Solving by factorisation

A quadratic equation like 2x2+5x−3=02x^2+5x-3=0 hides two numbers inside it — its roots — and factorisation is the fastest way to dig them out. The trick is to rewrite the quadratic as a product of two simple linear pieces, (…)(…)=0(\ldots)(\ldots)=0, and then lean on one very old fact: a product can only be zero if one of its factors is zero. No square roots, no long formula — just splitting the middle term and reading off two equations. This is the first method CBSE Class 10 teaches for the Quadratic Equations chapter, right after the standard form ax2+bx+c=0ax^2+bx+c=0 is introduced. It works beautifully when the numbers cooperate, turns word problems (ages, consecutive integers, areas) into two-line solutions, and builds the number sense that later makes the quadratic formula easy to trust rather than just memorise.

The core insight

Rewrite ax2+bx+c=0ax^2+bx+c=0 as (x−α)(x−β)=0(x-\alpha)(x-\beta)=0 by splitting the middle term, then use the zero product rule to read off the roots x=αx=\alpha and x=βx=\beta.

The core idea

Factorisation rests on one small, powerful fact called the zero product rule: if two numbers multiply to give zero, at least one of them must itself be zero. There is no other way to get a product of exactly 00.

if pq=0, then p=0 or q=0.\text{if } pq = 0, \text{ then } p = 0 \text{ or } q = 0.

where: pp and qq are any two real numbers (here, the two linear factors of the quadratic). To reach that factored form, CBSE uses the splitting the middle term technique. Two numbers pp and qq are found so that p×q=a×cp \times q = a\times c and p+q=bp+q=b; the middle term bxbx is then rewritten as px+qxpx+qx, and the four resulting terms are grouped in pairs to pull out a common binomial factor.

ax2+bx+c=0  ⟹  (x−α)(x−β)=0  ⟹  x=α or x=βax^2+bx+c=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; (x-\alpha)(x-\beta)=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; x=\alpha \ \text{or}\ x=\beta

where: aa, bb, cc are the coefficients of the standard quadratic, and α\alpha, β\beta are its two roots. Once both roots are found, they can be sanity-checked against α+β=−ba\alpha+\beta=-\dfrac{b}{a} and αβ=ca\alpha\beta=\dfrac{c}{a} — if either check fails, an arithmetic slip crept in somewhere. Not every quadratic splits into nice integers. When no such p,qp,q exist as simple numbers, factorisation becomes impractical, and the quadratic formula (a separate technique) is used instead — factorisation is best thought of as the fast first attempt, not the universal tool. Factorisation is popular in exams precisely because it needs only integer arithmetic when the numbers cooperate — no square roots to simplify and no fractions to carry through several lines of working. Many textbook quadratics are deliberately constructed so that acac splits into two friendly integer factors, which is exactly why this is usually the method worth trying first, before reaching for the quadratic formula. The skill is largely pattern recognition, and it improves with repetition: the more factor pairs you have tried mentally, the faster you spot which split works.

Figure
A flowchart showing the four stages from a quadratic equation to its two roots by splitting the middle term
From equation to roots — four stages ax squared plus bx plus c equals 0 split bx into px plus qx pq = ac, p+q = b group in pairs, factor each pair common binomial factor 1 times factor 2 equals 0 then apply the zero product rule: each factor set to 0 gives one root x = alpha or x = beta
Derivation ASplitting the middle term to reach the zero product rule

The goal is to show, step by step and without skipping the algebra, exactly why splitting bxbx into two carefully chosen pieces px+qxpx+qx always turns ax2+bx+c=0ax^2+bx+c=0 into a product of two linear factors, so that the zero product rule can be applied honestly rather than as a memorised shortcut.

Step 1. Choose pp and qq so that p×q=a×cp\times q = a\times c and p+q=bp+q=b. This is always possible when the quadratic has rational roots, because these are precisely the conditions that make the grouping in the next step work out with a common factor.

Step 2. Rewrite the middle term. Since p+q=bp+q=b, we have bx=px+qxbx = px+qx, so ax2+bx+c=0ax^2+bx+c=0 becomes ax2+px+qx+c=0ax^2+px+qx+c=0 — the same equation, just written with four terms instead of three.

Step 3. Group into two pairs and pull out the common factor from each. The first pair ax2+pxax^2+px shares a common factor, and the second pair qx+cqx+c shares a (possibly different) common factor; because pq=acpq=ac was chosen deliberately, both pairs factor to leave the same binomial behind.

Step 4. Factor out that common binomial. The equation now reads (binomial)×(leftover factor)=0(\text{binomial})\times(\text{leftover factor})=0, a genuine product of two linear expressions equalling zero.

Step 5. Apply the zero product rule. Set each linear factor to zero separately and solve; this gives the two roots x=αx=\alpha and x=βx=\beta, and no other value of xx can satisfy the original equation. Verified: with p,qp,q satisfying pq=acpq=ac and p+q=bp+q=b, expanding (x−α)(x−β)(x-\alpha)(x-\beta) reproduces ax2+bx+cax^2+bx+c term by term for any quadratic that factors over the rationals.

Worked example

Solve 2x2+5x−3=02x^2+5x-3=0 by factorisation.

Step 1. Identify aa, bb, cc. Here a=2a=2, b=5b=5, c=−3c=-3, so ac=2×(−3)=−6ac = 2\times(-3)=-6.

Step 2. Find two numbers that multiply to −6-6 and add to 55. Try 66 and −1-1: 6×(−1)=−66\times(-1)=-6 and 6+(−1)=56+(-1)=5. These work.

Step 3. Split the middle term: 2x2+6x−x−3=02x^2+6x-x-3=0.

Step 4. Group and factor each pair: 2x(x+3)−1(x+3)=02x(x+3)-1(x+3)=0.

Step 5. Factor out the common binomial: (x+3)(2x−1)=0(x+3)(2x-1)=0.

Step 6. Apply the zero product rule. x+3=0⇒x=−3x+3=0 \Rightarrow x=-3, and 2x−1=0⇒x=122x-1=0 \Rightarrow x=\dfrac{1}{2}.

Roots: x=−3x=-3 or x=12x=\dfrac{1}{2}.

Competitive stretch

Check the roots against the sum/product shortcut before moving on. Sum: α+β=−3+12=−52\alpha+\beta = -3+\dfrac{1}{2}=-\dfrac{5}{2}, and −ba=−52-\dfrac{b}{a}=-\dfrac{5}{2} — matches. Product: αβ=−3×12=−32\alpha\beta = -3\times\dfrac{1}{2}=-\dfrac{3}{2}, and ca=−32\dfrac{c}{a}=\dfrac{-3}{2} — matches too. This 10-second check catches most factorisation slips before they cost marks, and it is exactly how the word problem below can be verified: for x2+x−90=0x^2+x-90=0 with roots 99 and −10-10, sum =−1=−b/a=-1=-b/a and product =−90=c/a=-90=c/a, confirming 99 and 1010 (after rejecting the negative root) are correct for the consecutive-integer problem whose product is 9090.

Common traps

  • Applying the zero product rule before the equation equals zero. (…)(…)=0(\ldots)(\ldots)=0 is required first; never split (x−3)(x+2)=6(x-3)(x+2)=6 directly into x−3=0x-3=0 or x+2=0x+2=0.
  • Picking p,qp,q that satisfy only one condition. Always check both pq=acpq=ac and p+q=bp+q=b, not just the sum or only the product.
  • Losing a sign while cancelling a common factor, e.g. going from (2x−4)=0(2x-4)=0 to x=2x=2 is fine, but rushing the step can flip a sign — write out 2x=42x=4 before dividing.
  • Not rejecting invalid roots in word problems. A negative length, a negative count of people, or (as in the consecutive-integer problem) a negative integer when the problem demands positive values must be discarded.
  • Substituting the wrong number back to verify. After solving, always plug the root back into the original equation, not into an intermediate grouped form — a slip in an earlier step can otherwise go unnoticed.

Ask the tutor: Stuck on finding the right pair of numbers to split the middle term, or want to practise turning a word problem into a factorisable quadratic? Ask the AI tutor for a guided walkthrough.

How do I quickly find the right pair of numbers to split the middle term

List the factor pairs of a×ca\times c and scan for the pair that adds to bb. For 2x2+5x−3=02x^2+5x-3=0, ac=−6ac=-6, so the pairs are (1,−6),(−1,6),(2,−3),(−2,3)(1,-6),(-1,6),(2,-3),(-2,3); only (6,−1)(6,-1) adds to 55. With practice you start recognising common splits instantly, but when bb is large or the numbers are unfriendly, list all factor pairs systematically rather than guessing at random — it is faster than it feels.

What if I cannot find any integer pair that works

That usually means the quadratic does not factorise neatly over the integers — its roots may be irrational or fractional in a way that splitting the middle term cannot reach easily. In that case, switch to the quadratic formula, which always works regardless of whether the numbers are "nice." Factorisation is the fast first attempt; it is not meant to be forced when it clearly is not cooperating.

Why do we reject one of the two roots in some word problems

The quadratic equation is a mathematical object with two roots by construction, but the word problem it models usually has extra real-world restrictions — lengths, ages, and counts of people cannot be negative, and "consecutive positive integers" rules out negative values outright. Always translate both roots back into the context of the problem and discard any root that violates a stated condition, keeping only the one that makes physical sense.

Before this

Where this leads