Electronic Configuration

An atom with many electrons cannot just scatter them randomly among its orbitals — nature follows three strict rules every single time. Given a set of orbitals labelled by the quantum numbers nn, ll, mlm_l, an atom fills them in a fixed order, obeys a strict two-electrons-per-orbital cap, and spreads electrons out before pairing them up. Together, the Aufbau principle, the Pauli exclusion principle, and Hund's rule let you write the electronic configuration of any element on the periodic table just from its atomic number. This is the capstone skill of Unit II, Structure of Atom: turning orbitals and quantum numbers into a concrete, testable procedure. CBSE expects the (n+l)(n+l) filling order, correct configurations up to roughly Z=30Z = 30–3636, and the reasoning behind chromium's and copper's famous exceptions — not just memorising them.

The core insight

Electrons fill atomic orbitals in order of increasing (n+l)(n+l) energy (Aufbau), never more than two per orbital and only with opposite spin (Pauli), and singly across degenerate orbitals before any pairing (Hund), with half-filled and fully-filled subshells gaining extra stability from exchange energy.

The core idea

Aufbau principle. In the ground state, orbitals fill in order of increasing energy, lowest first. The energy ordering of subshells is fixed by the (n+l)(n+l) rule: the subshell with the lower value of n+ln+l fills first; if two subshells tie on n+ln+l, the one with the lower nn fills first. Applying this rule subshell by subshell produces the standard filling sequence:

1s<2s<2p<3s<3p<4s<3d<4p<5s<4d<5p<6s<4f<5d<6p<7s…1s < 2s < 2p < 3s < 3p < 4s < 3d < 4p < 5s < 4d < 5p < 6s < 4f < 5d < 6p < 7s \dots

where: each symbol is a subshell labelled by principal quantum number nn and orbital type (s,p,d,fs,p,d,f for l=0,1,2,3l = 0,1,2,3); the ordering is by increasing n+ln+l, with ties broken by lower nn. The famous case is 4s4s (n+l=4+0=4n+l=4+0=4) filling before 3d3d (n+l=3+2=5n+l=3+2=5), even though 3d3d has the smaller principal quantum number.

Pauli exclusion principle. No two electrons in an atom can share all four quantum numbers. Since n,l,mln, l, m_l specify one orbital, this caps every orbital at two electrons, and those two must have opposite spins, +12+\tfrac12 and −12-\tfrac12.

Hund's rule. Electrons occupying degenerate orbitals (same subshell, same energy) go in singly, with parallel spin, one to each orbital, before any orbital in that subshell gets a second electron. This minimises electron-electron repulsion and maximises the number of unpaired, parallel spins in the ground state. For example, nitrogen (Z=7Z=7, configuration 1s2 2s2 2p31s^2\,2s^2\,2p^3) places one electron in each of the three degenerate 2p2p orbitals (2px,2py,2pz2p_x, 2p_y, 2p_z) rather than pairing two in one orbital and leaving another empty — giving nitrogen three unpaired, parallel-spin electrons, consistent with its observed paramagnetism and its tendency to form three covalent bonds.

Figure
Filling order of subshells arranged by increasing n plus l with 4s shown filling before 3d
The (n + l) rule fixes the filling order 1s2s2p3s3p4s3d4p n+l=1n+l=2n+l=3n+l=3n+l=4n+l=4n+l=5n+l=5 4s (n+l=4) fills before 3d (n+l=5)

Writing configurations. Configurations are written as filled subshells with electron-count superscripts, e.g. oxygen (Z=8Z=8): 1s2 2s2 2p41s^2\,2s^2\,2p^4.

Stability of half-filled and fully-filled subshells. Configurations with an exactly half-filled (p3p^3, d5d^5, f7f^7) or fully-filled (p6p^6, d10d^{10}, f14f^{14}) subshell are extra stable, thanks to greater symmetry and larger exchange energy — the quantum stabilisation gained when same-spin electrons occupy degenerate orbitals. This is why chromium and copper deviate from the naive Aufbau prediction.

Derivation ADeriving the Aufbau filling order from the (n+l) rule

The goal is to show, using only the arithmetic of adding nn and ll for each subshell and breaking ties by the smaller nn, why the observed filling sequence places 4s4s before 3d3d and 5s5s before 4d4d — the two facts examiners test most and the two facts a naive "fill nn shells completely before moving on" instinct gets wrong, so that an atom's ground-state configuration can be predicted rather than memorised subshell by subshell.

Step 1. List candidate subshells near the third and fourth shells with their quantum numbers: 3s (n=3,l=0)3s\,(n{=}3,l{=}0), 3p (n=3,l=1)3p\,(n{=}3,l{=}1), 3d (n=3,l=2)3d\,(n{=}3,l{=}2), 4s (n=4,l=0)4s\,(n{=}4,l{=}0), 4p (n=4,l=1)4p\,(n{=}4,l{=}1), 5s (n=5,l=0)5s\,(n{=}5,l{=}0).

Step 2. Compute n+ln+l for each: 3s ⁣→ ⁣33s\!\to\!3, 3p ⁣→ ⁣43p\!\to\!4, 3d ⁣→ ⁣53d\!\to\!5, 4s ⁣→ ⁣44s\!\to\!4, 4p ⁣→ ⁣54p\!\to\!5, 5s ⁣→ ⁣55s\!\to\!5. Two ties appear immediately: 3p3p and 4s4s both give 44, and 3d3d, 4p4p, 5s5s all give 55.

Step 3. Break the 3p3p–4s4s tie by the tie-break rule (lower nn fills first): 3p (n=3)3p\,(n{=}3) fills before 4s (n=4)4s\,(n{=}4). Break the three-way 55-tie the same way: 3d (n=3)3d\,(n{=}3) fills before 4p (n=4)4p\,(n{=}4), which fills before 5s (n=5)5s\,(n{=}5).

Step 4. Assemble the order by increasing n+ln+l, applying the tie-breaks: 3s (3)<3p (4)<4s (4)<3d (5)<4p (5)<5s (5)3s\,(3) < 3p\,(4) < 4s\,(4) < 3d\,(5) < 4p\,(5) < 5s\,(5). So 4s4s fills before 3d3d purely because 4s4s has the lower n+ln+l value of the two (44 versus 55) — the smaller principal quantum number of 3d3d is irrelevant to when it fills, only to its label. Check: applying the same arithmetic one shell further gives 4d (n+l=6)4d\,(n{+}l{=}6) before 5p (n+l=6,5p\,(n{+}l{=}6, tie broken by n=4<5)n{=}4<5), and 6s (n+l=6,6s\,(n{+}l{=}6, tie broken last since n=6)n{=}6) — matching the standard sequence …4d<5p<6s…\dots 4d < 5p < 6s\dots quoted in the core idea above.

Worked example

Question. Write the ground-state electronic configuration of chromium (Z=24Z=24), state why it deviates from the strict Aufbau prediction, and predict copper's (Z=29Z=29) configuration by the same reasoning.

Step 1. Fill strictly by the Aufbau order up to 24 electrons: 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d41s^2\,2s^2\,2p^6\,3s^2\,3p^6\,4s^2\,3d^4, written with the argon core as [Ar] 3d4 4s2[Ar]\,3d^4\,4s^2. This is the naive prediction from mechanically following the filling sequence.

Step 2. Compare it against the observed ground state. Chromium's actual configuration is [Ar] 3d5 4s1[Ar]\,3d^5\,4s^1: one electron has shifted from 4s4s into 3d3d.

Step 3. Explain the shift using subshell stability. A half-filled 3d53d^5 (one electron in each of the five 3d3d orbitals, all parallel spin) combined with 4s14s^1 is more stable overall than 3d4 4s23d^4\,4s^2, because the extra symmetry and exchange energy of a half-filled dd subshell outweigh the cost of leaving 4s4s singly occupied.

Step 4. Apply the identical reasoning to copper. Strict Aufbau up to 29 electrons gives [Ar] 3d9 4s2[Ar]\,3d^9\,4s^2; shifting one 4s4s electron into 3d3d gives a fully-filled 3d103d^{10} plus 4s14s^1, which is more stable than 3d9 4s23d^9\,4s^2 for the same symmetry-and-exchange-energy reason. Chromium: [Ar] 3d5 4s1[Ar]\,3d^5\,4s^1; copper: [Ar] 3d10 4s1[Ar]\,3d^{10}\,4s^1 — both trade a filled 4s24s^2 for the extra stability of a half-filled or fully-filled 3d3d subshell.

Competitive stretch

Neighbouring elements test whether you apply this reasoning selectively and correctly. Manganese (Z=25Z=25, one more electron than chromium) follows strict Aufbau without any anomaly: [Ar] 3d5 4s2[Ar]\,3d^5\,4s^2. Here 3d5 4s23d^5\,4s^2 is already the stable arrangement — the half-filled 3d53d^5 is achieved without needing to strip an electron from 4s4s, so there is no shift and no exception to explain. Zinc (Z=30Z=30) is similarly regular: [Ar] 3d10 4s2[Ar]\,3d^{10}\,4s^2, a fully-filled 3d103d^{10} reached by ordinary Aufbau filling, again with no anomaly. The lesson is that the chromium/copper shift happens only when the naive Aufbau configuration is one electron short of a half-filled or fully-filled dd subshell — not whenever a d5d^5 or d10d^{10} appears.

Common traps

  • Filling 3d3d before 4s4s because 3<43 < 4 — the (n+l)(n+l) rule gives 4s4s (n+l=4n+l=4) before 3d3d (n+l=5n+l=5).
  • Pairing electrons in one orbital of a subshell before every orbital in it has at least one electron — this violates Hund's rule.
  • Thinking Pauli's principle limits a whole subshell to 2 electrons, rather than limiting each individual orbital to 2 electrons with opposite spin.
  • Memorising chromium and copper as isolated exceptions instead of understanding the half-filled/fully-filled stability argument, which is what CBSE actually tests.

Ask the tutor: Want to practice writing full and abbreviated configurations for a few tricky elements like chromium, copper, or the ones right after them?

Why does 4s fill before 3d if 3d has a smaller n and should be closer to the nucleus?

Because orbital filling order depends on total energy, not on nn alone. The (n+l)(n+l) rule captures this: 4s4s has n+l=4n+l=4 while 3d3d has n+l=5n+l=5, so 4s4s is lower in energy and fills first. Once 3d3d starts filling in transition metals, it does end up lower in energy than 4s4s in the filled atom, which is exactly why electrons are removed from 4s4s first when transition metals form ions — but the filling order itself is set by the (n+l)(n+l) energies at the moment each electron is added.

Do I need to memorise chromium and copper as the only exceptions?

You need to memorise the two configurations, [Ar] 3d5 4s1[Ar]\,3d^5\,4s^1 and [Ar] 3d10 4s1[Ar]\,3d^{10}\,4s^1, but CBSE tests the reasoning more than the list. Any element where shifting one 4s4s electron into 3d3d would create a half-filled (d5d^5) or fully-filled (d10d^{10}) subshell shows this behaviour, because that configuration gains extra exchange energy and symmetry. Understanding this lets you explain, not just recall, the anomaly if asked.

How is Pauli's principle different from Hund's rule if both talk about pairing electrons?

They answer different questions. Pauli's principle sets the absolute ceiling: no orbital can ever hold more than two electrons, and if it holds two they must have opposite spin — a hard limit that can never be broken. Hund's rule is about the order in which electrons are added when several orbitals of equal energy are available: fill each one singly, with parallel spin, before doubling up in any of them, because that arrangement is lower in energy. So Pauli tells you the maximum per orbital, and Hund tells you which orbital to fill next, and it applies only when there is more than one degenerate orbital available — so it matters for pp, dd and ff subshells, but not for ss subshells, which have only one orbital.

Before this

Where this leads