Nuclei

The previous chapter located the atom's positive charge and almost all of its mass inside a nucleus roughly ten thousand times smaller than the atom itself — a pinhead in a classroom. This chapter asks what that pinhead is made of, why it stays together, and why it sometimes falls apart. The answers turn out to explain the Sun's heat, a smoke detector, carbon dating of ancient bones, and the energy grid of an entire country. We start with bookkeeping: a nucleus of mass number AA and atomic number ZZ is a bundle of ZZ protons and N=A−ZN = A - Z neutrons, and different nuclei of the same element (isotopes), or different elements sharing a mass number (isobars) or neutron count (isotones), are all described by the same simple notation. Electron scattering shows every nucleus obeys R=R0A1/3R = R_0A^{1/3}, which forces nuclear density to be the same eye-watering constant — about 2.3×1017 kg/m32.3\times10^{17}\ \text{kg/m}^3 — for every nucleus from helium to uranium. The deeper story is energy. Einstein's E=mc2E=mc^2 turns a curious accounting fact — that a nucleus always weighs less than the sum of its separated protons and neutrons — into the single most important number in the chapter: the binding energy. Plotting binding energy per nucleon against mass number produces a curve with a broad hump around iron, and that hump's shape explains, in one picture, why splitting a heavy nucleus (fission) and fusing two light ones (fusion) both release enormous energy, while nothing useful happens in between. Layered on top of all this is radioactivity — the spontaneous alpha, beta and gamma decay of unstable nuclei, governed by an exponential law with no memory, characterised by a half-life. By the end of this chapter you will be able to compute binding energies, read the fission-fusion story off a single graph, and solve half-life and activity problems with confidence.

Key takeaways
  • A nucleus of mass number AA and atomic number ZZ contains ZZ protons and N=A−ZN=A-Z neutrons; nuclides are written ZAX^{A}_{Z}\text{X}, with isotopes sharing ZZ, isobars sharing AA, and isotones sharing NN.
  • Nuclear radius follows R=R0A1/3R=R_0A^{1/3} with R0=1.2 fmR_0 = 1.2\ \text{fm}, which makes nuclear density the same constant, about 2.3×1017 kg/m32.3\times10^{17}\ \text{kg/m}^3, for every nucleus.
  • Mass-energy equivalence E=mc2E=mc^2 converts the mass defect ΔM\Delta M (nucleus mass less than the sum of its free constituents) into the binding energy Eb=ΔM c2E_b = \Delta M\,c^2; 1 u=931.5 MeV/c21\ \text{u} = 931.5\ \text{MeV}/c^2.
  • Binding energy per nucleon Ebn=Eb/AE_{bn}=E_b/A peaks near 8.75 MeV8.75\ \text{MeV} at A≈56A\approx 56 (iron) and is lower for both light and heavy nuclei — this single curve explains why fission and fusion both release energy.
  • The nuclear (strong) force is short-ranged (a few fm), far stronger than the Coulomb force at nuclear distances, charge-independent, and saturates, which is why EbnE_{bn} stays roughly flat for 30<A<17030 < A < 170.
  • Radioactive nuclei decay by alpha (24He^4_2\text{He} emission), beta (electron or positron emission) or gamma (high-energy photon emission) processes, following the exponential law N(t)=N0e−λtN(t)=N_0e^{-\lambda t}.
  • Half-life T1/2=0.693/λT_{1/2}=0.693/\lambda and mean life τ=1/λ=1.44 T1/2\tau=1/\lambda=1.44\,T_{1/2} both measure decay speed; activity R=λNR=\lambda N is measured in becquerel (or the older curie).
  • In fission a heavy nucleus like 92235U^{235}_{92}\text{U} splits into two intermediate-mass fragments plus neutrons, releasing about 200 MeV200\ \text{MeV} per fission; in fusion, light nuclei like hydrogen combine (as in the Sun's proton-proton cycle) to release energy per event that is smaller but far larger per unit mass of fuel.
  • Key idea: mass-energy equivalence turns the mass deficit of a bound nucleus into a binding energy per nucleon that peaks near iron, so both splitting heavy nuclei and fusing light ones move toward that peak and release energy, while unstable nuclei separately relax toward stability through the exponential law of alpha, beta and gamma decay.
The core insight

A nucleus of AA nucleons is bound with an energy Eb=ΔMc2E_b=\Delta M c^2 set by its mass defect, whose per-nucleon value EbnE_{bn} peaks near iron so that both fission of heavy nuclei and fusion of light nuclei release energy by moving toward that peak, while unstable nuclides separately relax toward stability through the memoryless exponential decay law N(t)=N0e−λtN(t)=N_0e^{-\lambda t} characterised by a half-life T1/2=0.693/λT_{1/2}=0.693/\lambda.

What this chapter covers

The chapter builds in three connected stages. The first stage is pure description: what a nucleus is made of (protons and neutrons, called nucleons), how nuclides are named and classified as isotopes, isobars or isotones, and how big a nucleus is — leading to the striking fact that nuclear density is the same constant for every nucleus. The second stage is energetics: Einstein's mass-energy equivalence, the mass defect, the binding energy and binding energy per nucleon, the famous EbnE_{bn}-versus-AA curve, and the short-range, saturating nuclear force that holds nucleons together against the Coulomb repulsion of the protons. The third stage is dynamics: radioactivity (alpha, beta and gamma decay), the exponential decay law with half-life and mean life, and finally nuclear energy release through fission and fusion, including the physics of the Sun's proton-proton cycle. Worked examples reuse and extend NCERT's own Examples 13.1 to 13.4.

The core ideas

Composition of the nucleus: protons, neutrons and nucleons

Every atom's positive charge and almost all of its mass sit in a central nucleus built from two kinds of particles collectively called nucleons: the positively charged proton (mass mp=1.00727 u=1.67262×10−27 kgm_p = 1.00727\ \text{u} = 1.67262\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg}) and the electrically neutral neutron (mass mn=1.00866 u=1.6749×10−27 kgm_n = 1.00866\ \text{u} = 1.6749\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg}), discovered by James Chadwick in 1932 from the anomalous neutral radiation emitted when beryllium was bombarded with alpha particles. A free neutron is unstable, decaying into a proton, an electron and an antineutrino with a mean life of about 1000 s1000\ \text{s}, but inside a nucleus it is stable. The composition of any nucleus is fixed by three numbers:

A=Z+N.(1)A = Z + N. \qquad (1)

where: ZZ, the atomic number, is the number of protons (and hence the nuclear charge +Ze+Ze, and the number of electrons in the neutral atom); NN, the neutron number, is the number of neutrons; and AA, the mass number, is the total nucleon count, A=Z+NA=Z+N. A nuclear species, or nuclide, is written ZAX^{A}_{Z}\text{X}, where X is the chemical symbol — for instance gold's principal isotope is 79197Au^{197}_{79}\text{Au}, with 7979 protons and 197−79=118197-79=118 neutrons. Because chemical identity is fixed by ZZ alone, nuclides with the same ZZ but different AA (hence different NN) are isotopes of the same element and share essentially identical chemistry — hydrogen's isotopes are protium 11H^1_1\text{H}, deuterium 12H^2_1\text{H}, and tritium 13H^3_1\text{H} (unstable). Nuclides with the same AA but different ZZ, such as 13H^3_1\text{H} and 23He^3_2\text{He}, are isobars; nuclides with the same NN but different ZZ, such as 80198Hg^{198}_{80}\text{Hg} and 79197Au^{197}_{79}\text{Au}, are isotones. The atomic mass unit (u) is defined as one-twelfth the mass of a 12C^{12}\text{C} atom, 1 u=1.660539×10−27 kg1\ \text{u} = 1.660539\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg}, a far more convenient scale than the kilogram for nuclear-sized masses. Because most elements are naturally occurring mixtures of several isotopes, the atomic mass tabulated for an element is a weighted average over the relative abundances of its isotopes — chlorine's atomic mass of 35.46 u35.46\ \text{u} arises from 75.4%75.4\% of mass 34.98 u34.98\ \text{u} and 24.6%24.6\% of mass 36.98 u36.98\ \text{u}.

Size and density of the nucleus

Rutherford's alpha-scattering experiments, and later, more precise fast-electron scattering experiments, established that a nucleus behaves as a sphere whose radius depends on its mass number by a strikingly simple rule.

R=R0 A1/3.(2)R = R_0\, A^{1/3}. \qquad (2)

where: R0=1.2×10−15 m=1.2 fmR_0 = 1.2\times10^{-15}\ \text{m} = 1.2\ \text{fm} (1 fm=10−15 m1\ \text{fm} = 10^{-15}\ \text{m}) is an empirical constant common to all nuclei, and AA is the mass number. Since the volume of a sphere scales as R3R^3, Equation (2) says the nuclear volume is directly proportional to AA — pack in twice as many nucleons and the volume simply doubles, exactly as if nucleons were incompressible droplets of a constant-density liquid packed together. The physical reading is a liquid-drop model of the nucleus, and it makes an immediate, testable prediction: nuclear density should be the same number for every nucleus regardless of size, which is verified experimentally and derived formally below. That constant density, about 2.3×1017 kg/m32.3\times10^{17}\ \text{kg/m}^3, is roughly 2×10142\times10^{14} times the density of water — a teaspoon of pure nuclear matter would weigh as much as a mountain, which is why neutron stars, whose interiors are compressed to nuclear density, pack more mass than the Sun into a sphere the size of a city.

Mass-energy equivalence

Before nuclear physics, mass and energy were believed to be conserved independently. Einstein's special relativity replaced this with a single unified law: mass is itself a form of energy, and the two can convert into one another.

E=mc2.(3)E = mc^2. \qquad (3)

where: EE is the energy equivalent of a mass mm, and c=3×108 m/sc = 3\times10^8\ \text{m/s} is the speed of light in vacuum. The conversion factor c2c^2 is enormous, so even a tiny mass carries a huge amount of energy — one gram of matter, fully converted, releases E=10−3×(3×108)2=9×1013 JE = 10^{-3}\times(3\times10^8)^2 = 9\times10^{13}\ \text{J}, comparable to a large power station's output over several days (NCERT Example 13.2). In nuclear physics the practical unit conversion is 1 u=931.5 MeV/c21\ \text{u} = 931.5\ \text{MeV}/c^2, obtained by expressing 1 u=1.6605×10−27 kg1\ \text{u} = 1.6605\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg} in joules via Equation (3) and converting to electronvolts (NCERT Example 13.3) — a conversion so central to this chapter that every binding-energy and Q-value calculation ultimately runs through it.

Mass defect and binding energy

If a nucleus were simply its protons and neutrons sitting side by side, its mass would equal the sum of their individual masses. It never does — the nucleus is always lighter. This missing mass is the single most important quantity in nuclear physics.

ΔM=[Zmp+(A−Z)mn]−M.(4)\Delta M = \big[Zm_p + (A-Z)m_n\big] - M. \qquad (4)

where: MM is the actual (measured) mass of the nucleus, and ΔM\Delta M is the mass defect — the difference between the mass of the separated, free nucleons and the mass of the assembled nucleus. For 816O^{16}_8\text{O}, eight protons and eight neutrons in isolation weigh 16.12744 u16.12744\ \text{u}, but the actual nuclear mass is only 15.99053 u15.99053\ \text{u}, a defect of ΔM=0.13691 u\Delta M = 0.13691\ \text{u} — small as a fraction of the total, but, through Equation (3), it corresponds to a large amount of energy:

Eb=ΔM c2.(5)E_b = \Delta M\, c^2. \qquad (5)

where: EbE_b is the binding energy of the nucleus — physically, the energy that would have to be supplied to pull the nucleus apart into its separate, free nucleons, or equivalently the energy released when free nucleons assemble into that nucleus. For 816O^{16}_8\text{O}, Eb=0.13691×931.5=127.5 MeVE_b = 0.13691\times931.5 = 127.5\ \text{MeV} (NCERT Example 13.3). Because bigger nuclei naturally have bigger total binding energies simply by having more nucleons, a fairer measure of how tightly a nucleus is bound is the binding energy divided by the number of nucleons:

Ebn=EbA.(6)E_{bn} = \frac{E_b}{A}. \qquad (6)

where: EbnE_{bn}, the binding energy per nucleon, is the average energy needed to knock one nucleon out of the nucleus — it is the quantity that actually decides nuclear stability, not the total EbE_b.

The binding energy curve and nuclear stability

Plotting EbnE_{bn} against AA for every known nuclide produces one of the most information-dense graphs in physics. It rises steeply for the lightest nuclei, climbs to a broad maximum of about 8.75 MeV8.75\ \text{MeV} near A=56A=56 (iron), stays nearly flat at about 8 MeV8\ \text{MeV} across the middle range 30<A<17030 < A < 170, and then declines slowly to about 7.6 MeV7.6\ \text{MeV} at A=238A=238 (uranium).

Figure
Binding energy per nucleon plotted against mass number, rising steeply for light nuclei, peaking near iron at mass number 56, staying roughly flat across the middle range, and declining gently for heavy nuclei such as uranium, with arrows showing fusion climbing the curve from the light end and fission dropping down from the heavy end
Binding energy per nucleon versus mass number A mass number A E_bn (MeV per nucleon) 0 20 56 120 170 238 8.75 7.0 Fe, A=56, peak 8.75 MeV light nuclei, e.g. deuterium U-238, 7.6 MeV fusion climbs the curve fission drops down the curve

Two features of the curve carry all the physics. First, the near-constancy of EbnE_{bn} across the middle range is a direct signature of the short range of the nuclear force: a nucleon deep inside a large nucleus interacts only with its immediate neighbours (a saturation property), so adding more nucleons at the surface barely changes the binding felt by nucleons already inside, and EbnE_{bn} stops growing with AA. Second, because EbnE_{bn} falls away on both sides of the iron peak, any process that moves nuclei toward the peak — splitting a heavy nucleus into two medium ones (fission), or fusing two light nuclei into one heavier one (fusion) — leaves the nucleons more tightly bound than before, and the resulting decrease in total mass is released as energy. This one curve is the entire reason nuclear power plants and stars both work, and it is worked out quantitatively for fission in the derivation below.

The nuclear force

Something must hold protons together against their mutual Coulomb repulsion, and bind neutral neutrons too — an attractive force of a completely different character from both gravity and electromagnetism. Experiments carried out between 1930 and 1950 established its main features.

Figure
Potential energy of a pair of nucleons plotted against their separation, showing a deep attractive well with a minimum near 0.8 femtometres and a steep repulsive wall at smaller separations, with the force being attractive beyond the minimum and essentially zero beyond a few femtometres
Potential energy between two nucleons versus separation separation r (fm) potential energy U(r) 0.8 2 to 3 minimum, r0 approx 0.8 fm strongly repulsive attractive region force falls to zero beyond a few fm r to 0

The nuclear force is, first, far stronger than the Coulomb force at nuclear separations — strong enough to overcome the electrical repulsion between protons packed within a few femtometres of one another, which is why it must dominate for the nucleus to hold together at all. Second, it is short-ranged: it falls rapidly to essentially zero once nucleons are separated by more than a few femtometres, and the potential energy between a pair of nucleons is a minimum (most attractive) near r0≈0.8 fmr_0 \approx 0.8\ \text{fm}, turning strongly repulsive at smaller separations (nucleons resist being crushed together) and attractive beyond it. Third, it is charge-independent: the proton-proton, neutron-neutron and proton-neutron nuclear interactions are all approximately equal, unlike the Coulomb force, which only protons feel. Unlike Coulomb's law or Newton's law of gravitation, the nuclear force has no simple algebraic form — it is described instead through the potential-energy curve above and, at a deeper level, through the exchange of particles called mesons.

Radioactivity: alpha, beta and gamma decay

Discovered by accident in 1896 when Henri Becquerel found that uranium salts fogged a photographic plate through black paper, radioactivity is the spontaneous transformation of an unstable nucleus into a different, more stable configuration, with the emission of radiation. Three types occur in nature. In alpha decay, the nucleus emits a helium nucleus 24He^4_2\text{He} (an alpha particle), so the parent's mass number falls by 4 and atomic number by 2: ZAX→Z−2A−4Y+24He^{A}_{Z}\text{X} \rightarrow {}^{A-4}_{Z-2}\text{Y} + {}^4_2\text{He}. In beta decay, the nucleus emits an electron (β−\beta^-, with a neutron converting to a proton) or a positron (β+\beta^+, with a proton converting to a neutron), always accompanied by a neutrino or antineutrino; mass number AA is unchanged, while ZZ shifts by ±1\pm 1. In gamma decay, a nucleus left in an excited state after alpha or beta emission drops to a lower energy state by emitting a high-energy photon (hundreds of keV or more), with neither AA nor ZZ changing. Stability itself follows a pattern: light stable nuclei need a neutron-to-proton ratio near 1:11{:}1, rising to about 3:23{:}2 for heavy nuclei (extra neutrons dilute the mutually repelling protons without adding more Coulomb repulsion), and nuclei that stray from this band are the ones that decay.

The law of radioactive decay: half-life, mean life and activity

However a nucleus decays, the rate at which a large sample of identical unstable nuclei decays follows one universal statistical law, since each nucleus decays independently of every other and independently of its own past — decay has no memory.

N(t)=N0 e−λt.(7)N(t) = N_0\, e^{-\lambda t}. \qquad (7)

where: N0N_0 is the number of undecayed nuclei at t=0t=0, N(t)N(t) is the number still undecayed at time tt, and λ\lambda (units s−1\text{s}^{-1}) is the decay constant, the probability per unit time that any one nucleus decays — a fixed property of the nuclide, unaffected by temperature, pressure or chemical state. Two practical timescales follow directly from Equation (7):

T1/2=ln⁡2λ=0.693λ,τ=1λ=T1/20.693≈1.44 T1/2.(8)T_{1/2} = \frac{\ln 2}{\lambda} = \frac{0.693}{\lambda}, \qquad \tau = \frac{1}{\lambda} = \frac{T_{1/2}}{0.693} \approx 1.44\, T_{1/2}. \qquad (8)

where: the half-life T1/2T_{1/2} is the time for exactly half of any sample to decay, and the mean life τ\tau is the time for the sample to fall to 1/e1/e (≈37%\approx 37\%) of its initial size — also the true statistical average lifetime of the nuclei. The rate of decay itself, called the activity, is:

R=∣dNdt∣=λN=λN0 e−λt=R0 e−λt.(9)R = \left|\frac{dN}{dt}\right| = \lambda N = \lambda N_0\, e^{-\lambda t} = R_0\, e^{-\lambda t}. \qquad (9)

where: activity is measured in becquerel (1 Bq=11\ \text{Bq} = 1 decay per second) in SI, or in the older non-SI unit curie (1 Ci=3.7×1010 Bq1\ \text{Ci} = 3.7\times10^{10}\ \text{Bq}). Because RR is directly proportional to NN, activity decays with exactly the same exponential law and the same half-life as the population itself — this is the practical quantity a Geiger counter actually measures, since individual undecayed nuclei cannot be counted directly.

Nuclear energy: fission and fusion

The binding energy curve makes the direction of energy release predictable, and NCERT's own quantitative estimate for fission illustrates the scale involved. In nuclear fission, a heavy nucleus such as 92235U^{235}_{92}\text{U}, on absorbing a slow neutron, splits into two intermediate-mass fragments plus two or three free neutrons, for example 01n+92235U→92236U→56144Ba+3689Kr+3 01n^1_0\text{n} + {}^{235}_{92}\text{U} \rightarrow {}^{236}_{92}\text{U} \rightarrow {}^{144}_{56}\text{Ba} + {}^{89}_{36}\text{Kr} + 3\,^1_0\text{n}, releasing roughly 200 MeV200\ \text{MeV} per fission event (derived quantitatively below), enough that one kilogram of uranium releases about 1014 J10^{14}\ \text{J} — a million times more energy, per kilogram, than burning coal (∼107 J/kg\sim 10^7\ \text{J/kg}). The freed neutrons can trigger further fissions in neighbouring nuclei, producing the chain reaction that powers both nuclear reactors (controlled) and atomic bombs (uncontrolled). In nuclear fusion, light nuclei combine into a heavier, more tightly bound nucleus, again releasing energy, but only once the nuclei have enough kinetic energy to overcome their mutual Coulomb repulsion at very close range — the Coulomb barrier, roughly 400 keV400\ \text{keV} for two protons — which is why fusion needs extremely high temperatures (T∼107T \sim 10^7 to 109 K10^9\ \text{K}) and is called thermonuclear fusion. This is the Sun's power source: the proton-proton cycle converts four protons into one helium-4 nucleus in a multi-step sequence, 4 11H+2e−→24He+2ν+6γ+26.7 MeV4\,{}^1_1\text{H} + 2e^- \rightarrow {}^4_2\text{He} + 2\nu + 6\gamma + 26.7\ \text{MeV}, releasing 26.7 MeV26.7\ \text{MeV} per helium nucleus formed, and it is estimated the Sun has enough hydrogen fuel to continue for roughly another five billion years. Controlled thermonuclear fusion on Earth — confining a plasma at ∼108 K\sim 10^8\ \text{K} long enough to sustain net fusion — remains an active engineering frontier, pursued by international collaborations including India, because it promises power generation with abundant fuel and no long-lived radioactive waste.

Derivation ANuclear matter density is independent of mass number

The goal is to show, starting only from the empirical radius law R=R0A1/3R=R_0A^{1/3}, that the density of nuclear matter — mass per unit volume — comes out to the same constant number for every nucleus, whether it is helium or uranium, without any additional physical assumption beyond treating the nucleus as a uniform sphere. This is the algebraic backbone behind calling the nucleus a "liquid drop": constant density is exactly what a drop of incompressible liquid would show if you kept adding more of the same liquid to it.

Step 1. Write the nuclear mass in terms of AA. Every nucleon (proton or neutron) has a mass close to 1 u1\ \text{u}, so to good approximation the total nuclear mass is M≈A muM \approx A\,m_u, where mu=1.66×10−27 kgm_u = 1.66\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg} is the mass of one atomic mass unit. This step uses only the definition of mass number as a nucleon count.

Step 2. Write the nuclear volume in terms of AA using the radius law. Treating the nucleus as a sphere of radius R=R0A1/3R = R_0A^{1/3}, its volume is V=43πR3=43πR03AV = \dfrac{4}{3}\pi R^3 = \dfrac{4}{3}\pi R_0^3 A. The mass number appears here to the first power only, because the cube of A1/3A^{1/3} is exactly AA — this cancellation is the entire trick.

Step 3. Divide mass by volume. ρ=MV=A mu43πR03A=mu43πR03\rho = \dfrac{M}{V} = \dfrac{A\,m_u}{\tfrac{4}{3}\pi R_0^3 A} = \dfrac{m_u}{\tfrac{4}{3}\pi R_0^3}. The mass number AA cancels completely between numerator and denominator, leaving an expression built only from the constants mum_u and R0R_0 — no dependence on which nucleus you picked survives.

Step 4. Evaluate numerically. With mu=1.66×10−27 kgm_u = 1.66\times10^{-27}\ \text{kg} and R0=1.2×10−15 mR_0=1.2\times10^{-15}\ \text{m}, ρ=1.66×10−2743π(1.2×10−15)3≈1.66×10−277.24×10−45≈2.3×1017 kg/m3\rho = \dfrac{1.66\times10^{-27}}{\tfrac{4}{3}\pi(1.2\times10^{-15})^3} \approx \dfrac{1.66\times10^{-27}}{7.24\times10^{-45}} \approx 2.3\times10^{17}\ \text{kg/m}^3, matching both the direct calculation for iron in NCERT Example 13.1 (which uses the actual measured mass 55.85 u55.85\ \text{u} for A=56A=56 and gets the same 2.29×1017 kg/m32.29\times10^{17}\ \text{kg/m}^3) and the density inferred for neutron stars, which are essentially giant compressed nuclei. Verified: ρ=mu/(43πR03)=2.3×1017 kg/m3\rho = m_u\big/\big(\tfrac{4}{3}\pi R_0^3\big) = 2.3\times10^{17}\ \text{kg/m}^3, independent of AA by direct cancellation in Step 3; cross-checked against the iron-specific calculation of NCERT Example 13.1.

Go deeper · Derivation B · 2 minThe exponential law of radioactive decay
Derivation BThe exponential law of radioactive decay

The goal is to derive the population N(t)N(t) of a radioactive sample, starting from the single physical assumption that underlies all of radioactivity: at any instant, the number of nuclei decaying per unit time is directly proportional to the number of undecayed nuclei present, with no dependence on the sample's history or on external conditions. This is a first-order differential equation, and solving it also yields the half-life and mean-life relations used throughout the chapter.

Step 1. State the defining physical law. If NN nuclei remain undecayed at time tt, the number decaying in the next small interval dtdt is proportional to both NN and dtdt: dN=−λN dtdN = -\lambda N\, dt, where λ\lambda is the decay constant and the minus sign records that NN decreases. Dividing by dtdt gives the rate equation dNdt=−λN\dfrac{dN}{dt} = -\lambda N — decay is memoryless because this equation involves only the current value of NN, never the sample's age or origin.

Step 2. Separate variables and integrate. Rearranging, dNN=−λ dt\dfrac{dN}{N} = -\lambda\, dt. Integrating the left side from N0N_0 (at t=0t=0) to NN (at time tt), and the right side from 00 to tt, gives ln⁡N−ln⁡N0=−λt\ln N - \ln N_0 = -\lambda t, that is, ln⁡ ⁣(NN0)=−λt\ln\!\left(\dfrac{N}{N_0}\right) = -\lambda t.

Step 3. Exponentiate to isolate NN. Raising ee to both sides removes the logarithm: N(t)=N0 e−λtN(t) = N_0\,e^{-\lambda t}, which is Equation (7) — the population decays exponentially, never reaching exactly zero in finite time, only approaching it.

Step 4. Extract the half-life. By definition, at t=T1/2t=T_{1/2} the population has fallen to N0/2N_0/2: N02=N0e−λT1/2\dfrac{N_0}{2} = N_0 e^{-\lambda T_{1/2}}, so 12=e−λT1/2\dfrac{1}{2}=e^{-\lambda T_{1/2}}, and taking the natural log of both sides gives −ln⁡2=−λT1/2-\ln 2 = -\lambda T_{1/2}, hence T1/2=ln⁡2λ=0.693λT_{1/2} = \dfrac{\ln 2}{\lambda} = \dfrac{0.693}{\lambda}, confirming Equation (8). A useful consequence falls out immediately: after nn half-lives, exactly (1/2)n(1/2)^n of the original sample survives, regardless of nn — this shortcut solves most half-life word problems without touching a logarithm at all.

Step 5. Extract the mean life. The mean life is the population-weighted average of the time each nucleus survives before decaying, τ=∫0∞t λN0e−λt dt∫0∞λN0e−λt dt=1λ\tau = \dfrac{\int_0^\infty t\,\lambda N_0e^{-\lambda t}\,dt}{\int_0^\infty \lambda N_0e^{-\lambda t}\,dt} = \dfrac{1}{\lambda} (a standard exponential-distribution result), so τ=1/λ=T1/2/0.693≈1.44 T1/2\tau = 1/\lambda = T_{1/2}/0.693 \approx 1.44\,T_{1/2} — the mean life is always somewhat longer than the half-life, since a few nuclei survive for a very long time and pull the average up. Verified: solving dN/dt=−λNdN/dt=-\lambda N by separation of variables reproduces N=N0e−λtN=N_0e^{-\lambda t}; setting N=N0/2N=N_0/2 gives T1/2=0.693/λT_{1/2}=0.693/\lambda; the exponential distribution's mean equals 1/λ1/\lambda, giving τ=1.44 T1/2\tau=1.44\,T_{1/2}, consistent with the physical-quantities table in the NCERT chapter summary.

Go deeper · Derivation C · 2 minEnergy released in the fission of a heavy nucleus, from the binding energy curve
Derivation CEnergy released in the fission of a heavy nucleus, from the binding energy curve

The goal is to reproduce NCERT's own order-of-magnitude estimate that fission of a heavy nucleus releases roughly 200 MeV200\ \text{MeV}, derived directly from the shape of the binding-energy-per-nucleon curve rather than from any specific reaction's mass tables — showing that the entire energy yield of fission is really just the statement that the middle of the curve sits higher than its heavy end, quantified.

Step 1. Set up the model split. Take a heavy nucleus with A=240A=240 (close to uranium) splitting into two equal fragments, each with A=120A=120. Read the two relevant values off the binding-energy-per-nucleon curve: for the parent, Ebn(240)≈7.6 MeVE_{bn}(240) \approx 7.6\ \text{MeV} per nucleon; for each fragment, Ebn(120)≈8.5 MeVE_{bn}(120) \approx 8.5\ \text{MeV} per nucleon — the fragments sit closer to the curve's peak and so are more tightly bound, nucleon for nucleon.

Step 2. Compute the gain in binding energy per nucleon. Each nucleon, on moving from the parent to a fragment, becomes more tightly bound by ΔEbn=8.5−7.6=0.9 MeV\Delta E_{bn} = 8.5 - 7.6 = 0.9\ \text{MeV}. This per-nucleon gain is the entire physical content of the calculation — everything after this step is just multiplying by how many nucleons there are.

Step 3. Scale up to the whole nucleus. All 240240 nucleons of the parent gain this extra binding on average, so the total gain in binding energy — and hence the total energy released, since more binding means less mass, and less mass means energy given off via E=mc2E=mc^2 — is Q≈240×0.9 MeV=216 MeVQ \approx 240 \times 0.9\ \text{MeV} = 216\ \text{MeV}.

Step 4. Compare with the standard quoted value. This crude estimate, ≈216 MeV\approx 216\ \text{MeV}, sits close to the commonly quoted ≈200 MeV\approx 200\ \text{MeV} per fission event for nuclei like 92235U^{235}_{92}\text{U}; the small discrepancy is because a real fission does not split exactly in half into two identical A=120A=120 fragments (the observed fragments are typically unequal, as in 56144Ba^{144}_{56}\text{Ba} and 3689Kr^{89}_{36}\text{Kr}) and because a few neutrons are also emitted rather than bound into either fragment. The released energy appears first as the kinetic energy of the fragments and neutrons, and is ultimately carried away as heat — the energy a nuclear reactor extracts. Verified: ΔEbn=8.5−7.6=0.9 MeV\Delta E_{bn}=8.5-7.6=0.9\ \text{MeV}; total Q=240×0.9=216 MeVQ = 240\times0.9=216\ \text{MeV}, consistent with NCERT's own worked estimate in Section 13.7.1 and with the commonly quoted ∼200 MeV\sim 200\ \text{MeV} per fission of 92235U^{235}_{92}\text{U}.

Worked examples

Board level - binding energy and binding energy per nucleon of nitrogen-14 (NCERT Exercise 13.1 pattern)

Find the binding energy and the binding energy per nucleon of a 714N^{14}_7\text{N} nucleus, given its measured atomic mass m(714N)=14.00307 um(^{14}_7\text{N}) = 14.00307\ \text{u}. Use mH=1.007825 um_H = 1.007825\ \text{u} (hydrogen atom, proton plus one electron) and mn=1.008665 um_n = 1.008665\ \text{u}.

Step 1. Identify the composition. Nitrogen-14 has Z=7Z=7 protons and N=A−Z=14−7=7N=A-Z=14-7=7 neutrons. Because the given masses are atomic masses (nucleus plus electrons), it is consistent to compute the mass defect using atomic hydrogen mass on one side and the atomic nitrogen mass on the other — the 77 electrons that would appear on each side cancel automatically, since a neutral nitrogen atom also has 77 electrons.

Step 2. Compute the mass of the separated constituents. 7 mH+7 mn=7(1.007825)+7(1.008665)=7.054775+7.060655=14.115430 u7\,m_H + 7\,m_n = 7(1.007825) + 7(1.008665) = 7.054775 + 7.060655 = 14.115430\ \text{u}.

Step 3. Compute the mass defect and binding energy. ΔM=14.115430−14.00307=0.112360 u\Delta M = 14.115430 - 14.00307 = 0.112360\ \text{u}. Converting with 1 u=931.5 MeV/c21\ \text{u}=931.5\ \text{MeV}/c^2: Eb=0.112360×931.5≈104.66 MeVE_b = 0.112360 \times 931.5 \approx 104.66\ \text{MeV}.

Step 4. Divide by the nucleon count. Ebn=Eb/A=104.66/14≈7.48 MeVE_{bn} = E_b/A = 104.66/14 \approx 7.48\ \text{MeV} per nucleon. Answer: Eb≈104.7 MeVE_b \approx 104.7\ \text{MeV}, Ebn≈7.48 MeVE_{bn} \approx 7.48\ \text{MeV} per nucleon, consistent with nitrogen sitting on the rising, light-mass side of the binding energy curve, below the iron peak of 8.75 MeV8.75\ \text{MeV}.

Competitive level (JEE / NEET) - Q-value of a fusion reaction and exothermic versus endothermic (NCERT Exercise 13.5(i) pattern)

Find the Q-value of the reaction 11H+13H→12H+12H^1_1\text{H} + {}^3_1\text{H} \rightarrow {}^2_1\text{H} + {}^2_1\text{H} and state whether it is exothermic or endothermic. Given m(11H)=1.007825 um(^1_1\text{H})=1.007825\ \text{u}, m(13H)=3.016049 um(^3_1\text{H})=3.016049\ \text{u}, m(12H)=2.014102 um(^2_1\text{H})=2.014102\ \text{u}.

Step 1. Recall the Q-value definition for a reaction A+b→C+dA+b\rightarrow C+d: Q=[mA+mb−mC−md] c2Q = [m_A+m_b-m_C-m_d]\,c^2, the mass "lost" in the reaction converted to energy — a positive QQ releases energy (exothermic), a negative QQ requires energy input (endothermic).

Step 2. Sum the initial masses. m(11H)+m(13H)=1.007825+3.016049=4.023874 um(^1_1\text{H}) + m(^3_1\text{H}) = 1.007825 + 3.016049 = 4.023874\ \text{u}.

Step 3. Sum the final masses. Two deuterium nuclei: 2×m(12H)=2×2.014102=4.028204 u2\times m(^2_1\text{H}) = 2\times 2.014102 = 4.028204\ \text{u}.

Step 4. Compute the mass difference and convert to energy. Δm=4.023874−4.028204=−0.004330 u\Delta m = 4.023874 - 4.028204 = -0.004330\ \text{u}, so Q=−0.004330×931.5≈−4.03 MeVQ = -0.004330\times931.5 \approx -4.03\ \text{MeV}. Answer: Q≈−4.0 MeVQ \approx -4.0\ \text{MeV}, so the reaction is endothermic — despite both products being "light nuclei fusing," this particular combination actually requires an energy input, because a single triton is already more tightly bound, nucleon for nucleon, than a deuteron; not every rearrangement of light nuclei is downhill on the binding-energy curve. Timing note: about ninety seconds. The entire calculation is bookkeeping of six-decimal masses — write initial minus final without rounding early, since the answer is the difference of two numbers each near 4 u, and premature rounding can flip the sign of Q and hence the exothermic/endothermic conclusion. Always sanity-check the sign against the binding-energy curve: fusing light nuclei is not automatically exothermic unless the products truly sit higher on the curve than the reactants.

Competitive level (JEE / NEET) - half-life and decay constant from a falling activity reading

The activity of a radioactive sample falls from 50005000 disintegrations per minute to 12501250 disintegrations per minute in exactly 3030 minutes. Find (a) the half-life, (b) the decay constant in s−1\text{s}^{-1}, and (c) the activity after a further 4545 minutes from the start.

Step 1. Recognise the ratio as a power of one-half. Since activity is proportional to NN, and both obey the same exponential law, R(t)R0=12505000=14=(12)2\dfrac{R(t)}{R_0} = \dfrac{1250}{5000} = \dfrac{1}{4} = \left(\dfrac{1}{2}\right)^2. A drop to exactly (1/2)n(1/2)^n means precisely nn half-lives have elapsed — here n=2n=2.

Step 2. Solve for the half-life. Two half-lives take 3030 minutes, so T1/2=30/2=15 minutes=900 sT_{1/2} = 30/2 = 15\ \text{minutes} = 900\ \text{s}.

Step 3. Convert to the decay constant. λ=0.693T1/2=0.693900≈7.70×10−4 s−1\lambda = \dfrac{0.693}{T_{1/2}} = \dfrac{0.693}{900} \approx 7.70\times10^{-4}\ \text{s}^{-1}.

Step 4. Find the activity at t=45t=45 minutes using the half-life shortcut rather than re-deriving the exponential. Forty-five minutes is exactly 45/15=345/15=3 half-lives, so R=R0 (1/2)3=5000/8=625R = R_0\,(1/2)^3 = 5000/8 = 625 disintegrations per minute. Answer: T1/2=15 minT_{1/2}=15\ \text{min}, λ≈7.70×10−4 s−1\lambda \approx 7.70\times10^{-4}\ \text{s}^{-1}, and R(45 min)=625R(45\ \text{min}) = 625 disintegrations per minute. Timing note: under two minutes if you spot the power-of-half shortcut immediately. The trap is reaching for N=N0e−λtN=N_0e^{-\lambda t} and a calculator's natural log when the given ratio is already a clean power of 1/21/2 — always check whether R/R0R/R_0 is 1/21/2, 1/41/4, 1/81/8, and so on, before doing any logarithm at all, since whole numbers of half-lives solve instantly by inspection.

Common traps

  • Confusing atomic mass with nuclear mass. NCERT problems almost always give atomic masses (nucleus plus electrons). When computing ΔM\Delta M for an atom-to-atom reaction, use atomic hydrogen mass mHm_H (not bare proton mass mpm_p) on the constituent side, so the electron counts cancel automatically; mixing bare nuclear masses with atomic masses silently introduces an error of several electron masses.
  • Reading total binding energy where per-nucleon binding energy is needed. A uranium nucleus has a larger total EbE_b than an iron nucleus simply because it has more nucleons, but a smaller EbnE_{bn} — it is EbnE_{bn}, not EbE_b, that decides which way energy flows in fission or fusion.
  • Forgetting the cube root in the radius law. R=R0A1/3R = R_0A^{1/3}, not R0AR_0A or R0A3R_0A^3; a common slip is to treat volume (which is proportional to AA) as if it were radius.
  • Believing beta decay changes the mass number. β−\beta^- and β+\beta^+ decay change ZZ by ±1\pm 1 while AA stays exactly fixed (a neutron converts to a proton, or vice versa, inside the same nucleon count); only alpha decay changes AA (by 44).
  • Treating half-life as "when the sample is completely gone." After one half-life, half remains — not zero. After nn half-lives, a fraction (1/2)n(1/2)^n remains, and this fraction never reaches exactly zero in finite time.
  • Mixing up half-life and mean life. τ=T1/2/0.693≈1.44 T1/2\tau = T_{1/2}/0.693 \approx 1.44\,T_{1/2}; the mean life is always the larger number, and substituting one for the other in an exam answer is a common lost mark.
  • Assuming a negative Q-value means "fusion never releases energy." Some specific light-nucleus reactions genuinely require energy input (endothermic), as in the worked example above; the general fusion-releases-energy statement is about the broad slope of the binding-energy curve, not a guarantee for every individual reaction.
  • Ignoring units when converting HH or activity. Curie and becquerel differ by a factor of 3.7×10103.7\times10^{10}; forgetting to convert before comparing two activities is a frequent numerical slip.

You should be able to…

  • Write the standard nuclide notation ZAX^{A}_{Z}\text{X} for any nucleus, and correctly classify pairs of nuclides as isotopes, isobars or isotones.
  • State and apply the nuclear radius law R=R0A1/3R=R_0A^{1/3}, and explain why it forces nuclear density to be constant across all nuclei.
  • Compute mass defect and binding energy from given atomic masses, being careful to keep atomic (not bare nuclear) masses consistent on both sides of the calculation.
  • Sketch the binding energy per nucleon versus mass number curve from memory, locate its peak near iron, and use its shape to justify why both fission and fusion release energy.
  • List the defining properties of the nuclear force (strong, short-range, charge-independent, saturating) and connect saturation directly to the flatness of the binding energy curve.
  • Distinguish alpha, beta and gamma decay by what is emitted and by how each changes AA and ZZ.
  • Derive and apply the exponential decay law, and convert fluently between decay constant, half-life, mean life and activity.
  • Solve half-life word problems by recognising whole numbers of half-lives before reaching for logarithms.
  • Compute the Q-value of a nuclear reaction from given masses and correctly classify it as exothermic or endothermic.
  • Explain, in physical terms, why fusion requires extremely high temperatures (the Coulomb barrier) while fission does not.

Ask the tutor: Want to work through a mixed problem that combines a mass-defect calculation with a half-life question on the same radioactive sample, step by step, using your own numbers?

Why does a nucleus weigh less than the sum of its separate protons and neutrons?

Because binding a nucleus together releases energy, and by Einstein's E=mc2E=mc^2, releasing energy means losing an equivalent amount of mass. Picture pulling a nucleus apart into free protons and neutrons: you would have to supply energy (the binding energy) to do it, since the nuclear force is attractive and holds the nucleons in a low-energy configuration. Running that backward, when free nucleons come together to form the nucleus, that same energy is given off — as gamma rays or kinetic energy — and the nucleus that remains is lighter by exactly ΔM=Eb/c2\Delta M = E_b/c^2. The "missing mass" was never destroyed; it left as radiated or kinetic energy. This is precisely why atomic masses in a table are always slightly less than the sum of the free-particle masses they are built from.

If iron is the most tightly bound nucleus, why don't stars just turn everything into iron and stop?

They very nearly do, and that is exactly why stellar cores stop generating fusion energy once they build up iron. Fusion releases energy only while it moves nuclei toward the peak of the binding-energy curve; building elements heavier than iron by fusion would require nucleons to become less tightly bound, which costs energy rather than releasing it. So a star fuses hydrogen to helium, then (in massive stars) helium to carbon, and on up the periodic table, always climbing the same curve — but once the core is mostly iron, no further fusion step is downhill in energy, the core can no longer support itself against gravity, and the star collapses, often triggering a supernova. Elements heavier than iron found in nature are made in violent processes like supernovae and neutron-star mergers, not in ordinary stellar fusion.

What actually is a neutrino, and why does beta decay need one?

A neutrino (or antineutrino, in β−\beta^- decay) is an extremely light, electrically neutral elementary particle that barely interacts with matter at all — trillions pass through your body every second without effect. It is required in beta decay to satisfy conservation laws that a simple two-body decay (nucleus into daughter nucleus plus electron) cannot satisfy simultaneously: without it, the emitted electron's energy would have to take one fixed value every time, but experiments showed electrons come out with a whole range of energies. Wolfgang Pauli proposed the neutrino in 1930 specifically to carry away the missing energy and momentum in each individual decay while keeping the totals conserved, and it was detected experimentally only decades later, confirming the idea.

Why does fusion need such enormous temperatures, but fission does not?

Fission is triggered simply by a slow neutron finding its way into a heavy nucleus like 92235U^{235}_{92}\text{U} — neutrons have no charge, so there is no electrical barrier to overcome, and the process can happen at ordinary temperatures once a neutron is available. Fusion is different: it requires two positively charged nuclei to approach within a few femtometres of each other, close enough for the short-range attractive nuclear force to take over, but at that range they still feel a powerful mutual Coulomb repulsion (the Coulomb barrier, around 400 keV400\ \text{keV} for two protons). Overcoming that barrier needs nuclei moving fast enough that their kinetic energy rivals the barrier height, which statistically requires temperatures of tens to hundreds of millions of kelvin — hence "thermonuclear" fusion, and why it happens naturally only in stellar interiors or purpose-built fusion devices.

Is E=mc2E=mc^2 only relevant to nuclear reactions, or does it apply to chemical reactions too?

It applies universally, but the effect is enormously smaller in chemistry. Every chemical reaction also releases or absorbs energy by rearranging chemical bonds, and by mass-energy equivalence that energy change corresponds to a tiny mass change too — a burning log is, strictly, very slightly lighter afterward (as ash plus escaped gases) than its unburned mass would suggest from adding atomic weights, once you account for the energy radiated as heat and light. The reason nuclear reactions are said to be "different" is purely one of scale: chemical bond energies are on the order of a few electronvolts, while nuclear binding energies are on the order of millions of electronvolts — roughly a million times larger — so the associated mass changes in chemistry are far too small to detect with ordinary instruments, even though the same physical law governs both.

Before this

Where this leads