\times10^{-6} = 9.76\times10^{-6}\ \text{A}.

Step 4. Apply the generalised Ampere's law to a circular loop of radius r=3.0 cmr = 3.0\ \text{cm}, which lies inside the plate radius R=6.0 cmR = 6.0\ \text{cm}. Because the displacement current is spread uniformly over the plate area (uniform EE field between the plates), the current enclosed by a loop of radius r<Rr < R is only the fraction of the total that lies within that smaller circle, ienc=i0 (r2/R2)i_{\text{enc}} = i_0\,(r^2/R^2). Ampere's law then gives B(2πr)=μ0 i0 (r2/R2)B(2\pi r) = \mu_0\, i_0\,(r^2/R^2), so B=μ0 i0 r2πR2=(4π×10−7)(9.76×10−6)(0.03)2π(0.06)2=1.63×10−11 TB = \dfrac{\mu_0\, i_0\, r}{2\pi R^2} = \dfrac{(4\pi\times10^{-7})(9.76\times10^{-6})(0.03)}{2\pi (0.06)^2} = 1.63\times10^{-11}\ \text{T}. Answer: Irms=6.9 μAI_{\text{rms}} = 6.9\ \mu\text{A}; yes, id=ici_d = i_c at every instant; and B≈1.63×10−11 TB \approx 1.63\times10^{-11}\ \text{T} at r=3.0 cmr = 3.0\ \text{cm}. Timing note: about three to four minutes. The two traps that cost the most marks here are, first, quietly using IrmsI_{\text{rms}} where the question actually wants the amplitude i0=2Irmsi_0 = \sqrt{2}I_{\text{rms}}, and second, forgetting that for r<Rr < R the enclosed current scales as r2/R2r^2/R^2 (area fraction), not simply i0i_0 itself — that mistake would overestimate BB by a factor of R2/r2=4R^2/r^2 = 4 here. Always check whether the field point lies inside or outside the plate radius before choosing the enclosed-current formula.

Common traps

Treating displacement current as a flow of charge across the gap. No charge crosses between the plates of a capacitor. Displacement current is the name given to ε0 dΦE/dt\varepsilon_0\, d\Phi_E/dt because it has the same magnetic effect as a real current, not because charge is moving through the gap.

Forgetting that idi_d requires a changing electric field, not just a strong one. A capacitor holding a static charge, however large, has E≠0E \ne 0 but dΦE/dt=0d\Phi_E/dt = 0, so id=0i_d = 0 — only while charging or discharging does displacement current exist.

Assuming electromagnetic waves need a medium. Unlike sound (needs air) or a wave on a string (needs the string), electromagnetic waves are self-sustaining EE-BB oscillations that propagate through vacuum; a medium, if present, only slows the wave via Equation (8).

Mixing up amplitude and rms in AC-driven displacement-current problems, exactly the trap in the competitive worked example above: always convert consistently, i0=2 Irmsi_0 = \sqrt{2}\,I_{\text{rms}}.

Applying ienc=i0(r2/R2)i_{\text{enc}} = i_0(r^2/R^2) outside the plate radius. That formula only holds inside the plates (r<Rr < R); for r≥Rr \ge R the entire displacement current is enclosed and B=μ0i0/(2πr)B = \mu_0 i_0/(2\pi r), the long-straight-wire form.

Believing all electromagnetic waves are fundamentally different phenomena. Radio waves, visible light and gamma rays obey the very same Equations (5) to (8); only their wavelength, and hence how they are produced and detected, differs.

You should be able to…

  • State why Ampere's circuital law, in its original form, gives inconsistent results for a charging capacitor, and identify where the missing term comes from.
  • Write down the displacement current id=ε0 dΦE/dti_d = \varepsilon_0\, d\Phi_E/dt and the Ampere-Maxwell law, explaining why idi_d has the same magnetic effect as conduction current without being a flow of charge.
  • List all four of Maxwell's equations in vacuum and state, in one sentence each, what each one says.
  • Explain why only accelerated charges radiate, and why the radiated frequency equals the source's oscillation frequency.
  • State that electromagnetic waves are transverse, with E⃗\vec E, B⃗\vec B and the propagation direction mutually perpendicular, and find that direction from E⃗×B⃗\vec E \times \vec B.
  • Use c=1/μ0ε0c = 1/\sqrt{\mu_0\varepsilon_0}, νλ=c\nu\lambda = c and B0=E0/cB_0 = E_0/c fluently, finding any missing field, wavelength, frequency, kk or ω\omega from two given quantities.
  • Recall the seven named bands of the electromagnetic spectrum in order, with an approximate wavelength range, one production method and one use for each.
  • Reproduce the logic proving that the time-averaged energy densities of the EE and BB fields in a plane electromagnetic wave are equal.
  • Solve a displacement-current-inside-a-capacitor problem, distinguishing rms from amplitude values and applying r2/R2r^2/R^2 correctly for field points inside the plate radius.

Ask the tutor: if you would like to work through the direction-finding logic for a wave propagating along an arbitrary axis, or practice more displacement-current-in-a-capacitor numericals step by step, just ask.

Is displacement current a genuinely new type of current, or just a mathematical trick to fix Ampere's law?

It behaves exactly like a current for producing a magnetic field, but it is not a flow of charge. The historical route was patching an inconsistency in Ampere's law, but the physics is real: a changing electric field, on its own, sources a magnetic field, and this is precisely the mechanism that lets electromagnetic waves propagate through completely empty space with no charges present anywhere along the way. It is a genuine physical effect discovered through a mathematical inconsistency, not merely a bookkeeping fudge.

Why don't electromagnetic waves need a medium, when every other wave I have studied does?

Waves on a string, sound and water all involve some material physically oscillating, and it is that material's elasticity that carries the disturbance forward. An electromagnetic wave has no such component: the changing electric field creates a magnetic field (Ampere-Maxwell law), and that changing magnetic field creates an electric field further along (Faraday's law) — a handoff that is entirely self-contained. If a medium happens to be present, its permittivity and permeability change the speed via v=1/μεv = 1/\sqrt{\mu\varepsilon}, but the medium is never required for the wave to exist.

If radio waves and gamma rays are the same kind of wave, why are gamma rays so much more dangerous?

Both obey the same equations, differing only in wavelength and frequency, but that difference has huge consequences for how they interact with matter. A gamma-ray photon carries far more energy than a radio-wave photon (energy per photon rises with frequency, a quantum idea beyond this chapter), and short-wavelength gamma rays and X-rays can penetrate tissue and ionise molecules, damaging DNA. Radio waves carry too little energy per photon to ionise anything. So "same physics" does not mean "same effect on you" — interaction with matter depends strongly on wavelength.

Why is the numerical value of B0 always so much smaller than E0 in an electromagnetic wave?

It looks lopsided only because of the units chosen, not because the magnetic field carries less energy. Dividing E0E_0 by c≈3×108c \approx 3\times10^8 to get B0=E0/cB_0 = E_0/c automatically makes the number attached to B0B_0 (in tesla) look tiny next to E0E_0 (in volts per metre), even though the energy-density derivation above shows the two fields store exactly equal average energy. The size mismatch is an artefact of how volts, metres, teslas and seconds are defined, not a physical imbalance.

How is this chapter actually tested — is it mostly conceptual or mostly numerical?

Both, in roughly equal measure. CBSE boards favour short conceptual questions (state Maxwell's equations, explain why displacement current was needed, one property each of two spectrum bands) alongside straightforward numericals using B0=E0/cB_0 = E_0/c, c=νλc = \nu\lambda and id=ε0 dΦE/dti_d = \varepsilon_0\, d\Phi_E/dt. JEE and NEET push into displacement-current-in-a-capacitor numericals, direction-finding via E⃗×B⃗\vec E \times \vec B, and occasionally the energy-density equality. Knowing the spectrum table cold is worth fast, disproportionate marks in all three exams.

Before this

Where this leads