Electronic Configuration
An atom with many electrons cannot just scatter them randomly among its orbitals — nature follows three strict rules every single time. Given a set of orbitals labelled by the quantum numbers , , , an atom fills them in a fixed order, obeys a strict two-electrons-per-orbital cap, and spreads electrons out before pairing them up. Together, the Aufbau principle, the Pauli exclusion principle, and Hund's rule let you write the electronic configuration of any element on the periodic table just from its atomic number. This is the capstone skill of Unit II, Structure of Atom: turning orbitals and quantum numbers into a concrete, testable procedure. CBSE expects the filling order, correct configurations up to roughly –, and the reasoning behind chromium's and copper's famous exceptions — not just memorising them.
Electrons fill atomic orbitals in order of increasing energy (Aufbau), never more than two per orbital and only with opposite spin (Pauli), and singly across degenerate orbitals before any pairing (Hund), with half-filled and fully-filled subshells gaining extra stability from exchange energy.
The core idea
Aufbau principle. In the ground state, orbitals fill in order of increasing energy, lowest first. The energy ordering of subshells is fixed by the rule: the subshell with the lower value of fills first; if two subshells tie on , the one with the lower fills first. Applying this rule subshell by subshell produces the standard filling sequence:
where: each symbol is a subshell labelled by principal quantum number and orbital type ( for ); the ordering is by increasing , with ties broken by lower . The famous case is () filling before (), even though has the smaller principal quantum number.
Pauli exclusion principle. No two electrons in an atom can share all four quantum numbers. Since specify one orbital, this caps every orbital at two electrons, and those two must have opposite spins, and .
Hund's rule. Electrons occupying degenerate orbitals (same subshell, same energy) go in singly, with parallel spin, one to each orbital, before any orbital in that subshell gets a second electron. This minimises electron-electron repulsion and maximises the number of unpaired, parallel spins in the ground state. For example, nitrogen (, configuration ) places one electron in each of the three degenerate orbitals () rather than pairing two in one orbital and leaving another empty — giving nitrogen three unpaired, parallel-spin electrons, consistent with its observed paramagnetism and its tendency to form three covalent bonds.
Writing configurations. Configurations are written as filled subshells with electron-count superscripts, e.g. oxygen (): .
Stability of half-filled and fully-filled subshells. Configurations with an exactly half-filled (, , ) or fully-filled (, , ) subshell are extra stable, thanks to greater symmetry and larger exchange energy — the quantum stabilisation gained when same-spin electrons occupy degenerate orbitals. This is why chromium and copper deviate from the naive Aufbau prediction.
The goal is to show, using only the arithmetic of adding and for each subshell and breaking ties by the smaller , why the observed filling sequence places before and before — the two facts examiners test most and the two facts a naive "fill shells completely before moving on" instinct gets wrong, so that an atom's ground-state configuration can be predicted rather than memorised subshell by subshell.
Step 1. List candidate subshells near the third and fourth shells with their quantum numbers: , , , , , .
Step 2. Compute for each: , , , , , . Two ties appear immediately: and both give , and , , all give .
Step 3. Break the – tie by the tie-break rule (lower fills first): fills before . Break the three-way -tie the same way: fills before , which fills before .
Step 4. Assemble the order by increasing , applying the tie-breaks: . So fills before purely because has the lower value of the two ( versus ) — the smaller principal quantum number of is irrelevant to when it fills, only to its label. Check: applying the same arithmetic one shell further gives before tie broken by , and tie broken last since — matching the standard sequence quoted in the core idea above.
Worked example
Question. Write the ground-state electronic configuration of chromium (), state why it deviates from the strict Aufbau prediction, and predict copper's () configuration by the same reasoning.
Step 1. Fill strictly by the Aufbau order up to 24 electrons: , written with the argon core as . This is the naive prediction from mechanically following the filling sequence.
Step 2. Compare it against the observed ground state. Chromium's actual configuration is : one electron has shifted from into .
Step 3. Explain the shift using subshell stability. A half-filled (one electron in each of the five orbitals, all parallel spin) combined with is more stable overall than , because the extra symmetry and exchange energy of a half-filled subshell outweigh the cost of leaving singly occupied.
Step 4. Apply the identical reasoning to copper. Strict Aufbau up to 29 electrons gives ; shifting one electron into gives a fully-filled plus , which is more stable than for the same symmetry-and-exchange-energy reason. Chromium: ; copper: — both trade a filled for the extra stability of a half-filled or fully-filled subshell.
Competitive stretch
Neighbouring elements test whether you apply this reasoning selectively and correctly. Manganese (, one more electron than chromium) follows strict Aufbau without any anomaly: . Here is already the stable arrangement — the half-filled is achieved without needing to strip an electron from , so there is no shift and no exception to explain. Zinc () is similarly regular: , a fully-filled reached by ordinary Aufbau filling, again with no anomaly. The lesson is that the chromium/copper shift happens only when the naive Aufbau configuration is one electron short of a half-filled or fully-filled subshell — not whenever a or appears.
Common traps
- Filling before because — the rule gives () before ().
- Pairing electrons in one orbital of a subshell before every orbital in it has at least one electron — this violates Hund's rule.
- Thinking Pauli's principle limits a whole subshell to 2 electrons, rather than limiting each individual orbital to 2 electrons with opposite spin.
- Memorising chromium and copper as isolated exceptions instead of understanding the half-filled/fully-filled stability argument, which is what CBSE actually tests.
Ask the tutor: Want to practice writing full and abbreviated configurations for a few tricky elements like chromium, copper, or the ones right after them?
Why does 4s fill before 3d if 3d has a smaller n and should be closer to the nucleus?
Because orbital filling order depends on total energy, not on alone. The rule captures this: has while has , so is lower in energy and fills first. Once starts filling in transition metals, it does end up lower in energy than in the filled atom, which is exactly why electrons are removed from first when transition metals form ions — but the filling order itself is set by the energies at the moment each electron is added.
Do I need to memorise chromium and copper as the only exceptions?
You need to memorise the two configurations, and , but CBSE tests the reasoning more than the list. Any element where shifting one electron into would create a half-filled () or fully-filled () subshell shows this behaviour, because that configuration gains extra exchange energy and symmetry. Understanding this lets you explain, not just recall, the anomaly if asked.
How is Pauli's principle different from Hund's rule if both talk about pairing electrons?
They answer different questions. Pauli's principle sets the absolute ceiling: no orbital can ever hold more than two electrons, and if it holds two they must have opposite spin — a hard limit that can never be broken. Hund's rule is about the order in which electrons are added when several orbitals of equal energy are available: fill each one singly, with parallel spin, before doubling up in any of them, because that arrangement is lower in energy. So Pauli tells you the maximum per orbital, and Hund tells you which orbital to fill next, and it applies only when there is more than one degenerate orbital available — so it matters for , and subshells, but not for subshells, which have only one orbital.