Trigonometric ratios of specific angles

Every trigonometry problem in Class 10 leans on the same five angles: 0∘,30∘,45∘,60∘,90∘0^\circ, 30^\circ, 45^\circ, 60^\circ, 90^\circ. Rather than looking these values up, you are expected to know sin⁡30∘=12\sin 30^\circ = \frac12 or tan⁡60∘=3\tan 60^\circ = \sqrt3 instantly, the way you know your multiplication tables. The good news is that none of it needs memorising by brute force — every entry falls out of two very simple triangles you can redraw in under a minute: an equilateral triangle cut in half, and an isosceles right triangle. Once you can rebuild the table on demand, you are ready for the numerical evaluations this chapter asks for, and for the Heights and Distances chapter later, where angles of elevation and depression are always restricted to these same five values.

The core insight

The exact trigonometric values at 0∘,30∘,45∘,60∘,90∘0^\circ, 30^\circ, 45^\circ, 60^\circ, 90^\circ come from two elementary triangles — half an equilateral triangle for 30∘30^\circ and 60∘60^\circ, an isosceles right triangle for 45∘45^\circ — with 0∘0^\circ and 90∘90^\circ read off as the limiting cases where one side shrinks to zero.

The core idea

The five standard angles are not arbitrary — they are exactly the angles that appear when you cut two of the simplest possible triangles in half.

The equilateral route (30∘,60∘30^\circ, 60^\circ). Drop a perpendicular from one vertex of an equilateral triangle to the opposite side. That single altitude splits the 60∘60^\circ vertex angle into two 30∘30^\circ halves and produces a right triangle whose three sides are in the ratio 1:3:21 : \sqrt3 : 2 — a ratio worth remembering on sight.

The isosceles route (45∘45^\circ). A right triangle with both legs equal has two 45∘45^\circ acute angles by symmetry, and Pythagoras fixes the hypotenuse at 2\sqrt2 times a leg, giving sides in the ratio 1:1:21 : 1 : \sqrt2.

The limiting angles (0∘,90∘0^\circ, 90^\circ). These are not built from a triangle at all — imagine the angle in a right triangle shrinking toward 0∘0^\circ: the opposite side collapses to nothing while the adjacent side grows to match the hypotenuse, so sin⁡0∘=0\sin 0^\circ = 0 and cos⁡0∘=1\cos 0^\circ = 1. Swap the roles as the angle grows toward 90∘90^\circ and the reverse happens.

The standard table, the one thing in this topic worth having by heart:

θ\theta0∘0^\circ30∘30^\circ45∘45^\circ60∘60^\circ90∘90^\circ
sin⁡θ\sin\theta0012\frac{1}{2}12\frac{1}{\sqrt2}32\frac{\sqrt3}{2}11
cos⁡θ\cos\theta1132\frac{\sqrt3}{2}12\frac{1}{\sqrt2}12\frac{1}{2}00
tan⁡θ\tan\theta0013\frac{1}{\sqrt3}113\sqrt3undefined
csc⁡θ\csc\thetaundefined222\sqrt223\frac{2}{\sqrt3}11
sec⁡θ\sec\theta1123\frac{2}{\sqrt3}2\sqrt222undefined
cot⁡θ\cot\thetaundefined3\sqrt31113\frac{1}{\sqrt3}00

A quick shape-check that helps you spot a swapped value at a glance: as θ\theta climbs from 0∘0^\circ to 90∘90^\circ, sin⁡θ\sin\theta only ever increases and cos⁡θ\cos\theta only ever decreases.

sin⁡2θ+cos⁡2θ=1(holds for every row of the table above)\sin^2\theta + \cos^2\theta = 1 \qquad \text{(holds for every row of the table above)}

where: θ\theta is any of the five standard angles. This identity is a handy check — square and add any sin⁡\sin–cos⁡\cos pair from the table and the result must land on exactly 11; if it does not, one of the two entries was copied wrong.

Figure
Two triangles side by side, an equilateral triangle split by an altitude into two 30 60 90 triangles with sides in ratio 1 root 3 2, and an isosceles right triangle with legs 1 and hypotenuse root 2 giving the two 45 degree angles
The two triangles behind the whole standard table A B C D 2 root 3 1 30 60 equilateral triangle, altitude AD gives 30 and 60 P Q R 1 1 root 2 45 isosceles right triangle, legs equal gives 45 and 45
Derivation ADeriving the exact 30 degree and 60 degree ratios from an equilateral triangle

The goal is to show, from nothing more than the definition of an equilateral triangle and the Pythagoras theorem, exactly why sin⁡30∘=12\sin 30^\circ = \frac12, cos⁡30∘=32\cos 30^\circ = \frac{\sqrt3}{2}, tan⁡30∘=13\tan 30^\circ = \frac{1}{\sqrt3} and the matching 60∘60^\circ values are true, rather than asking you to accept the standard table on faith.

Step 1. Draw equilateral triangle ABCABC with every side equal to 22 units — the exact length does not matter, but 22 keeps the arithmetic clean since it is about to be halved. Every angle of an equilateral triangle is 60∘60^\circ, so angle A=A = angle B=B = angle C=60∘C = 60^\circ.

Step 2. Drop a perpendicular from vertex AA down to side BCBC, meeting it at point DD. Because triangle ABCABC is equilateral (hence isosceles from any vertex), this altitude does two things at once: it bisects the base, so BD=DC=1BD = DC = 1, and it bisects angle AA, splitting the 60∘60^\circ angle into two 30∘30^\circ halves.

Step 3. Focus on right triangle ABDABD alone. It has a right angle at DD, angle ABD=60∘ABD = 60^\circ (unchanged from the original triangle), angle BAD=30∘BAD = 30^\circ (half of angle AA), hypotenuse AB=2AB = 2, and base BD=1BD = 1. Find the third side ADAD using the Pythagoras theorem: AD=AB2−BD2=22−12=4−1=3AD = \sqrt{AB^2 - BD^2} = \sqrt{2^2 - 1^2} = \sqrt{4-1} = \sqrt3.

Step 4. Read the ratios straight off triangle ABDABD for angle BAD=30∘BAD = 30^\circ: the side opposite is BD=1BD = 1, the side adjacent is AD=3AD = \sqrt3, and the hypotenuse is AB=2AB = 2. This gives sin⁡30∘=12\sin 30^\circ = \frac{1}{2}, cos⁡30∘=32\cos 30^\circ = \frac{\sqrt3}{2}, and tan⁡30∘=13\tan 30^\circ = \frac{1}{\sqrt3}.

Step 5. Read the same triangle from the other acute angle, ABD=60∘ABD = 60^\circ, where the opposite and adjacent sides swap roles: opposite is now AD=3AD = \sqrt3, adjacent is BD=1BD = 1, hypotenuse is still AB=2AB = 2. This gives sin⁡60∘=32\sin 60^\circ = \frac{\sqrt3}{2}, cos⁡60∘=12\cos 60^\circ = \frac{1}{2}, and tan⁡60∘=3\tan 60^\circ = \sqrt3 — exactly the values in the standard table, and notice sin⁡30∘=cos⁡60∘\sin 30^\circ = \cos 60^\circ and cos⁡30∘=sin⁡60∘\cos 30^\circ = \sin 60^\circ, a pattern that always holds for complementary angles.

Worked example

Problem. Evaluate 2sin⁡230∘+3cos⁡245∘−tan⁡260∘2\sin^2 30^\circ + 3\cos^2 45^\circ - \tan^2 60^\circ.

Step 1. Pull the needed values from the standard table: sin⁡30∘=12\sin 30^\circ = \frac12, cos⁡45∘=12\cos 45^\circ = \frac{1}{\sqrt2}, tan⁡60∘=3\tan 60^\circ = \sqrt3.

Step 2. Square each value before substituting, since the expression asks for squares, not the values themselves.

sin⁡230∘=14,cos⁡245∘=12,tan⁡260∘=3\sin^2 30^\circ = \frac14, \qquad \cos^2 45^\circ = \frac12, \qquad \tan^2 60^\circ = 3

Step 3. Substitute into the original expression and simplify the coefficients.

2(14)+3(12)−3=12+32−32\left(\frac14\right) + 3\left(\frac12\right) - 3 = \frac12 + \frac32 - 3

Step 4. Combine the fractions first, then subtract: 12+32=2\frac12 + \frac32 = 2, and 2−3=−12 - 3 = -1. The value of the expression is −1\mathbf{-1}.

Competitive stretch

Take A=30∘A = 30^\circ and B=60∘B = 60^\circ and check that sin⁡(A+B)=sin⁡Acos⁡B+cos⁡Asin⁡B\sin(A+B) = \sin A\cos B + \cos A \sin B using only the standard table, without knowing the general angle-sum formula. The left side: A+B=90∘A+B = 90^\circ, so sin⁡(A+B)=sin⁡90∘=1\sin(A+B) = \sin 90^\circ = 1. The right side: sin⁡Acos⁡B+cos⁡Asin⁡B=(12)(12)+(32)(32)=14+34=1\sin A \cos B + \cos A \sin B = \left(\frac12\right)\left(\frac12\right) + \left(\frac{\sqrt3}{2}\right)\left(\frac{\sqrt3}{2}\right) = \frac14 + \frac34 = 1. Both sides equal 11, confirming the relation for this specific pair of angles — the general proof of the sum formula itself belongs to a later class and is not required here.

Common traps

  • Swapping sin⁡30∘=12\sin 30^\circ = \frac12 with sin⁡60∘=32\sin 60^\circ = \frac{\sqrt3}{2} — use the rule that sin⁡\sin increases and cos⁡\cos decreases from 0∘0^\circ to 90∘90^\circ to catch a swap instantly.
  • Writing tan⁡90∘\tan 90^\circ or cot⁡0∘\cot 0^\circ as if they had a finite value — both are undefined, since they correspond to dividing by a side of length zero.
  • Squaring a surd incorrectly, e.g. treating (12)2\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt2}\right)^2 as 122\frac{1}{2\sqrt2} instead of the correct 12\frac12.
  • Rounding to decimals like 0.50.5 or 0.7070.707 instead of keeping exact surd form — CBSE answers must stay exact (12\frac{1}{\sqrt2}, 3\sqrt3, and so on) unless a question explicitly asks for a decimal.

Ask the tutor: If the table keeps slipping your mind under exam pressure, ask the AI tutor for a fast way to redraw the two triangles and rebuild every entry from scratch.

Do I really have to memorise the whole table, or can I rebuild it every time?

Both skills matter, but rebuilding is the safety net. In a fast-moving exam you want the table on instant recall, yet if your memory ever slips, you should be able to redraw the equilateral triangle for 30∘30^\circ and 60∘60^\circ and the isosceles right triangle for 45∘45^\circ in under a minute and read the ratios straight off the sides. Practising the derivation a few times makes the memorised version stick far better than rote repetition alone.

Why are tan 90 degrees and cot 0 degrees undefined instead of just very large or zero?

Because tan⁡θ=sin⁡θcos⁡θ\tan\theta = \frac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta}, and at θ=90∘\theta = 90^\circ the denominator cos⁡90∘=0\cos 90^\circ = 0, so the ratio is a division by zero — mathematics leaves this undefined rather than assigning it any number. The same thing happens to cot⁡θ=cos⁡θsin⁡θ\cot\theta = \frac{\cos\theta}{\sin\theta} at θ=0∘\theta = 0^\circ, where sin⁡0∘=0\sin 0^\circ = 0. It is not that these values are simply "very large"; the ratio genuinely has no defined value at that exact angle.

I keep confusing which side is opposite and which is adjacent when I read the triangle. Any trick?

Always ask "opposite and adjacent to which angle?" first — the same triangle gives different opposite and adjacent sides depending on which acute angle you are standing at. In the equilateral-triangle derivation, the side BDBD is opposite to angle 30∘30^\circ but adjacent to angle 60∘60^\circ in the very same triangle. Label the angle you are working with clearly before you write any ratio, and the opposite-versus-adjacent mix-up mostly disappears.

Before this

Where this leads