Substitution method

Two unknowns, two equations, one clean trick: turn a pair into a single line. The substitution method solves a pair of linear equations in two variables by isolating one variable from one equation and plugging that expression into the other — collapsing two unknowns into one, which you already know how to solve. It is one of two algebraic tools (alongside elimination) that CBSE Class 10 expects for the chapter Pair of Linear Equations in Two Variables, and it is the method examiners lean on most for word problems — ages, digits, fractions, speed-distance-time, cost — because forming the equations and then substituting mirrors how the problem is described in words. Master the sequence once and it never changes: isolate, substitute, solve, back-substitute, verify.

The core insight

Isolate one variable from either equation, substitute that expression into the other equation to collapse two unknowns into one, then solve, back-substitute and verify.

The core idea

Substitution is a fixed sequence, not a bag of tricks — the same five moves solve every pair of linear equations you will meet in this chapter.

Choose wisely. Scan both equations for a variable whose coefficient is already 11 or −1-1; isolating that one avoids fractions for as long as possible. If every coefficient is something else, elimination (covered separately) is often faster, but substitution still works.

Isolate, then substitute. Write the chosen variable as an expression in the other, and replace every occurrence of it in the other equation — never the one you took it from, or you just get an identity like 0=00=0.

Solve one variable, then find the other. The substitution leaves a single linear equation in one unknown. Solve it, then back-substitute into the isolated expression to recover the second value, and check both numbers in the original pair. In general, for a1x+b1y=c1a_1x+b_1y=c_1 and a2x+b2y=c2a_2x+b_2y=c_2 with b1≠0b_1 \neq 0, isolating yy from the first equation gives y=c1−a1xb1y = \dfrac{c_1-a_1x}{b_1}, and substituting into the second collapses the system to

a2x+b2(c1−a1xb1)=c2,a_2x + b_2\left(\frac{c_1-a_1x}{b_1}\right) = c_2,

where: x,yx, y are the unknowns, a1,b1,c1a_1,b_1,c_1 are the coefficients and constant of the first equation, and a2,b2,c2a_2,b_2,c_2 those of the second. Solving this single equation for xx, then back-substituting, gives the complete solution — provided the lines are not parallel or identical (that special case is flagged in Common traps below).

Applies directly to word problems. Ages, digits, fractions, speed-distance-time and cost questions all reduce to a pair of linear equations once you name the unknowns, and substitution is usually the natural way to solve them because the sentence itself often hands you one variable "in terms of" the other. For instance, the sum of two numbers is 58 and their difference is 12 becomes x+y=58x+y=58 and x−y=12x-y=12; isolating x=y+12x=y+12 from the second and substituting into the first gives 2y+12=582y+12=58, so y=23y=23 and x=35x=35 — the same isolate-substitute-solve-back-substitute-verify sequence, just with a sentence to translate first instead of an equation handed to you ready-made.

Figure
Two intersecting lines on a graph meeting at one point labelled the solution, with a side box showing the isolate substitute solve back substitute verify sequence as five arrows
Substitution turns two lines into one meeting point x y solution x y equation 1 equation 2 the five moves 1 isolate a variable 2 substitute into other eqn 3 solve one equation 4 back substitute 5 verify both equations
Derivation ASolving a general pair by substitution

The goal is to show that for any pair of linear equations a1x+b1y=c1a_1x+b_1y=c_1 and a2x+b2y=c2a_2x+b_2y=c_2 with b1≠0b_1 \neq 0, the substitution sequence reduces the system to a single linear equation in xx whose solution, back-substituted, gives the unique point where the two lines meet — the same algebraic content behind every worked example in this topic.

Step 1. Isolate yy from the first equation. Since b1≠0b_1 \neq 0, divide through: y=c1−a1xb1y = \dfrac{c_1 - a_1x}{b_1}. This expresses yy purely in terms of xx, using only the first equation.

Step 2. Substitute this expression for yy into the second equation, replacing every occurrence of yy there: a2x+b2(c1−a1xb1)=c2a_2x + b_2\left(\dfrac{c_1-a_1x}{b_1}\right) = c_2. The second equation is now written entirely in the single unknown xx.

Step 3. Clear the fraction by multiplying every term by b1b_1: a2b1x+b2(c1−a1x)=c2b1a_2b_1x + b_2(c_1 - a_1x) = c_2b_1, which expands to a2b1x+b2c1−a1b2x=c2b1a_2b_1x + b_2c_1 - a_1b_2x = c_2b_1, and collects to x(a2b1−a1b2)=c2b1−b2c1x(a_2b_1 - a_1b_2) = c_2b_1 - b_2c_1.

Step 4. Solve for xx, provided a2b1−a1b2≠0a_2b_1 - a_1b_2 \neq 0: x=c2b1−b2c1a2b1−a1b2x = \dfrac{c_2b_1 - b_2c_1}{a_2b_1 - a_1b_2}. This condition is exactly the requirement that the two lines are not parallel, so a unique intersection point exists.

Step 5. Back-substitute this xx into y=c1−a1xb1y = \dfrac{c_1-a_1x}{b_1} from Step 1 to get yy. The pair (x,y)(x,y) found this way is the unique solution, and substituting both values into the original two equations confirms it — this is exactly the check performed in every worked example below.

Worked example

Solve using substitution: 2x+3y=112x + 3y = 11 and x−2y=−7x - 2y = -7.

Step 1. Isolate xx from the second equation, since its coefficient is 11: x=2y−7x = 2y - 7.

Step 2. Substitute into the first equation: 2(2y−7)+3y=112(2y-7) + 3y = 11.

Step 3. Solve for yy: 4y−14+3y=11  ⟹  7y=25  ⟹  y=2574y - 14 + 3y = 11 \implies 7y = 25 \implies y = \dfrac{25}{7}.

Step 4. Back-substitute: x=2(257)−7=507−497=17x = 2\left(\dfrac{25}{7}\right) - 7 = \dfrac{50}{7} - \dfrac{49}{7} = \dfrac{1}{7}.

Step 5. Verify: 2(17)+3(257)=27+757=777=112\left(\dfrac17\right) + 3\left(\dfrac{25}{7}\right) = \dfrac{2}{7}+\dfrac{75}{7} = \dfrac{77}{7} = 11 ✓, and 17−2(257)=17−507=−497=−7\dfrac17 - 2\left(\dfrac{25}{7}\right) = \dfrac17 - \dfrac{50}{7} = -\dfrac{49}{7} = -7 ✓. So x=17x = \dfrac17, y=257y = \dfrac{25}{7} — a valid solution even though both values are fractions.

Competitive stretch

The same pair can be checked against the general formula from the derivation above. Here a1=2, b1=3, c1=11, a2=1, b2=−2, c2=−7a_1=2,\ b_1=3,\ c_1=11,\ a_2=1,\ b_2=-2,\ c_2=-7. Then x=c2b1−b2c1a2b1−a1b2=(−7)(3)−(−2)(11)(1)(3)−(2)(−2)=−21+223+4=17x = \dfrac{c_2b_1-b_2c_1}{a_2b_1-a_1b_2} = \dfrac{(-7)(3)-(-2)(11)}{(1)(3)-(2)(-2)} = \dfrac{-21+22}{3+4} = \dfrac{1}{7}, matching the worked value exactly — a fast way to sanity-check an answer on a calculator-free paper without repeating every step.

Common traps

  • Substituting into the same equation the expression was taken from, instead of the other one — this only produces an identity like 0=00=0 and gives no new information.
  • Sign errors when distributing a negative coefficient across brackets, e.g. writing 2(2y−7)2(2y-7) as 4y−74y-7 instead of the correct 4y−144y-14, or forgetting to back-substitute and leaving the answer as only one variable's value.
  • Rounding fractional answers too early. A valid solution can be a fraction like 17\dfrac17; keep exact fractions through every step, since early rounding can make the final verification fail.
  • Assuming a unique solution always exists. If a2b1−a1b2=0a_2b_1 - a_1b_2 = 0 (parallel or identical lines), substitution collapses to 0=00 = 0 (infinitely many solutions) or a false statement like 0=50 = 5 (no solution) — recognise this rather than hunting for an error, and in word problems, always name the unknowns and write both equations before substituting.

Ask the tutor: if your substitution keeps producing messy fractions or an identity like 0 equals 0, share the exact pair of equations and the AI tutor will help you spot where to adjust your approach.

How do I decide which variable to isolate first?

Look at all four coefficients across both equations and pick whichever variable already has a coefficient of 11 or −1-1 in either equation. Isolating that one needs no division, so the expression you substitute stays fraction-free for longer and the arithmetic that follows is cleaner. If no coefficient is 11 or −1-1, substitution still works exactly the same way — it will just involve a fraction from the first step, or you may prefer the elimination method instead.

Why does substituting back into the same equation give a useless answer?

The equation you took the expression from already used up all its information the moment you isolated the variable — substituting it straight back just restates that same equation in disguise, which is why it collapses to an identity like 0=00=0. The whole point of substitution is to bring in the other equation's information, the one you have not used yet, so the combined system pins down a single point. Always double-check which equation you substituted into before solving.

My answer has ugly fractions like 1/7 — did I make a mistake?

Not necessarily. Substitution does not care whether the coefficients are nice; a valid intersection point can have fractional coordinates, and CBSE papers include such pairs deliberately to test that you keep exact values instead of rounding. The way to be sure is the verification step: plug both fractions back into both original equations. If both check out exactly, as in 17\dfrac17 and 257\dfrac{25}{7} above, the answer is correct however it looks.

Before this

Where this leads